Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutC24660 CA1 Portola Ave Interchange @ I-10 637-02CITY OF PALM DESERT PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT STAFF REPORT REQUEST: Approve Amendment 1 to Contract No.C24660 with Dokken Engineering for Additional Engineering and Environmental Documentation Services for the Proposed Portola Avenue Interchange on Interstate 10 (Project No. 637-02) SUBMITTED BY: Mark Greenwood, P.E., Director of Public Works APPLICANT: Dokken Engineering 5675 Ruffin Road, Suite 250 San Diego, CA 92123 DATE: July 10, 2008 CONTENTS: Amendment No. 1 to Contract C24660 Proposal with Fees Project Work Sheet Vicinity Map Recommendations: 1. Approve Amendment No. 1 to Contract C24660 in the amount of $94,000.00 with Dokken Engineering for additional services to complete the Project Approval and Environmental Documentation Phase; 2. Authorize the Mayor to execute the amendment to the agreement; and 3. Approve moving $73,983.90 from contingency to base. Discussion: On December 8, 2005, the City Council approved Contract No. C24660 with Dokken Engineering in the amount of $739,839.00, plus a 10% contingency, to complete the Project Report (PR) and Environmental Documentation (ED) Phase for the proposed new interchange on Interstate 10 (1-10) at Portola Avenue. The main hurdle related to the development of the project, being addressed by the consultant and staff, is the approval of a new connection at this location on 1-10 by Caltrans and the Federal Highway Administration. The draft New Connection Report (NCR) was prepared by Dokken Engineering and submitted to Caltrans for review. In addition to being approved by Caltrans, the NCR needs to be approved by the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) in Washington D.C. In the past few years, Caltrans and FHWA have increased their scrutiny of any proposed new interchange on any Interstate highway. One of the requirements is to demonstrate from a traffic standpoint whether improving adjacent interchanges and local streets would negate the need for this proposed interchange. This will require an addendum to the approved traffic study that will show that the proposed interchange is still needed. Portola/I-10 Interchange -Approval of Amendment No. 1 to Dokken Contract Page 2 of 3 July 10, 2008 Staff has prepared Amendment No. 1 to Contract 24660 with Dokken Engineering for the following additional services to complete the Project Approval and Environmental Documentation (PA/ED) phase before proceeding to final engineering. The additional services include the following tasks: 1. Project Management, Coordination, and Administration -additional services are required due to the delay in the completion of the PA/ED phase. The original schedule in the contract assumed completion by January 2008. The current schedule to complete the PA/ED phase is estimated to be June 2009. 2. Geometric Development and Cost Estimates -the geometry of the interchange was modified at the request of Caltrans to change the loop on ramp from a free right turn to a Type D and adding a sidewalk along the easterly side of Portola Avenue to increase the safety of pedestrians and bicyclists. This reversed the recommendations for savings previously approved during the value engineering study. This change required additional services to revise grading plans, profiles, alignments, superelevation diagrams, and cost estimates for inclusion into the Draft PR and the NCR. 3. Traffic Operational Analysis Report -additional services are needed to prepare an addendum to the Traffic Operational Analysis Report to serve as part of the justification for the proposed interchange in the NCR. 4. Draft PR, NCR and Fact Sheets -additional services are required to prepare and receive approval of the Draft PR, NCR, and Fact Sheets for non-standard geometric features. 5. Air Quality Report -as of June 21, 2007, an Air Quality Conformity Analysis Document is required that was not included in the original scope of work. The analysis is required by FHWA to make an air quality conformity determination pursuant to the Section 6005 of the Safe, Accountable, Flexible, and Efficient Transportation Act. 6. Focused Surveys for Special Status Species -focused Surveys were required for the Coachella Valley milk vetch, Coachella Valley fringe -toed lizard, burrowing owl, and Palm Springs round -tailed ground squirrel. The consultant performed the surveys, coordinated with the U.S Fish and Wildlife Service and California Department of Fish and Game, and prepared reports that summarized the results of the focused surveys. This work was completed prior to adoption of the Coachella Valley Multi Species Habitat Conservation Plan. Staff requests City Council approval of Amendment No.1 to Contract C24660 with Dokken Engineering in the amount of $94,000. The total request from Dokken Engineering for the above additional services is $119,000. The original contract included $67,000 for optional tasks. The Value Engineering Study, not identified in the original scope of work but required by Caltrans, used $42,000 of the optional task budget leaving $25,000 in the optional task budget. Therefore, the net increase to the contract will be in the amount of $94,000. The total revised contract amount will be $833,839. Staff has reviewed the request for additional services and is confident with the value being received for the cost of the additional services. CVAG, Portola/I-10 Interchange -Approval of Amendment No. 1 to Dokken Contract Page 3 of 3 July 10, 2008 in accordance with the existing reimbursement agreement, with reimburse the City 75% of PA/ED costs up to $1,500,000. The updated Project Report estimate prepared by Dokken Engineering for the project is approximately $74 million for preliminary engineering and environmental documentation, final design, right of way acquisition, and construction costs. The project is programmed to receive 75% funding from CVAG in Fiscal Year 2012-13 for final design, right of way acquisition and construction and has received $1.2 million in STP Local Funds for construction. See attached Project Work Sheet for estimated project costs and funding. Staff has been meeting with Congresswoman Mary Bono Mack's staff and submitted a Fiscal Year 2009 Appropriation Request Form. Her staff has indicated that the project ranks highest on the list for earmarking for additional federal funds. The project is estimated to be completed in late 2013. Fiscal Impact: Funds for this amendment are available in Budget Account 213-4351-433-40-01. In accordance with the existing reimbursement agreement, CVAG will reimburse the City 75% of the PA/ED Phase consultant costs. Prepared By: John Garcia, P.E. Engineering Manager Approval: Homer Croy ACM for Development Services Carlos L. 0 City Manage g Department Head: Mark Greenwood, P.E. Director of Public Works Paul Finan son e Diretor TY COUNCIL ACTION: APPROVED DENIED RECE I VED �..._ �... OTHER MEET I ) " TE NOES ABSENT ABSTAIN ; VERIFIED EY. 7 ')rigina.L on File wi Clerk OfiI.r`C-. CITY OF PALM DESERT Contract#/P.O.# C24660 12823 PROFESSIONAL SERVICE AMENDMENT Change Order No.. Contingency: NO Contract Purpose Portola Avenue Interchange on I-10-Additional Account No. 213-4351-433-40-01 Services for PA/ED Phase Consultant's Name Dokken Engineering Project No. 637-02 Address: 5675 Ruffin Road, Suite 250 Vendor No. 9089 San Diego, CA 92123 You are hereby requested to comply with the following changes from the contract plans and specifications: DECREASE INCREASE DESCRIPTION OF CHANGES In Contract Price In Contract Price Additional Environmental and engineering services to complete the Project $94,000.00 Approval/Environmental Documentation Phase including the following tasks: 1 . Project Management, Coordination, and Administration 2. Geometric Development and Cost Estimates 3. Addendum Traffic Operational Analysis Report 4. Draft Project Report, New Connection Report, and Fact Sheets 5. Air Quality Report 6. Focused Surveys for Special Status Species TOTALS: - $ 94,000.00 NET CHANGE IN CONTRACT PRICE: $ 94,000.00 JUSTIFICATION: Additional services are required due to: 1) delay in approval of the PA/ED phase, 2) modification of the geometry of the interchange (ramp configuration) that required changes to plans, profiles, grading, and cost estimates, 3) requirement for an addendum traffic analysis report used to justify the interchange in the New Connection Report, 4) revisions to Project Report, New Connection Report, and Fact Sheets, 5) required Air Quality Conformity Analysis not included in original scope of work, and 6) focused surveys for special status species not included in original scope of work. TOTAL BUDGET FOR PROJECT: + $ 6,560,036.99 CONTINGENCY: Less: Expend. & Encumb. To Date: - $ 861,419.71 Amount Approved by Council: + $73,983.90 Less: This Change Order Amount: - $ 94,000.00 Less: Prior Amendment(s): - $0 BALANCE OF BUDGET Less: This Amendment: - $73,983.90 REMAINING FOR PROJECT: $ 5,604,617.28 Balance Remaining of Contingency: - The amount of the Contract will be increased by the sum of: Ninety-Four Thousand Dollars ($94,000.00). Continued on reverse ... Contract C24660 Amendment No. 1 Continued from front This Professional Service Amendment covers changes to the subject contract as described herein. The Consultant shall perform all work as necessary or required to complete the Professional Service Amendment items for a lump sum price agreed upon between the Consultant and the City of Palm Desert, otherwise referred to as Owner. Contract Time Extension N/A Days. Revised Contract Total $ 833,839.00 The undersigned Consultant approves the foregoing Professional Service Amendment #1 as to the changes, if any, in the contract price specified for each item including any and all supervision costs and other miscellaneous costs relating to the change in work, and as to the extension of time allowed, if any, for completion of the entire work on account of said Professional Service Amendment #1. The Consultant agrees to furnish all labor and materials and perform all other necessary work, inclusive of that directly or indirectly related to the approved time extension, required to complete the Professional Service Amendment items. This document will become a supplement of the contract and all provisions will apply hereto. It is understood that the Professional Service Amendment shall be effective when approved by the Owner. Execution of this Professional Service Amendment by the Consultant constitutes a binding accord and satisfaction that fully satisfies, waives, and releases the Owner from all claims, demands, costs, and liabilities, in contract, law or equity, arising out of or related to the subject of the Professional Service Amendment, whether known or unknown, including but not limited to direct and indirect costs and/or damages for delay, disruption, acceleration, and loss of productivity, as well as any and all consequential damages. This document will become a supplement to the Contract and all provisions will apply hereto, all items included above must have required signatures as per the purchase resolution. 1. REQUESTED BY: 2. ACCEPTED BY: DEPARTMENT HEAD CONSULTANT Date Accepted 3. CERTIFIED FUNDS AVAILABLE: 4. APPROVED BY: FINANCE DIRECTOR JEAN M. BENSON, MAYOR Date Approved NOTE: No payments will be made prior to City Manager and Council approval CITY MANAGER Date Approved Continued on reverse ... n�i4,4 O a GVOHllba OIHIOdd NOINn :. `°� - 1 t t t i t t i I i t I t t t { t t t 0I. 31V1SId31N1 H • - 4. //';/ b _ Budget Augment For ,..sA __ VPR^ New Interchange on Interstate 10 at $ v q = w Portola Avenue Project C24660 B q $ N n I _ 12c Task 3.1 Project Management,Coordination 6 Administration t Task 3.1 Project ManagemeM,Coordination 6 Administration 0 0 0 0 Task 3.1-1 Coordination/Administration 8 8 16 4 8 12 0 28 Task 3.1-2 Coordination and Meetings 8 8 16 4 I 12 0 .28 Task J.1-]Adm nis0at on 4 8 12 0 0 12 Task 3.1-4 Progress Reports and Invoices 4 8 12 _ 0 0 12 TOTAL HOURS-Task 3.1 24 32 0 56 8 18 0 0 0 0 0 24 0 0 0 0 0 B0 'TOTAL COST-Task3.1 23.684.10 $3,823.60 $0.00 $7,707.70 51,331.79 $1,938.60 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 2000 $0.00 23,270.39 20.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00,, $10,979.09 Task 3.2 Engineering Development 0 Task 3.2-6 Geometric Development _ 4 24 48 76 $ 8 8 24 __0 100 Task 3.2-6 Cost Estimates 2 8 24 34 0 0 34 Task 3.2.10s Traffic Operational Analysis Report 4 16 24 44 16 12$ 32 32 208 0 252 TOTAL HOURS-TASK 3.2 10 48 96 154 18 128 0 0 40 8 40 232 0 0 0 0 0 386 TOTAL COST-TASK3.2 81,618.38 85,735.40 813,068.00 $20,421.78 92,6633.58 $15,508.84 80.00 80.00 $2,818.29 $637.48 92,517.59, 924,146.77 80.00 50.00 50.00 8000 80.00 844,667.55 Task 3.3 Project Report,Fact Shoots,8 New Connection Report - _ 0 Task 3.3.1 Preliminary Daft Project Report,New Connection Report and Fact Sheets 4 24 60 88 0 0 88 TOTAL HOURS-TASK 3.3 4 24 60 88 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 C 0 0 0 0 BB TOTAL COST-TASK 3.3 $647.35 42,867.70 58,167.50 211,682.5S 20.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 5000 50.00 $0.00 $0.00 20.00 $11,611255 Task 3.4 Environmental Document _ 0 Task 3.4Jd Air Quality Report 0 1 4 2 12' 28 32 72 72 TOTAL HOURS-TASK 3.4 0 0 0 0 I 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 2 12 26 32 72 72 TOTAL COST-TASK 3.4 S0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $168.47 50.00 $0.00 $421,45 $0.00 8000 50.00 2687.92 2416.09 41,355.27 52,013641 $1.589.26 $5,427.04 95,014.5a Focused Surveys 0 Coachella Valley Milk Vetch Focused Survey 0 1 40 8 49 0 49 Coachella Valley Fringe-road Lizard Focused Survey 0 4 140 8 152 0 152 Burrowing Owl Focused Survey 0 1 80 $ 89 0 89 _ Palm Springs Round-tailed Ground Squirrel Focused Survey_ 0 1 120 B 129 0 129 USFWS end COTG Coordination 0 16 32 3 56 0 56 TOTAL HOURS-TASKS 0 0 0 0 13 0 412 0 0 0 40 475 0 0 0 0 0 475 TOTAL COST-TASKS $000 $000 $0.00 $0.00 83828.89 $0.00 $39,012.18 5000 $0.00 5000 $2.517.59 $45,35667 9000 50.00 $0.00 9000 20.00 $45,358.67 TOTAL PROJECT HOURS 36 104 156 298 48 144 412 4 40 8 60 731 2 12 28 32 72 1101 DIRECT COSTS $187.97 $137.25' 572.96r $398.18 TOTAL PROJECT COST $o oo 10.00 $0.00 240,000.no 50.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 273,500,00 20.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $5,500.00 $119,eo0.00 L-10/Portnld AveAuOmenL OOKKEN ENGINEERING Pane 1 0/2 6/24/2008 637-02 Portola 1-10 Interchange Project/Construction Cost Estimates Community Benefits I Staff I Fund FY 08-09* FY 09-I 0 FY 10-I 1 FY 1 1-12 FY 12-13 Total More direct vehiculare access to Civic Center, • _ Property Acquisition: 213,851.853 $ - $ 5,000,000 $ 5,083,333 $ - $ , $ 10,083,333 business,entertainment,residential and Professional Services: 213,851,853 $ 3.000,000 $ - $ - $ $ $ 3,000.000 commercial areas. Reduced congestion at adjacent interchanges and local streets. Fees: $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - Construction: 213,851.853 $ - $ - $ - $ 15,000,000 $ 33.333,333 $ 48,333,333 Equipment: $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - Administration: $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - Direct Staff Costs: I 1 10 $ 34,593 $ 35,631 $ 36,700 $ 37,801 $ 38,935 $ 183,660 Contingency: 213,851.853 $ 600.000 $ 1.000,000 $ 1.016,667 $ 3,000.000 I$ 6,666,667 $ 12,283,333 Other. $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - Total: $ 3,634,593 $ 6,035,631 $ 6,136,700 $ 18.037,801 $ 40,038,935 $ 73,883,660 Recurring Cost Estimates Staff Fund FY 08-09* j FY 09-10 FY 10-I 1 FY 11-12 FY 12-13 Total Maintenance Costs: $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ Replacement Costs: $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - Administration: $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ Direct Staff Costs: 0 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ Contract Staff Costs: $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - Other: $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - Total: $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - Total All Costs: $ 3,634,593 $ 6,035,631 $ 6.136.700 I $ 18,037,801 I $ 40,038,935 1 $ 73,883,660 J Potential Increase to Public Safety Costs: $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -1 b - Project Fund Sources Fund FY 08-09* FY 09-I 0 FY 10-I 1 FY 11-12 FY 12-13 Total General Fund: $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - Measure A Funds: 213 $ 8,698,618 $ 9,000,000 $ - $ - $ - $ 17,698,618 0• reation Redevelopment Funds: 851,853 $ 12,500,000 $ - $ - 5 - $ - $ 12,500,000 Temporary Jobs Created: 100 Storm Drain Funds: $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - Average Income: Grant Monies:CVAG(75%) $ 625,380 $ - $ - $ 18.024,000 $ 36,051,000 $ 54,700.380 Other.STP Local $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 1,275,000 $ 1,275,000 Permanent Jobs Created: 0 $ - Total: $ 21,823,998 $ 9,000,000 $ - , $ 18,024,000 $ 37,326,000 $ 86,173,998 *Includes previously F.Y.expenditures/encumbrances DOKKEN ENGINEERING Igm Trrzrtsluortation Solrrtioas.fronr Concept to Construction June 24, 2008 Mr. John Garcia, PE City of Palm Desert, Department of Public Works 735-510 Fred Waring Drive Palm Desert, CA 92660 Subject: Budget Augment to Contract C24660, Portola Ave/I-10 Interchange Dear Mr. Garcia, This letter requests a change in the scope of work and a budget augment to include environmental focus surveys, an amendment to the traffic study to address Caltrans and FHWA requirements for a New Connection Report (NCR), preparation of an Air Conformity Analysis Document, modifications to geometry, and additional project management due to the increase in project schedule. The contract is requested to be amended as follows: Task 3.1, Project Management, Coordination & Administration Additional compensation is requested for Task 1, Project Management, Coordination & Administration due to unforeseen extensions of the anticipated the project schedule. The project schedule defined in the original contract assumed a project approval by January, 2008. The estimated completion of the PA/ED Phase is now June, 2009. Project review by Caltrans staff was assumed to require 30 days. Currently reviews are taking six to seven weeks. Extensive re-reviews of submitted reports, with circular comments, and frequent changing of Caltrans staff, has significantly increased the original assumed schedule for project delivery. This has led to additional PDT meeting and a significant increase in coordination of the project. Cost by Firm: Dokken Engineering $ 7,708 LSA $ 3,270 Total: $ 10,978 Augmentation to Task 3.1: $10,978 Task 3.2-5, Geometric Development Additional compensation is requested for Task 3.2-5, Geometric Development due to several different, circular comments from Caltrans that requested altering the interchange geometry, even after acceptance of the VA Study recommendations. The westbound loop onramp was originally designed as a D-type ramp per Caltrans preference to comply with ADA requirements. The VA Study recommended revising the li ramp to free-right geometry and eliminating the easterly sidewalk along Portola Avenue. These VA Study recommendations were accepted by City and Caltrans staff. The grading plans, profiles, alignments and superelevation diagrams were revised for inclusion into the Draft Project Report and NCR. During the third review of the NCR, Caltrans 1 i 5675 Ruffin Road,Suite 250,San Diego,CA 92123 • 7ele:858.514.8377 • Fax:858.514.8608 • www.dokkenengineering.com I DOKKEN ENGINEERING lruntsin)rtation Solutions from Concept to CoitqrucLion requested the on ramp geometry and sidewalk be reverted to its original D-type design. Cost by Firm: Dokken Engineering $ 10,049 LSA $ 1,705 Total: $ 11,754 Augmentation to Task 3.2-5: $11,754 Task 3.2-6, Cost Estimates Additional compensation is requested for Task 3.2-6 Cost Estimates, due to Caltrans requests to alter the interchange geometry after accepting the VA Study's recommendations, as described above in Task 3.2-5. Cost by Firm: Dokken Engineering $ 4,547 Total: $ 4,547 Augmentation to Task 3.2-6: $ 4,547 Task 3.2-10e, Traffic Operational Analysis Report An addendum to the original, approved by Caltrans, Traffic Operational Analysis Report, shall be prepared to analyze and discuss the modifications to the original traffic study caused by a potential future improvement of the eastbound ramps at the Monterey interchange. During the third review of the NCR, Caltrans noted that traffic study did not analyze future improvements to the eastbound ramps at Monterey. Per standard practices, the study only analyzed those projects that are defined were defined in the 2004 RTP and 2006 RTIP when the report was prepared. Caltrans has expressed this concern primarily due to recent interpretation of FHWA instructions (see attached) regarding new connections to the interstate system. Of concern is the following instruction: "The existing interchanges and/or local roads and streets in the corridor can neither provide the necessary access nor be improved to satisfactorily accommodate the design- year traffic demands while at the same time providing the access intended by the proposal." While improvements to the eastbound ramps at Monterey are not anticipated to provide an improved LOS in such a congested area, their inclusion into the traffic report will better provide additional evidence in support of the Portola interchange. The traffic study addendum will analyze the area of the eastbound ramps and along the freeway, including: • Revise freeway mainline operations analysis per HCM 2000 methods. The analysis shall determine free-flow speed, densities (passenger cars per mile per lane), and LOS for the freeway segments analyzed. • Revise ramp access and egress point analysis per the methods contained in "Chapter 25-Ramps and Ramp Junctions" of the 2000 HCM. The analysis shall determine LOS within the ramp influence areas of the freeway. 2 DOKKEN ENGINEERING IN. from • Revise interchange ramp analysis for Intersecting Lane Vehicles (ILV) per Caltrans HDM, Topic 406 and HCM 2000 delays, LOS, lane configuration requirements and turn pocket storage length. • Revise intersection analysis using both ILV and LOS per HCM methods, including average delay, lane configuration requirements and turn pocket storage length. • Revise roadway segments volume-to-capacity ratios and lane requirements. • Perform additional Caltrans Traffic Signal Warrant analysis. • Perform additional signal timing/signal coordination studies. Cost by Firm: Dokken Engineering $ 5,826 LSA $ 22,441 Total: $ 28,267 Augmentation Task 3.2-10e: $28,267 Task 3.3-1, Preliminary Draft Project Report, New Connection Report and Fact Sheets Additional compensation is requested for Task 3.3-1, due to extensive Caltrans re- reviews of submitted reports and frequent changing of Caltrans staff. Dokken Engineering has responded to all comments provided by Caltrans. Upon Caltrans' verification of the responses, the responses are accepted and new comments are provided. Due to the additional revisions and long review time, this process is causing a significant load on the project resources. Cost by Firm: Dokken Engineering $ 11,683 Total: $ 11,683 Augmentation to Task 3.3-1: $11,683 Task 3.4-4d, Air Quality Report The Air Quality Conformity Analysis Document is a new requirement being mandated on all current projects as of June 21, 2007. The analysis is required by FHWA to make an • air quality conformity determination, pursuant to Section 6005 of the Safe, Accountable, Flexible, Efficient Transportation Equity Act: A Legacy for Users (SAFETEA-LU). To keep the project momentum moving forward, the report is currently under preparation to eliminate the possibility of project delay. The original Task 3.4-4d Air Quality Report is amended to include the following: Consultant shall prepare an Air Quality Conformity Analysis per Caltrans standards. Cost by Firm: LSA $ S88 VPRA $ 5,427 Total: $ 6,015 Augmentation for Air Conformity Analysis Document: $ 6,015 3 DOKKEN ENGINEERING Trcrnsportatiori Solutions from Concert to Construction Optional Tasks The focus surveys were included in our original project scope as "Optional Tasks", since it was unclear at that time if the surveys would be required. To keep the project momentum moving forward, the endangered species surveys have been performed already to eliminate the possibility of project delay. The surveys were conducted over a five month period beginning in May 2006, and the results were incorporated into the NES. Each survey had to be conducted by a qualified biologist according to the protocols established by the CDFG, including the following restrictions, requiring multiple site walkovers at ten meter transects: Species Finding Site Period Transects Other f Visits Spacing Restrictions Required Coachella presence/ 6 Visits May 1- transects when temps Valley absence July 31 no greater are 100 to 104 fringe-toed than 10 on low wind lizard meters days. apart Palm presence/ at least 3 May 1 - transects 1 hour after Springs absence July 31 no greater sunrise to 4 i Ground than 10 hours after . Squirrel meters sunrise with - apart temps between 81 and 91. CV Presence/ 1 Feb-May 15 meters milkvetch absence The following is requested to be incorporated into the contract: Focused Surveys for Special Status Species • Coachella Valley milk vetch (Federally Endangered); 1 • Coachella Valley fringe-toed lizard (Federally Threatened/State Endangered); • Burrowing owl (State Species of Special Concern); and, I • Palm Springs round-tailed ground squirrel (Federal Candidate/State Species of Special Concern). Consultant will provide coordination with the U.S Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) and/or California Department of Fish and Game (CDFG) as appropriate. i 4 DOKKEN ENGINEERING lreiirsportatiori Solutions from Concept to Construction The Consultant will prepare letter reports summarizing the results of the focused surveys. Cost by Firm: LSA $ 45,359 Total: $ 45,359 Augmentation for Focused Surveys: $45,359 The total of these requested amendments is $119,000. The original contract included a contingency amount of$67,000. On March 30, 2007, Task 3.3-5, Value Analysis Study was authorized for $42,000, leaving $25,000 in remaining contingency funds. Therefore, an additional $94,000 is requested beyond the original contract agreement. Attached are a summary of costs per firm, a worksheet showing the number of hours/costs required, along with the direct costs for these additional Tasks. Sincerely, DOKKEN ENGINE :ING Accepted and Approved by: 110, • loll►: Chris Johnson, PE John Garcia, PE Project Manager City Engineer • i 5 Budget Augment For New Interchange on Interstate 10 at Portola Avenue Project C24660 TASK FEE SUMMARY TASK, " FEE .aii... Task 3.1 Project Management,Coordination&Administration $10,978.10 Task 3.2-5 Geometric Development $11,753.70 Task 3.2-6 Cost Estimates $4,546.58 Task 3.2-10e Traffic Operational Analysis Report $28,267.27 Task 3.3-1 Preliminary Draft Project Report, New Connection Report and Fact Sheets $11,682.55 Task 3.4-4d Air Quality Report $6,014.96 Coachella Valley Milk Vetch Focused Survey $4,457.58 Coachella Valley Fringe-toed Lizard Focused Survey $14,425.98 Burrowing Owl Focused Survey $8,245.17 Palm Springs Round-tailed Ground Squirrel Focused Survey $12,032.76 USFWS and CDFG Coordination $6,197.17 Reproduction $398.18 TOTALS: $119,000.00 I-10/Portola Ave Augment #1 Page 1 of 5 FEE PROPOSAL Dokken Engineering DIRECT COSTS (LABOR) NAME FUNCTION HOURS RATE AMOUNT Chris Johnson, PE Project Manager 38 $53.50 $2,033.00 Mike Roberts, PE Roadway Project Engineer 104 $39.50 $4,108.00 Gerard Lumabas, PE Roadway Designer 156 $45.00 $7,020.00 TOTAL HOURS #REF! TOTAL LABOR $13,161.00 INDIRECT COSTS (OVERHEAD) ESCALATION 0.00% $0.00 OVERHEAD 175.00% $23,031.75 TOTAL OVERHEAD $23,031.75 DIRECT COSTS Billed at Actual Cost ITEM QUANTITY UNIT UNIT COST AMOUNT Reproduction 1 LS $187.97 $187.97 TOTAL DIRECT COSTS $187.97 FEE (PROFIT) PERCENTAGE 10% FEE $3,619.28 TOTAL COST $40,000.00 KKE I-10/Portola Ave Augment#1 It A— PNTr1 � J1V t rVf. Page 2 of 5 RM w•Goli.Srrieu:Lmt,ertng.rom. FEE PROPOSAL LSA DIRECT COSTS (LABOR) FUNCTION HOURS RATE AMOUNT Lyn Calerdine Principal 48 $56.47 $2,710.56 Les Card Traffic 144 $41.10 $5,918.40 Denise Woodard Senior Biologist 412 $32.12 $13,233.44 Megan Macias Senior Air/Noise 4 $35.74 $142.96 Name Word Processor 40 $23.90 $956.00 Name Graphics 8 $27.03 $216.24 Name Administrative Assistant 80 $21.35 $1,708.00 TOTAL HOURS 736 TOTAL LABOR $24,885.60 INDIRECT COSTS (OVERHEAD) OVERHEAD 168.00% $41,807.81 TOTAL OVERHEAD $41,807.81 DIRECT COSTS Billed at Actual Cost ITEM QUANTITY UNIT UNIT COST AMOUNT Reproduction 1 LS $137.25 $137.25 TOTAL DIRECT COSTS $137.25 FEE (PROFIT) PERCENTAGE 10% FEE $6,669.34 TOTAL COST $73,500.00 DO I-10/Portola Ave Augment #1 ■ y rl ri E lti � Fw �� iNr: FTrvn Page 3 of 5 *K'w' clolzke ne:I:LnettinC•fon, FEE PROPOSAL VP RA DIRECT COSTS(LABOR) FUNCTION HOURS RATE AMOUNT Georgiana Vivian Vice President/Responsible Office 2 $70.00 $140.00 Stacey Kurz Senior Transportation Analyst/Em 12 $38.00 $456.00 Jason Ellard Transportation Analyst/Environme 26 $27.00 $702.00 Intern Technical Support 32 $16.50 $528.00 TOTAL HOURS 72 TOTAL LABOR $1,826.00 INDIRECT COSTS (OVERHEAD) OVERHEAD 170.19% $3,107.67 TOTAL OVERHEAD $3,107.67 DIRECT COSTS Billed at Actual Cost ITEM QUANTITY UNIT UNIT COST AMOUNT Reproduction 1 LS $72.96 $72.96 TOTAL DIRECT COSTS $72.96 FEE(PROFIT) PERCENTAGE 10% FEE $493.37 TOTAL COST $5,500.00 DOK I-10/Portola Ave Augment #1 T N ,''1 1 N Page 4 of 5 RR'w❑OL:YF!1daglDSictDC•SO,n CI1'Y OF PALM DESERT Contract#/P.O.# C24660 12823 PROFESSIONAL SERVICE AMENDMENT AmendmenU � Change Order No. Contingency: YES NO Contract Purpose Portola Avenue Interchange on I-10-Additional Account►vo. 213-4351-433-40-01 Services for PA/ED Phase ConsultanYs Name Dokken Engineering Project No. 637-OZ Add�ess: 5675 Ruffin Road, Suite 250 vendor No. gQ$g San Diego, CA 92123 You are hereby requested to comply with the following changes from the contract plans and specifications: DECREASE INCREASE DESCRIPTION OF CHANGES In Contract Price In Contract Price Additional Environmental and engineering services to complete the Project $94,000.00 Approval/Environmental Documentation Phase including the following tasks: 1 . Project Management, Coordination, and Administration 2. Geometric Development and Cost Estimates 3. Addendum Traffic Operational Analysis Report 4. Draft Project Report, New Connection Report, and Fact Sheets 5. Air Quality Report 6. Focused Surveys for Special Status Species TOTALS: - $ 94,000.00 NET CHANGE IN CONTRACT PRICE: $ 94,000.00 JUSTIFICATION: Additional services are required due to: 1) delay in approval of the PA/ED phase, 2) modification of the geometry of the interchange (ramp configuration) that required changes to plans, profiles, grading, and cost estimates, 3) requirement for an addendum traffic analysis report used to justify the interchange in the New Connection Report, 4) revisions to Project Report, New Connection Report, and Fact Sheets, 5) required Air Quality Conformity Analysis not included in original scope of work, and 6) focused surveys for special status species not included in original scope of work. TOTAL BUDGET FOR PROJECT: + $ 6,560,036.99 CONTINGENCY: Less: Expend. & Encumb. To Date: - $ 861,419.71 Amount Approved by Council: + $73,983.90 Less: This Change Order Amount: - $ 94,000.00 Less: Prior Amendment(s): - $� BALANCE OF BUDGET Less: This Amendment: - $73,983.90 REMAINING FOR PROJECT: $ 5,604,617.28 Balance Remaining of Contingency: - The amount of the Contract will be increased by the sum of: Ninety-Four Thousand Dollars ($94,000.00). Continued on reverse ... Contract C24660 Amendment No. 1 Continued from front This Professional Service Amendment covers changes to the subject contract as described herein. The Consultant shall perform all work as necessary or required to complete the Professional Service Amendment items for a lump sum price agreed upon between the Consultant and the City of Palm Desert, otherwise referred to as Owner. Contract Time Extension N/A Days. Revised Contract Total $ 833.839.00 The undersigned Consultant approves the foregoing Professional Service Amendment #1 as to the changes, if any, in the contract price specified for each item including any and all supervision costs and other misceilaneous costs relating to the change in work, and as to the extension of time allowed, if any, for completion of the entire work on account of said Professional Service Amendment #1. The Consultant agrees to furnish all labor and materials and perform all other necessary work, inclusive of that directly or indirectly related to the approved time extension, required to complete the Professional Service Amendment items. This document will become a supplement of the contract and all provisions will apply hereto. It is understood that the Professional Service Amendment shall be effective when approved by the Owner. Execution of this Professional Service Amendment by the Consultant constitutes a binding accord and satisfaction that fully satisfies, waives, and releases the Owner from all claims, demands, costs, and liabilities, in contract, law or equity, arising out of or related to the subject of the Professional Service Amendment, whether known or unknown, including but not limited to direct and indirect costs and/or damages for delay, disruption, acceleration, and loss of productivity, as well as any and all consequential damages. This document will become a supplement to the Contract and all provisions will apply hereto, all items included above must have required signatures as per the purchase resolution. 1. REQUESTED BY: 2. ACCEPTED BY: DEPARTMENT HEAD CONSULTANT Date Accepted 3. CERTIFIED FUNDS AVAILABLE: 4. APPROVED BY: FINANCE DIRECTOR JEAN M. BENSON, MAYOR Date Approved NOTE: No payments will be made prior to City Manager and Council approval CITY MANAGER Date Approved Continued on reverse ... 11 i ; �I June 24, 2008 Mr. John Garcia, PE � City of Palm Desert, Department of Public Works 735-510 Fred Waring Drive Palm Desert, CA 92660 Subject: Budget Augment to Contract C24660, Portola Ave/I-10 Interchange � Dear Mr. Garcia, This letter requests a change in the scope of work and a budget augment to include environmental focus surveys, an amendment to the traffic study to address Caltrans and ; FHWA requirements for a New Connection Report (NCR), preparation of an Air Conformity Analysis Document, modifications to geometry, and additional project management due I to the increase in project schedule. , The contract is requested to be amended as follows: � Task 3.1, Project Management, Coordlnation & Administration Additional compensation is requested Por Task 1, Project Management, Coordination & Administration due to unforeseen extensions of the anticipated the project schedule. The project schedule defined in the original contract assumed a project approval by January, 2008. The estimated completion of the PA/ED Phase is now June, 2009. Project review by Caltrans staff was assumed to require 30 days. Currently reviews are taking six to seven weeks. Extensive re-reviews of submitted reports, with circular comments, and � frequent changing of Caltrans staff, has significantly increased the original assumed schedule for project delivery. This has led to additional PDT meeting and a significant increase in coordination of the project. Cost by Firm: i Dokken Engineering $ 7,708 � LSA � 3.�70 Total: $ 10,978 Augmentation to Task 3.1: $10,978 Task 3.2-5, Geametric Development Additional compensation is requested for Task 3.2-5, Geometric Development due to several different, circular comments from Caltrans that requested altering the interchange geometry, even after acceptance of the VA Study recommendations. The westbound loop onramp was originally designed as a D-type ramp per Caltrans preference to comply with ADA requirements. The VA Study recommended revising the ramp to free-right geometry and eliminating the easterly sidewalk along Portola Avenue, These VA Study recommendations were accepted by City and Caltrans staff, The grading plans, profiles, aiignments and superelevation diagrams were revised for inclusion into the Draft Project Report and NCR. During the third revfew of the NCR, Caltrans I� S(�%?flu(fin I�oa�l,Suitr?'�O,San I�ii'�,i�,(�A �J'923 • li�lct:t�5fi.514.$377 • Pax:h�ih.514.i+G(� • �ti'WY�.iji��ilCCnen{;inc�•rin�;.cc>m ii � � / requested the on ramp geometry and sidewaik be reverted to its original D-type design. Cost by Firm: Dokken Engineering $ 10,049 LSA $ 1,705 Total: $ 11,754 Augmentation to Task 3.2-5: $11,754 Task 3.2-6, Cost Estimates i Additional compensation is requested for Task 3.2-6 Cost Estimates, due to Caltrans requests to alter the interchange geometry after accepting the VA 5tudy's ' recommendations, as described above in Task 3.2-5. •i Cost by Firm: ; Dokken Engineering 4 47 Total: $ 4,547 Augmentation to Task 3.2-6: $ 4,547 Task 3.2-10e, Traffic Operational Analysis Report An addendum to the original, approved by Caftrans, Traffic Operational Analysis Rep�rt, shall be prepared to analyze and discuss the modifications to the original traffic study ' caused by a potential future improvement of the eastbound ramps at the Monterey interchange. During the third review of the NCR, Caltrans noted that traffic study did not analyze future improvements to the eastbound ramps at Monterey. Per standard practices, the study only analyzed those projetts that are defined were defined in the 2004 RTP and 2006 RTIP when the report was prepared. Caltrans has expressed this concern primarily � due to recent interpretation of FHWA instructions (see attached) regarding new connections to the interstate system. Of concern is the following instruction: ' "The existing interchanqes and/or local roads and streets in the corridor can neither �' provide the necessary access n�r be improved to satisfactorily accommodate the design- �'� year traffic demands while at the same time provrding the access intended by the ! proposal." While improvements to the eastbound ramps at Monterey are not anticipated to provide , an improved LOS in such a congested area, their inclusion into the traffic report will better provide additional evidence in support of the Portola interchange. The t�affic study addendum will analyze the area of the eastbound ramps and along the freeway, including: • Revise freeway mainline operations analysis per HCM 2000 methods. The analysis shall determine free-flow speed, densities {passenger cars per mile per lane), and LOS for the freeway segments analyzed. • Revise ramp access and egress point analysis per the methods contained in "Chapter 25-Ramps and Ramp Junctions" of the 2000 HCM. The analysis shali determine LOS within the ramp influence areas of the freeway. � 2 � / • Revise interchange ramp analysis for Intersecting Lane Vehicies (ILV) per Caltrans HDM, 7opic 406 and HCM 2000 delays, LOS, lane configuration requirements and turn pocket storage length, • Revise intersection analysis using both ILV and LOS per HCM methods, including average delay, lane configuration requirements and turn pocket storage length. • Revise roadway segments volume-to-capacity ratios and lane requirements. • Perform additional Caltrans Traffic Signal Warrant analysis. • Perform additional signal timing/signal coordination studies. Cost by Firm: Dokken Engineering $ 5,826 � LSA � 2Z,441 Total: $ 28,267 �� Augmentation Task 3.2-10e: $28,267 Task 3.3-1, Preliminary Draft Project Report, New Connection Report and Fact Sheets Additional compensation is requested for Task 3.3-1, due to extensive Caltrans re- reviews of submitted reports and frequent changing of Caltrans staff. ' Dokken Engineering has responded to all comments provided by Caltrans. Upon Caltrans' verification of the responses, the responses are accepted and new comments , are provided. Due to the additional revisions and long review time, this process is causing a significant load on the project resources. Cost by Firm: Dokken Engineering $ 11,683 Total: $ 11,683 Augmentation to Task 3.3-1: $11,b83 Task 3.4-4d, Air Quality Report ' i The Air Quality Conformity Analysis Document is a new requirement being mandated on ;'� all current projetts as of June 21, 2007. The analysis is required by FHWA to make an ;� air quality conformity determination, pursuant to Section 6005 of the Safe, Accountable, Flexible, Efficient Transportation Equity Act: A Legacy for Users (SAFETEA-LU). To keep the project momentum moving f�rward, the report is currently under preparation to eliminate the possibility of project delay. The o�iginal Task 3.4-4d Air Quality Report is amended to include the following: Consultant shall prepare an Air Quality Conformity Analysis per Caltrans standards. Cost by Firm: ' LSA $ 588 VPRA 4 7 Total: $ 6,015 , Augmentation for Air Conformity Analysis Document: $ 6,015 ' 3 � � Optional Tasks The focus surveys were included in our original project scope as "Optional Tasks", since it was unclear at that time if the surveys would be required. To keep the project momentum moving forward, the endangered species surveys have been performed already to eliminate the possibility of project delay. The surveys were conducted over a five month period beginning in May 2006, and the resu4ts were incorporated into the NES. Each survey had to be conducted by a qualified biologist according to the prototols established by the CDFG, including the following restrictions, requiring multiple site � walkovers at ten meter transects: ` i Species Finding Site Period Transects Other Visits Spacing Restrictions Re uired ' Coachella presence/ 6 Visits May 1- transects when temps Valley absence July 31 no greater are 100 to iQ4 fringe-toed than 10 on low wind lizard meters days. , apart Palm presence/ at least 3 May 1 - transects 1 hour after Springs absence )uly 31 no greater sunrise to 4 Ground than 10 hours after Squirrel meters su�rise with apart temps between 81 and 91. CV Presence/ 1 Feb-May 15 meters milkvetch absence i ii `.i The following is requested to be incorporated into the contract: Focused Sufveys for Special Status Species • Coachella Valley mifk vetch (Federafly Endangered); • Coachella Valley fringe-toed liza�d (Federally Threatened/State Endangered); • 6urrowing owl (State Species of Special Concern); and, ; • Palm Springs round-tailed ground squirrel (Federal Candidate/State Species of Special Concern). Consultant will provide coordination with fihe U.S Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) and/o� California Department of Fish and Game (CDFG} as app�opriate. 4 I i � / The Consultant will prepare letter reports summarizing the results of the focused surveys. Cost by Firm: LSA � 45•359 Total: $ 45,359 Augmentation for Focused Surveys: $45,359 The total of these requested amendments is $119,000. The original contract inciuded a � contingency amount of $67,000. On March 30, 2007, Task 3.3-5, Value Analysis Study was authorized for $42,000, feaving $25,000 in remaining contingency funds. Therefore, an additional $94,000 is requested beyond the original contract agreement. r Attached are a summary of costs per firm, a worksheet showing the number of , hours/costs required, along with the direct costs for these additional Tasks. Sincerely, DOKKEN ENGINE ING Accepted and Approved by: Chris Johnson, PE John Garcia, PE Project Manager City Engineer 5 i .. O O 00 I� � (O 00 00 I �, (O I� a0 O I�� �I N � O) � O) .— f� � � O � � � �I �`">I CO I� N '7 I�: � � N: I� 00 O I� tn � CO 00 � � N �. M O� � O �..���jW O� I� tp. N� CO O V � N O � M O p � � aO � CO� � � a0 N tD � O� Lj�, � . EA I N tfl I EA � EA EA � . .. � �I ' �� � ! �. � � 0 � � � J N H U H O v � f- a� s •� cn 0 ,�o d _ , � � 'o = c � a ' I Q > o � � I � � � � ..• � c � d � � � � ° I z N a � � � � � y C I N � .� O � �, Q O � t' U 7 C> d G� � Q 3 � R f!3 a t f °a Z I N �i � 7 ` 1��+ p � � � � `, m C C j� m N O a � LL C C a+ C v � � � I O p °_' Q � � n`�i � c � V � � � O J d � O C C O I O a p � 'C � (7' a+ � 0> � 'a+ � p, t d. 7, � C Z � >, � � � d w � N G1 � L rn o a �a � � > m. m `o d `° � E p Z' �` Y C' v,� � o c � m' w �� � �I �I LLI o 3 C9 C7 �� >, � o � y �� o H ` � � m m � o Z °' �, o y� m Q �o RI O v> V o ol C7 c� o a a > >: � � ;, _ a� � �o; � � v I �a �a � .� � „ . � N N N• M � � � C., N � � � � M M M M M M t t •; � ' � "� .� Y Y Y Y. Y Y � �� � � LL� � i � R R ey0 A � O O 7 ip fn 0� � � � ►-� � � � c� c� m� a � � E rn � Q a� > Q m � 0 � o a° � o v rn •'. a ►— ` E O �A � 00 O � � ': O h Q1 N O r, .. c: � e- ►� O� O ~i•� G= v CO M OO � O J . � O � <D O '�*; V- N M M � M O h+i �• � � � n �' � �`.,�j x � �: n � = 0 0 0 � o �n p � y W F- � t� i 000 � or� Q � � W fn � M 00�O m O � W F- f� V� LL 0 � Z M O N � M = Z � O U � N � � J � � � cflU J � E» E» E» Q � > � U � O Q W O a O J � � F Q p 0 0 0 0 o Q � � o � MI� � � ~ O � ~ � � r►�nv► o � UNO � � H Z � ao v ca � M O � � � LL F�- W N O � � J 2 N � � N I O U ' _ �a � J 3 N Z d H Q } C � O� � i6 F_- Ci � � U W d � Z � m � A O y U' � a` o � !0 A � 3 3 m �a � •o �a �v a` �° � � I W w x Q � w Z - v� O w c mwW �a p w � � g � aw � .-� � � Q c a'`° � � u.i i ' c � Z o y A u�i � - a � • o� � � m,E O z v� o � � • � v � ° J ~ o � o � � Q • d � '�, �'� wg = � � � Y W t �'�-` m � � � w ` a > � O U � � z w O O � � � � � o � N O � ti a ' = o o � u> � o � 7 �: �p 00 N M O r, .. F 1n ti 1� O� O �••L•� F v 00 O M tD O � � � � 00 00 � CO M f�� - � w �' � � z ? �� Ti � z � � �I� � O N O � CO � (�y N W li K H Il.l ~ Z � � `'� v�`n�� o m � 2 Z � O � O � � � N � ���� g °° � � � � � � � � �; �� Q � ; � � a Q i I , o o Q � � 0 ~ a ~ 1�'O N�� O M 1lf � ~ �A � .E t} � � P O> O�M O � ~ N Q O � w Y�'f � M M N N N � ~ � M O � � N H I H V►Yf!A d! �p �U � � � j I � Z i � � OO � N �t O 00 O !O � '7 � � � �O ^ � � � � Z J O � _ � � � I � o O U x � J � Z � � � N F�- O y � � ~ Z � N y O � m � LL O Z �' > U' « � � � �o m Q � � v C. � � .. a.� c •� � o o �.c,•- � 'c 'c o„ E a` � v� v��3c� a � 0 , W w � ' � � I � � � � > w � m � g � � � • � � w � � . N � � � y � a �., u� c � y c �;� 0 � c � v � o '� U p p � � O � :. � • V a� � 3 �� Uw U � � Q H = H � W (j Cj H � a► d a� � � W � a > t�/) � �.'m m d R e�o � � > � aai W � J O J J � � 2;Z Z z O � Q' LL � � � O � M O � � a � : � � � o �. cc r� o w " A O ID � M O � y l0 h N M O I,�.� � J N O h � O 00 � V� � � w � 'i � M � 1A � z ` V! Vi tf! � p � � � O O O O � CO � � � w ~ F- W fn Z �I� oN m o = Z � � � O o � � �;� g �; � � `� � � J E» > � U la- a I O � Q � O , , �. Q 0 0 0 0�� � � `O J � a �- c, e O OD P 1D � ~ (n N fa.. � W �` �"� N � O O � H N M V/ � � V! � Q � H � Z � N N CD N N � � N M 1� � I--- � O � J _ N � � W C � � � O d y�> 2 U � � A W J � c�Q � ~ � Q Z � C i��A O m H O � p; >+ F- ~ m `�IC � � Z Z � `tg.a o — Q o a 'm � a a � � c « N C� � � � o `�° a o �'c � 'c � u _ m � m > (nF- H 0 i w W S � i Q,' a 0 � ; Z • O W U . g � �, W � � • cn �v N y � a v • O � ��� U Q O � LL j . U �d � �0 ~ Q U � O Q ' � � Y W (� W � 3 � a� �,. W = �a a > � W �� m � ` � � w o Q o � °�m w a w m � � U'� N � c z O 0 � � � o a � o � � a IT b ;�� -�:v -� C �I �1 �T �1 �1 1 �/ �1 �1 �i 'i � 'i �/ 1 � C O��1 � O O O O 01 O O 'O1 O O . °1 O O °1 ��� Dm D nnu�i :��° o o R nn M an � a n a � �'� a � n � � � � � ` � C F n � r r r �� r r r r s . � 1' �—'� r 1� 1� I] 3 !rf fr1 ,� P r � Y 1� P • W � � w M M 41 � r M M P M M �j !C lC �c �C'• � ���c �C � � \ ;n � x ly � �'� n 2 w � n 2 u �'' n 2 u u u �'' n 2 u'u c+ u u � � O o �v f ! ! y O O F ^' O O u :� O O N N i� r" O O � � � � � O � .Z1 n .71 tn C � � 7 v = � N C Y < tn C 1 tn G b w o y C � t;+ N S�� 3 �� � vi � ~ v+ n $ � i i • '� v+ � c '� �n9l� '� 'nY $ ' '� w � n,t� c� � ,`, F�i m � m n y v p i� a � s '3 n ti = z a y � a N y 13 g $ R 3 � !'F � c7 � c7 y n T T�c v, a y n � • v, a d n n . � �� � xrnc� g R T ; � y 3 � rn � x �n3M � w ,",. i ,'� 35 � ' � /� N x fQf�n c �- w 7C C t., 7C s cw 7C ^ _� M � � 'r -� o /�� �y � I"' O O �^ Y I� • �p <I +� A � p � w O ` � N p � np � � w i c i C C � W � � s � p $ 6 � � � � A � $� j• + 6�i : � n � � �� C ? n C�J. � A � � ^ d a < o � r o r A I � � � o N IT � � � � b � » Y I � j, ��p < /�� � R a 2 s ^ o � W � � _ ` ` R ." ' � $� a 3 �n a � 'P o , � � � � �/� f"� � y 71 A O a O .�. � �Li N a Z � � � R ,� E N % � � � � a T Iq 4 2 n m I :D lY N� � � 7 . a a O � i � E �o a I a 3 � � {0 �go I � � � 3 ' � � 4c i ; � w �a O �"� �D c ' � o ' � o {'d' .7 � ' ' 8 � o ' � � � ,� i � a � A � � i q � � I � d I � � A � O al, � N � � T , � � ' = � cD � � 0� F+ a ' O O � I I � � � ! I '. � w ii (q � �, i � Project Manager O O I I O J N A i � � � O � O � A + � O � N IA O A ♦ A O O I N M d/ a`", � � -o", i I Roadway ProjeG Engineer o I � I � . � c�''i+ i w : � p p N A � p ' p p � O � O A A O � O� O A O N Oo Oo O!'O� I � ! � � w � � o Roadway Designer 6 o � o � � S � I � � $ o � : � g o0 , , � ; � �� I � I o j � � I I Total �, � � I r. m � o p � N O . O N � pp � y W �1 (� � S V O� O � O�O O O O S � O N � OD OD D A A m O O> N�N Q� � O I I I � � N � i � i+ a, �, I Pnndpal o � I rn � � u � � � O m t�0 w O� I P -�I v O � � � O� � W A A' I I � i � � (/1 � (�1 i `(O�� � ' Traffic O p O I O . O WW N � 41 . O A O � O � O � A � a O T 10! O W I � i I (p (� (q �p Senior Biologist O j N A � p�' p I p p O I i O N m N N�O O'S S O � S � O � O O I I � � i ! Senior Pir/Noise op � o I � �p � o 0 O . A O � (AT A A O � I S � I S O I � I D N � a, � Word Processor o' � � o ao 0 A O O O O I � O g O � O N 00 O O i � I I � i I {p (� �q � �p Graphics O O O O J O O O � O � O p A ap O O m O O O W O O O N N I i i ; I , Administra6ve Fassistant O V I I O O J A O S o � g � � � m,� 8 � 8 � � � N � $ o � , i w � A w i Total I`� ~ p O 'v OND A � r O N N O . O N � N N N�N m tn�A �O p O � V N O N� W N � � O N �l O� (D t0 N �O N O O ' �1 OD O A �D A O O N�N O' � � � ' � � � ice President/Respansibl 0 op mp o �p � O N O � I t� N N S � O � S � �_ I� �, enior Transportation Anay �. o I uNi � i � o � i O N O � I v N N� S � O � O O I I � � I � N � o TransportaGon Pnalyst/En � 0 0 � � � � � N O ON+ O � I A � O�+ O � O � o O - i � M I I I �, Technical Support o , o I , m � � o � � O N O � O> N N I S � I O � S O I � � N I N I Total O O N O I I V O O O J p O O QJ N O � O O O�O O N N O � O O � O O O O O O O O O O I � 2 � , m ; � � � � � � � `£ o I Phase I Total Of 2 p '.WD t�T 'I � O�D O� V A T $ m � V � � (D �p N I tD O 01 N N O fNJ� � 0�0 O tNJ� � N A O O f0 O N I N m � O N � O Z � � 0 0 U N � � C � U � G U � � � > m � v U - 01 m � o v c � � ou � � � v � � � u , U/ C � � L L V ,� � � m u u N � N V � � � � � -C C U) U �\ Q ^ > `" `° �; �' � c � v io c i � y - ` ' � � C C ro a� c E u � o - � `° � Q � � � o � --- a � � m , � T � , , , , . � $ $ $ � I�1 O (�1 IO 1O �O M OI ' p m M n1 �+j f+7 00 C O V1 pl '� pp Q OD �p � O� O O n � O O M � N � '�� � � � �O ✓1 /� N Q O M 00 N � � 0 � 0 f� N � �� P n � � .� � � 1q W /R H M M M M N p N H N W M W w w W H M N M M M M w � M N ^ � � � � i N i � Q O G n P � OMf O�f �.M � �� r+i OD �p �p M ap - �/i �p r+� ri � �n n N .�f V m � O �i N O �N � N !"f .� `� � O � V � '� e� O LL LL LL H W N H N M M H M N M H M V/ M H p N M H M M N N M w N i � � O � � ;N . � � � � � N � r � � � 0 OD � O - F� ^ Q - - � V � N - � O - O - � O � � m � � � � � � LL LL LL � N M N M M N N N H M N M H N M Vf M N W N yf H M H H H N U C O � � � L � � O � � � � � . A � O r+i GJ � r1 m `G � � � ' � O' � O � ��' t�f �'.p V � _ � C � t�L ��t�L {�L y t V L L � � W N W M� M N M M M N M N N H N H N N N p N M N M M M y �+ y � ,0 25 , ' 0 25 `� o � � � � � o c� . � , O �a Q '^ vi _ ui - 4 S x 5� m g � �O� `� O o O� p 'P ZS � G1 � ,� vi - �O � t0 p P Oi � � LL � LL LL LL � � � M M M w w N M M M N N M N M H Vf w N N Vf H M N M M w � 7 a � Q � � ^ � M i � . , M i m g o � �p� � 'fi 25 '� 8 ��ff :.t Y�f • �D p eD Ol L � p pg �'+f g yM p ♦�y p � N � a �� '-! 10 �O � � � d M o � �,i �o c�i � e' `1 N � � LL LL LL V C W N N N N M M N H M b1 H M W Vf M �N N N M H M M M M M � ao � ao •• •• « r" � �' C - - m � O ' C O N N C �^ � O LL ao m m - � � .LL F- V U LL N N F' - - - - Q � °° V�1 N ~ y ' o ( u a i� �a 0 � H � N {/� � v N V yl � V �N.1 y y N O jC 3 N \ �� ' � n �^ p V 'C in LL � � 'j 61 C V V (J C V p r C C LL u � ( P N � � � � L � � �N Nv � � {L � C i� '� I Q C 'u C i N C C d i Vyl V � LL Q d � C � I �+ � 7 W N �' 00 C V in V � W � Q � VI I „ � E 'c d c � a+ u c v � � L ; ; £ � � a ►' N c a E ` c °' � p E ` � s I � c e� v � c d I 0 0 �+ o � 9 G o w ro y � � V ., � v d y � � w -- d a` u. U w Q U O M F oc Q 0- --- -- �-� - l7 E � v� l� O i - :.�� ;� � �w � �` � �,,� � r.� � � ,�". �,:, m F, `� � ° .�� '�:� t ��� �,���, � �;" y� r-,� �x ����.�, , , . � .. # � � ° : c� ..� ��a.;�3T ���. ��� # %'.^�.s, .r , �� �i^p�y'i�� �� �. s �a;' A �- „- � ° 1 �i q�,�{ ' 1: c' :N�.';�: Y+��� i,si fl ,a't>- �r T .. _r,-_ d p�.w '• � � ���� ; � .lr� � �, d �����'a���^" �,µ� ��,V 5 M.x���� i� �N �^Y'�.e q Mre��.. _ � � � :��� i1��A. t. '.' v,;:. . ., �, � .� + �II�� ! .'.A"� ��m � u'bt+psr:V � �...: � �. .�`'�. h, �y43 ��+ ,� +�'�.,�,-�r'g�' s r "V`:� S "�W►�f rr'� �-{ r,:� � .. ^e,�� � '4_ ""� ,� "� " g, tm � �" " ��� ,{��c�'" ' . �'^ �, . �g��_ 'rt� -��', ;� - � "�+a,'`y� �w ';�j : i.°f i �Y •.�� . �.-� �' �;' �.C,y�� M'� t,." ,pm kr.« ,� � 1i'i ? .�� M � ::', ati. . .n � .%. •?�. .y'�` ,�r py .�. .��, . n`�,"� �•i t° "' �" ., 4�' ,.;� �fi� . 'Lx & ' k'"�� AP� t; i� ' Ra £ �..> �+ �F�y�yry� �y.. 44 �� � .���� ��w^� � �''�� .� �� ,. ;. �Y.., � . � " y� XJ� 'K S 8,m°k k �.�� $,.. TM , . �^sY`�* ��� 4 �., . . sy p.: . �y s �; . � » � :� . �" y",; .��s$ �.'� . . .. r Nt .. ,�. .. * .a .. : � `` 'z�r.^ � �v� �" i z�H n �;d�,� "6 � � ��� +� "s � �'W ;� k ° �� � ° � `i �'� ,+a�^' k 44 �.r�� �,tt.. � "�"� � ,§'u `��.. , � , : . >. , r�. �: r a <. '' , . ,. , . , , . .� , ;, ,. - » ...� <. ; �, �.,m. � .�. ���m. r,��. .<>�i ,� �: ` � : , a �� , � ��r � ::,�� ;' ri �� °�" .`;` � �z. °� �� �- y� � � �:�, ,' `� - R?' � �° � ' w� �':����� n k��` ';# ���� b �,�: r:w ,`:x � _,; a ��° ;",,_ �- ,y,- �j3�°. �^ ^s'� � K ,�3��-- ,�` .� «,,� � � � �y5sr. !� � r, �a< �,z'"�T�` � � "a . { ' ��:� 'k �� "'' �� ��� ♦ �,� �'���.,: �-" " h � �� : ��- r �.., �- . .+. , :,, n . . ,.. �X ti t : �,,�� +' s'� � ti ? ^�r^�'�" : r�r,� ftY �� �a,��`� ��`��,'� ti ,a,y � �� ��`�� � �`�Y��4 *#R ,#„�.. 't' x � k; � � ;� �� ' '"+� w ,,. . ,� •r�, � .,�=° �� �. ���;.. � :1�� +„'��. :'i , ... .�,...�..,.. , i ., ,� .„ • �� .„ . .:n�..,_ ..... � �, . .,.., v4. � l,':" . � `w �.. � - .. . �.:':: I'� ` ' ' .,.'t".. .,n ...:� � � _...y..+.+'e -�..'Ct, a. ,-` w � '' '.. "� ........ - �^�.. .. . . .� .v � .. ,.. 93 -- - � �ry . � _ - ' � � - .. ,.. ' - _ :?, T � � '.�`vr �. � . .. � '..ts i . „ . �;.. y�,%`�s � . . . , . '"�. .�'`Myr'' ..� 2 ,� t�Rt . ,, .., � ,� � r �; � � �� � " , ah a ;:s "� � .' w,,�� '�.� s.��v� � ... �d �s.t R.; r � R. � yr"' � �- ... ' ri:w . � - . t :a�, JiF�..` ,� . '- . •, �n �.I��� , � �X,,<���5, � >K�°.� r�* r�yT^� { �.. _.ft , `,R ^k. -'e+'F.� n<n::r xa .y:.f"� Sp �,� ��w� � .:��' � ;-�a4 ��t'"T ,� s �"p"' q:� �v, «."� ... ,�::�,�„ �� s�. ,dk �&. � �,y.a.`�..,. � .4 * : ' :"' t � � r l .'ar��-p,� � r� �'�_;y". ' w T�.F . '%. , y y, x,:� go,+ir _ :�&a� �^."� %� , ,<M '. � � � � � 8' .:��y .�Y"+ ' � , i�'.. � ��`.29 ,`�¢ ,}.+k."� a '��,� ' a� a '�' r �► N � '1t� $' "�Y� � ""!k€;, #e'�.��,,��x � ,�o .�� �,-. !:'" �. '�� ✓.iG' n�� .,d'`�a � 'k`�'�„�'�1� � 4i .�"n .� ��'�y ��.,�, � ��. . . '.' � '��-`° :� V i h � ^�"��' �.u'� y��t d'9�, +�'.�C+",�,�c�.f.�»���, ^n�a �g�� u�. er �,w�^""":v`ps .-; �k� ''1� �s �'*•'' �..x"` a x� _ r 0..{�,- °�, � . � `�+ +diW',_ .tr .: .. ,. . .�,...��.; ��� . �a �° p+ x sa ���*� r ..M, � ', � : �i � ��Y; �. :w r�+rt e r�a.y, " >4�.,,, yr• y .�y' k�, : r�.+.,ti�?! � +dR� C'r-. ,w ♦ � ...Yer�� `, � �'� « �R..- t�+:.r .„e�� ��, a ���r �� ik�r. � �,gc'!'t"$+ � '� � "*`"�<�, .. � � s'- � ,v�* *�+P'+ �` 7« ... � � = ,. �,�^•+�}^'�`.p�s° y a € # �.� .�8'�'".y�, t �„�� �; °�.'°;�...:x, ar`��- ' "� �`.. .: , / /�a�' �"i �' �"^����'�y` �.{ 1 � -b,a�`s i,. q . t.• i'� ,. a• tlr'� .� '� Y �,!",x`y".��':'s.^'�"YKs`�"f o�as>+°'p' r. �'Y .�.'µ�,� ��q��.�s.way���''' k c ba w �,:-� '�'" "y �ra .w �S i". ��,. ,� ' Ys , W Z♦ �Y'l�' �i 'b +t Y � A+ !"' �PI M'�4&' 4R�. _�y } � �., �� ,.. ,.�` "' } x�.2 �.��;��� n "� ... � �1, O�.. '�^ a` ����" .. 'Rv��w„r �'W �� "4�""�t i �s2 �,,..^ k+.?"��' '� ♦� � � ;��� M.' -^ ! y. �y.�I+&, �'��d'*� � -': '4 �q�, s�' ,r '�M+"",�'w � .7 � `� R�1� w �"�M +�', �v 4� ?�' �35^ a � �.. �a '� . ak'° ..�At , . ... �i ...o.�, • '� � a�, S' � r+.., s,x t"� `.' „� �� "s� y�*�;g�N � �',�` Y' � � :; w, V,^* �*��". 4F .�'w�.�.'„ ':�� �. �r��'x �a x+.� t,yr��.i.v , � dF".�r,� � �� ♦ , y,+� � ✓ s '� . ` ` �r �� �..%^ ... t^ �, :#,�t7�w;E�"� y +.R. `�•3�ys�� .� �x�"�n +'*��,'��. ,� � "`s � � �..,,� , �t .«: "4" `� '� '�''",`.�'iA. ��.i�R.,,,, "��*S'aw. ,..� t �.r{ �, x°� +. ^�1 '�**a .,* � w. .. ,� ,y . . a ai��`. � ,.; ♦ �,fi.►' � �"i ea s�.i:- ��r�'�j a 4���ssa&x`'��t "i �";���.'W�.� `° ee��� 3w'f, R� �� ��. '��.#:<.�. � x� y'l'+�' � �t\.0 � „P. ��.. �` .�r � a.w � ' 4,a+ ;�m � '�`'f � °�;"� `� .' ��' �,�"�M'�.�.; ,��'7#�'��-�y,.-� � � '�,,,� d�.�"' `"' ��i:a� �i�:!� �$;`- � yry`���„' � S �s,w ��°,, r.,� �.�• � ..�� >��•'��. "�i.'��,� '� . :�4�, Q�,: � �`„�•�w • . ' r. #, 4 a 1,? ! ,;�,� ,� ' ,o-�` ��s°, �tF�• �`: w'ra�c. �,1F�� ''�� .�' b�3, i��J.. '£�'y�'���k�• • „'.ar`� • t.� u.'�d'f _�(�'�a ���# ..;�e�,"�F �F � "ifyY��. .� ,. �k'aC t nvei��' +�^� ,»s 1n.1r,'E;. s .. °a � t,� i"� � . �y;'� '� I�`.�`+ �. �..�. '�'�!� .y ' , x �n„��x.e1�++?" � �`��� � �, � ��Y,�s��n�':��. �' s� ��'�`G'. ��.��ia�c�'� y� ° �`���` d�:ks� t � ��at�i"�d,yi,4�y„'�r�.�p�.'�a �`�`'-s� ��° �' r ,�4'' ��'�'�''�{,�,���` �" ��` �,�� '�`y � �";y�y ' �rr..�°i' �':ra7' .Y � r��+l��_� p,. �E'>y�,' � ��, � �' 'Y,�r^� ,�',,,t+1'�' ":t�<_ • "�` ,",y�t'°`�; .r�°"�� ,^'�„��: +r. " x i! ,,� ��'��°'�+r �; �, y.�a. °�Y��•w �#- �"� o, �= fi ��. �„�. -,� e s � ►, a�h,�.�� �,:.'g�t, � • � �.wf'� ,c, ;�, , s� . ,`�. a r°' t � � �� •qr� s � �r r ` � � °, ,� °���^p � � � ' � w���N'����f ��„. `.`+�`� «w�s°'�;'.���zr��'' r�-�-"` +� � ,`r� w..�,� #�, Fx� � :p^kd.::,aa �A�i. '.:y��.: w� �.w.r- ��. M���� ����"��.�bk �p� �+C + �