Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutC22300 Cook St. Drainage & Intersection Imprvmnt 505-03CITY OF PALM DESERT PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT STAFF REPORT �.Z REQUEST: Adopt the Mitigated Negative Declaration and Execute the Notice of Determination for the Cook Street Drainage and Intersection Improvement Project (505-03) SUBMITTED BY: Mark Greenwood, P.E., Director of Public Works DATE: June 12, 2008 CONTENTS: Vicinity Map (Exhibit 2) Cook Street/Country Club Intersection (Exhibit 3A) Cook Street/Hovely Lane Intersection (Exhibit 3B) Notice of Determination Mitigated Negative Declaration Recommendation: By Minute Motion, adopt the Mitigated Negative Declaration (MND) and authorize the Director of Public Works to execute and file the Notice of Determination (NOD) with the County Clerk and the Governor's Office of Planning and Research for the Cook Street Drainage and Intersection and Improvement Project (505-03). Discussion: On December 13, 2007, City Council approved an amendment to the contract with Harris & Associates to prepare and process the environmental documentation for drainage and intersection improvements at the Cook Street/Country Club Drive intersection and the Cook Street/Hovley Lane East intersection as identified on attached Exhibit 2, Local Vicinity Map. In summary, this project will include the construction of drainage improvements that will eliminate the cross gutters and drainage issues at these two intersections. The project will also include the reconfiguration and construction of vehicle travel and turn lanes, raised medians, sidewalks, traffic signals and interconnect at these two intersections as depicted on attached Exhibits 3A and 3B. The Cook Street Drainage and Intersection Improvement Project will require the acquisition of six sliver properties. The table below lists the parcels that are affected and the approximate square footage of the acquisitions. Adopt MND and Approval to File NOD for Cook Street Intersection Project Page 2 of 2 June 12, 2008 PROPOSED RIGHT-OF-WAY ACQUISITION ON PRIVATELY OWNED PARCELS Location Northwest corner of Cook Street and Country Club Drive Southwest corner of Cook Street and Country Club Drive Northwest corner of Cook Street and Hovley Lane South side of Hovley Lane East, west of Cook Street Southeast corner of Cook Street and Hovley Lane East North of Hovley Lane East, east side of Cook Street Parcel Number(s) 620-370-011 620-370-012 624-310-003 624-040-034 624-290-001 632-060-033 632-410-035 Total Approximate Area of Take (sf) 590 3,430 6,990 3,495 495 1,930 146 17,076 The total project cost is estimated at $6.1 million, including environmental, design, right- of-way acquisition, and construction. CVAG is committed to funding 50% of the project costs. Due to the time required for the acquisition of the above -listed properties, construction most likely would not begin until summer of 2010. The project will be staged in order for construction to be completed by the fall. BonTerra Consulting, a sub consultant to Harris & Associates, conducted an Initial Study (IS) for the Cook Street Intersection Project pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). The IS and Notice of Availability(NOA)/Notice of Intent (NOI) to adopt a Mitigated Negative Declaration (MND) was distributed to various public agencies and organizations on March 19, 2008 to initiate a 30-day review period. The City received two letters during the review period from Sunline Transit Agency and the Riverside County Flood Control and Water Conservation District with minimal or no comments, respectively. Staff requests City Council adopt the MND and authorize the Director of Public Work t1.) execute and file the NOD with the County Clerk and the Governor's Office of Planr inj and Research for the Cook Street Drainage and Intersection and Improvement Project. Fiscal Impact: None Prepare By: John Garcia,15.E. Engineering Manager Appr Homer Croy ACM for Deve Carlos L. Ort • a City Manager ent Services Depart niy/ nd: Mark Greenvyood, P.E. Director of Public Works Paul Gibson Finance Director CD Local Vicinity Cook Street Drainage and Intersection Improvements Exhibit 2 CM R:\Projects\Harris\J004\Graphics\Imprvmnts_0208\Ex2_LV_021508.pdf Cook Street Improvements at Hovely Lane Cook Street Improvements at Country Club Drive Hovely Country Club CookCookPortolaWhitewater River Whitewater River §¨¦10 44thCookPortolaCountry Club Frank Sinatra El DoradoVarner D:\Projects\Harris\J004\improvements_021408\Ex_LV_021508.mxd2,000 0 2,0001,000 Feet² Improvements at Cook Street and Country Club Drive Cook Street Drainage and Intersection Improvements Exhibit 3A CM R:\Projects\Harris\J004\Graphics\Imprvmnts_0208\Ex3a_imprvmnts_Country_Club_022608.pdfSidewalk Improvement Continues 840' fromCountry Club Dr IntersectionCook StCountry Club Dr Lost River DrDe s e r t F a ll s Dr Cook StPipe Continues 1200' from Cook St Intersection D:\Projects\Harris\J004\improvements_021408\imprvmnts_Country_Club_021508.mxd150 0 15075 Feet² Improvement Areas Drainage Related Improvements Roadway Related Improvements Sidewalk Related Improvements Source: Aerials Express, 2006 Improvements at Cook Street and Hovely Lane Cook Street Drainage and Intersection Improvements Exhibit 3B CM R:\Projects\Harris\J004\Graphics\Imprvmnts_0208\Ex3b_imprvmnts_Hovely_021508.pdfCook StHovley Ln BoardwalkBougainvillea Cir Cook StHovley Ln D:\Projects\Harris\J004\improvements_021408\imprvmnts_Hovley_021508.mxd150 0 15075 Feet² Improvement Areas Drainage Related Improvements Roadway Related Improvements Sidewalk Related Improvements Source: Aerials Express, 2006 NOTICE OF DETERMINATION To: Office of Planning and Research 1400 Tenth Street, Room 121 Sacramento, CA 95814 From: City of Palm Desert 73-510 Fred Waring Drive Palm Desert, CA 92260 (Lead Agency and Applicant) Riverside County Clerk -Recorder 2720 Gateway Drive P.O. Box 751 Riverside, CA 92502-0751 Subject: Filing of Notice of Determination in compliance with Section 21108 or 21152 of the Public Resources Code. COOK STREET DRAINAGE AND INTERSECTION IMPROVEMENTS PROJECT Project Title SCH#: City of Palm Desert/John Garcia (760) 346-0611 STATE CLEARINGHOUSE NUMBER CONTACT PERSON AREA CODEJTELEPHONE/EXTENSION (If submitted to Clearinghouse) Project Location: The project site consists of the intersections of Cook Street at Country Club Drive and Cook Street at Hovley Lane in the City of Palm Desert, Riverside County. Latitude: 33.758036, Longitude: -116.356339 at Country Club Drive/Cook Street and Latitude: 33.747109, Longitude: -116.356262 at Hovely/Cook Street. Project Description: The Cook Street Drainage and Intersection Improvements Project would allow for the construction of drainage improvements; reconfiguration of vehicle travel and turn lanes, raised medians, and sidewalks at the intersection of Cook Street at Country Club Drive and the intersection of Cook Street at Hovley Lane; and installation of signal interconnect (in -road signal traffic sensors) between 42nd Avenue and Frank Sinatra Drive. This is to advise that the project on June 12, 2008 Date above described project: City of Palm Desert has approved the above described 0 Lead Agency 0 Responsible Agency and has made the following determinations regarding the 1. The project (❑ will / ❑O will not) have a significant effect on the environment. 2. ❑ An Environmental Impact Report was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA. O A Negative Declaration was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA. 3. Mitigation measures (I I were / ❑ were not) made a condition of approval of the project. 4. A statement of Overriding Considerations (❑ was / was not) adopted for this project. 5. Findings (LI were / O were not) made pursuant to the provisions of CEQA. This is to certify that the Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration and record of project approval is available to the General Public at: City of Palm Desert City Hall, 73-510 Fred Waring Drive, Palm Desert, California 92260 D to receive{] for filing and posting at OPR: 4 SIGNA (PUBLIC AGENCY) Bo Chen 6/13/08 City Engineer DATE TITLE NOTICE OF DETERMINATION To: Office of Planning and Research From: City of Palm Desert 1400 Tenth Street, Room 121 73-510 Fred Waring Drive Sacramento, CA 95814 Palm Desert, CA 92260 (Lead Agency and Applicant) Riverside County Clerk-Recorder 2720 Gateway Drive P.O. Box 751 Riverside, CA 92502-0751 Subject: Filing of Notice of Determination in compliance with Section 21108 or 21152 of the Public Resources Code. COOK STREET DRAINAGE AND INTERSECTION IMPROVEMENTS PROJECT Project Title SCH#: City of Palm Desert/John Garcia (760) 346-0611 STATE CLEARINGHOUSE NUMBER CONTACT PERSON AREA CODE/TELEPHONE/EXTENSION (If submitted to Clearinghouse) Project Location: The project site consists of the intersections of Cook Street at Country Club Drive and Cook Street at Hovley Lane in the City of Palm Desert, Riverside County. Latitude: 33.758036, Longitude: -116.356339 at Country Club Drive/Cook Street and Latitude: 33.747109, Longitude: -116.356262 at Hovely/Cook Street. Project Description: The Cook Street Drainage and Intersection Improvements Project would allow for the construction of drainage improvements; reconfiguration of vehicle travel and turn lanes, raised medians, and sidewalks at the intersection of Cook Street at Country Club Drive and the intersection of Cook Street at Hovley Lane; and installation of signal interconnect (in-road signal traffic sensors) between 42nd Avenue and Frank Sinatra Drive. This is to advise that the City of Palm Desert has approved the above described 4 Lead Agency … Responsible Agency project on June 12, 2008 and has made the following determinations regarding the Date above described project: 1. The project (… will / 4 will not) have a significant effect on the environment. 2. … An Environmental Impact Report was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA. 4 A Negative Declaration was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA. 3. Mitigation measures (4 were / … were not) made a condition of approval of the project. 4. A statement of Overriding Considerations (… was / 4 was not) adopted for this project. 5. Findings (… were / 4 were not) made pursuant to the provisions of CEQA. This is to certify that the Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration and record of project approval is available to the General Public at: City of Palm Desert City Hall, 73-510 Fred Waring Drive, Palm Desert, California 92260 Date received for filing and posting at OPR: SIGNATURE (PUBLIC AGENCY) DATE TITLE �`� ��1 ��r �. i a � � s _, r,.: � � � ��������� ����. �' ��� ��������� F�� T`HE ���I� �TI��T DR�I��.�� ,�1L� I �TE����`���� - I�Vt.PRC����hE�T� I�R�J��T P�LAh �DE��R�', ��,L�FC�RNIA Prepared for LCturi�Aylaipn City of Fafm bese� Palm Deserf C'suic C�r?ter 73-51� �red �'aring �rive Palr� �es�rt, Ca[ifor�iq 9?250 Prepcared by �am 5t�ewart, Projec#I�a��tagerJEnvironmentql Servaces BorTerra Cons�ltir�� 151 Kal�us prive,$ui#e E-20Q �osta Mesa,Cakifornia 92625 T: [7 i 4) 444-9199 F: (714] 444-959'9 wwvd.BonTerraConsulfiir�g.corn fvlc�y 22,2d08 � �" .. _ � � � suErir�r � � NiEMORANDUM May 21, 2008 To: City of Palm Desert From: Sam Stewart Subject: Cook Street Drainage and Intersection Improvements — Responses to Comments received on the Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration The City of Palm Desert conducted an Initial Study (IS) for the Cook Street Drainage and Intersection Improvements Project pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act(CEQA), as amended (Public Resources Code, §21000 et seq.), and in accordance with the State CEQA Guidelines (California Code of Regulations, Title 14, §15000 et seq.). In summary, the proposed project involves the reconfiguration of vehicle travel and turn lanes, raised medians and sidewalks, and the construction of drainage improvements at the intersection of Cook Street at Country Club Drive and the intersection of Cook Street at Hovley Lane, and construction of signal interconnect between 42nd Avenue and Frank Sinatra Drive. Pursuant to Public Resources Code, Section 21080(c)(2), the City of Palm Desert determined that a Mitigated Negative Declaration (MND) was the appropriate environmental document for the project. Public Resources Code, Section 21091(f) and the CEQA Guidelines Section 15074 require that the lead agency must consider the MND and comments received before approving the project. Specifically, Section 15074(b) states: Prior to approving a project, the decisionmaking body of the lead agency shall consider the proposed negative declaration or mitigated negative declaration together with any comments received during the public review process. The decisionmaking body shall adopt the proposed negative declaration or mitigated negative declaration only if it finds on the basis of the whole record before it (including the initial study and any comments received), that there is no substantial evidence that the project would have a significant effect on the environment and that the negative declaration or mitigated negative declaration reflects the lead agency's independentjudgment and analysis. The Cook Street Drainage and Intersection Improvements IS and Notice of Availability (NOA)/Notice of Intent (NOI) to Adopt an MND was distributed to various public agencies and organizations on March 19, 2008. The review period ended on April 18, 2008, and the City of Palm Desert received com ments for a period of 30 days. The City of Palm Desert received two comment Ietters during the public review period. The first letter received on April 1, 2008, from Sunline 90 Transit Agency acknowledges that they received and reviewed the IS/MND. The letter also stated that SunLine is not requesting inclusion of transit amenities and bus shelter as part of the proposed development. SunLine stated that in the event that the proposed development should impact the bus stop and/or service provided by SunLine, the City/developer would be required to contact SunLine 15 days prior to beginning of construction. The City received the second letter on April 11, 2008, from Riverside County Flood Control and Water Conservation District. This letter also acknowledges that the Riverside County Flood Control and Water Conservation District received and reviewed the IS/MND and has no comments. 151 Kalmus Drive,Suite E-200 Costa Mesa,CA 92626(714)444-9199(714J 444-9599 Fax R:1Pmjecls\HamsW004\RTC Memo-052108.doc Cook Street Drainage and Intersection lmprovements ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORM SECTION 1 — INTRODUCTION 1. Project Title: Cook Street Drain�ge and Intersection Improvements 2. Lead Agency Name and Address: City of Palm Desert 73-510 Fred Waring Drive Palm Desert, CA 92260 3. Contact Person and Phone Number: Planning Department (760) 346-0611 ext. 483 4. Project Location: The project site consists of the intersections of Cook Street at Country Club Drive and Cook Street at Hovley Lane in the City of Palm Desert, Riverside County. The project site is located on the U.S. Geological Survey's (USGS) Myoma and La Quinta 7.5-minute California Quadrangles at Township 5 South and Range 6 East. Cook Street forms the boundary between Sections 4, 9, and 16 to the west; and Sections 3, 10, and 15 to the east, on the above-mentioned quadrangles. The project site is presented in a regional and local context in Exhibits 1 and 2, respectively. An aerial photograph depicting the project site and identifying construction areas is provided in Exhibits 3A and 3B. 5. Project Sponsor's Name and Address: City of Palm Desert 73-510 Fred Waring Drive Palm Desert, CA 92260 6. General Plan Designation: N/A 7. Zoning: N/A 8. Description of Project: The Cook Street Drainage and Intersection Improvements Project (hereafter referred to as "the proposed projecY') would allow for the reconfiguration of vehicle travel and turn lanes, raised medians and sidewalks, and the construction of drainage improvements at the intersection of Cook Street at Country Club Drive and the intersection of Cook Street at Hovley Lane, and construction of signal interconnect between 42nd Avenue and Frank Sinatra Drive. The conceptual design of the drainage and intersection improvements is provided in Exhibits 4A and 4B. Cook Street is a four-lane arterial within the City of Palm Desert. Country Club Drive is designated as an arterial and Hovely Lane is designated as a thoroughfare in the Palm Desert General Plan. Cook Street, Country Club Drive, and Hovely Lane are all currently striped for two lanes in each direction with raised, landscaped medians and sidewalks. Cook Street also has Class II bike lanes (i.e., striped on-road lane) in both directions of travel. The improvements on Country Club Drive include installation of an 18-inch storm drain pipe, a catch basin on the northwestern corner, and two catch basins on the northeastern corner of the Cook Street intersection. The storm drain pipe would drain from these catch basins to a proposed catch basin and existing 18-inch storm drain pipe at Desert Willow Drive approximately 1,200 feet to the west. Storm water flows would be conveyed via the existing 18-inch storm drain pipe to an existing detention basin on the Marriott Golf Course immediately to the south. The proposed 18-inch storm drain pipe would be installed in the roadway contiguous to the south of the northern side curb and gutter on Country Club Drive. R1Pro�eds\Hartis\J004115-030508.doc t DraR lnitial Study WORKING DR4FT—NOT FOR PUBLIC DISTRIBUTIOtJ � p u '� � �, � �., 2 x �� �.y � � �+ � � {.. ��( ,t� � � S � _ `Y 3 .F`t � �r�iy w u L rwrzq .�`Y I}I � E r t "�� � c *4 �`�'' 'S JP ) t=' E �, J `� t� K .� . � $.a U' •.� Y.3`�k ".s a , � 6 YeF„y�; : E , ; � y°`, . � 3 4 ¢ f �� � � ��� �.Z ° , 3� S p � � E 3 n r v � o- s /� F d 4v ' k jj 4 : v: I} ° � �I in � v; �5�?� e w �� � „t, � .y '� �" � .�'i � " ' I, , ° � m �, � � �: , � � � �� � t� � � �. f��� � ,�� f a, � , � � a � �� � o C g � ' � '� `� t . � ' - , �:� � � �.� •0 1° . t � ,a � ` '' p`_ o ��5.',� �a'� P s= r ..>� 5 J �; ' s � } �� 3 h) 5 F Y € k�+e �� �� �� � ! a q �.� �� �x� �<: £? �`•% f ,3^ f R � IIN � t OyF . m"v '3. '§ ^ T� 2 C � i s,l y � " f � t a=g s �. � L 4 � ` �, �`� `c. ��. E � � ' � , � � Y v � s ''? � .. � ' r € ] $ F E '} M1 £; d" (a���z" �"Y `�`'� yi ` . �;y ,$.`,,, � 4 . 'z.. �.t}" �� `i p . 3 i{}� fv � . 91 + ��t � . ' 4 : �� x'ti� `�i f � S f� � �'�'Z.��g�'�.�"'�"#'e =a^^r;;. �.' �'"'r° � � �f x-.Y ��,y� �., , �4 � '", �r � <` `v.` � :, z � : (I'.e � <. � �x 3 e - ..�. � � {5�� � / � .d�'V�-n � �� E � `"fih 'vi i �3 N ,„+=�� �� � � 1 � } : � p � m. e �� , li•����g P � + � �' "'�'vs � x � ' O 1 (� ' � L X�.' �. F 4 t� � �� 1 S i � s,'_ f U o � � l i.� �� � +, ; -,� � .q 7.. p s ,p. � O • � � � ''�c+ � x - c � `�.� �. a ' � � 0 m �2''a,,i � ' i ? � ,` �t s �i-i � N � n is t (� 9 �., .;,, , �, U m „ � � �` � � �� �� E - � � p o �'' � °. �a � �o � �. - F' . tL$ � C N � A �E � �_,`�� f'"----.: p � ; �; � � ��� � r� 4 � dl Y :�« �,�'` � It � /, T � �� � U 3 V- �.��.,.4,�: : h �� .°t .. f.%.s' . . , x . . ....,. , pxwBD5lL0 lti*3�BObKO fluawanwdwppp0l�sweryp�oalw�:Q ' j -,�a'n . i -; � / ���'`�, E_ � : � ' � , 3� + � ( � � $ � . ( I � � � ' ., � � t �� � � - FmnkSina[m „� . , ,. � � ,......,�.._s�'^_^�..._._.�.>....,,e�^':�._.,.e,..,�,�..:... .......W..w,......:..._......,:,r...:...�^^ns ��:,:._ ..,.�_.. � �. � .._+` '"_"_,�` � � � �,��� i . � � �( �� , . ( _ a_ . � � , ,, , � �_� � , �, _�� � � E � �_.�._ � , , �t o�� � � . , _., --_ __ , � � � �. � Ar � , - - � � � � (��, �_�. � � } ;_ ' '� � � , � i � � � t � � , � ,_ w�I 1 ���. , ! � � � � �o� r �� � ` � � � � �..1 � s r = - �, . % �, a � � �� _ � �( _� �,. 1_ �,� � � f , � t- ; ,,, � � �;� , ':,� s � � � r � '� � ; k � � i � � � ��� ��� � ; � I � /� i �'?�_-_, � � € Cook Street ImprovemeMs � �� . � ` �'� �i � i � i f at Country Club Drive - � ` � ( �� � � �` � ., r . � ir t � � F S� � � �. . � . � � � 1� , �. r � ( � r 1 �. � ; r � I � � ; � ��� � r � � � ` � � � 1_, G :" Coun[ryClub � L Coun[ryClub y� j ,,..:� _v✓.'-�;,r...�.._ a'..w.�,.: � c.».._.:'-.,... ^ _.-'..v.>-.�rs- ...urc.^s�.- s�,,, ..> ..1.�., n.�e�.. a ,�,w.F,_. ....,,.,,, � �..,..�,..� � i �� . �. . � , . i �,. - � , s _ . -- i � � .. � 'y � k F � � , � q �r / � ,� � i `. o� . ` r E . .� .. `�. i`� ` [ t � a4� i � " �: ! Ft.. . i � � _ .J F � � � I : �_. i � ��`. 4` m�� �". � 7 � . S � ' I �` 7: o f i i ( � •�� :� i � . IU�{ Y � �� -'l � r '��, r , . . m= . � �. i �, , �� a . f . . i _ _ ..� ,t, � -� ` �; � � i � ;� . �^ _ �_.� . _ � � ��. �� . / ��,� � � _. _ 'l -, � �. �,-. � ;� � �" � � r ( � --� � t � ! � '��� � , � � ; , , i � �, � � I � ,,�`� �' __ � ( ` I t . � � s _,_ HovelY � � f� ). /� `. i � i I 1 � '�� , ._. � ,.. . _�_ < . . .. , 1 � � z � i - , i ^.. *,i r I - i � � �� ''.�' �. . _ ., �_ / ° � t � ' ��. , r i ` � �� . � . i � Cook Street Im rovements ' � � � � �`� -�-' . . P , � ...... , ._ _.. � ,,, � ,� i _ , . � . at Hovely Lane � � � i � r � % s !. � � i , A , i � ;.� . . i ' � _ , � ;� �� f �t % � � ; , . : � � � � �� ` ` ` i � ��� _ i. ` i � ; ;'� � � . , ,,. , ; � - � oA s ' < 1 I � � � u� I . ... , . _.__.. : . . . . .- . . � . . ..._ . . r � ' „ _f: � � � yt � � , � :_ :� _ . i � � �`hiFy�, 1� ` ! G.� . � . �c � ater,?.�;er'= — . � � . .� � -s i t . � .� � v { � - � _ '`� +, � � � i � � , � � �. � � � , a '. �� ',�� � � � . � ' � � zr � � i � � , � � � �� �� r � � a , E r £� 1 4 . .. I w 35.. aFlh . v.� w ,.�, �w,. �.m_, �w .,..�� .,.�,. ,__ _w �..� ._ _ �, _ � . .�.,..�:�:--; s i. ;� � � , �— _ �. �: _ _ � _ , Local Vicinity Exhibit 2 Cook Street Drainage and Intersection Improvements w�N y� �' E ZA�a ��0�0 � 2,��� /��r��/ �I v s Feet CONSU Li1NG cm zw�ya�w�m.uaoa�c�Pn¢svm�nm��azae�.z�v osisoe.par � q.,� � � � � � �� � � �z y"d£�`�a.�e oa` �:. ��, � 7�'{ x k• �.. f '�y�v � . u'�.z�yJ�}'�y Y` � : � J��g� �"' ,3�w Q� fl��� �� � � ` �{ � � �'�f��;�'e"�.. "'o�w,vg,,�A��s�+�ej � � 4" i.��+.'� :�. ve1 .. '�.bi-K y�� � S N"i',..,? � ��� ��� rri �-� � � ♦ mk� � �•d f ��" ,' � s. �A aF�.- � i �� ,F` ✓�.n��3� ����,�,-,�; . � v �3 X � �� �� �� � �����.���- �3� ��`- ywi"y� F .,w �. � '���, � �y.`4 x t � : 4� �,�x���� �� ��3 �`� � � ^ � W �s� � ���- S ..f � � �£ '�ry�„. 3€ � ,Jl 'T ` 4�}v. ¢� .f�.:� � �b � $ . � R'e ^'<XL'S�£r4Y .r � * i � `� ��� � �"� " � 2�L 2 � �` � . -v� �d^S , S '�.. ��rmr s� m �yF ���� � � 33��T l � .1 .i-?'<'"'^„ry � o���� �y� � :.. < � � B � �` m�" � .. � €s 4� �'``� �[ S� ��� , � � ��; ; 3 � m ,..yIU gy A.� : . �3``� `�� c 'y�`��jp &'�- �2 ' � ` � E t I F r 4 � -�v. � . � Y f ��� � � : }.�* . ���F. .i � � . } {�.' .a!yG f � `�� s � .c�;� �, � � � � � �P � 11 a . ` r • � �� .. e 4 '§�' �"^� M` G �;.� „L.vf ..� . ,. .. .�..: a, .... . �.0 �. ._ � � .. .;� -,. �,�€'�59�`_ �, :. � ..... � , • � 2 �= :, � v. . .. . ' � '.z ., '�' .,. ... r . .. �,� �t,.�,„ ��a'i' ^.-.m`�' �<-. . ,' v , ^. �i � .�^ , h � .. +' 3 ;' _u ` a ;v ,..... .:. . K s F � �� �=i Y 4�� � � f � �F? � F' L G„�., �-. ��t�, � �. , � ,e � � . ,�� � � , s� ' . „ � . � ��,�: r. fi � r � .��.;.�. — -` �.� � . � 3 �. � � � �I g� �? � ��� �:� ��.. ? F ti � �" ^,?``� � � '����'} ��������� � �' ��'`�; Z �� { £������ ��� kj ����. £_ �� � ��k� ��,. o �. .. f1-y?.� � �` � � _� ,�� . m 4 � � � ✓, �.. t o + y v # � ��?����..v�s��' .��� '�.�.' .<`�,�� �- - ^� . < ti$ � ` y � �.cF r���# . g Improvement Areas � � Drainage Related Improvements ,;, ��`-� � y � � ` Y e �� Roadway Related Improvements ���, _ < �� '.�, `f. � � Sidewalk Related Improvements � � p�� � �'n�".w,,;�.�;`s� y . ,� g,°� ., Source:Aerials Express,2006 Improvements at Cook Street and Country Club Drive Exhibit 3A Cook Street Drainage and Intersection Improvements N '"{°�E iso �s o iso .�nT—uP'�a1 � Feet c o N s u t r�H c cn�aw��«ssuwmavoo<�c�on�=s�m���oxoe�..aa�mavm��coun�cwe ousoe.ua � ,�� - e� �� � .�. �� » � � �: `a � t� ' ,.t=%` g � :�` c-'��`�u., `�'x3 " � `� �.`'�.,."��S $ , �'fi��a.^'�'.-rz. T z"� �',- � �^ � *- ��'� � ;, � � :'�€���� ��� F ��- ,' za. �� :,`6 #` - t � ��� ',�s "� '�{ �"ti Y 1 ��� Y�� � � ��� �F % �:.,� ,'3'e t- � # .�i.� k" ' m��wu.� � � � ��;.' � ���e�✓� „ e e�`� '�"�,- � �- , �. t°.l � '�;� p..���„d<,. 3"..�r.YG � �, #� ✓ �b.. € t�.;' e. Y' ;.T�. rv�-� .� .'«.'�'�` p a 3�` �: �. "�" t � '�` g;�:� �� � ,rs �' `" ' � A" } "2�` � ' .F ��n,. �:��" `�'.-�� ,�' ��`��`� ���x �{� t��' ��� � � t��� .. v . -=; .�s �' � ; � � . y �. c „ � s ." �� �$ r�j �,"�� �rN �_`�� � < � �, `"a`Y�' .. Y �� J�g�'��'� ` . �� 6 ce� S� "r'�"'a � 1 } €'/F' t� r=k�,G= � `?`� �,C. Y� �, `%NY v" �l',d.�?:4'' �[� s • � K�°��'1 . t ✓�Y A f •� .:�.� � s� �����,.� �`� �.. � F � i . ��.. �.� �. . `�` �� �Yt �y � '. �� ' �3� � �..�� "Y.. . " � ^: "'g'a"'s�- �r.:+z+�'`..�' .s � `�' � �;s l F � � ��,, "� �`� �.� � �� � � � g � d � n^ � .a,....� ..,�.� �� � i �C. ..%- .:.,. , � ,� � , ' :F x . N `� �sa ...� .�. � � � � � � � . r f.� p .Y �v la��+r, �°u` � � � � ���� � � , a x� '9 � �` .,. � `` �5��3 '<` , ,... , .. -�, . � vN ,� �, ..n�..:.�. „_. .,,� . . � . . . .<.. x m-„>z ° '-. r . . ' .;r- � ..�.,..�.� � �. �, �.��.�. . � . .... :. ., ,.. ,.. .._, � . .... ... __�,.� ,. � . . . �.. „ . v . - " . _ . � .,�: � .�. , ... . . .- r a ,. i;..,t'; �' �` ,�, ' a� �e s� � � �. r � �� a { y��n 3 �a y € '+n� u 9 . �-,.E � � G �� g � �-�"�`�'.d��jxa-�rx� . � E - � y q � k .. �:` z � � 'j '� �� � 5. " ....�... ,....,... � . . '§�,�- � � ��� . ;� � ; , � � c af r � � 1 . ��} .m' : Y�Y,#�.#k-�s� � � � � c. � 4 5 a ' ^ � h �� � � � r _ � , :."�� . �- a, , � �s.. . � � _� �� ��� � _. � ; r � � �`�"r� r z € � ., `�. „ � �� � � � � � �, , � � �.M e' b � ,� 'F� �`&r�' � � ` , � � $"A'=f � i �� � � �� "'k F" �' � g � �.���-�; � ImprovementAreas �. �'� ,� � " �-;.: �?...�-�� � � Drainage Related Improvements � E , "�� � :�..�. _` ,, . � : � - : �. � � Roadway Related Improvements � 3 „ � � .,� ., } .� s .;r � � Sidewalk Related Improvements �; �. „ �,,.� B - .. , Y. � , o- �; ' �. ..; �x o . , � ��% Source:Aerials�press,2006 Improvements at Cook Street and Hovely Lane Exhibit 3B Cook Street Drainage and Intersection Improvements N w�` 150 75 0 150 �V��T� s Feet c o H s u i r� ry c CMR\PmjoclSWomiVOWlG�apM1l¢1lmqvmn�s_0300�F 3b impvmnla_Hovoly 031508ptl1 �:� � $_� � � ����� S � � w ° ��� :�;�� � . u�' B � H t5 f � �� ��, o � �� � , .� � :rt�,c�'��`; � i `� � SE �'�— t i —m � ��, p�"$t : �` ... Y �y _y J V -r� #Y '1 I 5'� � � ( w, � � F- I Jm'�� I '�i �� 6 I � 1 � �-- !R� � � ., � ,I O v 11R. r , _, � wrssi ru xc ia s ns 3xn xssm I �. �.�. b�x � RiV r li� I � m � � �����{ � � � � �w � � s ; ;�; °� ,°�� , ts � s;�! � �"� � ' �� � , � a�w�� � ( �oj i� i� �' � ' I i e�s I � '��� �£ . � �' � --i � � .� � I t E� � {Ci . 4" � �-.,, � ��, � , � —�=�� I i>' p � � ! . I �... � F � I � li 1 1 -� � �f1 � Oc-m-1j I�' � I�W� i ( �� � I I � i��:. � ��• � � �; � ' � , !�, I : I ' 'I�� 1 �..�d /�,.r .�L. 'i } Y I��� ( � y�- . 0m�'�I ; �j � I �6 � =�.7 '��� � I'. � ��$ ` �� E � ...���� � i � � I ���,,�5 I � i � I e i` � !�� i., K.Tf �.. Fe "� ' i s r , a�yl � �,� � � , `i � �� � ��. @8ps i � ' �� � � 5���"8 i I � i i ... i I � �A i ... � � i h�� � � . �: �� � ' � � It�, � r i I (, O,�r* I i 1jf '��, I `� I I f 0. ' . � �, I �, i , � � , .� ,� � � � a �.:4�; > .,, � ` ..i o I ' , �� ��� � � , � I I � �i i � � � � > � i �,, � � , �j� ; � x � � � � „ � l P�p� 1��. I � G� U ! I �� (���� , � a�r ' ��� � � m„T�vi , u � �, 3s 3. H�.m o , � � °�� ' � rt���° ; � � i b � � et� � � �au�se S 2 w _L � P 4 �kd N ¢ ; _ � v E I a� • o o � :: �, I wrt W � N a E � 9Yt343-F r� /.•'Y3A� � 0 O h u� � � a�� y� � ° V � � � i sl,i t, _ E � � g : d o ¢ �..v Ip� j Y m � ,,� � �.� .V: I, � i,''�, ( '� w � "� - £ o °° o _ > m e o � � h o � E � U �veaima�� ,�macv�.3;..w�.,o�wwn�uuv.:Nai.u.a m ��L � � � �j s `n 9 �$'s � x u� x' w y•I � � � �— . F � �E� ��� � i'� rezi vss oc�3xs�s'3xn x�ivw � f 4t�i {�' I 1 � � d�I � i i i � ❑ ....�� � �I� �� rt i i � ''I I �n � � .r ' � � I 6 � �,_�� � '�1 � '� ��� I „ s � I � � � i�.'� �ii � i� �'---i j�,J�,� �� , �i L� � �i i Q i�'� .�..ar� �y � ^ S:�£ ❑ � � i � i o� i T;I i �,� I� �W ���� . i i �r � ;.� ` II '`"��b.O+ i �, i , i m .`i�� I fl I I 114�M..—.u�j � � I�.� pi` � M _� i--�� �� J F ��y f@!IyI . yf yy� y�w 11i ,� >T OW ��y <w—L� �ry uW 0— ' um Op. �I �� � i��_��k�� � o� �� r r� �w_� �W ' ��� i ��� ` 1 „�",I .�:: �� i r I x � � �` i i�� � � � � � �-. � O I I � �� � 9 ��. � �' ���I i F- ji IY".",, � � �n. . �� �� � �� ' (� , i � �'_. � p� I II I �i m � I I �� � �� 1 �I�� - �� ��� � i � 7� �'1 � d �� � ��w, ; �� ho � ,� , I'o,,i-- ��..,,i' ��, � o i � III=� i'� ""�j l �°I � I� g ����!I II ,'�`� v�: � ��=� i i i'� I � ., � �si�ms inaie y,oer 33s 3xn x�ivry � � G J 3Ntll Al3�OH 8 T Q a �y$a�i�� J I U I ��9 � �F �� �e p m a g I Is�l!���� ij g i�.� 5� �a = � ILI; i � n 'pt 1 � n� `_ � E -�;r- .�i�. ,.-. � - 32 b .. I � �.,�.'.�""_r }--� _ _ c +e.�' �. �V�. �d �„ t �- '_ 4 I— - v � = — � i i � � " ._ m i�a�.s �`��-_ L�K _ f nQoo o � o a=•�s- �� e lj�' .e v , t,.j�. _ O c E �'��' f ���. r z ^," � f, —' II � i - -, u � � / � i���' a �/ II I§ �o � � aas��„��4��e u 3ii 'ah:� �' I' N a 6 � �'-n ��"�yi' ��I� n �IIp�n. §;ig � @ � i a� m I� I ..,y�:� .s� � ,,.il�!� m o � �^ 'Q` � ^3NY'1 Al3�OH ; d E (J tU C O � S � 0 y � � U :areizo nwy avJ riR^['w^�a�vca"n�m��mac,�x.a � Cook Street Drainage and Intersection Improvements At the intersection of Cook Street and Country Club Drive, Cook Street is proposed to be widened by approximately 12 feet at its widest point primarily on the southwestern and northwestern legs of the intersection. The intersection improvements include the widening of Cook Street from approximately 460 feet north of the intersection to 900 feet south of the intersection. The raised median on Cook Street would be reconfigured to allow for two 10-foot-wide dedicated left-turn lanes onto Country Club Drive in both directions of travel. A 13-foot-wide dedicated right-turn lane on the northwestern leg of the intersection would be provided. The sidewalk on the western side of Cook Street would be widened from 10 to 12 feet from the intersection with Country Club Drive to approximately 840 feet to the south. Implementation of the proposed project requires the acquisition of property on the northern and southern sides of the intersection of Cook Street at Country Club Drive. A list of parcels that would be impacted and the approximate square footage of the acquisition on each parcel is provided in Table 1. Exhibits detailing the areas of acquisition are provided in Appendix A. TABLE 1 PROPOSED RIGHT-OF-WAY ACQUISITION ON PRIVATELY OWNED PARCELS _ Parcel Approximate Area Locafion Number(s) ofTake,(s� Northwest corner of Cook Street and Country Club Drive 620-370-011 590 620-370-012 3,430 Southwest corner of Cook Street and Country Club Drive 624310-003 6,990 Northwest corner of Cook Street and Hovley Lane 624-040-034 3,495 South side of Hovley Lane west of Cook Street 624-290-001 495 Southeast corner of Cook Street and Hovley Lane 632-060-033 1,930 North of Hovley Lane, east side of Cook Street 632-410-035 146 � Total 17,076 Source: Harris&Associates At the intersection of Cook Street and Hovley Lane, Cook Street would be widened by approximately 12 feet at its widest point on the northwestern and southeastern legs of the intersection and would extend past the intersection for approximately 335 feet to the north and 230 feet to the south. The southeastern leg of the intersection would be widened to allow for a 14-foot-wide right-turn lane, and a 4-foot-high retaining wall would be constructed at this corner to support the existing above-grade landscaping associated with the commercial land uses to the southeast. On Cook Street the intersection's existing raised median would be reconfigured to allow for two 10-foot-wide dedicated left-turn lanes in both directions of travel, and a 13-foot-wide dedicated right-turn lane would be provided on the northwestern corner of the intersection. The sidewalk on the western side of Cook Street would be widened from 10-to 12-feet. Proposed improvements would require the acquisition of property on the northwestern and southwestern sides of the intersection of Cook Street at Hovley Lane (Table 1). The proposed project also requires the installation of three 18-inch storm drain pipes that would collect storm water from proposed catch basins located on the northwestern and northeastern corners of the intersection and convey flows to a 36-inch storm drain pipe that would be installed in the center of Cook Street from the northern side of the intersection to approximately 280 feet south where it would connect with an existing storm drain pipe that would convey flows to the Whitewater River Channel. R1Pro�ects\HartisW004115-030508.tlac 2 braft Initial Study WORKING DRAFT—NOT FOR PUBLIC DISTRIBUTION Cook Street Drainage and Intersection Improvements On Hovley Lane, improvements include the widening of the southern side of the roadway by approximately 6 feet and widening of the northern side by approximately 6 feet from the intersection to approximately 500 feet to the west, and reconfiguration of the raised median from the intersection to approximately 450 feet west and 300 feet east of the intersection to allow for two 11-foot-wide left-turn lanes in both directions of travel. Additional project features include the installation of new traffic signals, signal trigger interconnect (in-road signal traffic sensors) from 42nd Avenue to Frank Sinatra Drive, and roadway pavement rehabilitation and/or replacement. The storm water drainage improvements would allow for the existing cross gutters (dips) at these intersections to be eliminated. Dip removal would reduce the potential for vehicle "bottoming", thereby improving traffic movement through the intersections, and enhancing tra�c safety. Raised medians of adequate width would be vegetated with drought-tolerant landscaping that is consistent with existing landscaped vegetation on Cook Street. To the extent feasible, the proposed lane reconfiguration would occur within the existing curb-to-curb roadway. Project construction is expected to begin approximately in May 2008 and completed by November 2008. To _prevent traffic delays during project construction, improvements at Country Club Drive would be completed in 5 stages and improvements at Hovley Lane would be completed in 6 stages. 9. Surrounding Land Uses and Setting: As previously noted, Cook Street is a four-lane arterial in the city. Country Club Drive is designated as an arterial and Hovely Lane is designated as a thoroughfare in the Palm Desert General Plan. Cook Street is striped for two lanes in each direction with Class ii bike lanes (i.e., striped on-road lane) and raised, landscaped medians and sidewalks. Surrounding land uses include single-family residential, general commercial, light industrial, and professional office. At the intersection of Cook Street at Country Club Drive, there is single-family residential development to the northeast, commercial and professional office uses (including retail strip commercial and private business offices) to the southeast and northwest, and the Marriott Desert Springs Golf Course) to the southwest. Light industrial and private business offices are concentrated on both sides of Cook Street at the intersection with Hovley Lane. 10. Other public agencies whose approval is required (e.g., permits, financing approval, or participation agreement): None R9ProjeclslHarns\J004115-030508.doc 3 D�afr lnitial Study WORKING DRAFT—NOT FOR PUBLIC DISTRIBUTION Cook Street Drainage and Intersection Improvements SECTION 2—ENVIRONMENTAL FACTORS POTENTIALLY AFFECTED The environmental factors checked below would be potentially affected by this project, involving at least one impact that is a "Potentially Significant ImpacY' as indicated by the checklist on the following pages. " � Aesthetics � Agricultural Resources � Air Quality Biological Resources Cultural Resources � Geology/Soils � Hazards& Hazardous � Hydrology/Water Quality � Land Use/Planning Materials � Mineral Resources � Noise � Population/Housing � Public Services � Recreation � Transportation/Traffic � Utilities/Service Systems � Mandatory Findings of Significance SECTION 3—DETERMINATION_(To be completed by the Lead Agency.) On the basis of this initial evaluation: � i find that the proposed project COULD NOT have a significant effect on the environment, and a NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, there will not be a significant effect in this case because revisions in the project have been made by or agreed to be the project proponent. A MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. � I find that the proposed project MAY have a significant effect on the environment, and an ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required. � I find that the proposed project MAY have a "potentially significant impacY' or"potentially signi6cant unless mitigated" impact on the environment, but at least one effect 1) has been adequately analyzed in an earlier document pursuant to applicable legal standards, and 2) has been addressed by mitigation measures based on the earlier analysis as described on attached sheets. An ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required, but it must analyze only the effects that remain to be addressed. � i find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, because all potentially significant effects (a) have been analyzed adequately in an earlier EIR or NEGATIVE DECLARATION pursuant to the applicable standards, and (b) have been avoided or mitigated pursuant to that earlier EIR or NEGATIVE DECLARATION, including revisions or mitigation measures that are imposed upon the proposed project, nothing further is required. Date Signature For R9Pmfects\Hams1J004V5-030508.tloc 4 Draft Initial Study WORKING DR4FT—NOT FOR PUBLIC DISTRIBUTION Cook Street Drainage and lntersection Improvements SECTION 4— ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORM This section includes the completed environmental checklist form. The checklist form is used to assist in evaluating the potential environmental impacts of the proposed project. The checklist form identifies potential project 'effects as follows: (1) Potentially Significant Impact; (2) Potentially Significant Unless Mitigation lncorporated; (3) Less Than Significant Impact; and (4) No Impact. The findings of impact identified in the checklist form are analyzed in detail in Section 5— Environmental Evaluation. The analysis should meet the following requirements. 1) A brief explanation is required for all answers except "No ImpacY' answers that are adequately supported by the information sources a lead agency cites in the parentheses following each question. A "No ImpacY' answer is adequately supported if the referenced information sources show that the impact simply does not apply to projects like the one involved (e.g., the project falls outside a fault rupture zone). A "No ImpacP' answer should be explained where it is based on project-specific factors as well as general standards (e.g., the project will not expose sensitive receptors to pollutants, based on a project-specific screening analysis). 2) All answers must take account of the whole action involved, including off-site as well as on-site, cumulative as well_as project-level, indirect as well as direct, and construction as well as operational impacts. 3) Once the lead agency has determi�ed that a particular physical impact may occur, then the checklist answers must indicate whether the impact is potentially significant, less than significant with mitigation, or less than significant. "Pote�tially Significant ImpacY' is appropriate if there is substantial evidence that an effect may be significant. If there are one or more "Potentially Signifcant ImpacY'entries when the determination is made, an EIR is required. 4) "Negative Declaration: Less Than Significant With Mitigation Incorporated" applies where the incorporation of mitigation measures has reduced an effect from "Potentially Significant ImpacY'to a "Less than Significant Impact" The lead agency must describe the mitigatio� measures, and briefly explain how they reduce the effect to a less than significant level (mitigation measures , from Section XVII, "Earlier Analysis," may be cross-referenced). 5) Earlier analyses may be used where, pursuant to the tiering, program EIR, or other CEQA process, an effect has been adequately analyzed in an earlier EIR or negative declaration. Section 15063(c)(3)(D). In this case, a brief discussion should identify the following: a) Earlier Analysis Used. Identify and state where they are available for review. . b) Impacts Adequately Addressed. Identify which effects from the above checklist were within the scope of and adequately analyzed in an earlier document pursuant to applicable legal standards, and state whether such effects were addressed by mitigation measures based on the earlier analysis. c) Mitigation Measures. For effects that are "Less than Significant with Mitigation Measures Incorporated," describe the mitigation measures which were incorporated or refined from the earlier document and the extent to which they address site-specific conditions for the project. 6) Lead agencies are encouraged to incorporate into the checklist references to information sources for potential impacts (e.g., general plans, zoning ordinances). Reference to a previously prepared or outside document should, where appropriate, include a reference to the page or pages where the statement is substantiated. 7) Supporting Information Sources: A source list should be attached, and other sources used or individuals contacted should be cited in the discussion. R:Nmlec�s\Hams\J004\IS-030500.tloc 5 Draft Initial Study WORKING DRAFT—NOT FOR PUBLIC DISTRIBUTION Cook Street Drainage and Intersection Improvements 8) This is oNy a suggested form, and lead agencies are free to use different formats; however, lead agencies should normally address the questions from this checklist that are relevant to a projecPs environmental effects in whatever format is selected. 9) The explanation of each issue should identify: a) the significance criteria or threshold, if any, used to evaluate each question; and b) the mitigation measure identified, if any, to reduce the impact to less than significance. Potentiaily Significan! ENVIRONMENTALISSUES Potentially Unless LessThan � Sfgnificant Mitigation Significant No (See attachments for info�7tation sources) '�, Impact Incorporated Impact Impact�� L AESTHETICS. Would the projecf: a) Have a substantial adverse effect on a scenic ❑ ❑ ❑ � vista? b) Substantially damage scenic resources, ❑ ❑ ❑ � including, but not limited to, trees, rock outcroppings, and historic buildings within a state scenic highway? c) Substantially degrade the existing visual ❑ ❑ ❑ � character or quality of the site and its surroundings? d) Create a new source of substantial light or ❑ ❑ ❑ � glare which would adversely affect day or nighttime views in the area? IL!AGRICULTURALRESOURCES. Would the project: a) Convert Prime Farmland, Unique Farmland, or ❑ ❑ ❑ �1 Farmland of Statewide Importance (Farmland), as shown on the maps prepared pursuant to the Farmland Mapping and Monitoring Program of the California Resources Agency, to non-agricultural use? b) Conflict with existing zoning for agricultural ❑ ❑ ❑ � use, or a Williamson Act contract? c) Involve other changes in the existing ❑ ❑ ❑ � environment which, due to their location or nature, could result in conversion of farmland, to non-agricultural use? III.AIR QUALIT'Y. Would the project: - a) Conflict with or obstruct implementation of the ❑ ❑ ❑ d applicable air quality plan? b) Violate any air quality standard or contribute to ❑ ❑ ❑ � an existing or projected air quality violation? ft:\ProJacLs\HartisW004\IS-030508.Coc 6 Draff Initial Sfudy WORKING DRAFf-NOT FOR PUBLIC DISTRIBUTION Cook StreetOrainage and Intersecfion Improvements Potentialiy Significant ENVIRONMENTALISSUES PoteMially Unless �essThan I � Significant Mitigation Significank No .(See attachments for information sources} .. Impact Incorporated .Impact Impact�� c) Result in a cumulatively considerable net ❑ ❑ � ❑ increase of any criteria pollutant for which the project region is non-attainment under an applicable federal or state ambient air quality standard (including releasing emissions which exceed quantitative thresholds for ozone precursors)? d) Expose sensitive receptors to pollutant? ❑ ❑ � ❑ e) Create objectionable odors affecting a o o � ❑ substantial number of people? IV. BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES. Would the project: a) Have a substantial adverse effect, either ❑ d ❑ ❑ directly or through habitat modifications, on any species identified as a candidate, sensitive, or special status species in local or regional plans, policies, or regulations, or by the California Department of Fish and Game or U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service? b) Have a substantial adverse effect on any ❑ ❑ ❑ � riparian habitat or other sensitive natural community identified in local or regional plans, policies, regulations, or by the California Department of Fish and Game or US Fish and Wildlife Service? c) Have a substantial adverse effect on federally o ❑ ❑ � protected wetlands as defined by Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (including, but not limited to, marsh, vernal pool, coastal, etc.) Through direct removal, filling, hydrological interruption, or other means? d) Interfere substantially with the movement of ❑ ❑ ❑ � any native resident or migratory fish or wildlife species or with established native resident or migratory wildlife corridors, or impede the use of native wildlife nursery sites? e) Conflict with any local policies or ordinances ❑ ❑ ❑ � protecting biological resources, such as a tree preservation policy or ordinance? f) Conflict with the provisions of an adopted ❑ ❑ ❑ � Habitat Conservation Plan, Natural Community Conservation Plan, or other approved local, regional, or state habitat conservation plan? R:\Pro�acls\HaMsW004\IS-030508.tloc 7 Draft Initial Study WORKING DR4FT—NOT FOR PUBLIC DISTRIBUTION Cook Street Drainage and Intersection Improvements Potentially Significant ENVIRONMENTALISSUES Potentially unless �essThan � Significant Mitigation Sfgniflcant No �� (See attachmenfs for information sources) ', impact Incorporated Impact Impact V.CULTURAL RESOURCES. Would the project:'I a) Cause a substantial adverse change in the ❑ � ❑ ❑ significance of a historical resource as defined in Section 15064.5? b) Cause a substantial adverse change in the ❑ '� ❑ ❑ significance of an archaeological resource pursuant to Section 15064.5? c) Directly or indirectly destroy a unique ❑ �1 ❑ ❑ paleontological resource or site or unique geologic feature? d) Disturb any human remains, including those ❑ � ❑ ❑ interred outside of formal cemeteries? VI'. GEOLOGIC PROBLEMS.'Wou/d the project: ' a) Expose people or structures to potential substantial adverse effects, including the risk of loss, injury, or death involving: i) Rupture of a known earthquake fault, as ❑ ❑ � ❑ delineated on the most recent Alquist-Priolo Earthquake Fault Zoning Map issued by the State Geologist for the area or based on other substantial evidence of a known fault? Refer to Division of Mines and Geology Special Publication 42. ii) Strong seismic ground shaking. ❑ ❑ � ❑ iii) Seismic related ground failure, including ❑ ❑ � ❑ liquefaction. iv) Landslides. ❑ ❑ J ❑ b) Result in substantial soil erosion or the loss of ❑ ❑ � ❑ topsoil? c) Be located on a geologic unit or soil that is ❑ ❑ � ❑ unstable, or that would become unstable as a result of the project, and potentially result in on- or off-site landslide, lateral spreading, subsidence, liquefaction or collapse? d) Be located on expansive soil, as defined in ❑ o � ❑ Table 18-1-B of the Uniform Building Code (1994), creating substantial risk to life or property? e) Have soils incapable of adequately supporting ❑ ❑ � ❑ the use of septic tanks or alternative waste water disposal systems where sewers are not available for the disposal of waste water? R:\Pro�ec�slHartisW004\IS-030508.tloc 8 D�aR Initial Study WORKING DRAFf—NOT FOR PUBIIC DISTRIBUTION Cook Street Drainage and Intersection Improvements Potentialiy �Significant ENVIRONMENTALISSUES Potentially Unless �essThan ' � Significant Mitigatlon SignificanE No � (See attachments for information sources) I impact mcorporated lmpact Impact' VII. HAZARDS. Would the project: a) Create a significant hazard to the public or the ❑ ❑ ❑ d environment through the routine transport, use, or disposal of hazardous materials? b) Create a significant hazard to the public or the ❑ ❑ ❑ � environment through reasonably foreseeable upset and accident conditions involving the release of , hazardous materials into the environment? c) Emit hazardous emissions or handle ❑ ❑ ❑ � hazardous or acutely hazardous materials, substances, or waste within one-quarter mile of an existing or proposed school? _ d) Be located on a site which is included on a list ❑ ❑ ❑ � of hazardous materials sites compiled pursuant to Government Code Section 65962.5 and, as a result, would it create a significant hazard to the public or the environment? e) For a project located within an airport land use ❑ ❑ ❑ � plan or, where such a plan has not been adopted, within two miles of a public airport or public use airport, would the project result in a safety hazard for people residing or working in the project area? � For a project within the vicinity of a private ❑ ❑ ❑ � airstrip, would the project result in a safety hazard for people residing or working in the project area? g) Impair implementation of or physically interfere ❑ ❑ ❑ � with an adopted emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan? h) Expose people or structures to a significant risk ❑ ❑ o � of loss, injury, or death involving wildland fires, including where wildlands are adjacent to urbanized areas or where residences are intermixed with wildlands? VIIL HYDROLOGY AND WATER QUALITY. Would the project: a) Violate any water quality standards or waste ❑ ❑ o � discharge requirements? R:Wrojects\Hams1J004\IS-030508.doc 9 DraR Initial Study WORKING DRAFT—NOT FOR PUBLIC DISTRIBUTION Cook Street Drainage and lntersection Improvements Potentiaily Significant ENVIRONMENTAL ISSUES Potentiauy uniess �essThan ' � Significant Mifigation Significanf No . (See attachments for information sources} Impacf Incorporatea �:.Impact ImpacY b) Substantially deplete groundwater supplies or ❑ ❑ ❑ � interfere substantially with groundwater recharge such that there would be a net deficit in aquifer volume or a lowering of the local groundwater table level (e.g., the production rate of pre-existing nearby welis would drop to a level which would not support existing land uses or planned uses for which permits have been granted)? c) Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern ❑ ❑ ❑ � of the site or area, including through the alteration of the course of a stream or river, in a manner which would result in substantial erosion or siltation on-or off-site? - d) Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern ❑ ❑ ❑ � of the site or area, including through the alteration of the course of a stream or river, or substantially increase the rate or amount of surface runoff in a manner which would result in flooding on-or off-site? e) Create or contribute runoff water which would ❑ ❑ � ❑ exceed the capacity of existing or planned storm water drainage systems or provide substantial additional sources of polluted runoff? f) Otherwise substa�tially degrade water quality? ❑ ❑ � ❑ g) Place housing within a 100-year flood hazard ❑ ❑ ❑ � area as mapped on a federal Flood Hazard Boundary or Flood Insurance Rate Map or other flood hazard delineation map? h) Place within a 100-year flood hazard area ❑ ❑ ❑ � structures which would impede or redirect flood flows? i) Expose people or structures to a significant risk ❑ ❑ ❑ � of loss, injury or death involving flooding, including flooding as a result of the failure of a levee or dam? j) Inundation by seiche, tsunami, or mudflow? ❑ ❑ ❑ � R:NroJecis\HamsW00d\IS-030508.tloc 10 Draft Initial Sfudy WORKING DRAFT-NOT FOR PUBLIC DISTRIBUTION Cook Street Drainage and Intersection(mprovements Potentialiy ��Signiftcant ENVIRONMENTAL ISSUES Potentially un�ess �essThan ' Significant Mifigation Significant No � '(See attachments for information sources) ! Impact Incorporetea .Impact Impact� IX. LAND USE AND PLANNING. Would the projecf: a) Physically divide an established community? ❑ ❑ ❑ � b) Conflict with any applicable land use plan, ❑ a ❑ � policy, or regulation of an agency with ju�isdiction over the project (including, but not limited to the general plan, specific plan, local coastal program, or zoning ordinance) adopted for the purpose of avoiding or mitigating an environmental effect? c) Conflict with any applicable habitat ❑ ❑ ❑ � conservation plan or natural community conservation plan? X: MINERAL RESOURCES. Woutd the'project:: '' ' a) Result in the loss of availability of a known ❑ ❑ ❑ � mineral resource that would be of value to the region and the residents of the state? b) Result in the loss of availability of a locally- ❑ ❑ ❑ �1 important mineral resource recovery site delineated on a local general plan, specific plan or other land use plan? XI. NOISE. Would the projecf'result in: a) Exposure of persons to or generation of noise ❑ ❑ � ❑ levels in excess of standards established in the local general plan or noise ordinance, or applicable standards of other agencies? b) Exposure of persons to or generation of ❑ ❑ � ❑ excessive ground borne vibration or ground borne noise levels? c) A substantial permanent increase in ambient ❑ ❑ � ❑ noise levels in the project vicinity above levels existing without the project? d) A substantial temporary or periodic increase in ❑ ❑ � ❑ ambient noise levels in the project vicinity above levels existing without the project? e) For a project located within an airport land use ❑ ❑ ❑ � plan or, where such a plan has not been adopted, within two miles of a public airport or public use airport, would the project expose people residing or working in the project area to excessive noise levels? f) For a project within the vicinity. of a private ❑ ❑ ❑ � airstrip, would the project expose people residing or working in the project area to excessive noise levels? R:\Pmjecls\Hams\J00411S-030508.tloc 11 Drak Inifial Study WORKING DRAFT-NOT FOR PUBLIC DISTRIBUTION Cook Street Drainage and Intersection Improvements Potentiaily '�.Significant ENVIRONMENTAL ISSUES Potentiauy Unless �ess Than ' � Significant Mitigation Significant No '. (See attachments for information sources) �mpact Incorporated Jmpact )mpact XII. POPULATION APId HOUSING. Would the project: a) Induce substantial population growth in an ❑ ❑ ❑ � area, either directly (for example, by proposing new homes and businesses) or indirectly (for example, through extension of roads or other infrastructure)? b) Displace substantial numbers of existing ❑ ❑ ❑ � housing, necessitating the construction of replacement housing elsewhere? c) Displace substantial numbers of people, ❑ ❑ ❑ �1 necessitating the construction of replacement housing elsewhere? XIII. PUBLIC SERVICES: Would the project: - a) Result in substantial adverse physical impacts ❑ ❑ � ❑ associated with the provision of new or physically altered governmental facilities, need for new or physically altered governmental facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental impacts, in order to maintain acceptable service ratios, response times or other performance objectives for any of the following public services: i) Fire protection? ❑ ❑ � ❑ ii) Police protection? ❑ ❑ � ❑ iii) Schools? ❑ ❑ � o iv) Parks? ❑ ❑ � ❑ v) Other public facilities? ❑ ❑ � ❑ XIV. RECREATION.'Wou/d the project:' a) Increase the use of existing neighborhood and ❑ ❑ ❑ � regional parks or other recreational facilities such that substantial physical deterioration of the facility would occur or be accelerated? b) Include recreational facilities or require the ❑ ❑ ❑ � construction or expansion of recreational facilities which might have an adverse physical effect on the environment? XV. TRAFFIC AND TRANSPORTATION: Would the project: a) Cause an increase in traffic which is ❑ ❑ ❑ � substantial in relation to the existing tra�c load and capacity of the street system (i.e., result in a substantial increase in either the number of vehicle trips, the volume to capacity ratio on roads, or congestion at intersections)? R:\ProjectslHams\J004\IS-030506.tloc 12 Draft Initial Study WORKING DRAFT-NOT FOR PUBLIC DISTRIBUTION Cook StreetOrainage and Intersection Improvements Potentiaily �.Signifcant ENVIRONMENTAL ISSUES Potentially un�ess �ess Than , ' Signifcant Mitigation Significant No (See attacfiments for information sources) i impact Incorporeted lmpact Impact' b) Exceed, either individually or cumulatively, a ❑ ❑ ❑ d level of service standard established by the county congestion management agency for designated roads or highways? c) Result in a change in air traffic patterns, ❑ ❑ ❑ � including either an increase in tra�c levels or a change in location that results in substantial safety risks? d) Substantially increase hazards due to a design ❑ a ❑ � feature (e.g., sharp curves or dangerous intersections) or incompatible uses (e.g., farm equipment)? e) Result in inadequate emergency access? ❑ ❑ � ❑ _ fl Result in inadequate parking capacity? ❑ ❑ o � g) Conflict with adopted policies, plans, or ❑ ❑ ❑ �1 programs supporting alternative transportation (e.g., bus turnouts, bicycle racks)? XVI. UTILITIES AND SERVICE SYSTEMS. Would the project: a) Exceed wastewater treatment requirements of ❑ ❑ ❑ d the applicable Regional Water Quality Control Board? b) Require or result in the construction of new ❑ ❑ ❑ � water or wastewater treatment facilities or expansion of existing facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental effects? c) Require or result in the construction of new ❑ ❑ ❑ � storm water drainage facilities or expansion of existing facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental effects? d) Have sufficient water supplies available to ❑ ❑ ❑ � serve the project from existing entitlements and resources, or are new or expanded entitlements needed? e) Result in a determination by the wastewater ❑ ❑ ❑ � treatment provider which serves or may serve the project that it has adequate capacity to serve the projecYs projected demand in addition to the provider's existing commitments? f) Be served by a landfill with sufficient permitted ❑ ❑ ❑ � capacity to accommodate the projecYs solid waste disposal needs? R1PmJects\HartisW004VS-030508.tloc 13 � Draft Initial Study WORKING DR4FT—NOT FOR PUBLIC DISTRIBUTION Cook Street Drainage and Intersection Improvements Potentially Significant ENVIRONMENTAL ISSUES Potenfially un�ess �ess7han ' Significant Mitigation SlgNflcant No � (See attachments for information sources) i impact Incorporated Impact Impact g) Comply with federal, state, and local statutes ❑ ❑ ❑ � and regulations related to solid waste? XVI. MANDATORY FINDINGS`OF SIGNIFICANCE. Would the project: a. Have the potential to degrade the quality of the ❑ ❑ � ❑ environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self-sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal or eliminate important examples of the major periods of California history or prehistory? b. Have impacts that are individually limited, but ❑ ❑ � ❑ - cumulatively considerable? ("Cumulatively considerable" means that the incremental effects of a project are considerable when viewed in connection with the effects of past projects, the effects of other current projects, and the effects of probable future projects.) c. Have environmental effects which will cause ❑ ❑ � ❑ substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly? R:1Pmjecis\Hams\J004U5-030508.tloc 14 ' DraRlnitialStudy WORKING DRAFT-NOT FOR PUBLIC DISTRIBUTION Cook Street D�ainage and Intersection Improvemenfs SECTION 5—ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION Substantiation and clarification for each checklist response is provided below. Included in each discussion are mitigation measures, as appropriate, that are recommended for implementation as part of the proposed project. � I. AESTHETICS. Would the project: a) Have a substantial adverse effect on a scenic vista? b) Substantially damage scenic resources, including, but not limited to, trees, rock outcroppings, and historic buildings within a state scenic highway? c) Substantially degrade the existing visual character or quality of the site and its surroundings? d) Create a new source of substantial light or glare which would adversely affect day or nighttime views in the area? No Impact (Sections a, b, c & d). In its current condition, Cook Street is a major thoroughfare. - However, it is designated as a major arterial and scenic roadway in the City of Palm Desert General Plan. According to the City's General Plan Circulation Element, special setbacks and landscaping standards are required for scenic roadways. The proposed project is required to comply with these standards to ensure that scenic resources, including natural scenic beauty and dramatic landforms, are visible from the roadway. Major scenic resources include the San Jacinto, San Bernardino, and other mountain ranges surrounding and encompassing the City of Palm Desert, as well as the desert floor. Cook Street is not designated as a State scenic highway and the proposed project does not include structures that would impede views of or from the project site. Therefore, the proposed project would neither substantially damage scenic resources within a State scenic highway, nor would it disrupt existing views of the surrounding environment to create a substantial adverse effect on a scenic vista. The proposed project would occur primarily within existing roadway right-of-way and would not substantially alter the visual character of the site and surroundings. As part of the proposed project design, raised medians would be vegetated with drought-tolerant landscaping that is consistent with existing landscaped vegetation on Cook Street. The proposed project improvements would not result in a negative aesthetic effect on nearby residences or automobiles and pedestrians traveling on the scenic roadway. None of the proposed project or landscaping features would include reflective surfaces that could create a source of glare. Street lighting potentially impacted by or relocated as a part of the proposed project would be replaced with lighting that would be in compliance with City Department of Public Works design standards and would be consistent with existing lighting on Cook Street. In accordance with the City Municipal Code, street lighting would be fully shielded to direct light directly onto the road surface and to prevent lighting spillover into adjacent residences. Therefore, the replacement of street lighting would not be expected to impact nighttime views of the area. No impacts are anticipated and no mitigation is required. II. AGRICULTURAL RESOURCES. Would the project: a) Convert Prime Farmland, Unique Farmland, or Farmland of Statewide Importance (Farmland), as shown on the maps prepared pursuant to the Farmland Mapping and Monitoring Program of the California Resources Agency, to non-agricultural use? R:1Pmjects\Harzis\J004\I5030508.tloc 15 Oraft Initial Study WORKING DRAFT—NOT FOR PUBLIC DISTRIBUTION Cook StreetOrainage and Infersection Improvements b) Conflict with existing zoning for agricultural use, or a Williamson Act contract? c) Involve other changes in the existing environment which, due to their location or nature, could result in conversion of farmland, to non-agricultural use? No Impact (Sections a, b, 8� c). The proposed project is not located on or in the vicinity of property considered Prime Farmland, Unique Farmland, or Farmland of Statewide Importance as mapped by the Farmland Mapping and Monitoring Program of the California Resources Agency (NRCS 1979). Additionally, the proposed project would not conflict with existing zoning or a Williamson Act Contract, nor would it result in conversion of farmland to non-agricultural use. No impacts would occur and no mitigation is required. III. AIR QUALITY. Would the project: a) Conflict with or obstruct implementation of the applicable air quality plan? b) Violate any air quality standard or contribute to an existing or projected air quality violation? c) Result in a cumulatively considerable net increase of any criteria pollutant for which _ the project region is non-attainment under tan applicable federal or state ambient air quality standard (including releasing emissions which exceed quantitative thresholds for ozone precursors)? d) Expose sensitive receptors to pollutant? e) Create objectionable odors affecting a substantial number of people? No Impact (Sections a 8 b); Less Than Significant Impact (Sections c, d, & e). The California Air Resources Board (CARB) divides the state into air basins which share similar meteorological and topographical features. The City of Palm Desert is in the Coachella Valley, a portion of the Salton Sea Air Basin (SSAB), which includes eastern Riverside and Imperial counties. The SSAB's climate and topography, high winds, and fine sandy soils are conducive to the formation of high concentrations of airborne particulate matter. Additionally, the predominantly westerly winds transport pollutants from the adjacent South Coast Air Basin (SCAB) into the SSAB. The Riverside County portion of the SSAB is under the jurisdiction of the South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD). The eastern Riverside County portion of the SSAB is designated a non-attainment area for the following national ambient standards: ozone (03) and fine particulate matter (PM). 03 is a colorless, odorless pollutant formed by a chemical reaction between volatile organic compounds (VOCs) and oxides of nitrogen (NOx) in the presence of sunlight. The primary sources of VOCs and NOx are mobile, including cars, trucks, buses, and agricultural and construction equipment. PM is the term used for a mixture of solid particles and liquid droplets found in the air. Coarse particles (all particles less than or equal to 10 micrometers in diameter, or PM10) derive from a variety of sources, including windblown dust. Fuel combustion and resultant exhaust from diesel buses and trucks are primarily responsible for fine particle (less than 2.5 microns in diameter, or PM2.5) levels. Air quality modeling has shown that 03 in the Coachella Valley originates in the SCAB and is transported into the SSAB by the predominantly westerly winds. The pollutant transport pathway from the SCAB to the SSAB is through the Banning Pass to the Coachella Valley. Downwind of the source region, exceedances occur' later in the day as the ozone cloud is transported downwind. If the peak were locally generated, it would occur near mid-day and not in the late R:�ProJecls\HartisW004\IS-030508.doc 16 DldR Initiel StUdy WORKING DRAFT-NOT FOR PUBLIC DISTRIBUTION Cook Street Drainage and lntersection Improvements afternoon or early evening. As a result, the SCAQMD is focusing on regulation of 03 in the SCAB. Between 1999 and 2001, the Coachella Valley exceeded the federal annual average PM10 national ambient air quality standards (NAAQS) numerous times. Because the Coachella Valley was unable to demonstrate attainment of the NAAQS by the 2001 attainment year, the SCAQMD prepared the 2002 Coachella Valley PM10 State Implemenfation Plan (CVSIP). The CVSIP includes control program enhancements that meet the Most Stringent Measure (MSM) requirements and a request for extension of the PM10 attainment date. Jurisdictions within the Coachella Valley are required to adhere to the requirements outlined in the CVSIP, including preparation of a Fugitive Dust Control Plan prior to issuance of grading permits for projects that result in more than 5,000 square feet of soil disturbance. A projecYs air quality impacts can be separated into short-term impacts from construction and long-term permanent impacts from project operations. The proposed project is consistent with the City General Plan Circulation Element and County's Master Plan of Arterial Highways; long- term regional and local air quality impacts have been considered in their respective approved environmental documentation. Although the primary objective of the proposed roadway improvements is to alleviate congestion on Cook Street and thereby improve traffic flow on the roadway, reduced congestion would also reduce vehicle idling, which would have a slightly positive impact on air quality. Because the proposed project itself does not increase the number of cars on the road, it is not considered a tra�c-generating use. The air quality analysis therefore focuses on the short-term construction impacts of the proposed project. Construction impacts include airborne dust from grading, demolition, and dirt hauling, and gaseous emissions from heavy equipment, delivery and dirt-hauling trucks, employee vehicles, and paints and coatings. To determine whether emissions resulting from project-related construction are significant, the SCAQMD recommends significance thresholds in its CEQA Air Quality Handbook. These thresholds were applied to the proposed project in order to assure local and regional consistency. Localized Significance Thresholds (LSTs) were not used for this analysis in accordance with the direction of the City of Palm Desert given that the proposed project would be phased in small increments to allow traffic lanes to remain open during construction and that relatively minor improvements are proposed in proximity to residential land uses northeast of the Country Club Drive intersection: The pollutants addressed by the SCAQMD thresholds include carbon monoxide (CO), sulfur oxides (SOx), nitrogen oxides (NOx), particulate matter (PM10 and PM2.5), and reactive organic compounds (ROC). The daily thresholds for each of the criteria pollutants are presented in Table 2. TABLE 2 PROJECT EMISSIONS (MAXIMUM POUNDS/DAY) CO �:�ROC TIOx PM70�� PMZS��.� Grading/Excavation 52 10 47 8 2 Drainage/Utilities/Sub-Grade 49 10 46 8 2 Paving 21 3 21 1 0 Maximum Emissions 52 10 47 8 2 SCAQMD Daily Thresholds 550 75 100 150 55 Source:Road Construction Model Version 5.2 R:NrojectslHems\J004VS-030508.doc 17 � DraR Initial Study WORKING DRAFT-NOT FOR PUBLIC DISTRIBUTION Cook Sfreet Drainage and Intersection Improvements Table 2 also presents estimated project emissions. Grading/excavation, drainage/utilities/sub- grade, and paving emissions were calculated using the Road Construction Model Version 5.2 developed by the Sacramento Metropolitan Air Quality Management District (SMAQMD) (Appendix B). Additionally, PM2.5 emissions were calculated using the Final Methodology to Calculafe PM2.5 and PM2.5 Thresholds developed by the SCAQMD. Construction emissions were calculated for the following construction equipment assumptions: • Grading/Excavation — one backhoe, one grader, one haul truck, one scraper, one water truck, and one signal board. o Drainage/Utilities/Subgrade — one compactor, one grader, one scraper, one signal board, one water truck, and one trencher. • Paving—one paver, paving equipment, one roller, and one signal board. The air quality analysis assumes that no more than 1 acre of the project site would be disturbed at any given time. Estimates of employee vehicle traffic and earth/debris export and import were also included in the air quality modeling effort. Employee vehicle traffic would add a maximum of 26 vehicle trips/day based on an expected maximum of 13 construction employees on the _ busiest construction day. An estimated 1,500 cubic yards (cy) of debris (e.g., concrete and asphalt) was assumed to be exported from the site during demolition which equates to two disposal truck trips a day. The PM2.5 fraction used to determine emissions was the "Construction and Demolition" subcategory and "Fugitive DusY' main category of the California Emission Inventory Data and Reporting System (CEIDARS) PM profiles. As identified on Table 2, project-related emission levels would not exceed SCAQMD's daily thresholds and would result in a less than significant impact. No mitigation is required; however, Standard Conditions of Approval 3-1 and 3-2 would apply to the proposed project and are expected to reduce construction emissions from the project by approximately 68 percent. Standard Conditions of Approval SC 3-1 If the project is expected to result in soil disturbance of an area greater than or equal to 5,000 square feet, the Project Contractor must submit a Dust Control Plan to the City for approval in accordance with the Coachella Valley State Implementation Plan (CVSIP). The Dust Control Plan must outline the measures that would be used to control dust on the project site, including at least one of the Coachella Valley Best Available Control Measures (CVBACM) for each dust source category as outlined in Chapter 2 of the CVSIP. SC 3-2 The City of Palm Desert will comply with South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD) regulations, including Rule 402 (the Nuisance Rule) and Rule 403 (Fugitive Dust). To ensure that the project is in full compliance with both these dust regulations and that there is no significant nuisance impact generated on the project site, the Palm Desert City Engineer will be responsible for ensuring compliance with these regulations throughout project implementation. Mandatory measures set forth by these regulations include, but are not limited to, the following: • Sweep any dirt tracked from the project site onto public streets no less than once per day. • Use particulate filters on all diesel equipment. R:\Pmjects\Hams1J004\IS-030508.doc 18 DraR Initial Sfudy WORKING DRAFT-NOT FOR PUBLIC DISTRIBUTION Cook StreetOrainage and Infersection Improvements • Water exposed surfaces a minimum of two times daily. If fugitive dust appears to be impacting adjacent residential land uses during times of high wind, additional watering will be conducted and/or grading activities will be halted. Cover all stockpiles of soil with tarps. • Cover all trucks used to haul soil from the site with a tarp to reduce fugitive dust. IV. BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES.Would the project: a) Have a substantial adverse effect, either directly or through habitat modifications, on any species identified as a candidate, sensitive, or special status species in local or regional plans, policies, or regulations, or by the California Department of Fish and Game or U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service? b) Have a substantial adverse effect on any riparian habitat or other sensitive natural community identified in local or regional plans, policies, regulations, or by the California Department of Fish and Game or US Fish and Wildlife Service? c) Have a substantial adverse effect on federally protected wetlands as defined by � Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (including, but not limited to, marsh, vernal pool, coastal, etc.) through direct removal, filling, hydrological interruption, or other means? d) Interfere substantially with the movement of any native resident or migratory fish or wildlife species or with established native resident or migratory wildlife corridors, or impede the use of native wildlife nursery sites? e) Conflict with any local policies or ordinances protecting biological resources, such as a tree preservation policy or ordinance? � Conflict with the provisions of an adopted Habitat Conservation Plan, Natural Community Conservation Plan, or other approved local, regional, or state habitat conservation plan? Potentially Significant Unless Mitigation Incorporated (Section a); No Impact (Sections b, c, d, e, & t�. The following analysis is based on a Biological Resources Assessment prepared by BonTerra Consulting on October 11, 2006. A follow-up visit to the project site by BonTerra Consulting biologist Sam Stewart determined that conditions at the project site have not changed since the original assessment was prepared. The full report is provided as Appendix C. The project site includes existing public roads and public and private property adjacent to the roadway alignment. Vegetation along the roads that may be removed by the proposed project include smoke tree (Psorothamnus spinosa), oleander (Oleander sp.), and fan palm (Washingtonia sp.). Adjacent vegetation that is not expected to be impacted by the proposed project includes fig (Ficus sp.), gum (Eucalyptus sp.), and pine (Pinus sp.). The majority of the project site provides very limited habitat for native wildlife species. The only wildlife species observed in the vicinity of the project site that could potentially occur on the project site include birds that may nest in ornamental vegetation. Bird species observed in the vicinity of the project site include American kestrel (Falco sparverius), killdeer (Charadrius vociferus), Anna's hummingbird (Calypte anna), black phoebe (Sayornis nigricans), common raven (Corvus corax), verdin (Auriparus' flaviceps), northern mockingbird (Mimus polyglottos), European starling (Sturnus vulgaris), common yellowthroat (Geothlypis trichas), song sparrow (Melospiza melodia), and Brewer's blackbird (Euphagus cyanocephalus). R9ProJacls\Hamis1J00d\IS-030508.doc 19 Draff Initial Study WORKING DRAFT—NOT FOR PUBLIC DISTRIBUTION Cook Street Drainage and Intersection Improvemenfs No special status habitats were observed on the project site. Plants or wildlife may be considered to have "special status" due to declining populations, vulnerability to habitat change, or restricted distributions. Certain special status species have been listed as Threatened or Endangered under the California and/or Federal Endangered Species Acts (CESA and FESA, respectively). No special status plant species are expected to occur due to lack of suitable habitat and the developed nature of the project site. Additionally, �o Threatened or Endangered species are expected to occur on the project site due to lack of suitable habitat and the developed nature of the project site. The project site is primarily existing roadway and is, therefore, not expected to function as a wildlife movement corridor. The project improvements are not expected to impede wildlife movement. Trees on the project site have potential to be used for nesting by raptors. Regulations prohibit activities that "take, possess, or destroy" any migratory bird or raptor nest or egg (Fish and Game Code §§3503, 3503.5, and 3513). Therefore, if construction that is anticipated to impact ornamental trees along the proposed project alignment is initiated during the raptor nesting season (February 1 to June 30) a pre-construction raptor survey is recommended. This is not expected to be a significant constraint on the proposed project. Mitigation Measures MM 4-1 If construction is scheduled to proceed beiween February 1 and July 30, no more than seven days prior to the onset of construction activities that would impact trees on the project site, a qualified Biologist will conduct a pre-construction nesting raptor survey within the limits of project disturbance and in adjacent areas for the presence of any active raptor nests. If a raptor nest is found, the following restrictions on construction will be required between February 1 and July 30 (or until nests are no longer active, as determined by a qualified Biologist): (1) clearing limits will be established within a minimum of 500 feet in any direction from any occupied raptor nest exhibiting nesting activity and (2) access and surveying will not be allowed within 100 feet of any raptor nest exhibiting nesting activity, or as otherwise determined by a qualified Biologist. Any encroachment into the 500/100-foot buffer area around the known nest is allowed only if it is determined by a qualified Biologist that the proposed activity shall not disturb the nest occupants. V. CULTURAL RESOURCES. Would the project: a) Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a historical resource as defined in Section 15064.5? b) Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of an archaeological resource pursuant to Section 15064.5? c) Directly or indirectly destroy a unique paleontological resource or site or unique geologic feature? d) Disturb any human remains, including those interred outside of formal cemeteries? Potentially Significant Unless Mitigation Incorporated (Sections a, b, c, & d). The following section is based on a cultural resources records search conducted on August 31, 2006, by the Eastern Information Center(EIC) at University of California, Riverside and a walk over survey of the project site conducted by BonTerra Consulting on September 7, 2006. R:\PmJects\Hams1J004\IS-030508.doc 20 DraR Initial Study WORKING DRAFT—NOT FOR PUBLIC DISTRIBUTION Cook Sfreet D�ainage and Intersection Improvements The EIC is the State-designated repository for records concerning archaeological and historical resources in Riverside County. The records search provided information on known resources and related studies within a one-mile radius of the proposed project alignment. The findings of the records search, literature review, and survey are provided in Appendix D. The EIC reported that at least 29 cultural resources investigations have previously 6een conducted within a 1-mile radius of the project site. One of these studies, RI-3649 covers a portion of Cook Street from Interstate 10 to Frank Sinatra Blvd (Chace 1994). The cited investigation was negative for cultural resources. The results of the records search indicate that 13 previously recorded cultural resources have been recorded within a 1-mile radius of the project site, but are not located within or adjacent to the project site. These represent archaeological and built environment resources. No archaeological or built environment resources were previously recorded within the project site; however, archaeological site CA-RIV-12698, a Late Prehistoric artifact scatter, was documented approximately 1,000 feet from the Cook Street. None are located within or directly adjacent to the project site. A walk over survey of the project site was conducted on September 7, 2006, by BonTerra Consulting. No previously recorded or unrecorded prehistoric or historic archaeological sites were identified as a result of the survey. The project site has been previously disturbed by the construction and maintenance of various paved roads, sidewalks and utility lines, as well as the construction of the surrounding residential and commercial development. Visibility of native soils on the project site was virtually non-existent given existing pavement over the established streets. Visibility of adjacent areas was intermittent, with minor areas of exposure along the street edge. No archaeological resources were observed in or adjacent to the project site. No built-environment resources remain subsequent to development along both sides of the project site. The relative scarcity of recorded cultural resources sites in the vicinity of the project site indicates that the potential for archaeological materials to be present is low. Because the project site is located primarily within previously disturbed areas, the likelihood that cultural resources may persist intact is substantially reduced. Mitigation Measures 5-1 and 5-2 are provided to ensure that any potential impacts to resources are mitigated. The results of the paleontological literature review indicate that the entire project corridor and a one-mile radius around it are situated on deposits of Younger Quaternary Dune Sands/Alluvium and Older Quaternary Deposits. The younger (Holocene) layers of the Quaternary Alluvium are not expected to yield significant fossil resources. No fossils have been recovered from this geologic unit in the vicinity of the project site. However, should undisturbed Older Quaternary Deposits be present at depth or exposed during excavation, such sediments would have undetermined paleontological sensitivity and may contain significant nonrenewable fossil resources. Therefore, it is expected that earthmoving activities associated with project construction would not likely result in a significant impact to paleontological resources. Mitigation Measure 5-1 would further reduce the likelihood of impacts to paleontological resources. Mitigation Measures MM 5-1 in the event that prehistoric or historic archaeological resources are encountered during earthmoving activities, work in the immediate area of the find shall be temporarily diverted or redirected to allow time to evaluate any exposed prehistoric or historic material, including paleontological resources. Any recovered prehistoric R:1Pro7ecls\HarzisW004\IS-030508.tloc 2'I DraR lnitial Sfudy WORKING DRAFT—NOT FOR PUBLIC DISTRIBUTION Cook Sfreef Drainage and Infersection Improvements or historic artifacts shall be catalogued by a qualified Archaeologist or Paleontologist. For non-tribal resources, the City of Palm Desert would retain any resources discovered during grading for display in public facilities or for educational purposes following cataloguing. MM 5-2 In accordance with Public Resources Code §5097.94, if human remains are found, the Riverside County Coroner must be notified within 24 hours of the discovery. If the Coroner determines that the remains are not recent, s/he will notify the Native American Heritage Commission in Sacramento to determine the most likely descendent for the area. The designated Native American representative will then determine the reassignment of the human remains in consultation with the Property Owner. With implementation of the above mitigation measures, impacts are expected to be reduced to a level of less than significant. VI. GEOLOGIC PROBLEMS. Would the project: a) Expose people or structures to potential substantial adverse effects, including the risk " of loss, injury, or death involving: i) Rupture of a known earthquake fault, as delineated on the most recent Alquist- Priolo Earthquake Fault Zoning Map issued by the State Geologist for the area or based on other substantial evidence of a known fault? Refer to Division of Mines and Geology Special Publication 42. ii) Strong seismic ground shaking. iii) Seismic related ground failure, including liquefaction. iv) Landslides. b) Result in substantial soil erosion or the loss of topsoil? c) Be located on a geologic unit or soil that is unstable, or that would become unstable as a result of the project, and potentially result in on- or off-site landslide, lateral spreading, subsidence, liquefaction or collapse? d) Be located on expansive soil, as defined in Table 18-1-B of the Uniform Building Code (1994), creating substantial risk to life or property? e) Have soils incapable of adequately supporting the use of septic tanks or alternative waste water disposal systems where sewers are not available for the disposal of waste water? Less Than Significant Impact (Sections a, b, c, d, & e). The project site is underlain by Quaternary Alluvium (Qal), which is primarily distributed at the mouths of drainages in the Santa Rosa Mountains and in the eastern portion of the Coachella Valley. These deposits may have accumulated rapidly, without being saturated and may be subject to wind erosion or collapse upon saturation (hydroconsolidation). There are no known active or potentially active faults that traverse the project site. According to the Palm Desert Planninq Area Map in the City of Palm Desert General Plan's Geotechnical Element, the project site is not located in the Alquist-Priolo Earthquake Fault Zone. The closest known active fault is the San Andreas Fault (right-lateral transform fault) which passes through the northern portion of Palm Desert approximately 7.5 miles north of the site and extends for more than 600 miles from the Salton Sea to Cape Mendocino and is capable of producing R1ProjecislHams1J004\IS-030508.tloc 22 Drak Initial Study WORKING DRAFT—NOT FOR PUBLIC DISTRIBUTION Cook Street Drainage and Intersection Improvements magnitude 8.0 and potentially greater magnitude earthquakes. Another nearby active fault is the San Jacinto Fault (right-lateral strike-slip fault) located approximately 20 miles southwest of the site. it extends for approximately 175 miles and is capable of producing magnitude 6.5 to 7.5 earthquakes. This fault has historically produced Iarger earthquakes than any other fault in California; however, it has not produced any particularly damaging quakes in recent history. Located 45 miles southwest of the project site, the next closest major fault zone is the Elsinore Fault, one of the largest but least active faults in southern California. It extends more than 140 miles in length and is capable of generating magnitude 6.5 to 7.5 earthquakes. Given the City's proximity to the San Andreas and San Jacinto faults, the City has the potential to experience extremely high seismically induced ground shaking. The effects of ground motion on structures can be lessened to ensure structural seismic safety through the adherence of the Uniform Building Code, California Building Code, and Unreinforced Masonry Law. No habitable structures are proposed as a part of the project; therefore risks to people and private property associated with the proposed project would be negligible. Liquefaction is a seismic phenomenon in which loose, saturated, fine-grained granular soils behave similarly to a fluid when subjected to high-intensity ground shaking. Liquefaction _ typically occurs where the groundwater table is within 50 feet of the ground surface. According to the Liquefaction Susceptibility on the Palm Desert Plannina Area Mao in the City of Palm Desert General Plan's Geotechnical Element, the project site is located in an area of low liquefaction susceptibility and contains fine-grained sediments with a groundwater depth of greater than 100 feet. Therefore, the proposed project would not be affected by liquefaction and no mitigation is required. Seiches refers to seismically induced oscillation or sloshing of water contained in reservoirs, lakes, ponds, swimming pools, and other enclosed bodies of water. In the event of strong ground shaking, the degree of damage to such small bodies of water in the City would likely be minor. However, seiching could result in the failure of larger bodies of water (including water tanks, retention basins, recharge basins, and other water storage structures) and could result in the inundation of land and structures downgradient. The Colorado River Aqueduct extends across the northerly boundary of the city, near the base of the Little San Bernardino Mountains and is situated adjacent to segments of the San Andreas Fault. A surface rupturing earthquake on one of these segments could damage the Aqueduct and release large volumes of water. The proposed project consists of roadway improvements and would not be affected by nor result in adverse effects from a seiche event. According to the Seismicallv induced Rock Falls and Landslide Susceotibilitv Map in the Geotechnical Element of the City General Plan, the project site is in an area of shallow topographic gradient underlain by young unconsolidated sediments, with a "low to none" susceptibility of being impacted by rock falls or.landslides. The topography of the project site is flat and would not be substantially altered with implementation of the proposed project. No new slope or bare areas would be created with implementation of the proposed project. Therefore, the potential for landslides is considered negligible. Wind erosion occurs on dry, sandy, finely granulated soils and involves the removal of soil from one place in its deposition to another. In the Coachella Valley, the prevailing winds originate from the San Gorgonio Pass to the west, and follow the central axis of the valley in a southeasterly direction. Most of the developed portion of the city is highly susceptible to wind erosion. According to the Wind Erosion Hazard Zones shown on the Palm Desert Planninq Area Mao in the City of Palm Desert General Plan's Geotechnical Element, the project site is in a Severe to Very Severe Wind Erosion Hazard area, which is exposed to erosive winds where soils show distinct evidence of wind removal and/or accumulation in hummocks 24 to 48 inches R:\Projec�s\Hartis1J004\IS-030508.tloc 23 Draft Initial Study WORKING DRAFT-NOT FOR PUBLIC DISTRIBUTION Cook Street Drainage and/ntersection Improvements in height. Increases in the amount of windblown sand in the city are related to episodic flooding of the Whitewater River Floodplain and other major drainages to the west. The composition of the Whitewater River floor consists of typically course sands, gravels, and cobble. However, during major flood events, large quantities of sand and gravel are deposited on the river floor and are exposed within the floodplains. The proposed roadway improvements would not be expected to affect erosion or deposition on the project site or in the vicinity as the roadway is currently developed. No impacts are anticipated. According to the Seismically induced Settlement shown on the Palm Desert Planninq Area Map in the City of Palm Desert General Plan's Geotechnical Element, the project site is in an area with a high susceptibility to seismically induced settlement which is underlain by young, unconsolidated deposits. Risks associated with land subsidence or soil expansion are considered low due to the minimal amount of grading required for the project and the lack of subsidence because construction would occur in the original alignment. Appropriate design standards and standard engineering practices would be applied during construction of the project. No significant impacts are anticipated. VII. HAZARDS. Would t_he project: a) Create a significant hazard to the public or the environment through the routine transport, use, or disposal of hazardous materials? b) Create a significant hazard to the public or the environment through reasonably foreseeable upset and accident conditions involving the release of hazardous materials into the environment? c) Emit hazardous emissions or handle hazardous or acutely hazardous materials, substances, or waste within one-quarter mile of an existing or proposed school? d) Be located on a site which is included on a list of hazardous materials sites compiled pursuant to Government Code Section 65962.5 and, as a result, would it create a significant hazard to the public or the environment? e) For a project located within an airport land use plan or, where such a plan has not been adopted, within two miles of a public airport or public use airport, would the project result in a safety hazard for people residing or working in the project area? f) For a project within the vicinity of a private airstrip, would the project result in a safety hazard for people residing or working in the project area? g) Impair implementation of or physically interfere with an adopted emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan? h) Expose people or structures to a significant risk of loss, injury or death involving wildland fires, including where wildlands are adjacent to urbanized areas or where residences are intermixed with wildlands? No Impact (Sections a, b, c, d, e, f, g, � h). The proposed project is the improvement of an existing City roadway and would not create a significant hazard to the public or the environment through the routine transport, use, or disposal of hazardous materials or reasonably foreseeable upset and accident conditions involving the release of hazardous materials into the environment. Palm Desert High School is located more than one mile from the Hovley Lane intersection at 43570 Phyllis Jackson Lane. However, as mentioned above, the proposed project would not result in hazardous emissions or handle hazardous or acutely hazardous materials, substances, or waste. R:1Projec�slHams1J004\IS-030500.tloc 24 Draft lnitial Study WORKING DRAFT-NOT FOR PUBLIC DISTRIBUTION Cook Street Drainage and lntersection Improvements A Phase I hazardous materials/substances site records search was completed for the project site and its immediate vicinity (EDR 2006). The records search is provided as Appendix E. Sites were identified in the area that would be affected by the proposed project. Sites located in the vicinity of the proposed project alignment include two leaking underground storage tanks (i.e., diesel and unleaded gasoline tank at a service station); an aboveground storage tank for waste oil at a tool maintenance and repair shop; and a sewage treatment facility. None of these sites are in the direct impact footprint of the proposed project and would not be directly or indirectly affected by the proposed project. The project site is not located within the boundaries of an airport land use plan nor is it within two miles of a public airport or public use airport; therefore, the project would not result in a safety hazard for people residing or working in the project area. The closest public use airport is the Palm Springs International Airport approximately 10 miles to the west. A private airport is located near the termination of Portola Avenue near Interstate 10. The Bermuda Dunes Airport is used for approximately 25,000 flights annually. However, the orientation of the airport requires flight paths to be east-west trending approximately 6 miles north of the project site. Therefore, the proposed project would not result in a safety hazard for people residing or working in the project area as a result of the private airstrip. The City of Palm Desert has established a Multi-Hazard Functional Plan (MHFP) with planned responses to natural and technological emergency situations. The MHFP includes emergency response or evacuation plans that would be implemented during various emergency situations. The Cove Communities Commission, comprised of various City officials from the cities of Palm Desert, Rancho Mirage, and Indian Wells, is the decision-making entity for emergency and related services issues with the contracted Riverside County Sheriff and Fire Departments. Palm Desert's three fire stations (#33 at Town Center Drive and Highway 111, #71 at Portola Avenue and Country Club Drive, and #67 at Mesa View Drive and Portola Avenue) share the capacity of authority as a First Response Team. The agency responsible for the Hazardous Response Plan (HRP) addressing hazardous and toxic materials is the County of Riverside Health Hazardous Materials Division and/or the Regional Water Quality Control Board. The proposed project would not be expected to impede the implementation of the MHFP or HRP as it would allow through-tra�c during construction. Therefore, no impacts are anticipated and no mitigation is required. In addition, the project proposes roadway and drainage improvements and is surrounded by urban development; therefore, the proposed project would not expose people or structures to a significant risk of loss, injury, or death involving wildland fires, including where wildlands are adjacent to urbanized areas or where residences are intermixed with wildlands. No mitigation is required. VIII. HYDROLOGY AND WATER QUALITY. Would the project a) Violate any water quality standards or waste discharge requirements? b) Substantially deplete groundwater supplies or interfere substantially with groundwater recharge such that there would be a net deficit in aquifer volume or a lowering of the local groundwater table level (e.g., the production rate of pre-existing nearby wells would drop to a level which would not support existing land uses or planned uses for which permits have been granted)? c) Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the site or area, including through the alteration of the course of a stream or river, in a manner which would result in substantial erosion or siltation on- or off-site? R9Proiects\HamsW004VS-o3o506.tloc 25 Drak Initial Study WORKING DR4FT—NOT FOR PUBLIC DISTRIBUTION Cook Street Drainage and Intersection Improvements d) Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the site or area, including through the alteration of the course of a stream or river, or substantially increase the rate or amount of surface runoff in a manner which would result in flooding on-or off-site? e) Create or contribute runoff water which would exceed the capacity of existing or planned storm water drainage systems or provide substantial additional sources of polluted runoff? fl Otherwise substantially degrade water quality? g) Place housing within a 100-year flood hazard area as mapped on a federal Flood Hazard Boundary or Flood Insurance Rate Map or other flood hazard delineation map? h) Place within a 100-year flood hazard area structures which would impede or redirect flood flows? i) Expose people or structures to a significant risk of loss, injury or death involving flooding, including flooding as a result of the failure of a levee or dam? j) Inundation by seiche, tsunami, or mudflow? No Impact (Sections a, b, c, d, g, h, i, & j), Less Than Significant Impact (e & fl. The Federal Clean Water Act establishes a framework for regulating potential water quality impacts from construction activities through the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency's National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) program. Municipalities within the Coachella Valley that conduct public improvement projects involving more than one acre of grading are required to submit a Notice of Intent (NOI) to the State Water Resources Control Board (SWRCB) to obtain coverage under the Areawide Urban Storm Water Runoff Permit (MS4) for the Coachella Valley (Order No. 01-077). The Regional Water Quality Control Board (RWQCB) oversees the implementation and enforcement of the MS4 permit. Because the project would involve grading on no more than one acre at a time, the City would not be required to submit an NOI to the SWRCB. The Coachella Valley is underlain by several large subsurface aquifers, or sub-basins. The Whitewater River Sub-basin encompasses 400 square miles and underlies the city and a substantial portion of the valley floor; it is the largest groundwater repository for the Coachella Valley. The Coachella Valley Water District (CVWD) provides domestic water services to Palm Desert using wells that extract groundwater from the Whitewater River sub-basin. This sub- basin is artificially recharged with imported Colorado River water carried via the Metropolitan Water District Aqueduct. it is also recharged naturally with runoff from the San Jacinto, Santa Rosa, and San Bernardino mountains. The proposed project would not result in a measurable impact to groundwater supply or groundwater recharge. The proposed project involves the installation of storm drain pipelines in Cook Street and on Novley Lane. However, the proposed project would not measurably alter the drainage pattern in the project area because storm water flows originating on the project site currently enter existing catch basins that drain to existing storm drain pipes that flow to the Whitewater River Channel. The drainage improvements would convey storm water generated on the project site and in the immediate vicinity to the storm drain pipes more efficiently, which would reduce the potential for on-site flooding. The project would result in a negligible increase in impervious surface given that it is primarily repaving areas that are currently paved with concrete or asphalt. Sections of raised medians with natural soil and landscaping would be removed; however, new raised and landscaped medians are also proposed in areas that are currently paved. Therefore, the proposed project R:\ProJecLslHanis\J004V5-030508.tloc 26 Draft Initial Study WORKING DRAFT-NOT FOR PUBLIC DISTRIBUTION Cook Street Drainage and lntersection Improvements would not be expected to substantially increase the rate or amount of surface runoff in a manner which would result in flooding on or off the site. The proposed project would not create or contribute appreciable volumes of runoff water beyond the existing condition and would therefore not result in flows that would exceed the existing or planned storm water drainage system capacity nor would the project provide substantial additional sources of polluted runoff. Construction activities such as grading, excavation, and trenching for site improvements would result in disturbance of soils on the project site. Runoff from the project site during construction could transport soils and sediments from these activities. Spills or leaks from heavy equipment and machinery, staging areas, or building sites could also enter runoff. Typical pollutants could include petroleum products and heavy metals from equipment and products such as paints and solvents that could contain hazardous constituents. Short-term water quality impacts could result if polluted runoff enters the Whitewater Channel (located 0.8-mile south of Hovley Lane) and downstream receiving waters. Potential erosion, siltation, and other water quality impacts during construction of the proposed project would be managed through the preparation of a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP). This plan would be a joint effort between the City and Contractor. The SWPPP would describe the measures or practices to control pollutants during both the construction and post-construction phases of the project. An SWPPP typically contains a list of target structural and non-structural best management practices (BMPs) which would be used to control, prevent, or reduce pollution. BMPs that are most often used during construction include gravel bags, temporary de-silting basins, and the timing of grading to avoid the rainy season (November through April). The SWPPP would contain BMPs that address the following areas during construction, as defined by the California Storm Water Best Management Practice Handbook: internal erosion control, good housekeeping practices, waste containment, minimization of disturbed areas, stabilization of disturbed areas, and controlling the perimeter of the site. In addition to the requirements of the NPDES program, provisions of the Uniform Building Code include elements that also require reduction of erosion and sedimentation impacts. The Contractor's full compliance with applicable local, State, and federal water quality standards would avoid water quality impacts. The proposed project consists of roadway and drainage improvements; no housing is proposed. Because no habitable structures would be placed within the 100-year flood hazard area and because existing flows would not be redirected in a manner that could result in on-site or off-site flooding, the proposed roadway improvements would not expose people or structures to a significant risk of loss, injury, or death involving flooding. No significant impacts are anticipated and no mitigation is required. No large water bodies are located in the vicinity of the project site. Therefore, the proposed project would not expose people or structures to a significant risk of loss, injury, or death involving flooding as a result of the failure of a levee or dam, or inundation by seiche, tsunami, or mudflow. IX. LAND USE AND PLANNING. Would the project: a) Physically divide an established community? b) Conflict with any applicable land use plan, policy, or regulation of an agency with jurisdiction over the project (including, but not limited to the general plan, specific plan, local coastal program, or zoning ordinance) adopted for the purpose of avoiding or mitigating an environmental effect? c) Conflict with any applicable habitat conservation plan or natural community conservation plan? R:\PmjeclslHartis\J004\IS-030508.doc 27 . Drak Initial Study WORKING DRAFT-NOT FOR PUBLIC DISTRIBUTION Cook Street Drainage and Intersection Improvements No Impact (Sections a, b, & c.) The proposed project would allow for roadway improvement in City-owned right-of-way with minimal take of private property (Table 1), including portions of sidewalks and landscaped areas. These proposed acquisitions would not physically divide an established community. The City is currently negotiating with private property owners to acquire the right-of-way necessary to complete the project. Cook Street is designated as an arterial in the Circulation Element of the City of Palm Desert General Plan. Arterial street sections are described in the Circulation Element as having 3 traffic lanes, a bikeway (either Class II on-street or Class I off-street), and 24-foot-wide parkways with sidewalks in each direction of travel. The proposed project would widen the roadway to the ultimate width consistent with the Circulation Element and would construct the roadways, medians, and sidewalks in a manner consistent with the requirements of the General Plan and Municipal Code. No habitat conservation plans or natural community conservation plans currently apply to the proposed project site. No impacts are anticipated and no mitigation is required. X. MINERAL RESOURCES. Would the project: a) Result in the loss of availability of a known mineral resource that would be of value to the region and the residents of the state? b) Result in the loss of availability of a locally-important mineral resource recovery site delineated on a local general plan, specific plan, or other land use plan? No Impact (Sections a & b). The Surface Mining and Reclamation Act of 1975 (SMARA) mandated the initiation of mineral land classification by the State Geologist in order to help identify and protect mineral resources in areas within the State subject to urban expansion or other irreversible land uses which would preclude mineral extraction. SMARA also allows the State Mining and Geology Board (SMGB) to designate lands containing mineral deposits of regional or statewide significance in accordance with classification criteria set by the State Geologist. The project site is located on land that is designated MRZ-3 on California Division of Mines and Geology mineral resources maps, which indicate that this is an area which contains mineral deposits, the significance of which cannot be evaluated from available data. The proposed project would result in construction in an area that is developed in the existing condition. Therefore, the roadway improvements would not cause additional land to be precluded from future mineral extraction. Therefore, implementation of the proposed project would not result in the loss of availability of a known mineral resource that would be of value to the region and the residents of the state or in the loss of a locally important mineral resource recovery site delineated on a local general plan, specific plan, or other land use. No impacts would occur and no mitigation is required. XI. NOISE. Would the project resuit in: a) Exposure of persons to or generation of noise levels in excess of standards established in the local general plan or noise ordinance, or applicable standards of other agencies? b) Exposure of persons to or generation of excessive ground borne vibration or ground borne noise levels? c) A substantial permanent increase in ambient noise levels in the project vicinity above levels-existing without the project? R:\PmjectslHarzisW004\IS030508.tloc 26 Draft lnitial Study WORKING DRAFT—NOT FOR PUBLIC DISTRIBUTION Cook Street Drainage and/ntersection Improvements d) A substantial temporary or periodic increase in ambient noise levels in the project vicinity above levels existing without the project? e) For a project located within an airport land use plan or, where such a plan has not been adopted, within two miles of a public airport or public use airport, would the project expose people residing or working in the project area to excessive noise levels? fl For a project within the vicinity of a private airstrip, would the project expose people residing or working in the project area to excessive noise Ievels? Less Than Significant Impact (Sections a, b, c, and d), No Impact (Sections e and t�. Sound pressure measurements are expressed in decibels (dB). However, sound pressure level alone is not a reliable indicator of loudness. In order to approximate the frequency response of the human ear, a series of sound pressure level adjustments is applied to the sound measured. The A-Weighting scale effectively approximates the frequency response of the average ear when listening to most everyday sounds. Furthermore, the State Department of Aeronautics and the California Commission on Housing and Community Development have adopted the community noise equivalent level (CNEL) scale. The CNEL weighting scale weights the average noise levels for the evening hours (7:00 PM to 10:00 PM) by increasing them by 5 dB, and weights the late evening and morning hour noise levels (10:00 PM to 7:00 AM) by increasing them by 10 dB. The A-Weighting and CNEL scales are described in Exhibit 5. The City of Palm Desert's Noise Ordinance states that the 1-hour average noise level in residential areas from a fixed (i.e., non-transportation) noise source may not exceed 55 dB(A) during the day between the hours of 7:00 AM and 10:00 PM and 45 dB(A) in the evening between the hours of 10:00 PM and 7:00 AM. If the ambient noise level exceeds the above noise standards, the noise standard shall be the ambient noise level. Furthermore, Section 9.24.070 of the Municipal Code limits construction activities to the following days and hours at certain times of year: • Monday through Friday from 7:00 AM to 5:30 PM; Saturdays from 8:00 AM to 5:00 PM (October 1st through April 30�h). . Monday through Friday from 6:00 AM to 7:00 PM; Saturdays from 8:00 AM to 5:00 PM (May 1st through September 30th) • Construction is not permitted on Sundays or government holidays. In the short-term, construction noise levels in the vicinity of the project are expected to fluctuate depending on the particular type, number, and duration of use of various pieces of construction equipment. The exposure of persons to the periodic increase in noise levels would be short-term, and project construction is expected to comply with the City of Palm Desert's Municipal Code requirements. Therefore, construction of the project is otherwise exempt from the Noise Ordinance standards during the above-mentioned construction hours and would not result in a significant impact on nearby residences. Groundborne vibration is measured in terms of the velocity of the vibration oscillations. As with noise, a logarithmic decibel scale (VdB) is used to quantify vibration intensity. When groundborne vibration exceeds 72 to 80 VdB, it is usually perceived as annoying to building occupants. The degree of annoyance is dependent upon individual sensitivity to vibration, and the frequency of the vibration events. Typically, vibration levels must exceed 100 VdB before building damage occurs. R:\PmjecLslHams\J004\IS-030508.tloc 29 Draft Initial Study WORKING DRAFT-NOT FOR PUBLIC DISTRIBUTION � u a � . u'1 , � j o �, I R �1, � M` mi � � ' X � � "� w �^ z w" � O r c� _ _ $ e � � � � r K ; � � �= N ?'c' 'x� O �' __ q p =` — ' W y C {� �� h i _ 3 � � U o`c o= Z � ' " W � �� ' - Z j - - V O Y' ^ 5 � C 'L - = M1 � _ � � � - E ; x o ° y .� `v'' � .�l — n ry > = ^ 2 ^ ._ — J c 2 ,E j N ' f oi � ` � � � � � c _ c ' m _ �.� u Y _ � q '_ �� :.0 _ y � � v � v ,�''o = : - t `Av. Y0�' n:� i� � Cs zY -^ � Q %� �� �i m� � � 'a X �� i�.� ........fJ.,.........t ......,... p`.n��'• � ; � Q ; N y W J y y � : ! i . . . . Z N .. :� .. O 3 5 v "' '. 'T `c < ¢ G 2 s c C — x ' s _ ' � m O - _ - x b - E � o � u •� � � = ' - _ . , � :a ^ 3 v ..2„ _ ' n �' =• j Y � � :;� a ' ' `� N Q � - '_ _ _° i # � �* `s � - } .� ' ``'c sS = y l,l � �' € _ - _ s c _ � _ � = L (/1 � n y 5 - = _ ' � .o 0 0 2 = 's t _ 'a � � � `3 - J t M N G ^ _ y .+' � � ..� < — � Jl � �L � N �` ' - ; � ' - - v � � 1 U ` ! U ,} N '. � � � G L e1� � � �y N N � L /y @ � V. U � O �/ N 1 V (Q Q QJ J � � � m N � � � � Z U N iAresiou xa�soiyde�B�600fISWeHIsl�alo�dGO Cook Street Drainage and l�tersection Improvemenfs The primary vibratory source during the construction of the project would be jackhammers. Typical jackhammers generate an approximate vibration level of 79 Vd6 at a distance of 25 feet. Therefore, it is possible that vibration would be perceived by residents as a nuisance if jack hammering occurs within about 22 to 56 feet of residences. However, project improvements do not involve jack hammering within 55 feet of residences. Therefore, impacts are considered less than significant due to the temporary nature of project construction, and because the vibration levels would be well below the threshold of building damage. The proposed project would not reduce the distance from the roadway to sensitive receptors in the vicinity of the proposed improvements (i.e., residences northeast of the intersection of Cook Street and Country Club Drive). The project would not remove existing barriers to noise and the proposed drainage improvements would remove existing intersection dips, which would thereby reduce vehicle noise typically associated braking, shock absorption, and acceleration. Furthermore, road resurfacing/repaving would be expected to reduce tire noise on the roadway by removing pot-holes and other surface irregularities. Long-term noise would not increase for existing residential land uses and impacts are considered less than significant. The proposed project is not located in an airport land use plan nor is it near a private airstrip. Furthermore, the proposed project would not expose people to excessive noise levels associated with airport uses. No impacts would occur. Mitigation Measures MM 11-1 Project construction shall comply with the City of Palm Desert Noise Ordinance. All construction activities shall be limited to the following time constraints: . Monday through Friday from 7:00 AM to 5:30 PM; Saturdays from 8:00 AM to 5:00 PM (October 1st through April 30'h). • Monday through Friday from 6:00 AM to 7:00 PM; Saturdays from 8:00 AM to 5:00 PM (May 1st through September 30�"). . Construction is not permitted on Sundays or government holidays. XII. POPULATION AND HOUSING. Would the project: a) Induce substantial population growth in an area, either directly (for example, by proposing new homes and businesses) or indirectly (for example, through extension of roads or other infrastructure)? b) Displace substantial numbers of existing housing, necessitating the construction of replacement housing elsewhere? c) Displace substantial numbers of people, necessitating the construction of replacement housing elsewhere? No Impact (Sections a, b, & c). The proposed project involves street improvements that do not provide access to previously inaccessible areas, and would not, therefore, have growth-inducing effects. The proposed project is in compliance with adopted traffic policies and forecasts and the proposed roadway width would be considered consistent with the Circulation Element of the City of Palm Desert General Plan and the CounN of Riverside Plan of Arterial Hiqhways (MPAH). The proposed project would not result in direct or indirect population growth impacts that have not already been analyzed and mitigated. R1Pro�ects\Hams\J004\IS-030508.tloc $Q Draft Initial Study WORKING DRAFT-NOT FOR PUBLIC DISTRIBUTION Cook Street Drainage and Intersection Improvements The proposed project is a roadway improvement project. Land uses proximate to the project site include residential uses; however, project implementation would not displace existing homes or people. No mitigation is required. XIII. PUBLIC SERVICES. Would the project: a) Result in substantial adverse physical impacts associated with the provision of new or physically altered governmental facilities, need for new or physically altered governmental facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental impacts, in order to maintain acceptable service ratios, response times or other performance objectives for any of the following public services: i) Fire protection? ii) Police protection? iii) Schools? iv) Parks? v) Other public facilities? _ Less Than Significant Impact (Section a). The proposed project is a street improvement project and would not directly affect emergency police or fire services. Short-term traffic delays may occur during construction. However, this short-term impact would not be considered significant because the road would remain open during construction. Additionally, a Traffic Control Plan would be prepared to address construction work hours, maintenance of pedestrian facilities, and emergency vehicle access (See the Transportation and Traffic Section of this Initial Study regarding the Traffic Control Plan). The proposed project would not affect any schools or park facilities. Local school buses use Cook Street as a travel route and may be delayed by construction activities. As with other traffic in the area, the delays would not be substantial and construction would be of a short duration. While the Desert Sands Unified School District (DSUSD) may choose to re-route their school buses during the construction phase of this project as a result of time constraints, this impact is temporary and would be considered less than significant. Although impacts are expected to be less than significant, the following mitigation measure is provided in order to reduce the nuisance impact of construction of the proposed project on public services. Mitigation Measures MM 12-1 No less than four weeks prior to commencement of roadway demolition and grading activities, the City of Palm Desert will provide notice to the County of Riverside Fire Department, County of Riverside Sheriff's Department, and the Desert Sands Unified School District indicating that they may experience delays on the project roadway segment. Such notice will provide a schedule with the expected duration of each construction task. XIV. RECREATION. Would the project: a) Increase the use of existing neighborhood and regional parks or other recreational facilities such that substantial physical deterioration of the facility would occur or be accelerated? R9Projecls\HamsW004\IS-030508.tloc 31 Draft/nitial Study WORKING DR4FT—NOT FOR PUBIIC DISTRIBUTION Cook Street Drainage and Intersection Improvements b) Include recreational facilities or require the construction or expansion of recreational facilities which might have an adverse physical effect on the environment? No Impact (Sections a & b). The proposed project would neither generate an increase in population, nor would it increase tl5e demand for local or regional parks or other recreational facilities. Furthermore, the proposed project does not include recreational facilities or require the construction or expansion of any recreational facilities. No mitigation is required. XV. TRAFFIC AND TRANSPORTATION. Would the project: a) Cause an increase in tra�c which is substantial in relation to the existing tra�c load and capacity of the street system (i.e., result in a substantial increase in either the number of vehicle trips, the volume to capacity ratio on roads, or congestion at intersections)? b) Exceed, either individually or cumulatively, a level of service standard established by the county congestion management agency for designated roads or highways? c) Result in a change in air traffic patterns, including either an increase in traffic levels or a change in location that results in substantial safety risks? � d) Substantially increase hazards due to a design feature (e.g., sharp curves or dangerous intersections) or incompatible uses (e.g., farm equipment)? e) Result in inadequate emergency access? f) Result in inadequate parking capacity? g) Conflict with adopted policies, plans, or programs supporting alternative transportation (e.g., bus turnouts, bicycle racks)? No Impact (Sections a, b, c, d, f, and g), Less Than Significant Impact (Section e). Cook Street is an existing north-south roadway designated as an "Arterial" (150-foot-wide right-of- way) in the City of Palm Desert General Plan. Recent traffic counts on Cook Street documented a daily traffic level of approximately 33,000 vehicle trips. The primary objective of the proposed project is to provide intersection improvements at the intersections of Cook Street at: Country Club Drive and at Hovley Lane. Portions of Cook Street and Hovley Lane would be widened from their current configuration to their ultimate width. Lanes would be widened but the current configuration would remain the same. The proposed project is expected to improve traffic flow at the intersections. It would therefore be expected to alleviate long-term traffic congestion on Cook Street. Therefore, the proposed project would be expected to result in a minor reduction in tra�c volumes that could otherwise exceed the capacity of the street system or Level of Service (LOS) standards established by Riverside County and the City of Palm Desert. To maintain traffic flow, project construction would be completed in several stages. Improvements at Country Club Drive would be completed in 5 stages and improvements at Hovley Lane would be completed in 6 stages. Traffic may be limited to one lane in each direction during construction. Consequently, construction operations may result in traffic delays on Cook Street and surrounding roads. Construction employee traffic would add up to 26 peak hour trips per day. Construction vehicles (delivery and haul trucks) would add up to approximately ten additional trips per day, The Contractor would submit a Traffic Control Plan to the Public Works Department for review and approval (see SCA 15-1). This plan would address construction hours, maintenance of pedestrian facilities and emergency vehicle measures, as well as include measures to minimize potential traffic delays. The Traffic Control Plan would be R:\PmJeclslHartisW004115-030508.tloc 32 Oraft Initial Study WORKING OR4FT—NOT FOR PUBLIC DISTRIBUTION Cook StreetOrainage and/ntersecfion lmprovements submitted and approved by the City prior to issuance of either grading or construction permits, whichever occurs first. No further mitigation is required. The proposed project site is located approximately two miles from the Bermuda Dunes Airport, a general aviation facility which currerftly accommodates approximately 25,000 annual operations. The project would allow for roadway and drainage improvements and would not affect air tra�c patterns or levels. The current roadway configuration has no parking and none is proposed or would be removed with project construction. The roadway design does not contain any sharp curves. Furthermore, no land uses adjacent to the proposed project site are incompatible with, nor would they become incompatible with one another as a result of the proposed project. The proposed project could result in constraints to local or regional emergency access. The Traffic Control Plan would include specific measures for notifying emergency service providers about roadway constraints during construction. The Traffic Control Plan would include specific provisions relating to communications with the Desert Sands Unified School District about construction-related roadway constraints. Standard Conditions of Approval SC 15-1 Prior to issuance of grading permits, the Construction Contractor must submit a Traffic Control Plan to the Department of Public Works, which specifies (1) the locations and dimensions of the construction work zone, staging areas, and materials storage areas; (2) locations of construction signs, barricades and delineators; (3) a schedule of road and/or lane closures; (4) a schedule of construction work and subsequent traffic control duration; and (5) measures designed to minimize tra�c delays and accommodate emergency vehicles. XVI. UTILITIES AND SERVICE SYSTEMS. Would the project: a) Exceed wastewater treatment requirements of the applicable Regional Water Quality Control Board? b) Require or result in the construction of new water or wastewater treatment facilities or expansion of existing facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental effects? c) Require or result in the construction of new storm water drainage facilities or expansion of existing facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental effects? d) Have sufficient water supplies available to serve the project from existing entitlements and resources, or are new or expanded entitlements needed? e) Result in a determination by the wastewater treatment provider which serves or may serve the project that it has adequate capacity to serve the projecYs projected demand in addition to the provider's existing commitments? � Be served by a landfill with sufficient permitted capacity to accommodate the projecYs solid waste disposal needs? g) Comply with federal, state, and local statutes and regulations related to solid waste? No Impact (Sections a, b, c, d, e, f, & g). The project proposes roadway and drainage improvements and would not result in the need for new electrical or natural gas facilities, R:Wm�ecis\HamsW004\IS-030508.tloc 33 Drak Initial Study WORKING DRAFT—NOT FOR PUBLIC DISTRIBUTION Cook Street Drainage and lntersection Improvements communication systems, local or regional water, or wastewater treatment and distribution facilities, storm water drainage facilities, long-term water supplies, or long-term solid waste services. In addition, it would not result in impacts that would exceed wastewater treatment requirements. However, the relocation and extension of existing utilities and service systems would be required. The utility relocations involving telephone, cable N, and water lines and adjustments to Southern California Edison (SCE) vaults and/or power lines would be performed by the individual utility companies. The coordination of the required relocation and extension of facilities would be completed in advance between the appropriate Contractor and service providers and agencies. The relocations of existing service systems as a result of the proposed project would not result in additional impacts. No mitigation is required. The Construction Contractor would be responsible for demolition and construction debris waste disposal for the proposed project. Demolition and construction debris, including asphalt and concrete from the existing roadway, would be recycled at the Granite Construction Company in the City of Palm Desert. Additional, non-recyclable construction debris would be disposed of at the Edom Hill Landfill or another operating landfill with sufficient permitted capacity to accommodate the project's needs, including, but not limited to, the Badlands Landfill in the City of Moreno. The proposed project would comply with federal, State, and local statutes and regulations related to solid waste. No impacts are anticipated and no mitigation is required. XVI. MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE. Wouid the project: a. Have the potential to degrade the quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self-sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal or eliminate important examples of the major periods of California history or prehistory? b. Have impacts that are individually limited, but cumulatively considerable? ("Cumulatively considerable" means that the incremental effects of a project are considerable when viewed in connection with the effects of past projects, the effects of other current projects, and the effects of probable future projects.) c. Have environmental effects which will cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly? Less Than Significant (Sections a, b, 8� c). As identified in the Biological Resources Section, the proposed project site is located in an urbanized area with vegetation consisting primarily of ornamental plant species that provide low quality habitat for native wildlife species. Project impacts would not substantially reduce fish or wildlife habitat; threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community; or reduce the number or range of a rare or endangered plants or animals. As discussed in the Cultural Resources Section, the proposed project site is currently in a developed condition and the potential for impacts to historic or prehistoric cultural resources and/or paleontological resources is considered low due to the minimal grading and/or excavation associated with the proposed project improvements. Furthermore, mitigation provided would reduce the potential for impacts to historic or prehistoric resources to a level considered less than significant. As discussed in the Noise Section, the project would result in an increase in ambient noise levels during construction. However, the project would comply with the City of Palm Desert R:\Ptojecls\HarrislJ004\IS-03050B.tloc 34 Draft Inifial Study WORKING DRAFT—NOT FOR PUBLIC DISTRIBUTION Cook Street Drainage and Infersection Improvements Noise Ordinance during construction and long-term noise levels would not increase for sensitive receptors upon project completion. R:\Projecls\Hartis\J004\I5�030508.tloc 3S Draft Initial Study WORKING DRAFT—NOT FOR PUBLIC DISTRIBUTION Cook Street Drainage and Intersecfion Improvemenfs XVII. REFERENCES California integrated Waste Management Board Solid Waste Information System (SWIS) www.ciwmb.ca.gov/SW IS/. City of Palm Desert. March 2004. Final General Plan. City of Palm Desert. Municipal Code Title 25—Zoning: www.codemanage.com/palmdesert CVAG Department of Finance. 2001. Regional Housing Needs Assessment. Department of Mines and Geology. 2000. Seismic Hazards Maps. Environmental Data Resources Inc. November 29, 2006. EDR Radius Map with Geocheck, Portola Avenue Bridge, Palm Desert, CA 92260. Newport Traffic Studies. February 9, 2006. Cook Street 24-Hour Traffic Volumes. South Coast Air Quality Management District. 2006. Final Methodology to Calculate PM2.5 and - PM2.5 Significance Thresholds. Southern California Air Quality Management District. 1999. CEQA Handbook. U.S. Department of Agriculture Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS). 1979. Soil Survey of Riverside County, California, Coachella Valley Area. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (2000), Watershed Assessment Database www.epa.gov/surf3/states/CA. R:\Pro�ec�slHartisW004\IS-030508 Eoc 36 Draft Initial Study WORKING DR4Ff-NOT FOR PUBLIC DISTRIBUTION APPENDIX A RIGHT-OF-WAY ACQUISITION EXHIBITS � N o w < g � U �i^ N �pN i-- o � a N� Z2 �n � � gt I �� II m � No � � � � $� Q j E - - e �W `� ? � = �a � W 3� �-l� B � W�a g W Z � � � O � � � � g '� ? � aj � Q tt'`I � W W M � � � +, � � X� Z F=�tt1 � �V' W�� ,Cy � � W U Z l�M 2 li h G� ^ K � .. � ^ � C/2 M a � ¢N � ¢� O � � - � p ¢ 30 ¢ 30 Q � � � � I � I o � a xoo Xoo ~ � ��� � O M O � � � � Z o^0 I W �=O a = O �r^ ~ a � � Q � Q�c�o Q�� = a o ���8 � � Q � � � � �� . Z o � �� N �. � W w 0 3 � � � � W -�D' � �� `� � w � � � o"� o4 � �mo ❑ 00~ U �� � a� � a � `�' - - � Q � � � �3 �I � ; G (.s�) � �,o I 3 � .S9 F� ��o � � � I �� � c�O E (,l9) W� � Q � � � I X � ,LL N Q w cr Q �Q � `- � — Z vi \ Q� � � — i � 2 �� Q ^Y � �- °' �m� V W I :r � � � � N JOQ (� O � J � � a�x3 ^ `� OV � a � � U � � zm �� , � o�P �U� _ a � � � a�3 _- �¢ '�� �� wo m � �8� _ � � ��� : l i�am Y"�^ x � i�S 3 � I � W � I � i , � �� � � Q �� i. � I � � � ! '; Lst) a> ,ss L� m � ! .L9 W � � � � 3 i � � _ � � ���� z z � ' c� (� «f � ���� IFi� W : Z@I I � Rr � �C�� W � � N k� Q �q ��'tl ~ Z � � S Z W (FiI � y � FW X ci� _ _-1 C� y)tn W �� 4 WW y Y � � � � a a3 �3 � � � � � � � ao � � I o a� G i- m h cW, a 1 'n � Il^ I w� o Q N � / N ^ F ¢ a � Z m � � e � � � �� — __---I -- � � � _ I � 3 � � � � W Z �yo, rc 33 � o�� wm � / � � � ¢W3 Wb > p� I o� �vWiW Z .. o �>- 3 0� �`-' w�c�i 3 � am a� �ov� � . C�O i ( Kj XO �F RU �I- � � � � R W` K S � I Q2 \ � � I Z \ � � ' J � �, � �I � i I ti ZW i ? � � 2� I' ' Y �.W Qa � woa � ' � �_� O WC>W � � Z �Km �� �` I u � i Wd 6£:£0:: BOOZ/Ct/L 'bmP'A15 l!Q!4xa MOiI c:nlJ F�lunoJ\RWnop xG�4K3 M@J\(tPL500-L90)laanS Noo��Y>>a0 wlod��H I M I F O Q 5 � O y^ F- N �� ZZ -W'� a �+� }J V�II �e ¢� cn� °i� �t V�1 � I ¢a �(y� � a g� �s W � S �i � � ' c� � Woa = o I � � '' ~m � �~� '� W � cnm � � pw� � 3 a � w� � Z ��m � x o� �- .+� a� I �' aw=rn � � c��r � Li.l ¢ z �Ni y �, - Z Q � � Y � O � �W � � Z \ Q ; �j_ U � $ � OWW Q Q � � � _ ��•�� a X o �� � � �' � ���� � � (,s�J � o � �� � � � 3 .�5 �o �n Q C�o N t �99) c� - - � � .99 � �= 1 � W� � Y ��' I ¢ 3 W 3 C� 3 � �o � a,� �, � �' c� Q N � I � I �- � � � Z �� a � � I � z ��� � � � k� ; � Y o � w� 3 Z � w� � O v�'i W � � z i� o� � °_ � _ ,- � N o�..'.-C 3� a L_ _ _ _� N r — -, : �3 -- I �� v� � �V J� �!--- 1l— a 3� � —�� � W ¢ W� � � W� � /; �Z am Ozm n pQ �� � �w ¢ � , =J a � I a� 3o � N o w � a � =V�j � 'g U v�i^ � O � ��M � N �� p� a y� I � � � J� � �� � W Q N II � � � $� Q2� � � a j e Op = a a _ ��_�� _ � \ _ � i �� �z c� X � � �� =J J � � � � � � � � � — � � � � w �- �� zW � " " � �¢ Z �L Q � � � �� O U ��'yT � � � � � ? �S� 3 � � � ~ M Qa � � � f1�� x� x � o W3� = a � � -�� w� W�� Q a o woa C� � '��� o ��W � o � ��` � W �� �o Gsti) z � M Z � �m _,_, .� U •JCJC � J�- J �54) Q �"3 a � ,£'9 0 �~ J 1 N � S Q � � U' � Q �K W I O I O � 03 \ � 1 a o� o _ ` `� � � Y �� �. _ � a� am - � O � r,�'"��J � m N I � U v '� Q �Qe �3 Q Q �Q� zo tO � Q M � O '' `� .. � i I as�c, x� o v j W i �� � � � � N � c� - - � — � , � � M N p , � a _ I � I— `$ U v'�— � ` I ¢�� N �m � N K Q N d' � � OW^ �� $f o.0 � N I � aZ3 N�i � � � g� � a0 � _ �a o — ° w \ X � � Gss) s W �I � �.55) � J �- -r..� � W ,Z9 � � %� I � p e� �, _ . � = y� ZZ � Q o W � �� � � � �� � � ��� � �I ��� � '�W � � _ � cn � � �o = �, o ���� � I N .. � � = c� � w ���� o � �.�ti� , � o w �W � �,� � � .sti Z z � �m � i Gssa Q � � �1¢ e W3 I a� ��, � 1� � Y � �' a� cn � w 11 ' 3 0� mZ � ¢ o v' Il 1 o v,�y � w � o � °0 1 in om� �� Z � ¢ _ — � �� � ¢ `" � _ I �U i X W O W � v1 ^ iV N � M O � � T � p I Q 1 � I ,—�i 3 � � � Q � O i Z p � � p � � I�-'. �� la" � �' � � 2 L� I � WK w � I vJ � � � > � � � � I c� - - --� — � I } � ~ N � U � � _ _ �W - � Y�l �.� � Q � v--� II rg' U 'h'� � �O a ___— O� � N �� � Vl S � I_----- � 'Q y c� —�- x� a � � a� dS '�� �- G 3 „ �� � � � 8� � � W� � w � ^ e I- � - �� m € = �a Z .. � � c� � � c��- F- �'3 I �o�� ti3 ZZ � � �LJ � �n�� cn >- =� X O WU� WO Q1- �f- �t_ 2 �'- -i-� 2 >'W �- � Q S� .Z� � �o ¢� � � F- � Ce] .6£'� . '9 Q w�-a � � � - titi .� �l °^' 3 �� w I� LL Q o S9 � p � � � � \ O = ��� ` Y v�i Z �� m J � � � � � I -' W = a a ���� W W � O V w ���tl a � 0 � � � ��~� � � � a a � � � N �� �o � Q a � h a J� J W c� Q �3 J am a� 3 a� ' ac� p3 a� F j �.� � 1 I I � a� — ir) — �-- - - - -J=� _ _� � � � s � C� cO ^ � N — � m � _ Q � U � J �3 � Q � c� �-� ¢ � � � N �L! � ' �3�3 2� � � "' N I O z S� I x �' �W �_ " � � p W W� w� 1 U _ � �—� � i I � c� - -�-- - Q1 I �-- � I � N o U � W _ _ �W � �il ''�� `O Q � v— �� �'�' c� v�— � v�i= � i_---- -- �� � a �� —�- x� a t I �+. � d1 � o _ �— �� t� N -- Op�j -/� w � gE I � �, W�t W € S "�n'. Z� T � Z�� Z¢ � W Q3 � � I i=m� �3 ZZ �� �LJ X �� X� Q �y� O� ` W U W� �t- a= T -I-� x �- w a�' �+ .z� � 3p Q� Q a� � � �s rn ,s� . 's � W � a p Q � - titi� 'l � 3 � � W W LL o s's � � �' i � C� O �.,, 3 ��_ ' Y v�i Z t=-� m J � � � ���� I '� W = a o ���g J � o�� a � / a � o � ���LL �"� N �o a � � � +� N �� � rp � Q { � � a ��- J pW c� ¢ N 3 J � J am a� 3 i �� WQ �� Z � � � 0 3 a'� � I o� X � i a� � � � � _ �n _ �—_____�_� - -� � � � � � �o r. � � —� � ¢� v — 'Q I U � � �3 � Q C� �\ C� �-�¢ y � � N W � ' �3� 3 z� � v �`' i� Z � I O z � � k � �W vFi= � I � p '�' wo w� 1 U � � - -'� - — � i � �' APPENDIX B AIR QUALITY EMISSIONS CALCULATIOiV WORKSHEETS E m m N OI C N ° " E v v y T N N N O h N y T N N N O N O N N p 9 O Q y o > a � y 'rn o 'rn o LL a � LL f d � a � m m ¢ n (/1 N N a O (7 t�J � C') � � y T O � � V il N N N 9 G y ry y O s X � ` % y j W '� W y o � o d � 3 a 3 a `o `o `m `m a o _ � � w m .- m n E a N y� .t .- a a E m � � m m � a a � a o c a � c rn � �c - E � '� E � o c = o c = a � c f E ` E a � E ' ' N O N O O 1� t0 r �- d V O O N d U � V V N V �- � C A N N �- N W � C V t7 � �� 'O N � �C a � o m � o _ E s v E t O o w o � N K H Z O O Z O O V N V N N Iq j� M N O� N m j �E j� � CJ N O n'J O j �E q ln d� N N O �p � � N N �- N O) �p � N N d N N d � a io o' rn m a' N c s � " � y N m � O �°+ � O � V � 'm U � '� N Q1 T O O O C� O 1N � � N T O N V N � � � � m ; � 9 � o � y � 9 0 � y > ,/� > U� .L] O� (O � � � � K V, Y 0 fO N O N � K � O � N E N O O N a N 0 p O O o U � ;, � U � ` E C N � C A A A A A A 9 � /� � A A A A � � � 1 � C O d L d N � A N O N L N N � � N � � } 0 .�. v'O m N � � T p �0 W o � N N y N E � T � c N a�i � E ,c t v c y `o 0 £ E u oi ¢` � r ° � E a � rn m � E o � �o m W N a m ° � m £ n p " N o ° j Q � y � " C W "c a ° a � a w v � c W r a �n a � m .o a � c O C � A y . y o 3 C c A � � o � x o 3 O ❑ N O A O N p G uf � � a � o a F m o. E N u1 U � ,�'p ? C a m 'p d E w � a u E c � W � � O y N ` E N � C g � � N 1� N ~ `� 6 N � C N 9 � � � C N � N � N W N 9 � � O � N E E N N m c m = o o m �R m �' E d c m = - rn « � �o :; E (� � r � % � n � z � F�- E o t � K � � m o E N m m a � W � E � '- a � W � E � Z � � E o � a a � c c E � o a m a ` c c E E � � d a � O � N � N N O `G O O 3 N 1` q � q o �0 � a` C� i9 ❑ a E f- a F a` <9 !9 ❑ a � t°- a h° m T C p � 3 C 3 p � � � . . O � ll j E y m a y t � L N jp U � � d � N V � � � � C � 6 �y � ;T2a C � � � �' � � N T � U c a_ � H� m a p J�? oa3 � Q O '- _ �ry 2 O �� W w 2 �" � ��.: cz V =, w Q� - � y m C � o - a a V N O o d O N R � ` N N � a E o o w m `m = y u c o � 2 N � a `� � N m c E N � J U W a N � N N s j N� C m O � � � .t.. ,� a a v v � � � � N L O Ol m o � (7 � y o � � E o > 10 3 m v c � y m m m m � � u�i � E E E v 'a � � '° � z �° m` ` in 3 m w w w m m m r o�a�o W � w m E .= �i ci .= ni ri �E m m �Z a. a.o `a � ° « T a " " a � v a w W �p L N p N (p �- C N P O m N 'O ry � O - °o E � U u IG > m a N N � d U A - � V d O T � O � �C a Q `n O � = � � o � � � d L � U �u y � o c C � ,1°' a ` a. O � � o � .N N o Vi °�' " o `+i � 0 C G 1] O �m N N y G V N G c E � � N W � ._ i 5 � d v q C L a S V � W W T � � y .'._". c .p �' � a w o `o V �- � � '-" a E �' ° y >, '^ O ' - N ? 9 y � : A a a 4 � LL � C. Ip V f�q ' � - ' � _ _ �= o m p d � 'd^ G � V c o y U Q �, $ .� � ,a, � m 2 rn t ¢ y � � a � _v E m V C c j 9 � y � o o c w v Q � � � ' c 'a � K m o m ao'. z u H U . � � 'o � � o. a. m E l6 a. �� o o � � m m m v $ K m � x `v � W E° � O (0 o n _o = n o o 'o 'o' m ' 'o o � `0 'o 'o > .mc �.' O z O :.. 5 a` U a` a` a` O a` �- � 3 m m a i- N O O O O o O O O O � O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O e O O O O O N o O O O O m m � O O O O � O O O O O h O O O O O O � p o 0 O O O O 6 0 $ O O 0 O N O � 0 N a O O O O � U ^ o 0 � O O O O � c O O O O O � O N % m m ry p m v � � � m O � � Z m � o U � V � O N N O � j t d m �- � U A o' y 0 h U v � c o 0 0 0 0 0 0 ,y � in � o .c �o �a o o n o a a o o �i N �i � d A � o � o `m ai m � `m � 'o p' a io p' m n U O � U d c � � � � r o c' o o� U � N d K v U ¢ td.� D `v m n � y ° a ` c - � o O 'b •y a' c� y g p�, _ •E � ° C � W �', m O �, @ OI .—��.. E V � C '^ d _ N ` m a m 7 . 9 E n '� I�p a10i o in = v c � o U '- � rn O a i "' g _ a >''N H g >` 2 ¢ c � : "; O 's '° !-^ m a c sU � '�yf � � N a c a E w t0 a � F �' o+ o� m c o = v w a a c � c . � � � � � � y ? o � �° 10 m' o � � � o m m £ o 0 z t9 c9 � a f- _ � E � > x w a h N N n m f ` N N N mf O P N O O O O O O O O O O O€O O r O O O O O O a o 0 o d d d d d d d d o elP�e a o � o � o � o u � i � v m v > v � € ~ ~ Io v � ( Q I() ^ (O O O N O N O N (O N N N Q N � O � O �- O U � � N O Oi O Oi O Oi O O � ,0 . �.. U � O � O � O � � j N > > ' O � m � Ja v � O � I ' d = � � N OjNiQiN.N�� % N O O � O � O e` O O ' V t � % t+l e` O r' O � O � �I � � i Z O O O O O O O O O O .� Y fl`�� 2 (O � O � O � O m i � � � i � � i i � f�- N � F � 3 ( � � E v i � m ( � I j i ` ! E o I ( i � � o n ( � li, � � , e I � m a i I I � u y � ,ty�M M (� O N N O h O N O 1p O O m �^. : (� 1p O O O O O O x � O m `° o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 � ; O ^ o � o � o � 3 q � o � Q .. y o 0 0 0 > � � i � , A ) O � : w y q � U � � � � 5 � � � � � p O o O E U d ` t ` E a t � � U . � � . , m � 5 , �: p o Z � 5 LL � - u - N J °� m C d a O a d � � y m _ � C y " yyj oi U'� m ° � @ d C o, ° � l� 'o . 5 0 m � `m � c v i a a c 'N � m i a v .o d o N v U c � y y°', y y U `� � _ {L U ' � = o K N o � �p o tll � " � v m �' a J > 2� °� j n I1,J " D m `m �a u m N £ � W � � a � � � � � m Y c � � a c� .� = m > y �' m rn m a c fl o� t7 a O a 4 � V � s a v �' 'U2 � � u � � c � � a � � 7 � rn � � O 2@ �@ 'm � � 2 o m $ 'm o > o a F- � W a E a o a o � o � (� c q (7 U' o a � � U, a V, a � a a a � � GI � � N 10 U, a U'� a � a 5 N a. E v o°�i a°1i a °i � m m m `m 'm „ m H 2 v �' a 1° : �' m -' ' '' ' '' E � ; n o 0 0 o m d a a v a � 'c � � � = v a "' a " a '" B 0 � a. E E E E � � o- � o. � o. " o. " � � � rn � m � o. � � � � " Y 3 0` �a m m v m `o_ o ,o o. a a a n a n d � c A ° n �' n a n `o `o `o `o � y c c y v ? D 'm a a a m � � c m c m c � � o 0 o d �E �E o' o o' o 'a `o 'o o `� 1° `� E o' o 'o `o o' o 3 E o` z z z z w w a ti a � a F a �- 9 � c� i� o w a � a � a ti 0 o c g o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 � o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o p a � a o 0 0 0 o d o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o d d o 0 0 0 0 0 a � c 'o n >. o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 p m o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o a Z a o 0 0 o c o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 'o n � o � .- O o 0 o a o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 a o o U A o a o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 � E o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o a o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 a a � a o � c 0 �'o c'�o U, � g g o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 -� � y � o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o a o 0 0 0 0 o c o � � a o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o c o 0 0 0 0 0 a a c 'o o' n n �)! � ` I d a p V A E � o 'a d � N �' t �' W c m ! m 'a t�' � u o 'c d m - v - L' w ` n ^ Q � oi � S ` °rn a 1= � E o '- m o m c � 'o > >, b .9 a � 'v a . ❑ E i K `o A d K K '° c 'v. '° � � m d a, � 1 � N � � � o' c 3 '�u. H ' �e a a x `m d � d � � a � � � � y � � � m T m o 0 o N@ 2 0 � o L° o � � m' m o oi � L" � 'o a .._I___ r m m o a o 0 0 o w LL c9 � O o a a � rn i'n in w r- r n _ a � c' � � � u m `o '''^ � v' `-' E m � � � � m = > `�, c °� 4 u, � W � °1 d u O d � > r �t : T a U O 6 �,; .: f E o' � � L Z a � o _�;,�. �, U c n N `� m O C V N c w •N _ a+ °' N - N °� ^ � > � 7 A m � QG m � � � W `o •+ `- n � U 'm v E d E o � � � Z 1 `m '� - c p_ - � rn m > c rn rn � 7 5 y a+ 'a c � .o a �`n � = a .� _ �jJ _v o v � � � o` E 'a � a LL N c c _ y - � � p � d > > c a' � � � m � � O � > i i `� a _ _ _ _ o O n rn 'm 'm y. � ti 11 LL LL O U� O T 0 O O O O O O O P O O 0 O N O O O � N O O O O n � m m o 0 0 0 0 0 o m o o m o � o 0 o w N O O O O N O � E O O O O C O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O a a � 0 K o 0 0 0 0 0 o n o 0 o M o o a m n o 0 0 o m a O A � o 0 0 0 0 0 o c o 0 0 o c o 0 o rn m o 0 0 0 2 a 6 0 0 o d d d d d o o � o m o d o N N d d d d c � - a � c 0 0 a. o 0 0 0 0 o c o 0 0 0 o ry o 0 o m o 0 0 0 o m m U a c o 0 0 0 0 0 o c4i o o in o m o 0 0 �o m o 0 0 o a � N O O O O O O O (O O O V O OO O OO C (C � O O O O C O 6 � TI� O O O O O O O O O N O m O p O Q N O O O O !O N m m o 0 0 0 0 0 0 � o o m o 0 0 o m m o 0 0 0 � p � � o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 �- o 0 0 o N o 0 0 oi o 0 0 0 0 o' v a ; E � a y n m y N W .. m w F � s o � � E a - '� t d 2 '"' a n n g ' rn a r E m �- "o `" o o a T 2 n 9 � Q o � ` `� d � ft' m w 9 � w v d v .� P' u F m o � o W `a m° � a' � c n m s � � E c 3 u'�i H 'm � °' a x `m m � w �' � a `° u ° K n i. " ` `o o 10 t0 2 0 " `o `0 0 � � m 'm 'o � rn � �v a m c 1- m m V U U U U O w t� (9 � O O a a K ri) ln N N I- f- E 3 0 0 m m o `m v E > � `o � a � E e i n .- .- o � � .- a U C 7 O N E z' 'm d c � 0 0 R d q E H d w p a c v m i� 0 0 0 o a o 0 0 0 0 o m o 0 0 0 0 o n � o 0 o m � N O O O N O O O O O O N O O O O O O � O O C N p a � O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O 9 O 6 % T O O S Q $ O O O O O A S O O O O O m n O O p � N O Q N O O Z � O O O T O O O O O O � O O O O O O N V O O O N V C O n p r o 0 o a o 0 0 0 0 o e o 0 0 0 0 o M o 0 o m n m U N O O O � O O O O O O � O O O O O O 0 N O O O � � p � O O O O O O O O O O N O O O O O O N M O O O M M O 6 O O O m O O O O O O O O O O O O O m � O A N N ON O O O O O O O O O O N O � O O p p O O A � p E O C O N O O O O O O � O G O O O O m � O O O O � 9 � O 6 N d N a � D W � m � � Q F � j O C H � 9 W � 6 � a F � E `� � ¢ p m o' " o o' >. .� a a � 'v v K � o � m o K° K 3 o W m � W m 9 a � � `m m m c d m ` u " �' c � m `v � ` a a S `a � � v m c a '° u " y m U E N N Y N N � L N N O OI j � d N F Gl Rl U U U U U ❑ W I�i f'J � O O p, p. R' N N � 41 F- r E � N N u N N � 1 � `o E a � E e z a N N J O N E m Z D r N j m � a d � o N a a d _ E � v a � rn N C q O o a o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o c o 0 0 o m m e o a o 0 0 o n o � m o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o m m ry o a o 0 0 0 � o 0 � ? o 0 o d 6 0 0 0 0 0 o d d d d o d d d c d d 6 a 9 c Qo 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o m m � o 0 0 0 o ry � H � o a o a o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o ry a o m o 0 0 0 o N Z a o 0 0 o d d d c d o d c d o n n v o N o 0 0 o n a c p r o 0 o a o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o n o 0 0 0 0 0 � M � V a o 0 o a o 0 0 0 o a o 0 0 o w � w o � o 0 0 o f o N a00000000000000 > � � 0 � 0000 0 a � m0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o M m m o � o 0 0 o m � � o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o m n � o m o 0 0 o N d d � � o o d d o 0 0 0 0 0 o d d d d o 6 c c c d o d a 0 ri ; E � Q � in a t v w � m 'v ti �' o o c m E w " ° ° O1 a � 2 n a o Q a o _ � � O T � - d' N � � d N F � N � C "c U N al � (L v C � v N 6 p `w � rn x a t `m m r d " E c 3 m d � �e a � x t > '> m � '° N t � � c y >, ` ` `o o L° N 2 0 0 �° x m m o � a o rn 9 m v o H m m U U U U U O W LL U' � O O 2 a fL N 41 41 N F i- N W V N = E > v `o E a p, E Q i a � � U L � � 6 O C O a � � Z c � V N `y N ❑ O D N � O � E c w g m �0 O a �- � T N V � � m w w w m m m m w m m m m m m m m m m m m m A 'o m Z ❑ � `o � j ry in � m � m � rn N rn �n �n � m � �o rv '� m m m o � � LL 1� I� V N I� In � Q V t0 Yl N Q d. N � 0 l N [Y y � � - � o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 � o o m a m � 0 L O J p N a " � a � w c v m .-. c N d m W L W p� a N O d v ¢ � �A H O W � m Z ry x E U C O aN tn �O j y` a O � � 3 y N M > O N pJ OI Q N W � N Q W m � ` W � � �y N (O a A m N W N H U � `o a o = p � � o V y O � - � U V O O T 4n � C > � Q (J N 0 9 `m ra m E a V O � N L � m C � � M ` m '¢ A a � A LL ° o o m � a � m a U U S m d Q x W O 'a �j F- W d O a � W S t O E v y � Q o } ° � E m r�n � n F `o0 3 � .o' u E � m Z ;� q n m w < ` � .. ° > o W m 'a � x v .., o N o L' d m C u m Q '"'`" o W 1�- F2- E c � � m �' v a o. t Q � K � @ a` m �' 2 5 � d n �O � w o � a 0 c E .� � ~ c o@ rn � U W � ~ ~ �" m a°�i c � `m � � n° O a � @ v d ._ m w @ o� L' .c d `m v . U .. '' v 3 L a S 2 d m � m rn a a m c N `0 � ,:° ,:,;a 10 � 'Q v o `o m m � � m � ,�' c m' 'm o 'o a `o rn a � m a d y rn Z W W p] U U U U � U'� O O O a a fL 2' K K 4J UI i� N f �- � 0 41 W ,"..��..� Celebrofing �mmxnm C O N S U L T 1 N G '°9°-'c°6 An EnvlronmeNol Piann�ng/Rc�sclrca . Monogemert!Corporotion , ._� /, , �_`� December 1, 2006 Mr. Ehab Gerges ViA EMAIL AND MAIL Harris &Associates egerges�harris-assoacom 750 "B" Street, Suite 1800 San Diego, California 92101 �� Subject: Biological Constraints Suroey for the Cook Street Restriping Project in the City of Palm Desert, Riverside County, California Dear Mr. Gerges: This letter report presents the findings of a biologicai constraints survey for the Cook Street project site (hereafter referred to as the project site) in the City of Palm Desert, Riverside County, California (Exhibit 1). BonTerra Consulting Senior Scientist Dr. Michael Robson conducted a general plant and wiidlife survey on ,�� ;- i' October 11, 2006. The purpose of the survey was to evaluate potential biological ,t ���� ��� constraints to development of the project site. Focused surveys for special status 1�-- __��--�� plant or wildlife species were not included in this survey effort. The California Native Plant Society's (CNPS) Inventory of Rare and Endangered Vascular Plants of California (CNPS 2006) and California Department of Fish and Game's (CDFG) California Natural Diversity Database (CNDDB) (CDFG 2006) were reviewed prior to the survey to identify special status plants, wildlife, and habitats known to occur in the vicinity of the project site. Database searches included the U.S. Geological {., . Survey (USGS) Myoma and La Quinta 7.5-minute quadrangles. �!/�' /' PROJECT LOCATION �f�.;, The project invofves the restriping of lanes and shouiders along a three-mile section of Cook Street between Fred Waring Drive and Frank Sinatra Drive (Exhibit 2). The project site is located o� the USGS Myoma and La Quinta I51 Kc,;m�,s D ��e 7•5-minute topographic quadrangle maps on portions of Township 5 South; Range 6 East; Sections 3, 4, 9, 10, 15, and 16. Topography on the project site is Su!i� E.200 relatively flat with a range in elevation from approximateiy 160 to 280 feet above mean sea level. Cook Street crosses the Whitewater River just north of Fred G.s!c Pd�eso Waring Drive. Surrounding land uses indude commercial, residential, and ornamental. The project site is located within the proposed Coachella Valiey Coi�Po�o r 92b26 Multipie Species Habitat Conservation Plan area. � (71 n,� q44-9199 � !' '�I 44%1-9j9� lax �rr�.w_k;onie�rcccnsulhn�:_corc� Mr. Ehab Gerges December 1, 2006 Page 2 EXISTING CONDITIONS Veqetation Tvqes and Other Areas The project site consists of an existing roadway. Vegetation along the road that may be impacted by the proposed project includes smoke tree (Psorothamnus spinosa), oleander (Oleandersp.), and fan paim (Washingtonia sp.). Adjacent vegetation that is not expected to be impacted by the proposed project includes Spanish needles (Palafoxia arida), plicate tiquilia (Tiquilia plicata), broad-leaved cattail (Typha latifolia), puncture vine (Tribulus terrestris), fig (Ficus sp.), gum (Eucalyptus sp.), and pine (Pinus sp.). Wildlife Habitat Given the developed nature of the project site and vicinity, there is limited habitat for native wildlife species. The only reptile species observed in the vicinity of the project site was side- blotched lizard (Uta staosburiana). Bird species observed in the vicinity of the project site _ inciude American kestrel (Faico sparverius), kilideer (Charadrius vociferus), Anna's hummingbird (Calypte anna), black phoebe (Sayornis nigricans), common raven (Corvus corax), verdin (Auriparus flaviceps), northern mockingbird (Mimus polyglottos), European starling (Sturnus vulgaris), common yellowthroat (Geothlypis trichas), song sparrow (Melospiza melodia), and Brewer's biackbird (Euphagus cyanocephalus). Mammal species observed in the vicinity of the project site include desert cottontail (Sylvilagus audubonii). No fish or amphibian species were observed in the vicinity of the project site. Special Status Habitat No Special status habitats were observed on the project site. The adjacent Whitewater River is Iikely under the jurisdiction of U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) and/or CDFG. Regulatory permits or agreements from these agencies would be required prior to the alteration of USACE and CDFG jurisdictional areas. Special Status Saecies Plants or wildlife may be considered to have "special status" due to declining populations, vulnerability to habitat change, or restricted distributions. Certain special status species have been listed as Threatened or Endangered under state and/or federal Endangered Species Acts. Special Status Plants Several special status plant species are known to occur in the vicinity of the project site. One of these species is federally and/or state-listed Threatened or Endangered species: Coachelia Valley milk-vetch (Astragalus lentiginosus var. coachellae). This species is not expected to occur on the project site due to lack of suitabie habitat. Severai CNPS List 18 and �ist 2 species have been reported by the CNDDB in the vicinity of the project site. These species may meet the criteria in Section 15380 of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), which states that if a species meets the definition of Threatened or Endangered, it may be treated as such under CEQA. However, these species are not expected to occur on the project site due to lack of suitable habitat. Mr. Ehab Gerges December 1, 2006 Page 3 CNPS List 3 and List 4 species are not considered constraints on development because impacts on these species are typicaliy considered less than significant under CEQA. These species are not expected to occur on the project site due to lack of suitable habitat. Special Status Wildlife Several special status wildiife species are known to occur in the vicinity of the project site. Two federaily or state-listed Threatened or Endangered species are known to occur in the vicinity of the project site: desert pupfish (Cyprinodon macularius) and Coachella Valley fringe-toed lizard (Uma inornata). These species are not expected to occur on the project site due to lack of suitabie habitat. Other species that may meet the criteria in Section 15380 of the CEQA are not expected to occur on the project site due to lack of suitable habitat. Otherlssues Wildlife Movement - The project site consists of an existing road and is, therefore, not expected to function as a wildlife movement corridor. The project improvements are not expected to impede wildlife movement through corridors crossing the project site, including the Whitewater River Crossing. Migratory Bird Treaty Act Ornamental plantings immediately adjacent to the project site have potential to support nesting birds. The Migratory Bird Treaty Act (MBTA) prohibits activities that result in the direct take (defined as the killing or possession) of a migratory bird or its eggs. Therefore, if construction activities expected to impact nesting habitat (i.e., ornamental and/or native trees or shrubs) are initiated during the nesting bird season (March 15 to September 15), a pre-construction survey . is recommended. This is not expected to be a significant constraint on the proposed project. Nesting Raptors Trees immediately adjacent to the project site have potential to be used for nesting by raptors. Regulations prohibit activities that "take, possess, or destroy" any raptor nest or egg (CDFG Code 3503, 3503.5, and 3513). Therefore, if construction activities expected to impact nesting habitat are initiated during the raptor nesting season (February 1 to June 30), a pre-construction raptor survey is recommended. This is not expected to be a significant constraint on the proposed project. RECOMMENDATIONS In order to reduce potential adverse effects on water quality in the adjacent Whitewater River, it is recommended that the project contractor implement Best Management Practices required by the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES, Environmental Protection Agency), administered by the Regional Water Quality Control Board. In order to avoid potential impacts on nesting birds, vegetation clearing activities on the project site should occur outside the peak nesting season (February 1 to August 30). If vegetation clearing occurs between March 15 and September 15, a Biological Monitor shouid conduct a pre-construction survey of the project alignment to identify any active nesting locations. Restrictions may be placed on construction activities in the vicinity of any active nest observed until the nest is no longer active as determined by a qualified biologist. Mr. Ehab Gerges December 1, 2006 Page 4 A survey for active raptor nests is recommended seven days prior to commencement of any construction activities during the raptor nesting season (February 1 to June 30). Restrictions may be placed on construction activities in the vicinity of any active nest observed until the nest is no longer active as determined by a qualified biologist. Typicaliy, a 300- to 500-foot buffer zone is designated around a nest to allow construction to proceed while minimizing disturbance to the active nest. Once the nest is no longer active, construction can proceed within the buffer zone. Please contact Samuel Stewart at (714) 444-9199 if you have questions or comments. Sincerely, BONTERRA O ULTI � �:��ti , � �< , �v ;� ,+�`l�f�" (��11i�'.'�Y� �.1. � {'� "(-0.' - Sar�el C. �te� rt IV �-'Dr. Mike . Robsbn Project Man�'ger Senior Sc�e'ntist „ Attachments: Exhibits 1 and 2 RAPmjectW arrisV004\Constraintsd20106.dx � REFERENCES California Department of Fish and Game (CDFG) Natural Diversity Database. 2006. California Natural Diversitv Database. Records of Occurrence for USGS Myoma and La Quinta 7.5-minute quadrangles. Sacramento, CA: CDFG, Natural Heritage Division. California Native Plant Society (CNPS). 2006. Electronic Inventory of Rare and Endangered Vascuiar Plants of California. Records of Occurrence for USGS Myoma and La Quinta 7.5-minute quadrangles. Sacramento, CA: CNPS. http://www.cnps.org(inventory. ���°�"'��a`.���..�.� '��������rt s; v �t�' �. .r �. �e ^ s w r= .� y .r t^ x +` ,� .�, ,�^�„�°'�T` '�`� � , f r .�. . r, ��b� -`,��`�:^�y �K. : ��"r r , '*' .�'Y�"t'��� 1e ��" '�f* ., � r � �. H .� ,+ �������"� „ � �.�,��^, G�s �,� � �` � �"�"s � � ��d�`�.'".a' f ' r""�'t .3,�.<� � -" . P�d"��� ,.. 3 3�3 r;�" ..i� m: �,� � � 4 ,..�..,,Rpncncit�,� y�,,. ..�SxJ'���,� $` r-� .s ,�- ,� � k� s�.u` - ,' ;. � d. '�Cucamonga �= 7 r � �,� e x,,r�'-*r`�� � � � . ,: :�tk-e;- �7 � � �^ 30 ' d-�'�"` c`'�` � .w �. ;��a`���r„ " ,✓� " 3' r/---u• - "?Ff.�' ,. 3"� ;: c�.� 5e � �e,�e ? �,,, e y�"6 . atai(a . San Bernardmo � .a.r9��,;1� �r ..w ���,� �E`���'�����k�``���s �, : .: { . OntaAa �••' r�.»��"`.��������.��� � �.,, ,�i J ' � a : �` x �� r� ✓ §'�' : � � YucalPa �� :3� „Fy '� � � �, sut ..z, c a d �. �� " ed�antla §"x .�'��l�i ��a-z'..�'-�`�+��:�:' � " �"� �r�s F�,�� a E��� : Rrvers�de t . ` ,�, � i�= x.�f �..�ra�"�� � "� ;`�*��` '`r 5� a r = * .,zr i � ��,{ Ya-?-�"r"x i�`"Sr� �`�a�� .v w �` „a '` ..��us :"u ¢�i��m ��i��''�� �'�'�� '��� `^rr�-� i 'a .� � -� � �� 6o r �'. "� � m � P :'.,E'� ..«.:, r�� t s.� �� , ' •,--_._ \ : r a ' ���' �'�K Moreno Valley ' t � � � , � •�{ f � M � y v�' �Corona ;�� La6e �.. � ;� � �, ,�c' � �'�'s t "'` �_ .8 � ' �e���� s ]9 + � �� f("alrvw" Panls ,� �r ,� ' � ��� <'�s+ i�:`�T�' � �` �Spe � f� r��'� �' tr' . f,� .el'�P �,���� � . � � 3M �: ..d � Y, -�'� .. �3< '��,��� ,�""�,w � � � � ' � .c �^�.+- f jY � ` € �,�� s �' ..: � `x � �" r�� � C!¢Y�I�tl .7'� f�`� rs�t � '� �„aA + � }'78tl�btiet �, x� ` � � r `^'`rg' r � P�OfBCt ; � .. � : E'o7tl9k; �..�� �, ,, . �� .` ` � `.�„` � ` LOCBtlOf1 p �� . ��.: r e, � � � �-'"F ^'ssr�. ; CanYonL e "'r�' ' �± �4 t� ���,�..-.�> � � :s £ �d.`� `� 7 -`�'' xt xx � F ee+.�. ' F �.�� `` `:r F ancho r.'[" " "� ✓" �, i 't'�,� r �'�"6 � ant!' .m.� 1 aFr 1 ae s � r ,.� � .f ?'�. � � � "...�E, G�. iHa{ta �:. ` r ?` Lak� 9 �� , ,s " � 's;� ,�z � �,-h i a t �o��. � '� sr,�elnar4 ' �'" � >�v t -.fi� . 9� ihr,`� � °� ,.,a..� � � "; '"�r" r . r � x --� ,,�. r . � ° �`� �l � , � �;. � �:', „ r°`�` y� ..�,g . ��' ` t ��"' " :.�b!� '� ,,,y .<:'i��`�'��. , � `? #�j 'r U ,'�"�`� tl ly �f h�.j � F , ��� „ �� ` � 2 0���� �.+� ✓' an Juan � �" Temecula : `* � v:�f.�j `"'��``� aplsGana � �.�,r �.. "a',�` '`f �'e„r d , .x% � ��� ���.�',� � � ,. 3� ���°���� �,�'� .� 'r�f'' �J �9 y rr � � x{e�� fi��p���fp ��'°'�,1� � � � � $ ,� t - ,� � . �^' ` s� `. v.r i�- :�x � > s �r .:'� a xa � � � � Clem s �7!U l' � V � i � �r�.r��x�z`�r$ ' a r ? ,e .+ `� A � ,,^ Petf4i€rt4n � .'� � �: ' �, �+ � �"� ��� 3�a � r f ��t � 'f���� „�`� f�� �,��� Y ��'. ^� , rt `F� Y�f�F ����„ 1i��y.r/ y�c` , h �`/ a . F� � r� �b '�'lg '' � " t�`#'" r s' tr m�`'' � P� i l ' s=1"` � �aY t`�,�,,, rs f � � �.. `y : ,�, �' ; � t.� ����'� r .f'w�' a.`rT °{ , , � � a�` ,x`( ;�a ;-?�' ,ad f'r �_. . .` . � . . � c �r � . . .- ` � �" � � � �� u p �,i F` � ". � ;3"°yyCr a� J. � l� �' s r ��.d ./6 .' ��+�y . i'"�. * . ��� N I _ R'i� 3� : 1 � g i� t ��, ���r � � �j� F r��- l r s �r , r .3�1r�r� =5 "� ,� ". �r � *s� ` �;; "i P `k...�' �' n `a m �+ g " ' j , s ,3`K ap�g"� J' �� r � `5'"':Kv'N � - � PACfF7G � �z � v.s� s � ��.,a � �x��i � r�` r � � i � � 1' �t { �. 3 i` OCE.4N ' .� . y= .�^"�` � r� �.^' ,.� . 3 � '� � ������'`��� � �c �a1i �` � e .�`- � � �a � ���� � � � p r F � � . ts N,. . r i � �=`� . �{ t .:d` �. � � x.� ,, d� . � " �k .f ' � ,� ` # � � ;r-� 1 'n . ` � ''"�" ; ' . . . . � �.� � �'� <�. � ���� ���p� � .. . _ . � �' x� ��� � rr � . , u?s,: ��.a� � �F e. `� . '��. � Regional Location Exhibit 1 Cook Street Lane Realignment N w�E iO S O 1O ���� � Miles CONSU(i1NG 5 fl/Pryeds/Hems4000/GtaDhi¢IFi1 RL�140106�1 � R L (� r l \ �`\ \ �9 �. � � �14 ��\l l�( " 1�� • —...r— 1___� �....,i...\ .. \a`— . .__.�%e �_V� a.e..4 ;` / .�?) �L,.._.._"Y`t: `� �� \, `� � lti�� /�..� �.� °�v . \ • ��.� \ ..,\ , 9 � � � � � !! l •�.� � � A� A o . �"`"_ �a: N �� � \ m 9 ( C? . . � g, 1� az .!\'\� � �\ �. -, 4 � ' ,�, �� , . �,\ � ., , .�_ , _�,-� -. � ��� �., �� , �i �. . ,� � . , ,� . � ,,�� : , � . _ , , ,, ..e , . , e� 1 � ' FronkSinuhuDr �1 1. c i 9 � "'__— _ .:._ __ J n ' ..:.. '—". \. . � _ . . { di"y i- � I - �_ � � \ � ...._ �, i k � � � A � V 1� � ' L L �.s J " � ^ � `�.�� \ ,� \ �✓• �1� � o� .� N 9 � 4 � I � •\ �\ o ��'� ` \ � a� Da 6`$ � , a � 3� � �' � � �., �_2 ��"�" �p I a r�' y � '\.,\ � '� ( i i � ..._ ;'l�P E A� ��y��..J��i �j,i, �' \l `\�ce�� �� _ l p i c� .�,�-J � � � A � �'"'�,, ,�p ���P,�"�� . " "�� C� ' --�, l � � ��. `� t IW�:; r � . • - �� �,°,-�'�, v \ °=�"==�-��., - � ` J \ \ � �. .� 'dyA ��� �� 5��� o � � \..� �� .,,�eI c\ � ;.43.. --_-,...,,_:�._��!^-~�-1\ `�,__9 4�\ io � 1t ; . '. .. .A.s l . � �� �-r-- �.�J -- -a--t — --- . _ _._.._ --- -� — - ������aa u �q � �� . rc�� � �,�,_�`,. .w+�. B (S o�� '.�� \ ,ykp� �� �C,' 11 ^v / ' ,,,,x� t= f ., � � � �\ ) ZI �d��€�s���.E'aa.. : �p C� . . .: _ J� _ i r � �� -; - ...... . .._— �-!�>� ---T;� ..:_. _� r. �, , .. � _�7� Ql Y'� ' D �Qn ~�4,� � � C� 4 ' �:� r o �P '—` �� ,. . u ,.` "'"� �@ .. �i�+ � �� i����5 ����]+�}.,'�� � �1 .... b iV i `a' '�..� a �.� * q] � 'i l t., F S d n }����l. C - .' ._ �„Y al { � yn u � '� ?3`" �. +�t+r- wae� �� . �' a � '�..�-�.� r � r--ry 1 ��`. � , [ i� k "v. r"c,9.6 K`- ^ '�' 7 li l.��l.-^> G' ''14 � � �y"'' �u�i ro� . � x ��� � ',. v �C,� �� j���' 17 ' �; , At � k �� �,�, s � � r— ,• f ... � .� ��---�� � 4�"�i��i��a� �� J � �b fl ��„ i4� k,_�� w � �� . 6 �, A�/e h 1^ � �\� O -. 'r " '.r §'��F, � � �. y . � ,E �, 7r �IF'^ .. r .,.: � � :� $. ,� .. �: � � �� �� :,�.s-M-�f . � . - '� i� . ..:.� � �� ,� S�S�. �5$) � a i 1 .wou. Frcd Wnnng Dr :�� i � - "e".� s r 3 1 .�'w � . �"�'� I -'�avx�� '�j �� f .� v � 4� � :c, t ,� ;.. �a° ( � ; t � } a � �,f �� � � ,� ,;�. . : ; r � G �s , � � , a� r, , w�� �i��� � . i�ia ��ojwi � � ���� �.4Z2 � � ,. ti �e3 u�.+ i, w�A:. uC�. 21 tJ �.n*.�.+. �� np r R y'�`c. � ..Ia e i�r i .�. ��,^x @ aa :� � w +��ie �is N � E �...�+.,�sa� �. ��fGti1 � \� d . . ��-7.� _ � .r.. r1i- >. P I[�1:� Palm : "x i h,.S I ,�s� ' � �� . `T,� �. 3 ��4i t ��` � �Deeert ^v 6✓ ^� :... ...'�`d a � T.� .��f � .�i . • ,£--... ;� r����Z �i n iti�� " � ��d :�4 ; � � �i � ��� j°li � . �z..a� � --��a� ' .I � ���f .�.a �C-� a^� , . ���4� �n:e c� 4� u 3� 1�* r����_wn` � .e,�-,_ . t � i s ...--c.'e . _.. �Pa�M�iE "F s`�--''--"��� �-,• , W li � �J,NYa�+i 'i"�'j �i� y+\�+� �� 2Q "4c�� 3j ��... -. �.�L..�..�.,:�' � Z� .., �cEr � �� ;. �� ��v � �tVA � € �., ,,( \ �w.o 'vcE � �' ^., ,�s & S� �I � Pro ect Location �-•"' ����; m q tf�;'��,,ti �)� ,� � � Z �.�1z}� � . �Soumo°USGSCv(h�ea�u,iC�,ityyyoma F � ( n .�.4. . __a -_ ,E�cE�� „��r ;� ) ��,r4,LaQuinm�and�Roncho�Miiage'(S�hLnuleQundrangle y Local Vicinity Exhi6it 2 Cook Sfreet Lane Realignmenf w�E R,000 1,000 0 2.OW �� �Foet �wwa�+ . � _ �' c� .�rs �� � rrr� � An Environmental Planning/Resource Management Corporatio� ' September 15, 2006 Mr. Ehab Gerges VIA FAX, E-MAIL, AND MAIL Harris & Associates (619) 236-1179 750 "B" Street, Suite 1800 San Diego, California 92101 Subject: Phase I Cultural Resources Assessment for the Proposed Cook Street Restriping Project, City of Palm Desert, Riverside County, California Dear Mr. Gerges: _ Per your request, BonTerra Consulting has completed a Cultural Resources Assessment of the Proposed Cook Street Restriping Project area (hereafter referred to as the project). The results of the study are presented below. This letter report was prepared in accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and conforms to the standards required by the California O�ce of Historic Preservation (OHP). INTRODUCTION The proposed project area is located in the City of Palm Desert, Riverside. The project involves restriping of lanes and shoulders along a three-mile section of Cook Street between Fred Waring Drive and Frank Sinatra Drive. The City of Palm Desert has determined that the project has the potential to affect cultural resources that may be present at the road edge. At the request of Harris & Associates, BonTerra Consulting completed a Cultural Resources Assessment of the proposed project located within a three-mile section of Cook Street in the City of Palm Desert between Fred Waring Drive and Frank Sinatra Drive in Riverside County, California (Exhibit 1, Regional Location). PROJECT DESCRIPTION The proposed project is located on portions of Township 5 South; Range 6 East; Sections 3, 4, 9, 10, 15, and 16 (San Bernardino Baseline and Meridian), as indicated on the attached copy of the U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) 7.5-minute 151 Kalmus Drive Myoma and La Quinta topographic quadrangles (Exhibit 2, Local Vicinity). Suite E-200 This study was conducted to identify any potentially significant cultural (archaeological or historical) or paleontological (fossil) resources that might be Costa Mesa adversely impacted by the project in accordance with CEQA. This report presents the methods used to identify archaeological and historic resources in the project California 92626 vicinity; any known and/or potential archaeological, historic, and paleontological (714)444-9199 resources in the project area; the projecYs potential to adversely impact any significant cultural or paleontological resources; and recommendations regarding (714)444-9599 fax treatment of any project-related impacts. � Mr. Ehab Gerges September 15, 2006 Page 2 BonTerra Consulting Cultural Resources Manager Brian Glenn prepared this assessment. Mr. Glenn is a Registered Profes�ional Archaeologist, qualified under the Secretary of the Interior's standards (Attachment A). METHODOLOGY Archaeological/Historical/Culturai Records Search A cultural resources records search for the project area and a one-mile radius was conducted by staff at the Eastern Information Center (EIC) on August 31, 2006 (Attachment B). The EIC is the designated repository of the California Historical Resources Information System for records concerning archaeological and historical resources and associated studies in Riverside County. The records search provided data on known prehistoric and historic archaeological sites, built- environment (constructed) resources, and previous studies within one mile of the project area. Sources consulted at the EIC included archaeological site and artifact records, Archaeological Determinations of Eligibility (DOE) listings, and the OHP's Historic Property Data File (HPDF). The HPDF contains listings for the National Register of Historic Places (NRHP), California Register of Historic Resources (CRHR), State Historical Landmarks (SHL), and California Points of Historical Interest (PHI). The specific sources that were consulted at the EIC are listed below. . National Register of Historic Places (NRHP), with updates to 2005 • California Register of Historical Resources (CRHR), 2005 . California Historic Resources inventory (CHRI), 2005 • CalifoPnia Historical Landmarks (CHL), with updates to 2005 • California Points of Historical interest (CPHI), 2005 . Archaeological Determinations of Eligibility, with updates to May 5, 2005 • Archaeological site records • Maps depicting site locations . Historic USGS Elsinore 30' Topographic Quadrangle of 1901 . Cultural resource studies and reports that cover areas within a one-mile radius of the proposed project area Archaeological Field Survey An archaeological field survey of the proposed project corridor was conducted by Mr. Paul Shattuck of BonTerra Consulting on September 6, 2006 (Exhibit 2). The survey included a pedestrian survey of both sides of the corridor along Cook Street between Fred Waring Drive and Frank Sinatra Drive. Visibility was poor over most of the corridor given the current level of development. Inspection focused on areas of exposure adjacent to the Area of Potential Effects (APE) in an effort to identify prehistoric or early historic material remains. In addition, the survey was prepared to document historic period buildings, structures, and objects (i.e., those greater than 50 years of age)within or adjacent to the APE. A Garmin Geko 301 Global Positioning System (GPS) unit was utilized to accurately map any resources encountered, and a Nikon Coolpix 5600 digital camera was used for general-purpose and historic-building photography. Addresses and Assessor's Parcel Numbers (APN) of lots along the project corridor were recorded and assessed for potential historic period structural remains. Given the recent nature of the development of this area, the presence of historic structures was determined unlikely. Mr. Ehab Gerges September 15, 2006 Page 3 Paleontological Resources Records Search A paleontological resources records search and scientific literature review for the project area was conducted on September 7, 2006, by Dr. Sam McLeod, Curator, Department of Vertebrate Paleontology, Natural History Museum of Los Angeles County (NHMLAC; Attachment C). Dr. Mc�eod is a qualified paleontologist with extensive experience in Riverside and San Bernardino counties. The records search and literature review provided information on geologic formations, known fossil types and localities, and any published studies within the project area and in the general vicinity. RESULTS Archaeological/Historicai/Cultural Records Search The results of the records search at the EIC indicate 29 cultural resources studies have been conducted within a one-mile radius of the project area (Attachment B). One of these studies, RI-3649 covers a portion of Cook Street, from Interstate 10 to Frank Sinatra Blvd (Chace 1994). The survey was negative for cultural resources. A summary of the 22 studies is provided in Table 1 below. TABLE 1 PREVIOUS STUDIES CONDUCTED WITHIN ONE MILE OF THE PROJECT '�� EIC Re ort No. `Author s 'and Year Co4era eR e'iof Stud�7Resources'�18entified RI-0002 Ro ers 1953 � No acrea e surve ed,Overview stud onl RI-0103 Drover&Nelson 1978 200 acres surve ed, 10 resources RI-0161 Greenwood 1975 No acrea e surve ed,Overview stud onl RI-0487 Swenson 1978 274 acres surve ed, 1 resource RI-0494 Swenson 1978 27 acres surve ed,no resources RI-0714 SRS 1979 460 acres surve ed, no resources RI-0715 Keller 1998 460 acres surve ed, no resources RI-1189 Tadlock&Tadlock 1978 434 acres surve ed, no resources RI-1211 Warren et al. 1980 No acrea e surve ed,Overview stud onl RI-1362 Swenson 1981 400 acres surve ed,no resources RI-2063 White&Van Horn 1986 300 acres surve ed, resources RI-2064 White&White 2000 600+acres surve ed,no resources RI-2145 McCarth 1987 No acrea e surve ed, Overview stud onl RI-2178 Neiditch 1987 34 acres surve ed,no resources RI-2210 Undenvood et al. 1986 167 miles, 13 resources RI-2282 Padon 1987 400 acres surve ed,no resources RI-2658 White&Van Hom 1989 Evaluation re ort RI-2765 Arkush 1990 9.5 miles surve ed,4 resources RI-3245 Van Horn et al. 1990 No acrea e surve ed, Overview stud onl , 16 resources RI-3489 Love et al. 1992 No acrea e surve ed, General Plan EIR RI-3547 White&White 1992 100 acres surve ed,2 resources RI3625 Ho an&Tan 1993 500acres surve ed, 1 resource RI-3643 Mason 1992 50 acres surve ed, no resources RI-3649* Chace 1994 1 mile surve ed, no resources RI-3935 Drover 1995 20 acres surve ed, no resources RI-4052 Love&Tan 1997 190 acres surve ed, no resources RI-4240 Love et al. 1999 180 acres surve ed, no resources RI-5418 Duke et al.2004 96 acres surve ed, 1 resource RI-5877 Love et al.2000 No acrea e surve ed,Overview stud onl `covers a ortion of lhe ro'ect area � Mr. Ehab Gerges September 15, 2006 Page 4 A total of 13 previously recorded cultural resources have been identified within one mile of the proposed project area. These represent a rather even mixture of archaeological or built- environment resources. No archaeological resources were previously recorded within the project corridor; however, archaeological site CA-RIV-12698, a Late Prehistoric artifact scatter, was documented approximately 1,000 feet from of the APE. No resources listed on or eligible for the NRHP or the CRHR are recorded within the APE. In addition, no CHL or CPHI were identified within one mile of the proposed project site. The current edition of the HPDF inaintained by the OHP does not list any historic resources or properties within the boundaries of project area. Various historic topographic quadrangles encompassing the APE (1904 Indio 30'; 1941 Toro Peak and Edom 15'; and 1958/59 Palm Desert and 1000 Palms 15') indicate undeveloped terrain with a rudimentary north-south road illustrated along the Section 15 and 16 section line on the 1941 Toro Peak 15' quadrangle and a well in the southwest corner of Section 15 on the _ 1959 Palm Desert 15' quadrangle; the 1941 road is not shown. The well is also shown on the most recent 1959 (photo-revised 1980) 7.5' La Quinta quadrangle. Aerial imagery available through Google Earth's Digital Globe (2006) indicates the corner is now fully developed as part of a housing development. Archaeological and Built-Environment Field Survey The approximately three-mile project length consists of residential and commercial areas developed continuously since the period subsequent to the 1980 photo-revision of the La Quinta USGS 7.5' topographic quadrangle. No previously recorded or unrecorded prehistoric or historic archaeological sites were identified as a result of the survey for the Cook Street restriping project corridor APE conducted by BonTerra Consulting. The project area has been previously disturbed by the construction and maintenance of various paved roads, sidewalks and utility lines, as well as the construction of the existing residential and commercial development. The surveys required approximately six hours to complete. Visibility of the project corridor was virtually non-existent given existing pavement over the established streets. Visibility of adjacent areas was intermittent at best, with minor areas of exposure along the street edge. No archaeological resources were observed in or adjacent to the project corridor. No built- environment resources remain subsequent to development along both sides of the APE. Paleontological Resources Records Search The results of the paleontological records search and literature review indicates two major deposits within the project area: Younger Quaternary Dune Sands/Alluvium and Older Quaternary Deposits. Younger Quaternary Dune Sands/Alluvium has low potential to yield fossil resources and is assigned low paleontologic sensitivity. However, these deposits likely overlie Older Quaternary Deposits present in the subsurface. Older Quaternary Deposits have high potential to contain significant nonrenewable paleontologic resources and are assigned high paleontologic sensitivity. Elsewhere throughout southern California, older Older Quaternary Deposits have been reported to yield significant fossils of extinct animals from extinct the Ice Age taxa including mammoths, mastodons, ground sloths, dire wolves, short-faced bears, sabre-toothed cats, large and small horses, large and small camels, and bison. Review of the Regional Paleontologic Locality Inventory (RPLI) at the NHMLAC indicates that no paleontologic resource localities are recorded from within the proposed project corridor or from at least one mile in any direction. Mr. Ehab Gerges September 15, 2006 Page 5 The results of the paleontological literature review indicate that the entire project area and the one-mile radius are situated on d�posits of Younger Quaternary Dune Sands/Alluvium and Older Quaternary Deposits. The younger (Holocene) layers of the Quaternary Alluvium are not expected to yield significant fossil resources, and no fossils have been recovered from this geologic unit in the vicinity of the proposed project. However, should undisturbed Older Quaternary Deposits be present at depth or exposed during excavation, such sediments would have undetermined paleontologic sensitivity in that they might have potential to contain significant nonrenewable fossil resources. CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMEPIDATIONS The records search indicated that 29 studies have been conducted within one mile of the project site and 13 cultural resources were identified as a result of these studies. One of the studies (RI-3649, Chace 1994) terminates at the northern end of the current project APE. The historic maps indicate the area remained, for the most part, undeveloped. Exceptions being a rudimentary road illustrated on the 1941 map along the current Cook Street project APE, north of what is now Fred Waring Road and a well on the northeast corner of Cook Street and Fred Waring Road, which was first illustrated in 1959. No archaeological sites, built environment, or potentially significant cultural resources were identified within the proposed project corridor APE as a result of the field survey; however, visibility was virtually non-existent across the bulk of the project corridor given existing pavement and sidewalks. Prehistoric period resources are known within 1,000 feet of the project corridor APE. Based of archival research and field investigations, BonTerra Consulting concludes that the proposed project has little potential to encounter buried archaeological resources within the project corridor APE. Archaeological monitoring is not recommended. If potentially significant archaeological evidence (e.g., stone artifacts, dark ashy soils, burned rocks, old glass, metal, ceramic artifacts) becomes apparent during ground disturbances, work in that location shall be diverted and a qualified archaeologist notified immediately to evaluate the find. The significance of the resource shall be determined through evaluation according to CEQA criteria. Should evaluation conclude that important cultural resources exist and will be �egatively impacted by construction of the project, recommendations shall present mitigation measures to necessary to lessen those impacts to a level of less than significant. if human remains are discovered, the Riverside County Coroner's office must be notified immediately under state law (California Health and Safety Code § 7050.5) and all activities in the immediate area of the find must cease until appropriate and lawful measures have been implemented. If the Coroner determines that the remains are Native American, the Coroner shall contact the Native American Heritage Commission (NAHC) (California Public Resources Code § 5097.98). The NAHC will designate a Most Likely Descendent who will make recommendations concerning the disposition of the remains in consultation with the lead agency and project archaeologist. Analysis of the paleontological records search indicates excavation within the boundaries of the proposed project has a potential to impact significant nonrenewable paleontological resources. Excavation, should they be required, into undisturbed sediments of the Older Quaternary Deposits will necessitate that a qualified vertebrate paleontologist develop a mitigation program to include monitoring excavation activities that extend more than a few feet below the surface as a protection against impacts to nonrenewable paleontological resources. The monitoring Mr. Ehab Gerges September 15, 2006 Page 6 program shall include recovery, preparation (to a point of identification), cataloguing of fossil materials, and provisions for paleontological specimens recovered during mitigation to be deposited in an accredited and permanent scientific institution for curation so as to be available for further research. No paleontological monitoring is recommended for near-surface (less than three feet) disturbance of the project corridor. A preconstruction meeting shall be conducted in which the project paleontologist shall explain procedures necessary to protect and safely remove potentially significant fossil materials for study and curation. The methods employed during monitoring and/or recovery of fossil specimens shall be documented in a report of findings. Please contact me at (714)444-9199 if you have any questions regarding this assessment. Sincerely, BONTERRA CONSULTING " � L-��z.-"'�„�. -_-•_ Brian K. Glenn, M.A., RPA Cultural Resources Manager Exhibits 1 and 2 Attachment A: Professional Qualifications Attachment B: Archaeological/Historical/Cultural Records Search Attachment C: Paleontological Resources Records Search R:\Prajec�s\HartisW004\Letter_Raport-091506.tloc ��` �'a��-�r,i',��� ���,���� rr� � � � r .T ta + w r S,rraaYKr y'� .�' e � � 'u�" p�" � . f �t',�„"�<� . "+� '€� J r�� i�t ✓ N 18 � f, `�c ; `s+'�` x ���� ,�"2 �jt r r^ �r ,� f d � ..�"'.�'� „�,.f..;,�'�;,-" ��i"��t�i"`` �,r'� .vs+ y.�������'"�F�` .r�r -: .:x a . e -a` ,..C.,'� F�dfr�`� .. .� ��.; i',�e..f`i2"�"`�'rt' ,fi ` l�'v � �, ' � r�r Hifncha � ...r3' r,„' .s a k�'�`3.%� v'f , v�-.. ;.;-�:, �� > �� "Cucamon6a .:" 'i�t �.`�� � ?af`� JB r , '`�*".� : P< t r. ao , � jr� z�`a.a _ : ��} ��� =�'� ' ; . , #� .a*`� . ,z- y iW{n�2'���3 '^t# R . : � , „v,_. � �'*" ;i#�. & 6 I Rizlro San Bernerdmo R'�.°�„' ,, � "T �F"-�. +,�,.�z�"�"rp�-.,s, '`� s �+'" ''�r� i�� 1 � , n � � €t r „dj �'r��€��'� � .�. � r " >� 3� .3° l.! � . � � # '�'�✓� ,^�` ,rr^`��' p° f'>"�° ontario ,,`-"'� '`�'a-�'�3�J,a,r��s�� ,u��,,,.,a�x �*"" � f ?` f ` �d;_' _"_e, , . �.,� . . . 'st r'"v' rr.+ F r, �l � �Y , ,w° ,.0 ,� Yuca( a . Rodiandr � '� Q-"`�xa`�g�,cf*Y��-'`{� r.�� '� rr�r,...rr,.� r ��ps s��` ' ILveraide . � �.� ',s-rt�s �""#��`��3r��3-� .` � ��.��,�.;., ,� � � � „r �. 3`.1 z ,� rf'"�l' ; S r . '�,- � q, gf� k .TM����' "? "5`,ss?ff � � G �`„� ""„' e�• ,#�' �,�. 1f S. � a E �„ µ � <s ' - 6� . 3 ; a � f i f \ z � ! G Moreno Valley' �� � -� � �� r � r . rCorona a ,. I" , � � � • s,, ^� ' ,�'� � � �7 '�`R 1 ,, ., ".x' Lalv � .� g .: � � '"��. ���E *� 't� � fi'at�€+ws :�', ,a .� � ='r ' .�� ,A,° Perria � FY-� � z `� ` z�%�3 F•' p f '",b` 3� w�s "°��ar c'*� v�` �y ��� : , ��x' r,'� z � '� � '^:�.''��`�� :..� t � � �,y.�. � �, ;. y. # .. � I�F�����i`�' '` CISV2i8a$`� �'� .t�.v �� '"� ���'"�_ , �� c Nsrw�a� �,� x � � s,� ���x �.'��:�� Pro�ect � � � F Fo«sG rc � � ; " �< ,:_� � : �� Location v �" ��� , '`. r ���1�1a a�a�, Canon �e "� ..'�' ,��`a .9 P ,+ �£�. � rr� ,.w , 7.-.! `x 5 > & Y Ytf � . �Y .. b w1`��'Ya"�'°�'�': � '�`:� "�� � .�-=�i, $'�. ' ,� ancha �.�, ; _ -% � r y.4� . d�l[d �# . � .r'f 4 c`�"' ,%ri .F '.,n"" y�i 1 ,r l' „ �g . A :a .f C I"`��1" b i # J a .3 rgants - � ,�i Leka C' . ��' r ,,�` `�+' „. ,}: k d ` f pn,�, . ,�i � � � � ' �Ioo�. .,... : � . 2` x }s e7o,. + a szrFJsinwo ; � "`` .r.. � v+;, � � ,>-- i x aF f� 'r r ?� F� �'"�� ; � .k` .�` � r . � .r,r; < ^z`, e z'm ` � � ` "'�.f , ,�"� y � ` < �'`. �,� .; a .r .� r` , � xir ¢ + x. #3��xts . , „ f. tn. � ,� .r�;T �'����� SanJuan � � `� �,r� xS`F"' �t : Temecula r i �"�� � . ,�''��r-*� '���€`p�-Fv-��, ��� ani.e.aiw r r��$„ �,` �3 ,. . � � � �r ,� . .� z =� s r .,n r -�f "+'r' < �E , �:�� f S`` ft ;T °�t'�' ^1.y"+ 9 a'X �a � `�"�,y°��`��d, '"€�C �-`.���'�$�. ,� ',. > �^ � .�u r €" e �p t2t' $ o-1 2 fE Clem a +C3II1P J' � t " : ,J` 1��,aA.r�^/ � '� � - �� ' � � P$nmeian ` x : : en � .--'�° � : `` .,-"� X x 4� ; '� w � �«^`:/s r''. '` : < a r � � r .a�`'` _ �,s.f'r t %yg%, e �`"p� a '� � � r f ..� � s � 1 f i� �+ �f ` -` < *�'�J � °t�x , r �/�"-.F ,_�Y � �4 �/'�r , x "r s ' r� �. (3rd 9 xt`. �' { ; . 3� � � f � �;8 z t �-��' "'r� � ' �"w'l"�,"` 4. `� "`1F+�ra���Y��`''� "�'��•� £� 5�� 3 ,y /5 �}' ` # j%'�'e� �` Y 1 1 ��x;"f� 1 '�� � �(.�.Y�T.� `�,<. � i� � ��,-, xF s �=x` J ± { Y k.s� � f e 9'�.i� : ; . 8 �; � ; ��r��..r $ € Y.X ✓ µ : w �� �, ,} 4Y � X 9. I � ,rt✓'y a' Y' L�� a r�. } h"4, E r �k`, � &F7 .a a `-"' '� " �o �� , �� ' � '� µ^�-r`� �` :� �.`���s � � ? � �,�, '"°�fr.�'�'� x i �� €' # :r� � : $ � P A C 1 F t C '�. � ?�,,-. .u, .�` �s a"�- x �, ;�, r �,.. E OGEAN � lY' �s .r � � �' ' � � .�a � ���� . *� ��;. � � � � � �� � � � � a` .��` _ :f-s:� ,: � ^.z-.- „ �t p .. � '� , r ,x°' s .� � ,N' , rr r � a v � � r . � , � � �' . u "f f #-"K r"f w, ��`� J k�' .+ t°,C`' r�: �,� � . a f,. � � i 5 k �"`.;� �sA`a 3 x .+ � � � s }x Y -::f f a"�i 9 . . . ,_ � . . _r. ..�„ . , .m,L...:�.s�� z,s. ._ , x_.. , =i�` d .. __ . '�:.:��� t,s�� Regional Location Exhibit 1 Cook Street Restriping Project N �j � wvE lO S O lO �^—�� � Miles CONSULTING s RJPmlecls/F1amsIJ00ElG2Phi�IF11_Rl_090)O6ptll ' � �L � _ t �� `•,,� •, c,� - r . � �� )�-S�. c'� � �-� , ,. ._...�\ -_._.� .�•�.i �`\ \�-t- '__' .e ,." . _a,�. a,._"_ V I�ea-�j.:.r 1- \ / � � �� � l ��l •\.. . . . �.,� �� � I� y � � � � \ \� \\\ \�� o�� �� �� (l L"'> - � �, . � � �� \ 30 32 � \\. ~ \ �\,. \\ �'`:) '_r'� `i $ .. o . ._��� ..��oo:. I `\ \\ � \ �"�, ' 6'�`W �/� � � _��� �-� ' �., \ � . � � �'\� � �� � __�� _ FrnnkSinatnDr � ) (� �, / \��\\\�\\ �\�� . _:. _ 4 �� t�� I �'�. � � V � A � ' L L ,. „ca ��..,il i � �'o� ") l>' 4 � f � � ��� �� \\ � �6�� � # k I � � � '.� . . � I 1.{. \ U Li�. 3 w +{M L}'^�.�i. D�4�ry rJ. I 4 J� \\ .� \ `�\ �'��.. ��r4 � �� '� `r�'y-i I\., n ,^ �� /�� ! I � l.� ��,..\ ... �, ` J�• , . � �t� � 'a1 p ✓ �J i._-✓ � � � .o � _ �� ' � �, �,��� . _� . i � a _` � � �-.. �< ,1,�g� '` K� - �� �` _,� �,� l � '�- ". - ��' � � `�---- ' ., : `.=b �� 5�-,5 ,� ;\� � \ \ �i �` —'l 8 � u � 3- � � �\.} ` 9 �� la /� � ll t �. r 'no._.._. � I -`:1 . .. • , � � ti��.� .� \s s� � � � .. -�v-��� '°�. -- '�,.- _ .---- - '— — - � -�, .- � - -----c ---- - � - -- Y rt' ' d '`b � � - " �§ � - �a a . :�-.)�, � )1 � � a. �. R f'_l��_ 9 : �J ' ]� �� � 11 +y � �'� t ", �S . �� , � z1 _ ..„F� f r J4 .- p � �"�������� i ' �d `� . "�.. "� ` �i i . d ".L<}c . a:.�C� „ — .... ._._. -- _ u° Q n�' D �� ' V �l ' " � � " � rry� `ti" � .�`�a§,� � , 4 S . } `v-r � - 7 ;�} g��y I�c.��uT��'m� . t ..... y `V • -.. °���„� � y "+at�� ' h �g� i�' T�{ ���J' � t -' � _ d � _ � -�� s, ti i a '� r �, ,..�,.... � `�" '`� wq. wair ��n�-t -� � r — '�,,�� �7 17': r i k ij'ir p rR$iFt, rt- ` 't-`` �'�"��..�p�-l��t�" C' •4 .Q ,��4 :. c xl���fy`"� � s a'+ i �-�� � li � O �, ��.?�� �o� � � . � -' °` •` � � � p . '� ; � i I ; L..\ .�„:.'i �yhz�, � � , d u f �6.�. � ��`+� il $` � Ws}��f� ���� \ `� yyr�- � � f".A.. .,na.,sr•_, s��'. � ' � ° �`'�'�` � � t � ': i��,�.^.,. tf7 - �� � � nl' . � � .wou. Fred War'ngDr �`�`.'�.,. ' i`� �'� }p Y� t . . ����•=--•r+ � ._ I , . '^`=°�'a.'t� e pf -+"„^`---�C;�"r`�i yW �.�„ 11�� I 3 �.�I: ` Well\'_` � v""nT/F9 \ l � 3 ` � ' ' g`S 3�� � ' � � �` �^`; d � ,� f � � s ' > � , �;�'i� � r � ' �h. a(� ' � � ' ��" n ,, �� . , , ,.� o w�� r � . ,:�, �� � � �:wvE�.�`'"'w��.. �u ..�,� � 21 _ .. . 3 U q��'°�'� eF1 ff�� ° '..�� • e vsn 'd ' . �^N'aii� ° i Y•"�. ]R9' �'[q� 4J9 �✓ v � � - � � ..,.e,a. � - :i� ,�+�y=���w �� r$ ...� ���t"i Palm ,�ry` " .� �'.,' . - +„�r��I' �I 4� :�b � � � �" X � ! se ^. besert �y•i r t.,�m '",x �S � .�.'t�-"y ,q' � o � r,�.._-:, ' r� . . �i rt 'ze,�-� ��,�r� . � u J �? 'a-�'�'l��t �;�r ' �� �+„� ��-.�--�-;,���• �x,�����f"� ��'y �� 4� � ,'~��I�$w J,ii.rt a � � t,. -rv�j �y.. � . .. . • 1.�. � W 11 ''f'P` A up� sr_ .,5�'y, `\ \ , 41 f �.��� NY �� `Y 4� �P811n�ert f'a -,-..s�rtc_ ,.. F "r �'...' �)n ✓'.'' �' [xa.�s Fk �\� t\ 4LEPris�M"a✓+� ,., j .zr � �4�`4� �,�y"`.r:�Eas�� b�e � "�. ', � � 1 ,C��� �I Project Locatlon ,,,.�; Y, ���� m� (�"'�-,��,� 5a,,° E1 �1�J) ��ourcc O6O8Celhed_rM1aICIty,M�omv �� , , . —yx ^- �E�¢ � �/ � � ,�.�i��LoQmofn p"..d!RenehbMi@age75�Mioule4vid�angle�� yLocal Vicinity Exhibit 2 Caok Sfreef Reshaping Pmject . "`�` z.000 �,aaa o z.oao '�'�'�� �Fea� � " �,�.� ATTACHMENT A PROFESSIONAL QUALIFICATIONS �¢��� BRIAN K. GLENN, M.A., RPA C O N 5 U !T l N G CULTURAL RESOURCES MANAGER M.A., Archaeology, University of California, Los Angeles, 1991 B.A., Anthropology, University of California, Santa Barbara, 1986 B.A., Geography, University of California, Santa Barbara, 1986 Brian Glenn specializes in Cultural Resource Management (CRM) under California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA), and Iocal regulations. During more than 20 years of professional experience, he has directed or contributed to projects in many areas of southern California. He is skilled in a wide range of field and administrative tasks fundamental to CRM and has written numerous technical reports. His professional foci concern southern California's Campbell Tradition (circa 5000 B.P.), artifact morphology as an indicator of function, environmental reconstruction through the analysis of fish and shellfish remains, and the graphic display of data with emphases in exploratory data analyses, computer aided drafting (CAD), and geographical information systems (GIS). Mr. Glenn is a Registered Professional Archaeologist (RPA) qualified under Secretary of the Interior's standards. Representative Project Experience: State Route 111 Widening Project, La Quinta. BonTerra Consulting supervised preparation of Caltrans-approved cultural resources documents which included a Caltrans Historical Resource Compliance Report and an Archaeological Survey Report which included historic archives review, pedestrian survey, and Native American consultation. Client: RBF Consulting, 2005 Black Bench Specific Plan, City of Banning, Riverside County. BonTerra Consulting conducted a Phase I cultural resources assessment of the property which included historic archives review, pedestrian survey, Native American consultation, and paleontological literature review. Client: SunCal Companies, 2005 National Register Evaluation of CA-RIV-2195. Surface collection, subsurface testing, and reporting on four loci of archaeological site CA-RIV-2195 within the City of La Quinta, Riverside County. Client: Southern California Presbyterian Homes, Department of Housing and Urban Development(HUD) and the City of La Quinta, 2002 Professional Experience: BonTerra Consulting, Managing Archaeologist-2005 to Present Pacific West Archaeology-1996 to 2005 Ogden Environmental & Energy Services-1991 to 1996 UCLA Institute of Archaeology-1988 to 1991 UC Santa Barbara Center for Archaeological Studies-1984 to 1988 Registrations, Certifications, and Affiliations: Register of Professional Archaeologists (RPA, formerly SOPA), 1992 Society for California Archaeology (SCA) San Diego County Archaeological Society (SDCAS) President, 1999 Various County and City Consultant Lists ATTACHMENT B ARCHAEOLOGICAL/HISTORICAUCULTURAL RECORDS SEARCH EASTERN INFORMATTOM CENTER �ALIFORNIA WISTORICAL RESOURCES �NFORMATION �YSTEM Department of Anthropolog"y, University of California,Riverside,CA 92521-0418 (951) 627-5745- Fax (951)827-5409 -eickw@ucr.edu Irryo,Mono,and Riverside Counties August 31, 20Q6 RS #3792 Brian K. Glenn BanTerra Consulting 151 Kalmus Drive, Suite E-200 Costa Mesa, CA 92626-7969 Re: Cultural Resource Records Search for the Harris J004 Cook Street Re-Striping Project Dear Mr. Glenn: We received your request on August 30, 2006 fqr a cultura! resource records search for the Harris 7004 Cook Street re-striping project located in Sectfon 33, T.4S, R.6E and various sections of T.SS, R.6E, SBBM in the city of Palm Desert in Riverside County. We have reviewed our site records, maps, and manuscripts against the location map you provided. Our records indicate that 22 cultural resource studies have been conducted within a one-mile radius of your project area. One of these studies involved a portion of the project area, and there are three adjacent to the project area. A copy of this report is included for your reference. Seven additional studies provide overviews of cultural resources in the general project vicfnity. All of these reports are listed on the attachment entitled "Archeological Reports" and are availabie upon request at 15¢/page plus $30/hour. The KEYWORD sectfon of each citation lists fihe geographic area, quad name, listing of trinomials (when identified), report number (n our manuscript files (RI #}, and the number of pages per report. No cultural resource properties are recorded within the boundaries ofthe project area. Our records indicate that 13 properties have been recorded within a one-mile radius of the project area. Copies of the records are included for your reference. The above fnformation is reflected on the enclosed map. Areas that have been surveyed are highlighted in yellow. Numbers marked in blue ink refer to the report Brian K. Gienn August 31, 2006 Page 2 number in our manuscript files(RI #). Cultural resource properties are marked in red; numbers in biack refer to Trinomtal designations, those in green to Primary Number designations. National Register properties are indlcated in Iight blue. Additional sources of information consulted are identified below. National Register of Historic Places: no listed properties are located wlthin the boundaries of the project area. OfFlce of Historic Preservation (OHP), Archaeologica{ Determinations of Eligibility(ADOE): no listed properties ara located within the bounderies of the project area. Office of Historic Preservation (OHP), Directory of Properties in the Historic Property Data File (HPD): no listed properties are located within the boundaries of the project area. Not all properties in the California Historical Resources Information System are listed on the OHP ADOE and HPD. The ADOE and HPD comprise lists of properties submitted to the OHP for review. Copies of the relevant portions of the 1904 USGS Indio 30', 1941 USGS Toro Peak 15', 1959 USGS Paim Desert 15', 1941 USGS Edom 15', and 1958 USGS Thousand Palms 15` topographic maps are included for your reference. As the Information Center for Riverside County, it is necessary that we receive a copy of all cultural resource reports and site information pertaining to this county in order to maintain our map and manuscript files. Confldentlal information provided with this records search regarding the location of cultural resources outside the boundaries of your project area should not be included in reports addressing the project area. Sincerely, Step� Ostrich Information OfFicer Enclosures ___________________________________________________________________________________ � ARCAEOLOGICAL REPORTS NADS/Query � � Printed: OS/31/2006 Page: 001 � Document No. : 1080003 Unpublished Report . ROGERS, MALCOLM S. 1953 MISCELLANEOUS FIELD NOTES - RIVERSIDE COUNTY. SAN DIEGO MUSUM OF MAN. SUBMITTED TO N/A. UNPUSLISHED REPORT ON FILE AT UCR, EASTERN INFORMATION CENTER, RIVERSIDE, CA 92521. Last Update: 10/11/2005 Cataloged by: WOR-CA-04 on 09/19/1988 Keywords: RI-0002 {MF # 0003) (6) , 240 PP (7) , NO-ACREAGE SURVEYED - RECONNAISSANCE STUDY (4) , AGUANGA 7.5' QUADRAbTGLE (4) , ALBERHILL 7.5' QUADRANGLE (41 , ARICA MOUNTAINS 7.5' QUADRANGLE (4) , SACHELOR MTN 7.5' QUADRANGLH (4) , BEAUTY MTN 9.5' QUADRANGLE (4) , BIG MP12IA MTNS 7.5' QUADRANGLE (4� , BLACKBURN CANYON 7.5' QUADRP.NGLE (4) , BLYTHE Nfi 7.5' QUADANGLE (4) , CAENILLA MTN 7.5' QUADRANGLE (4) , CATHBDRAL CITY 7.5' QUADRANGLE (4) , WTTONWOOD BASIN 7.5' QUADRANGLE (4) , � COTTONWOOD SPRING 7.5' QUADRANGLE (4) , DESERT CENTER 7.5' QUADRANGLE (4) , DURMID 7.5' QUADRANGLS (4) , EAST DECEPTION CANYON 7.5' QUADRANGLE (4) , EAST OF RED CANYON 7.5' QUPSJRANGLE {4) , EAST OF VICTORY PASS 7.5' QUADRANGLE (4) , FRINK NW 7.5' QUADRANGLE (4) , HAYFIELD 7.5' QUADRANGLE (4) , HAYFIELD SPRING 7.5' QUADRANGLE (4) , HEMET� 7.5' QUADRANGLE (4) , INDIAN COVE 7.5' QUADRF�7GLE (4) , KEYS VIEW 7.5' QUADRANGLE (4) , LA QUINTA 7.5' QUADRANGLE (4) , LAKE ELSINORE 7.5' , QUADRANGLE (4) , LAKEVIEW 7.5' QUADRANGLE (4) , LITTLE MARIA MTNS 7.5' QUADRANGLE (4) , MCCOY PEAK 7.5' QUADRANGLE (4) , MCCOY SPRING 7.5' QUADRANGLE (4) , MECCA 7.5' QUADRANGLE (4) , MORTMAR 7.5' QUADRANGLE (4) , MYOMA 7.5' QUADRANGLE (4) , OROCOPIA CANYON 7.5'QUADRANGLE (4) , PALEN LAKE 7.5' QUAARANGLE (4) , PALM SPRINGS 9.5' QUADRANGLE (4) , PALM VIEW PEAK 9.5' QUADRANGLE (4) , PALO VERDE 7.5' QUADRANGLE (4) , PECHANGA 7.5' QUADRANGLE (4) , PINTO WELLS 7.5' QUADRANGLE (4) , QIIEEN MTN 7.5' QIIADRANC>LE (4) , RANCAO MIRAGE 7.5' QUADRANGLE (4) � RED CANYON 7.5' QUADRANGLE (4) , RICE 7.5' QUADF2ANGLE (4) , RIPLEY 7.5' QUADRANGLE (4) , ROOSEVELT MINE 7.5' QUADRANGLE (4) , SAGE 7.5' QUADRANGLfi (4) , SALTON 7.5' QUADRANGLE (4) , SITTON PEAK 7.5' QUADRANGLE (4) , STYX 7.5' QUADRANGLE (4) , VAIL LAKE 7.5' QUADRANGLE (4) , WHITE WATER 7.5' QUADRANGLE (4) , WILDOMAR 7.5' QUADRANGLE (4) , WINCHESTER 7.5' QUADRANGLE (4) Document No. : 1080L16 Unpublished Report DROVER, CHRISTOPHER AND LEONPIZD N. NELSON 1976 THE COACHELLA VALLEY WATEA DISTRSCT FLOOD CONTROL ASSESSMENT: A CULTURAL RESOURCE EVALUATION. Ai7TA0R(S) . SUBMITTED TO COUNTY. UNPUSLISIifiD REPORT ON FILE AT UCR, EASTERN INFORMATION CENTER, RIVERSIDE, CA 92521. Last Update: 12/O1/2003 � Cataloged by: WOR-CA-04 on 09/28/1988 Keywords: 200 ACRES SURVEYED (4} , 71 PP (7) , CA-RIV-1325 (9) , CA-RIV-1324 (8) , CA-RIV-1323 (8) , CA-RIV-1367 (8) , CA-RIV-1322 (8) , CA-RIV-1320 (8) , CA-RZV-1326 {8) , CA-RIV-1327 (6) , CA-RIV-1321 (8) , CA-RIV-6065 (8) , COACHELLA VALLEY (4) , LP QUINTA 7.5' QUAD (4} , RI-0103 (MF #0091) (6) , RANCHO MIRAGE 7.5' QUAI} (4) __-`--------------'----------"_--------------------------------------------- --------�-------------------'-'-----------------'----`------------------------ ___________________________________________________________________________________ � ARCHEOLOGICP3, REPORTS NADB/Query � � Printed: 08/31/2006 Page: 002 � Document No. : 1080200 Unpublished Report GREENWOOD, ROBERTA S. 1975 PALEONTOLOGICAL,ARCHAEOLOGICAL, HISTORICAL, AND CULTURFiL RESOURCES--WEST COAST-MIDWEST PIPELINE PROJECT, LONG BEACH TO COLORADO RIVER. GREENWOOD AND ASSOCIATES. SUBMITTED TO PRIVATE. UNPUBLISHED REPORT ON FILE AT UCR, EASTERN INFORMATION CENTER, RIVERSIDE, CA 92521. Last Update: 01/07/2004 Cataloged by: WOR-CA-04 on 10/Ol/1988 Keywords: RI-0161 (MF #0144) (6) , 38 PP (7) , NO ACREAGE SURVEYED--OVERVIEW OF PROJECT AREA (4) , BEAi7MONT 7.5' QVADRANGLE (4) , BLYTHE 7-5' QUADRFfNGLE (4) , CP.SAZON 7.5' QUADRANGLE (4) , CATHEDRAL CITY 7.5' QUADRANGLE (4) , COTTONWOOD BASIN 7.5' QUADRANGLE (4) ,_ COTTONWOOD SPRING 7.5' QUADRANGLE (4) , DESERT CENTER 7.5' QUADRANGLE (4) , DESERT HOT SPRINGS 7.5' QUADRANGLE (4J , EAST OF AZTEC MINES 7.5' QUADRANGLE {4) , EL CASCO 7.5' QUADANGLE (4) , FORD DRY LAKE 7.5' QUADRANGLE (4) , HAYFIELD 7.5' 4UADANGLE (4) , HAYFIELD SPRING 7.5' QUADRANGLfi (4) , AOPKINS WELL 7.5' QUADRANGLE (4) , INDIO 7.5' QUADRANGLE (4) , LA QUZNTA 7.5' QUADRANGLE (4) , MYOMA 7.5' QUADRANGLS (4) , PALM SPRINGS 7.5' QUADRANGLE (4) , RIPLEY 7.5' QUADRANGLE (4) , ROOSEVELT MINE 7.5' QUAIJANGLE (4) , SIDEWINDER WELL 7.5' QUADRANGLE (4) , SUNNYMEAD 7.5' QUADRANGLE (4) , THERMAL CI�,NYON 7.5' QUADRANGLE {4) , WHITEWATER 7-5' QUAbRANGLB (4) , YUCAIPA 7.5' QUADRANGLE (4) _"____'_'_"_'_""_""'_""""""_""'____"""_'_____""_""_"'__"_"'_ Document No. : 1080529 Unpublished Report SWENSON, JAMES 1978 ARCHAEOLOGICAL ASSESSMENT OF THE PROPOSED DESERT AORIZONS COUNTRY CLUB, INDIAN WELLS, RIVERSIDE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA. ARCHAEOLOGICAI, RESEARCH UNIT, U.C. RIVERSIDE. SUBMITTED TO PRIVATE. UNPUBLISHED REPORT ON FILE AT UCR, EASTERN INFORMATION CENTER, RIVERSIDE, CA 92521. Last Update: O1/15/2004 Cataloged by: WOR-CA-04 on 10/18/1988 Keywords: 13 PP (7) , 274 ACRES SURVEYED (4) , CA-RIV-1315 i6) , COACfiELLA VALLEY (4) , LA QUINTA 7.5' QUAD (4) , RI-0487 (MF #0423) (6) --"-'------'---------'--'-------'------------------------------'-'-'-------"---- Document No. : 1080535 Unpublished Report SWENSON, SAMES D. 1978 ARCHAEOLOGICAL ASSESSMENT OF TENTATIVE 7.'RACT 12762, INDIAN WELLS RIVERSIDE COUNPY, CALIFORNIA. ARCHAEOLOGICAL RESEARCH UNIT, U.C. RIVERSIDE. SUBMITTED TO PRIVATE. UNPUBLISAED REPORT ON FILE AT UCR, EASTERN INFORMATION CENTER, RIVERSIDE, CA 92521. Last Update: O1/15/2004 � Cataloged by: WOR-CA-04 on 1Oj18/1988 Keywords: 29 ACRES SURVEYED (4) , 9 ?P (7} , COACHELLA VALi,EY (4) , So-1 4UINTA 7.5' QUPD (4) , RI-6444 (MF #0427) (6) , NO RBSOURCES (8) ___________________________________________________________________________________ � ARCHEOLOGICAL REPORTS NADH/Query � � Printed: 08/31/2006 Page: 003 � Document No. : 1080764 Unpublished Report SCIENTIFZC RESOURCE SURVEYS, INC. 1979 ARCHAEOLOGICAL SURVEY REPORT ON: THE PROPOSED MOBILE HOME SITE (460+ ACRES) LOCATED IN THE MYOMA AREA OF THE COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE. AUTHOR(S) . SUBMITTED TO � PRIVATE. UNPUBLISHED REPORT ON FILE AT UCR, EASTERN INFORMATION CENTER, RIVERSIDE, CA 92521. Last Update: 12/17/2003 Cataloged by: WOR-CA-04 on 11/02/1988 Keywords: 460 ACRES SURVEYED (4) , 7 PP i7) , COACHELLA VALLEY (4) , RI-0714 (MF #0636) (6) , MYOMA 7.5' QUAD (4) , NO RESOURCES (8) --------------------------'------------------------------—-----------------'-- Document No. : 1081334 Unpublished Report - TADLOCK, JEAN AND W.L. TADLOCK 1978 ARCHAEOLOGICAL ELEMENT - ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT, IVEY RANCA, COACHELLA VALLEY, RIVERSIDE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA. AUTHOR(S) . SUBMZTTED TO PRIVATE. UNPUBLZSHED REPORT ON FILE AT UCR, EASTERN INFORMATION CENTER, RIVERSIDE, CA 92521. Last Update: 01/13/2004 Cataloged by: WOR-CA-04 on 12/13/1958 Keywords: 434.49 ACRES SURVEYED (4) , 9 PP (7) , COACHELLA VALLEY (4) , RI-1189 (MF #1167) (6) , MYOMA 7.5' QUAD (41 , NO RESOURCES (8) "'____"'_'_"""'______"_"""'_'__'_'_"'_"__"'_____""""""""'"'_"_ Document No. : 1081359 Unpublished Report WARREN, ELISABETH VON TILL, ROSERT H. CRABTREE, CbAUDE N. WARREN, MARTHA KNACK, AND R. MCCARTY 1980 A CULTURAL RESOURCES OVERVIEW OF THE COLORADO DESERT PLANNING UNITS. INSTITUTE FOR AMERICAN RESEARCH. SUBMITTED TO SURERU OF LAND MANAGEMENT. CONTRACT NO. YA-512-CT-8-100. UNPUBLISHED REPORT ON FILE AT UCR, EASTERN ZNFORMATION CENTER, RIVERSIDE, CA 92521. Last Update: O1/13/2004 Cataloged by: WOR-CA-04 on 12/14/1988 Keywords: RI-1211 (MF #1192) (6} , 157 PP (7) , NO ACREAGE SURVEYED--OVERVIEW (4) , ARICA MTNS 7.5' QUADRANGLE (4} , pRLINGTON MINE 9.5' QUADRANGLE (4) , AUGUSTINE PASS 7.5' QUADRANGLE (4) , BIG MAFtIA MTNS NE 7.5' QUADRANGLE (4) , BIG MARIA MTNS NW 7.5' QUADRANGLE (4) , HIG MARIA MTNS SB 7.5' QUADRANGLE (4) , SIG MARIA MTNS SW 7.5' QUADRANGLPs (4) , BLYTHE NE 7.5' QUADRANGLE (4) , BUZZARD SPRING 7-5' QUADRANGLE (4) , CATCLAW FLAT 7.5' QUADRPNGLE (4) , CATHEDRAL CITY 7.5' QUADPANGLE (4) , CHUCKS3ALLA SPRING 7.5' QIIADRANGLE (4) , CLARK LAKE NE 7.5' QUADRANGLE (4) , . COLLINS VALLEY 7.5' QUADRANGLE (4) , CORN SPRING 7.5' QUADRANGLE (4) , COTTOiIWOOD BASIN 7.5' QUP.DRANGLE (4} , COXCOMB MTS 7.5' QUADRANGLE (9) , DESERT CENTEP. 7.5' 4UADR�INGLE (4) , EAST OF AZTEC MINE ?.5' QUADRPNGLfi (4) , FORD DRY LAKE 7.5' QOADF.7i.YGLE (4) , GRANITE PP.SS 7.5' QUADRANGLS {4) , GROMMET 7.5' 4UADRrNGLE (4) , iiAYFTELD 7.5' QUADRPNGLE (4) , IiAYFISLD SPRING 7.5' QliADRANGLE (�t) , HOPKIDTS WELL 7.5' QUADRANGLE (4) , INCA 7.5' QUADRANGLE (4) , LA QUSNTA 7.5' QUADRANGLE (4} , LITTLE CHUCI�WALLA MTNS 7.5' QUAOFlANGLE (41 , LITTLE MARIA MTNS 7.5' QCIADRPNGLE (4) , MARTINEZ MTN '7.5' Qi7ADRANGLE (4} , MCCOY PEAK 7.5' QUADRANGLE (4) , MCCOY SPRINGS 7.5' QUADRANGLE (4) , MCCOY WASH 7.5' QUADRANGLE (4) , MECCA 7.5' QUADRANGLE (4) , MORONGO VALLEY 7.5' QUADRANGLE (4) , MORTMAR 7.5' QUADRANGLE (4) , � OCOCOPIA CANYON 7.5' QUADRANGLE (4) , PALEN LAKE 7.5' QUADRPNGLE (4) , PALEN MTNS �.S' QUADRANGLE (4) , PALEN PAS5 7.S' QUADRANGLE (4) , PILOT MTN 7.5' QUADRPNGLE (4) , RABBIT PEAK 7.5' QUADRANGLE (4j , RANCHO MIRAGE 7.51 QUADRANGLE (4) , RED CANYON 7.5' QUADRANGLE �4) , •RED CLOUD CANYON 7.S' QUADRANGLE (4) , RSCE 7.5' QUADRANGLE (4) , ROCKHOUSE CANYON 7.5' QUADRPNGLE (4) , ROOSEyELT MINE 7.5' QUADRANGLE (4) , SEVEN PALMS VALLEY 7.5' QUADRANGLE (4) , SIDEWINDER WELL 7.5' QUADRANGLE (4) , STYX 7.5' QUADRANGLE (?) , THERMAL CANYON 7.5' QUADRANGLE (4) , TORO PEAK 7.5' QUADRANGLE �4? , VIDAL 7.5' QUADRANGLE (4) , WASHINGTON WASH 7.5' QUADRANGLE (4) , WEST BERDOO CANYON 7.5' QUADRANGLE (4) , WEST OF PALEN PASS 7.5' QUADRANGLE (4) , WHITEWATER 7.5' QUADRANGLE (4) ___________________________________________________________________________________ � ARCHEOLOGICAL REPORTS NADB/Query � ( Printed: 08/31/2006 Page: 004 � Document No. : 1081590 IInpublished Report SWENSON, JAMES D. 1461 AN ARCHAEOLOGICAL ASSESSMENT OF THE PROPOSED DESERT FALLS COUNTRY CLUB SITE IN COACHELLA VALLEY, RIVERSIDE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA. ARCHAEOLOGICAL RESEARCH UNIT, U.C. RIVERSIDE. SUBMITTED TO PRIVATE. UNPUBLISHED REPORT ON FILE AT UCR, EASTERN INFORMATION CENTER, RIVERSIDE, CA 92521. Last Update: OI/20/2004 Cataloged by: WOR-CA-04 on 12/20/1988 Keywords: 18 PP (7) , 400 ACRES SURVEYED (41 , COACHELLA VALLEY (41 , RI-1362 (MF #1414) (6) , MYOMA 7.5' QUAD (4) , NO RESOURCES (8) -——---'-------------"----------"'------------------------------'-----------'- Document No. : 1082498 Unpublished Report - WHITE, LAURIE S., AND. DAVID M. VAN HORN 1986 ARCHAEOLOGICAL SURVEY REPORT: PROPOSED SITE OF THE INDIAN WELLS RESORT AND CONVENTION CENTER: ARCHAEOLOGICAL ASSOCIATES, INC. SUBMITTED TO PRIVATE. UNPUBLISHED REPORT ON FILE AT UCR, EASTERN INFORMATION CENTER, RIVERSIDE, CA 92501. Last Update: 03/OS/2004 Cataloged by: WOR-CA-04 on 06/OS/1989 Keywords: 14 PP (7) , 300 ACRES SURVEYED (4) , COACHELLA VALLEY (4) , LA QUZNTA 7.5' QUAD (4) , RI-2063 (MF #2262) (6) , YES RESOURCES (8) ---'-----'----------------------------------------------'-----'------'---- Document No. : 1082567 Unpublished Report MCCARTHY, DANIEL F. 1987 CULTURAL RESOURCE IDENTIF2CATION AND RECOMMENDATIONS FOR THE NORTHERN SPHERE SPECIFIC PLAN FOR THE CITY OF PALM DESfiRT, RIVERSIDE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA. ARCHAEOLOGICAL RESEARCA UNIT, U.C. RIVERSIDE. SUBMITTED TO CITY OF PRLM DESERT. CONTRACT NO. N/A. UNPUBLISHED REPORT ON FZLE AT UCR, EASTERN INFORMATION CENTER, RIVERSIDE, CA 92501. Last Update: 03/25/2004 Cataloged by: WOR-CA-04 on 06/10/1989 Keywords: RI-2145 (MF #2328) (6) , 17 PP (7) , OVERVIEW-NO ACREAGE SURVEYED (4) , COACHELLA VALLEY (4) -----'-----"'------------------------'-------------'-------"-----"'------ Document No. : 1082605 UnpUblished Report NEIDZTCH, BARRY R. 1967 AN ARCHAEOLOGICAL ASSESSMENT OF 34 ACRES OF LAND LOCATEO IN THE CITY OF PALM DESERT, RIVER5IDE COUNTY, . CALIFORNIA. ARCHAEOLOGICAL RESEPI2CFI UNIT, U.C. RIVERSIDE. SU3MITTSD TO PRIVATE. ifNPUBLISHED REPORT ON FILE AT UCR, :e1STSRN iNFORMATION CENTER, RIVERSIDE, CA 92501. Last Update: OS/27J2004 Cataloged by: WOR-CA-04 on 06/12/1989 Keywords: 34 ACRES SURVEYED {4) , 7 PP (7j , � COACHELLA VALLEY (4) , LA QUID7TA 7.5' QUAD (4) , RI-2176 (MF #2364) (6) , MYOMA 9.5' QUAD (4) , NO RESOURCES (8) � ___________________________________________________________________________________ � ARCHEOLOGICAL REPORTS NADB/Query � � Printed: OB/31/2006 Page: 005 � Document No. : 1082640 Unpublished Report UNDERWOOD, S. , J. CLEI,AND, C.M. WOOD, AND R. APPLE 1986 PRELIMINARY CULTURAL RESOURCES SURVEY REPORT FOR TAE US TELECOM FIBER OPTIC CABLE PROJECT, FROM SAN TIMOTEO CANYON TO SOCORRO, TEXAS: THE CALIFORNIA SEGMENT. DAMES AND MOORE. SUBMITTED TO BUREAU OF LAND MANAGEMENT, DESERT DISTRICT, RIVERSIDE. UNPUSLISHED REPORT ON EILE AT UCR, EASTERN INFORMATION CENTfiR, RIVERSIDE, CA 92521. Last Update: 02f23/2004 Cataloged by: WOR-CA-04 on 06/14/1989 Keywords: RS-2210 (MF #2396) (6) , 98 PP (7) , 167.5 MI X 25 M SURVEYED (4) , AZTEC MINES 7.5' QUADRANGLE (4) , SEAUMONT 7.5' 4UADRANGLE (4) , BLYTHE 7.5' QUADRANGLE (4) , CABAZON 7.5' QUADRANGLE (4) , CATHEDRAL CITY 7.5' QUADRPNGLE (4) , CORN SPRING 7.5' QUADRANGLE (4) , COTTONWOOD BASIN 7.5' QUALJRANGLE (4) , COTTONWOOD SPRING 9.5' � QUADRAP7GLE (4) , DESERT CENTER 7.5' QUADRANGLE (4) , DESERT HOT SPRING 7.5' QUADRANGLE (4) , EL CASCO 7.5' QUADRANGLE (4) , HAYFIELD 7.5' QUADR.ANGLE (4) , HAYFIELD SPRING 7.5' 4UADRANGLE (4) , HOPKINS WELL 7.5' QUADRANGLE (4) , INDIO 7.5' QUADRANGLE (4) , LA QUINTA 7.5' QUAI7RANGLE (4J , MYOMA 7.5' QUADRIINGLE (4) , PALM SPRINGS 7.5' QUADRI\NGLE (4) , REDI,ANDS 7.5' QUADRANGLE (4) , RIPLEY 7.5' QUADRANGLE "(4) , ROOSEVELT MINE 7.5' QUADRANGLE (4) , SIDEWINDER WELL 7.5' QUADRANGLE (4) , SUNNYMEAD 7.5' QUADF2ANGLE (4) , THERMAL CANYON 7.5' QUADRANGLE (4) , WRITEWATER 7.5' QUADRANGLE (4) , 33-0053 (CA-RIV-53T) (8) , 33-0159 (CA-RIV-159) (8) , 33-0893 (CA-RIV-893) (9) , 33-1634 (CA-RIV-1634) (8) , 33-1767 (CA-RIV-1767) (B) , 33-1768 (CA-RIV-1768) (8) , 33-3075 (CA-RIV-3075T) (B) , 33-3076 (CA-RIV-3076T) (8) , 33-3077 (CA-RIV-3077T} (8) , 33-12818 (8) , 33-12819 (8) , 33-12820 (8) , 33-12821 (8) ___'__"'_"'_'_""_""_'__""__'_"__"'_"_'_"__'_""'__"____"___"__"__' Document No. : 1082719 Unpublished Report PADON, BETH 1967 CULTURAL RESOURCE ASSESSMENT - CENTER POINTE PROJECT - RIVERSIDE COUNTY. CULTURAL RESOURCE MANAGEMENT-LSA ASSOCZATES, INC. SUBMITTED TO PRIVATE. UNPUBLISHED REPORT ON FILE AT UCR, EASTERN INFORMATION CBNTER, RIVERSIDE, CA 92501. Last Update: 06/1'7/2004 Cataloged by: WOR-CA-04 on 06/16/1989 Keywords: 100 ACRES 5URVEYED (4) , 16 PP (7) , COACHELLA VALLEY (4) , RI-2282 (MF #2475) (6) , MYOMA 7.5' QUAD (4) , NO RESOURCES (6} —----------——------'-------------'-'----'-------------—'--------"---'------- Document No. : 1083128 Unpublished Report W"HITE, LAURIE, AND DAVID VAN HORN � 1989 ARCHAEOLOGICAL INVESTIGATIONS AT TAE CHAPIN ADOBE CITY OF INDIAN D7ELLS. ARCHAEOLOGZCAL ASSOCIATSS, LTII. SUBMITTED TO PRIVATE. UNPUBLISFiED REPORT ON rILE AT UCR, E�?STERN =NFORNATSON CENTER, P.IVERSIDE, CA 92501. Last Vpdate: 07/O1/2004 Cataloged by: WOR-CA-04 on�. 08/27/1990 Keywords: RI-2658 (MF #2862) (6) , 52 PP (7) , NO ACREAGE S"JRVEYED (4) , COPCH^cLLA VALLEY (4} , LA QUINTA 7,5' QIIA17 (4) , CA-RIV-3886H (8} ___________________________________________________________________________________ � ARCHEOLOGICAL REPORTS NADB/Query � � Printed: 08/31/2006 Page: 006 � -------------- ➢ocument No. : 1083375 Unpublished Report ARKUSA, BROOKE 1990 AN ARCHAEOLOGICAL ASSESSMENT OF TEiE PROPOSED MID-VALLEY STORMWATER CHANNEL LOCATED IN THE COACHELLA VALLEY OF CENTRAL RIVERSIDE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA. ARCHAEOLOGICAL RESEARCA UNIT. ST7BMITTED TO PRIVATE. CONTRACT NO. N/A. UNPUBLISHED REPORT ON FILE AT UCR, EASTERN INFORMATION CENTER, RIVERSZDE, CA 92521. Last Update: OB/06/2004 Cataloged by: WOR-CA-04 on 09/12/1990 Keywords: RI-2765 (MF #2969} (6) , 13 PP (7) , 9.5 MI X 100 FT SURVEYED (4) , INDIO 7.5' QUADRANGLS (4) , LA QVINTA 7.5' 4UADRANGLE (4) , MYOMA 7.5' QUADRANGLE (4) , COACFIELLA VALLEY (4)_, CA-RIV-3439-H (8) , CA-RZV-3440-H (8) , CA-RIV-3867 (8) , UCRARU #1066 (6) "__"""__"_____"'_'_"_"_'"'_'_""""""'_'_"""_""'_""""'___'""' Document No. : 1063836 Unpublished Report VAN HORN, DAVID M. , LAURIE S. WHITE, AND ROBERT S. WIiITE 1990 CULTURAL RESOURCES SENSITIVITY OVERVIEW FOR THE COACAELLR VALLEY ENTERPRISE ZONE. ARCHAEOLOGICAL ASSOCIATES, LTD. SUHMITTED TO COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AGENCY. UNPUBLISAED REPORT ON FILE AT UCR, EASTERN INFORMATION CENTER, RIVERSIDE, CA 92521. Last Update: 10/07/2004 Cataloged by: WRO-CA-04 on 07/11/1991� Keywords: RI-3245 (MF #3477) (6) , 66 PP (7) , OVERVIEW + UPDATE RECORDED RESOURCES (4) , INDIO 7.5' 4UAD (4) , LA QUINTA 9.5' QUAD (4) , MECCA 7.5' QUAD (4) , THERMAL CANYON 7.5' QUAD (4) , VALERIE 7.5' QUAD (4) , COACHELLA VALLEY (4) , CA-RIV-135 (33-0135) (8) , CA-RIV-148 (33-0148) (8) , CA-RIV-676 (33-0676} (8) , CA-RIV-795 (33-0795) (8) , CA-RIV-1634 (33-1634) (B) , CA-RIV-1637 (33-1637) (8) , CA-RIV-2982 (33-2982) (8) , CA-RIV-2983 (33-2983) (6) , CA-RIV-2984 (33-2984) (8) , CA-RIV-2965 (33-2985) (8) , CA-RIV-2986 (33-2986) (6) , CA-RIV-2987 (33-2987) (6) , CA-RIV-3438H (33-3438) (8) -----------'---'------"--------------------------------'------'----'---------- Document No. : 1084160 Unpublished Report LOVE, BRUCE, JOAN S. SCHNEIDER, GWYN ALCOCK, DAWN REID, KEVIN HALLARAN, AND TOM TANG 1992 CULTURAL RESOURCES: LA QUINTA GENERAL YLAN EIR. ARCHAEOLOGICAL RESEARCH UNIT, U.C. RIVERSIDE. SUBMITTED TO PRIVATE AN1J CITY OF LA QUINTA. UNPUHLISHr�D REPORT ON FILE AT UCR, EASTERN INPORMATION CENTER, RIVERSIDE, CA 92521. Last Update: 10/14/2004 Cataloged by: WRO-CA-04 on 06/O1/1992 Keywords: RI-3489 (MF #3747) (6) , 54 PP (7) , GENERAL PLAN EIR-NO ACREfiGE SURVSYED (4) , COACHELLA VPZLEY (4) , UC'd7il2U #1159 (6) ___________________________________________________________________________________ � ARCHEOLOGICAL REPORTS NADB/Query � � Printed: 08/31/2006 Page: 007 � Document No. : 1084243 Unpublished Report WHITE, ROBERT 5. RND LAURIE S. WHITE 1992 AN ARCHAEOLOGICAL ASSESSMENT OP PORTIONS OF THE AIGHWAY 111 CORRIDOR SPESZFIC PLAN, CITY OF INDIAN WELLS, RIVERSIDE COUNTY. ARCHAEOLOGICAL ASSOCIATES, LTD. SUBMITTED TO PRIVATE. UNPUBLISHfiD REPORT ON FILE AT UCR, EASTERN INFORMATZON CENTER, RIVERSIDE, CA 92501. Last Update: 10/14/2004 Cataloged by: WRO-CA-04 on 10/02/1992 Keywords: RI-3547 (MF #3811) (6) , 24 PP (7) , 100 ACRES St7RVEYED (4) , LA QUINTA 7.5 QUAD. (4) , COACAELLA VALLEY (4) , CA-RIV-0064 (8) , CA-RIV-2934 (8) -----------'---—------------------'----------'----"'---------------------—-- Document No. : 1084363 Unpublished Report HOGAN, MICHAEL AND TOM TANG 1993 ARCHAEOLOGICAL SURVfiY OF THE CARVER PROJECT LOCATED IN THE CITY OF PALM DESERT, RIVERSIDE COUNTY, CA. ARCHAEOLOGICAL RESEARCH UNIT. SUBMITTED TO PRIVATE. CONTRACT NO. ARU #1218. UNPUBLISHED REPORT ON FILE AT UCR, EASTERN INFORMATZON CENTER, RIVERSIDE, CA 92501. Last Update: 10/14/2004 Cataloged by: WRO-CA-04 on 07/O1/1993 Keywords: RI-3625 (MF #3912) (6) , 36 PP. (7) , 500 ACRES SURVEYED (4) , COACHELLA VALLEY (4) , MYOMA 7.5' QUAD. (4) , CA-RIV-5080 (8) "'_"_"""""'"""""'_""'__'___"___'___'_""'_"""'___"'_"""'_"" Document No. : 1084366 Unpublished Report MASON, ROGER 1992 NEGATIVE ARCHAEOLOGICAL SURVEY REPORT, P.M. 46.5 - 47.3. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION. SUBMITTED TO DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION. UNPUBLISHED REPORT ON FILE AT UCR, EASTERN INFORMATION CENTER, RZVERSIDE, CA 92501. Last Update: 10/25/2004 Cataloged by: WRO-CA-04 on 07/06/1993 Keywords: RI-3643 (MF#3935) (6) , 5 PP. (9) , 50 ACRES SURVfiYED (4) , COACHELLA VALLEY (4) , MYOMA 7.5' QUAD. (4) , NO CULTC7RAL RESOURCES (8) ------'------------------------------'-----'--------------------------'---- Document No. : 1084689 Unpublished Report CHACE� PAUL 1994 A CULTtII2AL RESOUACES SURVEY FOR THE COOK STREET IMPROVEMENT PROJECT, CITY OF PALM DESERT, RIVERSIDE COUNTY. TAE KEITH COMPANIES. SUBMITTED TO CITY OF PALM DESERT. UNPTTBLISHED REPORT ON FILE AT UCR, EASTERN INFORMATION CENTER, RZVERSIDE, CA 92501. � Last Update: 10/i5/2004 Cataloged by: 47R0-CA-04 on Oi/19/1995 Keywords: RI-36a9 (MF #3950} (6} , 19 PP. (7) , 1 LINEAR MILE SIIRVEYED i4) , MYOMA 7.5' 4UAD I4) , COACHELLA VALLEY (4) , NO RESOURCHS (8) ___________________________________________________________________________________ � ARCHEOLOGICAL REPORTS � NRDB/Query � � Printed: OB/31/2006 Page: 008 � Document No. : 1084891 Unpublished Report DROVER, CHRISTOPFiER 1995 ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT EVALUATZON: AN ARCHAEOLOGICAL ASSESSMENT OF THE PARCEL 3 OF PARCEL MAP 27615, LA QUINTA, CALIFORNIA. AUTHOR. SUBMITTED TO PRIVATE. UNPUBLISAED REPORT ON FILE AT EASTERN INFORMATZON CENTER, U.C. RIVERSIDE, CA 92521. Last Update: 10/27/2004 Cataloged by: WRO-CA-04 on 03/2'7/1996 Keywords: RI-3935 (MF #4310) (6) , 11 PP (7) , 20 ACRES SURVEYED (4) ; LA 4UINTA 7.5' QUAD (4) , COACIiELLA VALLEY (4) , NO RESOURCES (8) , PM 27615 (6) -------'---"---------—---------------------'-'-----------------------------'-- Document No. : 1085181 Unpublished Report ' LOVE, BRUCE, AND BAI "TOM" TANG 1997 CULTURAL RESOURCES REPORT CALIFORNZA STATE UNIVERSITY, SAN BERNARDINO COACHELLA VALLEY CAMPUS CITY OF PALM DESERT RIVERSIDE COUNTY, CAI,IFORNZA. CRM TECH. SUHMITTED TO PRIVATE. UNPUBLISHED REBORT ON FILE AT EASTERN INFORMATION CENTER, U.C. RIVERSIDE, CA 92521. Last Update: 11/O1/2004 Cataloged by: WRO-CA-04 on 04/27/1998 Reywords: RI-4052 (MF #4493) (6) , 19 PP (7) , 190 ACRES SURVEYED (4) , MiYOMA 7.5' QUAD (4) , COACAELLA VALLEY (4) , NO RESOURCES (8) , CRM TECH JOB #289 (6) ---'--------'---------------------------------------------------------'------'- Document No. : 1085344 Unpublished Report KELLER, JEAN A. 1996 A PHASE I CULTURAL RESOURCES ASSESSMENT OF AMENDMENT TO SPECIFIC PLAN 151. AUTHOR. SUBMITTED TO PRIVATE. CONTRACT NO. N/A. UNPUSLISAED REPORT ON FILE AT EASTERN INFORMATION CENTER, U.C. RIVERSIDE, CA 92521. � Last Update: 12/17/2003 Cataloged by: WRO-CA-04 on 10/27/1999 Keywords: RI-0715 (MF #0636) (6) , 32 PP (7) , 460 ACRES SURVEYED (4) , MYOMA 7.5' QUAD (4) , NORTHERN PENSNSULA RANGES (4) , NO RESOURCES (B) ----------------------------------------------"----------------------------- Document No. : 1085463 Unpublished Report LOVE, BRUCE, BAI TOM TANG, AND MICHAEL AOGRN Z999 HISTORICAL/ARCHAEOLOGICAZ, RESOURCES SURVEY REPORT: IVEY RANCA COUNTRY CLUB NEAR THE COMMUNZTY OF THOUSAND PALMS, RIVERSIDE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA. CRM TECH. SUBMITTED TO PRIVATE. CONTRACT NO. 422. UNPUBLISHED REPORT ON FILE AT EASTERN INFORMATION CENTER, U.C. RIVERSIDE, CA 92521. Last UpdaCe: il/03/2004 Cataloged by: FiRO-CP-04 on OB(22/2000 Key�aords: RZ-4240 (MF #�722) (51 , 22 PP f7) , 180 ACRES SURVEYED (4) , MYOMA 7.5� QUAD (4) , COACHELLA VALLEY (41 , NO RESOURCnS (4) , CRM TECH CONTkACT #422 (6) ___________________________________________________________________________________ � ARCAfiOLOGICAL REPORTS NADB/4uery � ( Printed: 08/31/2006 Page: 009 � Document No. : 1085531 Unpublished Report WHITE, ROBERT S. AND LAURA S. WHITE 2000 A CULTURAL RESOURCES ASSESSMENT OF TFIE HERITAGE CLUB PROJECT SITE, 600+ ACRES LOCATED IP'Il�IEDIATELY NORTH OF TIiE INTERSECTION OF FRED WARING DRIVE .AND EL DORADO DRIVE, INDIAN WELLS, RTVERSIDE COUNTY. ARCHAEOLOGICAL ASSOCIATES. SUHMITTED TO PRIVATE. UNPUBLISHED REPORT ON FILE AT EASTERN ZNFORMATION CENTER, U.C. RIVERSIDE, CA 92521. Last Update: 03/08/2004 Cataloged by: WRO-CA-04 on 08/23/2000 Keywords: RI-2064 (MF #2262) (6) , 45 PP (7) , 600+ ACRES SURVEYSD (4) , LA QUINTA 7.5' QUAD (4) , COACFIELLA VALLEY (4) , NO RESOURCES (8) --'--------------———---'----'------------------------—---------"-----——--- Document No. : 1086781 Unpul�lished Report DUKE, CURT, NAT LAWSON, AND RIORDAN GOODWIN 2004 CULTURAL RESORUCE ASSESSMfiNT, XAVIER COLLEGE PREPAR�TORY HIGH SCHOOL, APNS: 653-290-002, -015, 653-300-�30, CITY OF TAOUSAND PALMS, RIVERSIDE COUNTY, CA. LSA ASSOCIATfiS. SUBMITTED TO PRI. UNPtTBLISHED REPORT ON FILE AT EASTERN INFORMATION CfiNTER, U.C. RIVERSIDE, CA 92521. Last Update: 03/06/2006 Cataloged by: WRO-CA-04 on 03/06/2006 Keywords: RI-5418 (6) , 19 PP (7) , 96 ACRES SURVEYED (4) , MYOMA 7.5' QUAD (4) , 33-13395 (8) , PROJECT NO. RMW430 (6) -------------------—'-------------------------------------------------------— . Document No. : 1087240 Ilnpuhlished Report LOVE, BRUCE, BAI TANG, ANIJ MP.RIAM HOGAN 2000 CULT17RAL RESOURCES TECHNICAL REPORT, CITY OF PALM DESERT GENERAL PLAN. CRM TECA. SUBMITTED TO PRI. UNPUBLISHED REPORT ON FILE AT EASTERN INFORMATION CENTER, U.C. RIVERSIDE, CA 92521. Last Update: OS/23/2006 Cataloged by: WRO-CA-04 on OB/23/2006 Keywords: RI-587'7 (6) , 31 PP (7) , 130 SQ MILES SURVEYED (4) , CATHEDRAL CITY 7.5' QUAD (4) , EAST DECEPTION CANYON 7.5' QUAD (4) , LA QUINTA 7.5' QUAD (4) , MARTINEZ MTN. 7.5' QUP1J (4) , MYOMA 75' 4UAD (4) , RANCHO MIRAC>E 7.5' QUAD (4J � SEVEN PALMS VALLEY 7.5' QUAD (4) , TORO PEAK 7.5' QUAD (4) , NO RESOURCES (8} , CONTRACT #639 (6) ATTACHMENT C PALEONTOLOGICAL RESOURCES RECORDS SEARCH ����°�� ���c��°� F" o f L o s R n g e 1 e s C�te n t y Vertebcate PaleontoJo�SecYiot� ' . r ` r d� i F�e Telephone:(273j 63-332$ f-, ,� �, FAY:(2131746-9431 900 Exposition Boulevard e Los Angeles,G1 90007 �! r l� j� i' j�(7 �'� r-;� e-mail:smcleodta;tduu.org , �;,1� � ,�, ���,r;;, '�il� :S�P � � zo��; ����� �y 4 �t 7 September 2006 — - _I BonTeiTa Consultina 151 Kalmus Drive, Suite E-200 Costa Mesa, CA 92626-7969 P.ttn: Brian K. Gienn, Culturai kesources Manager re: Paleontological Resources for the proposed Harris J004: Cook Street Re-striping Project, Riverside County,project area Dear Brian: I have conducted a thorough search o£our Vertebrate Paleontology records for the proposed Harris J004: Cook Street Re-striping Project, Riverside County, project area as outlined on the sections of the Myoma and La Quinta USGS topographic quadrangle maps that you fased to me on 5 September 2006. We do not have any vertebrate fossil localities that lie directly within the project boundaries,nor do we have any localities neazby From the same or sunilar sedimentary deposits as occur within the proposed project area. From the level of geologic mapping available to me, it appeazs that the portion of the proposed project area nortli of the Whitewater River wash has surficial deposits of yonnger Quaternary dune sands and approximately the portion south of the Whitewater River wash has surficial deposits of younger Quatemary Alluvium,the latter derived primarily as fan deposits from tke:�ills To !ha s�uth. These deFosit�are unlik�!y tc centain sign±ficant vertebraYe!ossils, at least in the uppermost layers, and we have no vertebrate fossif localities anywhere nearby from these or similar deposits. Grading of shallow excavations in the youn�er Quatemazy Dune Sands or AIluvium are unlikely to encoun[er significant vettebrate fossils. Deeper excavations in the proposed project area that extend down into older Quaternary deposits,however, may well encounter significant vertebrate fossil remains similar to those from the famous Rancho La Brea asphalt deposits in Los ���eles or other"Ice Age"deposi[s found throughout southern Cafifornia. Any deep and snbstantiul excavations Sn the proposed project area, fherefore, should be inanitored closely to "...Io ins�-�ire �,vnr-der, discovery and r.s�nns;bl!ity ;or ot�r i'idiurul and <uitural wnrEd;." yuickly and professionally recover any fossil remains discovered while not impeding development. Any fossils recovered daring miti�ation sl�ould be deposited in an accredited and pennanent scientific institution for the benefit of cu�rent and future generations. This records seazch covers oniy the vertebrate paleontolo�y records of the Natural History Museum of Los Angeles County. It is not intended to be a thorough paleontological survey of the proposed project azea covering other institutional records, a literature survey, or any potential on- site survey. Sincerely, �'{�wLese�'`"l � �i`( r a�� - Samuel A. McLeod, Ph.D. Vertebrate Paleontology enclosure: invoice EDR� Environmental Data Resources Inc E I2 ata Rpo Corridor Study Cook Street Restriping Palm Desert, CA 92260 November 30, 2006 The Standard in Inquiry number 01805628.1r Environmental Risk Management Information 440 Wheelers Farms Road Milford, Connecticut 06461 Nationwide Customer Service Telephone: 1-800-352-0050 Fax: 1-800-231-6802 Internet: www.edrnet.com Thank you for your business. Please contact EDR at 1-800-352-0050 with any questions or comments. Disclaimer-Copyright and Trademark Notice This Report contains cedain information obtained from a variety of public and oiher sources reasonably available to Environmental Data Resources, Inc.Il cannot be concluded from this Report that coverage information for lhe target and surrounding properties does not exist from oihef SoufCes.NO WARRANTY EXPRESSED OR IMPLIE�,IS MA�E WHATSOEVER IN CONNECTION WITN THIS REPORT.ENVIRONMENTAL DATA RESOURCES,INC.SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIMS THE MAKING OF ANY SUCH WARRANTIES,INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR USE OR PURPOSE.ALL RISK IS ASSUMED BY THE USER.IN NO EVENT SHALL ENVIRONMENTAL DATA RESOURCES,INC.BE LIABLE TO ANYONE,WHETHER ARISING OUT OF ERRORS OR OMISSIONS,NEGLIGENCE, ACCIDENT OR ANY OTHER CAUSE,FOR ANY LOSS OF DAMAGE,INCLUOING,WITHOUT LIMITATION,SPECIAL,INCIDENTAL, CONSEQUENTIAL,OR EXEMPLARY DAMAGES.ANY LIABILITY ON THE PART OF ENVIRONMENTAL OATA RESOURCES,INC.IS STRICTLY LIMITED TO A REFUND OF THE AMOUNT PAID FOR THIS REPORT.PufChaSBf BCCeptS this Report"AS IS".Any aflalySeS,eSGRlet@S,tBtirigS, environmental risk levels or risk codes provided in this Report are provided for illuslrative purposes only,and are not intended lo provide,nor should they be interpreted as providing any facts regarding,or prediction or forecast of,any environmental risk for any property.Only a Phase I Environmental Site Assessmenl pertormed by an environme�tal professional can provide infortnation regarding the environmental risk for any property.Additionally,the information provided in lhis Report is noi to be construed as legal advice. Copyright 2006 by Environmental Data Resources,Inc.All rights reserved.Repmduction in any media or format,in whole or in part,of any report or map of Environmental Data Resources,Inc.,or its affiliates,is prohibited withoui prior written permission. EDR and ils logos(including Sanbom and Sanborn Map)are trademarks of Environmental Data Resources,Inc.or its affiliates.All other trademarks used herein are the ro ert of their res eclive owners. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY A search of available environmental records was conducted by Environmental Data Resources, Inc. (EDR). TARGET PROPERTY INFORMATION ADORESS PALM DESERT,CA 92260 . PALM DESERT,CA 92260 DATABASES WITH NO MAPPED SITES No mapped sites were found in EDR's search of available ("reasonably ascertainable ") government records withi�the requested search area for the following data6ases: - FEDERAL RECORDS NPL_________________________National Priority�ist Proposed NPL______________Proposed National Priority List Sites Delisted NPL_______________.National Priority List Deletions NPL RECOVERY .Federal Superfund Liens CERCLIS_____________________Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation,and Liability Information System CERC-NFRAP CERCLIS No Further Remedial Action Planned CORRACTS__________________Corrective Action Report RCRA-TSDP_________________ Resource Conservation and RecoveryAct Information RCRA-LQG__________________ Resource Conservation and Recovery Act Information ERNS________________________ Emergency Response Notifcation System HMIRS Hazardous Materials Information Reporting System US ENG CONTROLS________.Engineering Controls Sites List US IN5T CONTROL________.Sites with Institutional Controls DOD_________________________.Department of Defense Sites FUDS________________________ Formerly Used Defense Sites US BROWNFIELDS A Listing of Brownfelds Sites CONSENL__________________.Superfund (CERCLA)Consent Decrees ROD____________ Records Of Decision UMTRA______________________ Uranium Mill Tailings Sites ODI__________________________ Open Dump Inventory TRIS Toxic Chemical Release Inventory System TSCA Toxic Substances Control Act FTTS_________________________FI FRA/TSCA Tracking System-FIFRA(Federal Insecticide,Fungicide,& .Rodenticide Act)/TSCA(Toxic Substances Control Act) SSTS________________________.Section 7Tracking Systems ICIS__________________________ Integrated Compliance Information System PADS______ PCB Activity Database System MLTS________________________ Material Licensing Tracking System MINES_______________________ MinesMasterindexFile RAATS RCRA Administrative Action Tracking System STATE AND LOCAL RECORDS HIST Cal-Sites Historical Calsites Database TC01805628.7r EXECUTIVESUMMARYI EXECUTNE SUMNIARY CA BOND EXP.PLAN_______ Bond Expenditure Plan SCH_______________________.School Property Evaluation Program Toxic Pits.___ Toxic Pits Cleanup Act Sites SWFILF_____ Solid Waste Information System WfNUDS/SWAT______________.Waste Management Unit Database SLIC_________________________ Statewide SLIC Cases HIST UST____________________ Hazardous Substance Storage Container Database AST____________ AbovegroundPetroleumStorageTankFacilities Notify 65 Proposition 65 Records DEED________________________ Deed Restriction Listing � VCP__________________________Voluntary Cleanup Program Properties WIP_.______ Well Investigation Program Case List CDL______________._._._.Clandestine Drug Labs RESPONSE_________________State Response Sites ENVIROSTOR______________.EnviroStor Database TRIBAL RECORDS INDIAN RESERV_____________Indian Reservations INDIAN LUST Leaking Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land INDIAN UST__________________Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land EDR PROPRIETARY RECORDS Manufactured Gas Plants___ EDR Proprietary Manufactured Gas Plants SURROUNDING SITES:SEARCH RESULTS Surrounding sites were identifed. Page numbers and map identifcation numbers refer to the EDR Radius Map report where detailed data on individual sites can be reviewed. Sites listed in bold italics are in multiple databases. Unmappable(orphan)sites are not considered in the foregoing analysis. FEDERALRECOROS RCRAInfo: RCRAInfo is EPA's comprehensive information system, providing access to data supporting the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act(RCRA)of 1976 and the Hazardous and Solid Waste Amendments(HSWA) of 1984. RCRAInfo replaces the data recording and reporting abilities of the Resource Conservation and Recovery Information System(RCRIS).The database includes selective i�formation on sites which generate, transport, store , treat and/or dispose of hazardous waste as defined by the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act(RCRA).Conditionally exempt small quantity generators(CESQGs)generate less than 100 kg of hazardous waste,or less than 1 kg of acutely hazardous waste per month.Small quantity generators(SQGs) generate between 100 kg and 1,000 kg of hazardous waste per month Large quantity generators generate over 1,000 kilograms(kg)of hazardous waste,or over t kg of acutely hazardous waste per month.Transporters are individuals or entities that move hazardous waste from the generator offsite to a facility that can recycle, treat,store,or dispose of the waste.TSDFs treat,store,or dispose of the waste. A review of the RCRA-SQG list,as provided by EDR,and dated 06/13/2006 has revealed that there are 5 RCRA-SQG sites within the searched area. TC01805628.ir EXECUTIVESUMMARY2 ' EXECUTIUE SUMMARY Site - Address Map ID Page CNARLES BIEHL 75 091 ST CHARLES PL N 2 9 EXCLUS/VE AUTO BODY 74872 VELIE WAY#7 5 13 PALM DESERT BODY&PAINT,lNC 74867 VELIE WY 5 14 JULES AUTO SERVICE 74841 AVE 42 5 15 VALLEYWIDE TOOL REPAIR 74 991 JONI DR UNIT 6 6 15 FINDS:The Facility Index System contains both facility information and"pointers"to other sources of information that contain more detail.These include:RCRIS; Permit Compliance System(PCS); Aerometric Information Retrieval System(AIRS); FATES(FIFRA[Federal Insecticide Fungicide Rodenticide Act] and TSCA Enforcement System, FTTS[FIFRA/TSCA Tracking System]; CERCLIS; DOCKET(Enforcement Docket used to manage and track information on civil judicial enforcement cases for all environmental statutes); Federal Underground Injection Control(FURS); Federal Reporting Data System(FRDS);Surface Impoundments(SIA);TSCA Chemicals in Commerce Information System (CICS); PADS; RCRA-J (medical waste transporters/disposers);TRIS; and TSCA.The source of this database is the U.S. EPA/NTIS. A review of the FINDS list, as provided by EDR, and dated 07/21/2006 has revealed that there are 6 FINDS sites within the searched area. Site Address Map ID Page CHARLES BIEHL 75 091 ST CHARLES PL N 2 9 EXCLUS/VE AUTO BODY 74872 VELIE WAY#7 5 13 PALM DESERT BODY&PAINT,lNC 74867 VELIE WY 5 14 JULES AUTO SERVICE 74841 AVE 42 5 15 VALLEYW/DE TOOL REPA/R 74 991 JONI DR UNIT 6 6 15 COACHELLA VALLEY WATER DIST 43-000 COOK ST 7 20 STATE AND LOCAL RECORDS WDS:California Water Resources Control Board-Waste Discharge System. A review of the CA WDS list,as provided by EDR,and dated 09/20l2006 has revealed that there is 1 CA WDS site within the searched area. Site Address Map ID Page PALM DESERT WRP#10 00-008 43000 COOK ST 7 19 CORTESE: This database identifies public drinking water wells with detectable levels of co�tamination, hazardous substance sites selected for remedial action, sites with k�own toxic material identified through the abandoned site assessment program,sites with USTs having a reportable release and all solid waste disposal facilities from which there is known migration. The source is the California Environmental Protection Agency/Office of Emergency Information. A review of the Cortese list, as provided by EDR, and dated 04/01/2001 has revealed that there are 2 Cortese sites within the searched area. TC01805628.7r EXECUTIVESUMMARY3 ` EXEGUTIVE SUMMARY Site . Address Map ID Page COLONYCABLEV/SION 41725COOKSTREET 3 11 CVWD-PALM DESERT 43000 COOK 7 16 SWRCY:A listing of recycling facilities in California. A review of the SWRCY list, as provided by EDR, and dated 10/10/2006 has revealed that there is 1 SWRCY site within the searched area. Site Address Map ID Page TOMRA PACIFIC INC/RALPHS#27 74884 COUNTRY CLUB DR 1 8 LUST:The Leaking Underground Storage Tank Incident Reports contain an inventory of reported - leaking underground storage tank incidents.The data come from the State Water Resources Control Board Leaking Underground Storage Tank Information System. A review of the LUST list, as provided by EDR, and dated 10/11/2006 has revealed that there are 4 LUST sites within the searched area. Site Address Map ID Page PALMER CABLE VISION 41725 COOK ST 3 9 COLONY CABLE V/SION 41725 COOK STREET 3 11 Facility Stalus:Case Cbsed CVWD-PALM DESERT 43000 COOK 7 16 CVWD PALM DESERT 43000 COOK STREET 7 16 Facility Siatus:Case Closed CA FID:The Facility Inventory Database contains active and inactive underground storage tank locations.The source is the State Water Resource Control Board. A review of the CA FID UST list,as provided by EDR,and dated 10/31/1994 has revealed that there are � 2 CA FID UST sites within the searched area. Site Address Map ID Page PALMER CABLE VISION 41725 COOK ST 3 9 COACHELLA VALLEYWATER DIST 43000 COOK ST 7 21 UST:The Underground Storage Tank database contains registered USTs. USTs are regulated under Subtitle I of the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act(RCRA).The data come from the State Water Resources Control Board's Hazardous Substance Storage Container Database. A review of the UST list,as provided by EDR, and dated 10/11/2006 has revealed that there is 1 UST TC01805628.tr EXECUTIVESl1MMARY4 ' EXECUTIVE SUMMARY site within the searched area. Site Address MapID Page CVWD 43000 COOK ST 7 18 SWEEPS:Statewide Environmental Evaluation and Planning System. This underground storage tank listing was updated and maintained by a company contacted by the SWRCB in the early 1980's. The listing is no longer updated or maintained. The local agency is the contact for more information on a site on the SWEEPS list. A review of the SWEEPS UST list,as provided by EDR,and dated 06/01/1994 has revealed that there are 2 SWEEPS UST sites within the searched area. Site Address Map ID Page PALMER CABLE VISION 41725 COOK ST 3 9 COACHELLA VALLEY WATER DIST 43000 COOK ST 7 21 " CHMIRS:The California Hazardous Material Incident Report System contains information on reported - hazardous material incidents, i.e., accidental releases or spilis. The source is the California O�ce of Emergency Services. A review of the CHMIRS list,as provided by EDR,and dated 12/31/2004 has revealed that there are 2 CHMIRS sites within the searched area. Site Address Map ID Page Not reported 43-000 COOK ST. 7 18 Not reported 75-000 GER.4LD FORD DR. 8 21 DRYCLEANERS:A list of drycleaner related facilities that have EPA ID numbers. These are facilities with ceRain SIC codes: power laundries,family and commercial;garment pressing and cleaners'agents; linen supply;coin-operated laundries and cleaning;drycleaning plants except rugs;carpet and upholster cleaning; industrial launderers;laundry and garment services. A review of the CLEANERS list,as provided by EDR,and dated 04/18/2005 has revealed that there are 3 CLEANERS sites within the searched area. Site Address Map ID Page PALM DESERT C&C CLEANERS INC 74924 COUNTRY CLUB DR S 1 3 C 8 C CLEANERS 74924 COUNTRY CLUB DR S 1 4 C&C CLEANERS 74-924 COUNTRY CLUB OR, 1 6 TC07805628.ir EXECUTIVESUMMARYS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY HAZNET:The data is extracted from the copies of hazardous waste manifests received each year by the DTSC. The annual volume of manifests is typically 700,000-1,000,000 annually,representing approximately 350,000-500,000 shipments. Data from non-California manifests&continuation sheets are�ot included at the present time. Data are from the manifests submitted without correction,and therefore many contain some invalid values for data elements such as generator ID,TSD ID,waste category,&disposal method.The source is the Department of Toxic Substance Control is the agency A review of the HAZNET list,as provided by EDR,and dated 12/31/2003 has revealed that there are 7 HAZNET sites within the searched area. Site Address Map ID Page C B C CLEANERS 74-924 COUNTRY CLUB DR, 1 6 COUNTRY CLUB ANIMAL CLINIC 74998 COUNTRY CLUB DR# 1 �8 PALMER CABLE VISION 41725 COOK ST . 3 9 JT MAINTANCE 74991 VELIE WAY#3 4 12 VALLEY WIDE TOOL REPAIR 42005 COOK ST#108 4 12 EXCLUSIVEAUTOBODY 74872VELIEWAY#7 5 13 Not reported _ 75-000 GERALD FORD DR. 8 2? Emissions Inventory Data:Toxics and criteria pollutant emissions data collected by the ARB and local air pollution agencies A review of the EMI list,as provided by EDR,and dated 12/31/2004 has revealed that there are 2 EMI sites within the searched area. Site Address Map ID Page JOHN'S FURNISHINGS,JOHN ORTEG 74-872 VELIE WAY#5 5 13 DESERT MAGIC,JOHN ISRAEL ETT 74-872 VELIE WY#5 5 14 TC01805628.ir EXECUTIVESUMMARY6 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Please refer to the end of the findings report for unmapped orphan sites due to poor or inadequate address information. � TC07805628.ir EXECUTNESUMMARY7 118°R'OD" 116°l0'W" � � . � ¢ 1 � ��4h Y'�C�1 t ZjOf S]Jt'.1�.9 $ � a �8� � � � RM4[SIINIP/.�fl Q �•� \ M61M1iPA0fl FMY1I61lNiMOP xA PVE�IIE:B �' � �^ 4 1 � . � b � a . � / : � P+ N � m ° � � m m cs oe ' : � \ m W a .�. _c - N ' o'"_'°_g a— � ec� fr ; `a---��� 9 m \ . \ . Q9 � � ~o c ~ a�' .. � GMEFiP '. H y'�. 4- y a �.\r �y 0�{FOOII 4 y 4-� � 9 �E eL ,p,\tlqyP00 � ��y_ > PG��� p M . i ... $ ' Fop\ �yn ' \ Ofl M0.LYNOC .��� _ �0 � // ��m � µ e m�:'.. YMrtE11UqgEI Q Q � q o I $ / fPP.IE $ �^ .. REONNFMP� . (. \d .. ��� ,.. I � � PMfHJRS)�. � v� �. � � & 11Ed0 $ew \ � $ H�. FUNMM49YPIIrG90fl �,. iS � .. \ g �� � �' ; t Q .. YIALANiANA `�� � � .. \ , ze 'y: u � " �IjFiS'PSc�§� �\� u c�`�� 3 � �'�AMMMPF HOYlEYLNF \ OVERFIN � � �1 � � LEX44t1P �<CMNOE� \ � /-� / m � ( Ng i3-`- \ " q � o CO,y�_ \ I�O.iVE 9PNOFVE p� � GOLOGAM� ��9 //� VEl'c'ffi1 r t : o �d `�43'W �. ��' \ M W e .. n a �.. COM�., y. \ .M:q10P � �` o � e �CIR .. 0 � r v "......_.-�, o ;�S C�SIf((�y� �..�. P 41EPlE0Pm � ��� � \ � a —�-- �;� � �� . e a g A6�: -. �:; m . m �„'_\ \ g ( m � � $ e \ % � `�-�� � �1 � y R: �� �"� � � \, � e � m w � � \, sw [wnsr a m„ "`. ��.'. � �� < c W vnFnnoon v[qe[ c* ' a q6tFPOP � � �� p ftUN`Y \�� FPEOWLRMG�R � �ko rA @9 y4'�� � �f'PACO�'. � \ ,1 � \ IPWFY / ChIf11NRWPV IiiU�fl: $ , �� IIPERVE Q � � � � � ' ii6°]2'W 116°30'00" EDR DataMap�- Corridor Study EOR'OEmiranmental �� � DaGResaurceslnc Cook Street Restriping -. ...::.5�..'...:: �d Liated 5itea O Waterways Q Water Pelm Deaert,CA Q Earthquake Epicenters�Railroada �Supertund Sitee (Richter5orgmatar) r� ContourLinee�FederalDODSites N ��Search Baundary o Ve tla Roads ��P�Pelinee �Indian Reservationa 91A 1-.-{�—� �MajorRoads M„'Powerlinee �10o-YrRoodZones 1-�' Sea/einMiles �Fault Linea 0 National Watland Inventory GppqMON06EORinceROOOT�IeI./azPd.Wrz005. OIBASBtB.tr��ANovOA MAP FINDINGS SOMMARY � Total Database Plotted FEDERALRECORDS NPL 0 Proposed NPL 0 Delisted NPL 0 � NPLRECOVERY 0 CERCLIS 0 CERC-NFRAP 0 CORRACTS 0 RCRA TSD 0 RCRA Lg.Quan. Gen. 0 RCRA Sm. Quan.Gen. 5 ERNS 0 HMIRS 0 _ US ENG CONTROLS 0 US INST CONTROL 0 DOD 0 FUDS 0 US BROWNFIELDS 0 CONSENT 0 ROD 0 UMTRA 0 ODI 0 TRIS 0 TSCA 0 FiTS 0 SSTS 0 ICIS 0 PADS 0 MLTS 0 MINES 0 FINDS 6 RAATS 0 STATE AND LOCAL RECORDS Hist Cal-Sites 0 CA Bond Exp. Plan 0 SCH 0 Toxic Pits 0 State Landfill 0 CA WDS 1 WMUDS/SWAT 0 Cortese 2 SWRCY 1 LUST 4 CA FID UST 2 SLIC 0 UST 1 HIST UST 0 - TC01805628.1r Page 1 of24 MAP FINDWGS SUMMARY ; , Total Database Plotted AST 0 SWEEPS UST 2 CHMIRS 2 Notify 65 0 DEED 0 VCP 0 DRYCLEANERS 3 WIP 0 CDL 0 RESPONSE 0 HAZNET 7 EMI 2 ENVIROSTOR 0 TRIBAL RECORDS - INDIAN RESERV 0 INDIAN LUST 0 INDIAN UST 0 EDR PROPRIETARY RECORDS Manufactured Gas Plants 0 NOTES: Sites may be listed in more than one database TC01805628.1 r Page 2 of 24 ����MAP FINDINGS Map ID Direction EDR ID Number Distance Distance(ft.)Site �atabase(s) EPA ID Number 1 PALM DESERT C&C CLEANERS INC CLEANERS 5105807986 74924 COUNTRY CLUB DR STE 110 NIA PALM DESERT,CA 92260 CLEANERS: EPA Id: CAL000259949 NAICS Code: 81232 NAICS Description: Drycleaning and Laundry Services(except Coin-Operated) SIC Code: 721'i SIC�escription: Power Laundries,Family and Commercial Create Date: 09/27/2002 Facility Active: Yes Inactive Date: Not reported Facility Addr2: Not reported Mailing Name: Not reported Mailing Address: 74924 COUNTRY CLUB DR STE 110 Mailing Address 2: Not reported Mailing State: "CA - Mailing Zip: 922600000 Region Code: 4 Owner Name: SOOK HEE LEE SIN Owner Address: 74924 COUNTRY CLUB DR STE 110 Owner Address 2: Nol reported Owner Telephone: 7607799277 Contacl Name: SOOK HEE LEE SIN/OWNER �� Contact Address: 74924 COUNTRY CLUB DR STE 110 Contacl Address 2: Not reported Contact Telephone: 7607799277 EPA Id: CAL000259949 NAICS Code: 81232 NAICS Description: Drycleaning and Laundry Services(except Coin-Operated) SIC Code: 7212 SIC Description: Garment Pressing,and Agents for Laundries and Drycleaners . Create Date: 09/27/2002 FacilityActive: Yes Inactive Date: Not reported Facility Addr2: Not reported Mailing Name: Not reported Mailing Address: 74924 COUNTRY CLUB DR STE 110 Mailing Address 2: Not reported Mailing State: CA Mailing Zip: 922600000 Region Code: 4 Owner Name: SOOK HEE LEE SIN Owner Address: 74924 COUNTRY CLUB DR STE 110 Owner Address 2: Not reported Ow�er Telephone: 7607799277 Contact Name; SOOK HEE LEE SINlOWNER Contact Address: ]4924 COUNTRY CLUB DR STE 110 Contact Address 2: Not reported Contact Telephone: 7607799277 EPA Id: CAL000259949 NAICS Code: 81232 NAICS Descriplion: Drycleaning and Laundry Services(except Coin-Operaled) � SIC Code: 7216 SIC Description: Drycleaning Plants,�Except Rug Cleaning Create Date: 09/27/2002 TC01805626.1 r Page 3 of 24 ; MAP FIN�INGS Map ID Direction EDR ID Number Distance Distance(ft.)Site Database(s) EPA ID Num6er PALM DESERT C&C CLEANERS INC (Continued) 5705807986 Facility Active: Yes Inactive Date: Not reported Facility Add2: Not reported Mailing Name: Not reported Mailing Address: 74924 COUNTRY CLUB DR STE 110 Mailing Address 2: Not reported Mailing State: CA Mailing Zip: 922600000 Region Code: 4 Owner Name: SOOK HEE LEE SIN Owner Address: 74924 COUNTRY CLUB DR STE 1'10 Owner Address 2: Not reported Owner Telephone: 7607799277 Contact Name: SOOK HEE LEE SIN/OWNER Contact Address: 74924 COUNTRY CLUB DR STE 1'10 Contact Address 2: 'Not repoded - Contact Telephone: 7607799277 EPA Id: CAL000259949 NAICS Code: 81232 NAICS Description: Drycleaning and Laundry Services(except Coin-Operated) SIC Code: 7219 SIC Description: Laundry and Garmeni Services,NEC(except diaper service and clothing alteration and repair) Create Date: 09/27/2002 Facility Active: Yes Inactive Date: Not reported . , Facility Add2: Not reported Mailing Name: Not reported Mailing Address: 74924 COUNTRY CLUB DR STE 110 - Mailing Address 2: Not reported Mailing State: CA . Mailing Zip: 922600000 Region Code: 4 Owner Name: SOOK HEE LEE SIN Owner Address: 74924 COUNTRY CLUB DR STE 110 Owner Address 2: Not reported Owner Telephone: 7607799277 Contaci Name: SOOK HEE LEE SIN/OWNER Contad Address: 74924 COUNTRY CLUB DR STE 110 �. Contact Address 2: Not reported Contact Telephone: 7607799277 1 C&C CLEANERS CLEANERS 5105266651 74924 COUNTRY CLUB DR STE'I'10 N/A PALM DESERT,CA 92260 CLEANERS: EPA Id: CAL000181647 NAICS Code: 81232 NAICS Description: Orycleaning and Laundry Services(except Coin-Operated) SIC Code: 7212 SIC Description: Gartnent Pressing,and Agents for Laundries and Drycleaners Create�ate: O6/OB/1996 � . Facility Acfive: No . Inactive Date: 9/27/2002 FacilityAdd2: Notreported . Mailing Name: Not reported Mailing Address: 74924 COUNTRY CLUB DR STE t 10 TC01805628.1 r Page 4 of 24 ?MAP FINDINGS Map ID Direclion EDR ID Number Distance Distance(ft.�Site Database(s) EPA ID Number C&C CLEANERS (Continued) 5105266651 Mailing Address 2: Not repoded Maili�g State: CA Mailing Zip: 922600000 Region Code: 4 Owner Name: HONG LEE Owner Address: 50-580 SPYGIASS HILL DR Owner Address 2: Not reported Owner Telephone: 7607778408 Contact Name: HONG LEE Coniact Address: 74924 COUNTRY CLUB DR STE 110 Contact Address 2: Not reported Coniact Telephone: 7607799277 EPA ld: CAL000181647 - NAICS Code: 8�232 NAICS Description: Drycleaning and Laundry Services(excepi Coin-Operated) - SIC Code: 7216 SIC Description: Drycleaning Plants,Except Rug Cleaning Create Date: 06/08/1998 FaciliryAclive: No Inactive Date: 9/27/2002 Facility Addr2: Not reported Mailing Name: Not reported Mailing Address: 74924 COUNTRY CLUB DR STE 110 Mailing Address 2: Not reported Mailing State: CA Mailing Zip: 922600000 Region Code: 4 Owner Namer HONG LEE OwnerAddress: 50-560 SPYGLASS HILL DR OwnerAddress 2: Not reported Owner Telephone: 7607778408 . ConiactName: HONGLEE Contact Address: 74924 COUNTRY CLUB DR STE 110 Contact Address 2: Not reported Contact Telephone: 7607799277 EPA ld: CAL000181647 � NAICS Code: 81232 NAICS Descriplion: Drycleaning and Laundry Services(except Coin-Operated) SIC Code: 7219 � SIC Description: Laundry and Garment Services,NEC(except diaper service and cbthing alteration and repair) Create Date: 06/08/1998 Facility Active: No Inactive Date: 9/27/2002 Facility Add2: Noi reported Mailing Name: Not reported Mailing Address: 74924 COUNTRY CLUB DR STE 110 Mailing Address 2: Nol reported Mailing Siate: CA Mailing Zip: 922600000 . Region Code: 4 Owner Name: HONG LEE OwnerAddress: 50-580 SPYGLASS HILL DR Owner Address 2: � Not repoAed OwnerTelephone: 7607778408 � Contact Name: HONG LEE TC01805628.1 r Page 5 of 24 :���.MAP FINDINGS Map ID Direction EDR ID Number Distance Distance(flJSite Database(s) EPA ID Number C&C CLEANERS (Continued) 5105266651 Contact Address: 74924 COUNTRY CLUB DR STE 110 Contact Address 2: Not reported Contact Telephone: 7607799277 EPA Id: CAL000181647 NAICS Code: 81232 NAICS Descripiion: Drycleaning and laundry Services(except Coin-Operated) SIC Code: 7211 SIC Description: Power Laundries,Family and Commercial Create Date: O6/08/1998 Facility Active: No Inactive Date: 9/27/2002 Facility Add2: Noi reported Mailing Name: Not reported Mailing Address: 74924 COUNTRY CWB DR STE 110 Mailing Address 2: 'Not reported - Mailing State: CA Mailing Zip: 922600000 Region Code: 4 Owner Name: HONG LEE OwnerAddress: 50-580 SPYGLASS HI�L DR Owner Address 2: Not reported . � OwnerTelephone: 7607778406 Contact Name: HONG LEE Contact Address: 74924 COUNTRY CLUB DR STE 110 Contact Address 2: Noi reported - Contact Telephone: 7607799277 1 C&C CLEANERS HAZNET 5103953702 74-924 WUNTRY CLUB DR,#110 CLEANERS NIA PALM DESERT,CA 92260 HAZNET: Gepaid: CAL000173727 Contact: MOON RO Telephone: 0000000000 Facility Add2: Not reported Mailing Name: Not reported Mailing Address: 74924 COUNTRY C�UB DR STE 110 Mailing City,St,Zip: PALM DESERT,CA 922601969 Gen County: Riverside TSD EPA ID: CAD981397417 TSD County: Los Angeles Waste Category: Halogenated solvenis(chloroform,methyl chloride,perchloroethyle�e,etc.) Disposal Meihod: Recycler Tons: .4792 Facility County: Riverside Gepaid: CAL000173727 Contact: MOON RO Telephone: 0000000000 Facility Add2: Not reported MailingName: Notreported Mailing Address: 74924 COUNTRY CLUB DR STE 110 Mailing City,St,Zip: PAIM DESERT,CA 922601969 Gen County: Riverside TSD EPAID: CAD981397417 TSD County: Los Angeles TC01805626.1 r Page 6 of 24 �'�. MAP FINDINGS � Map ID Direction EDR ID Number Distance Distance(ft.)Site Database(s) EPA ID Number C&C CLEANERS (Continued) 5�03953702 Waste Category: Not repoded Disposal Method: Recycler Tons: .0000 Facility County: Riverside Gepaid: CA�000173727 Contact: MOON RO Telephone: 0000000000 � Facility Add2: Not reported Mailing Name: Not reported Mailing Address: 74924 COUNTRY CLUB DR STE 110 Mailing City,St,Zip: PALM DESERT,CA 92260'1969 Gen County: Riverside TSD EPA ID: CAD981397417 TSD Counly: Los Angeles Waste Category: -Halogenated solvents(chloroform,methyl chbride,perchloroethylene,etc.) - Disposal Method: Recycler Tons: .0000 Faciliry County: Riverside Gepaid: CAL000173727 Contact MOON RO Telephone: 0000000000 Facility Add2: Not reported - Mailing Name: Not reported Mailing Address: 74924 COUNTRY CLUB DR STE 110 Mailing Ciry,St,Zip: PALM DESERT,CA 922601969 � Gen County: Riverside TSD EPAID: CAD981397417 TSD County: Los Angeles Waste Category: Halogenated solvenis(chloroform,methyl chloride,perchloroelhylene,etcJ Disposal Method: Recycler Tons: .4214 Facility Counry: Riverside �link fhic tir P�While viewing on your computer to access -1 additional CA_HAZNET:record(s)in lhe EDR Site Report. CLEANERS: EPA Id: CAL000173727 NAICS Code: Not reported NAICS Description: Not reported SIC Code: Not reported SIC Description: Not reported Create Date: 07/13/1995 . FacilityActive: No Inactive Date: 6/30/1999 Facility Add2: Not reported Mailing Name: Not reported Mailing Address: 74924 COUNTRY CLUB DR STE 110 Mailing Address 2: Not reported Mailing State: CA Mailing Zip: 922601969 Region Code: 4 Owner Name: MOON RO . OwnerAddress: -- Owner Address 2: Not reported TC01805628.1 r Page 7 of 24 ���.MAP FINDINGS Map ID Direction EDR ID Number Distance Distance(ft.)Site Database(s) EPA ID Number C&C CLEANERS (Continued) 5103953702 Owner Telephone: 00�0000000 Contact Name: MOON RO Contact Address: INACTIVE PER VQ99-BMI Contact Address 2: Not reported Contact Telephone: 7607799277 1 COUNTRY CLUB ANIMAL CLINIC HAZNET 5103958719 74996 COUNTRY ClU6 DR#240 NIA PALM DESERT,CA 92260 HAZNET: Gepaid: CAL000147580 Contact: LILLIAN ROBERTS,DVM Telephone: 0000000000 Facility Add2: Not reported Mailing Name: Not reported Maili�g Address: 74998 COUNTRY CLUB DR#240 Mailing City,St,Zip: PALM DESERT,CA 922600000 Gen Counry: Riverside TSD EPA ID: CAD983604000 TSD County: San Bernardino Waste Category: Photochemicals/photoprocessing waste Disposal Method: Recycler Tons: .2293 FaciftyCounly: Riverside t TOMRA PACIFIC INC/RALPHS#27 SWRCY 5107138'112 74884 COUNTRY CLUB DR . N/q PALM DESERT,CA 92260 SWRCY: Certification Status: O Facility Pho�e Number. (951)520-1700 Date facility became certified: 03/29/99 Date facilily began operating: OS/01/99 Date facility ceased operating: Still operating Whether The Facility Is Grandfaihered: Not reported Convenience Zone Where Faciltiy Located: 4359 Convenience Zone Where Faciltiy Located 2: 0 Convenience Zone Where Faciltiy Located 3: 0 Convenience Zone Where Faciltiy located 4: 0 Convenience Zone Where Faciltiy Located 5: 0 Convenience Zone Where Faciltiy Located 6: 0 Convenience Zone Where Faciltiy�ocated 7: 0 Aluminum Beverage Containers Redeemed: AL Glass Beverage Containers Redeemed: GL Plastic Beverage Containers Redeemed: PL Other mat beverage containers redeemed: OB Refilla6le Beverage Containers Redeemed: Not reported TC01805628.1r Page 8 of 24 �:.'MAP FINDINGS Map ID Direction EDR ID Number Distance Distance(R.)Site Database(s) EPA ID Number 2 CHARLES BIEHL RCRA-SQG 1000818781 75 091 ST CHARLES PL NO G FINDS CAD983646936 PALM DESERT,CA 92260 RCRAInfo: Owoer. CHARLES BIEHL (619)341-0062 EPA ID: CAD983646936 Contack KAREN MORERA (619)341-0062 Classifcation: Small Quantity Generator TSOF Activities: Not reported Violation Status:No violations found FINDS: Other Pertinent Envi�onmenlal Activity Identified at Site - RCRAInfo is a�ational information system that supports the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act(RCRA)program thmugh lhe tracking oF events and activities related to facilities thal generale,transport,and treat,store,or dispose of hazardous waste.RCRAInfo allows RCRA progrem staff to track the notification,permit,compliance,and corrective action activities required under RCRA. 3 PALMERCABLEVISION HAZNET S101589622 41725 COOK ST � LUST NIA PALM DESERT,CA 92260 CA FID UST SWEEPS UST HAZNET: Gepaid: CAL000209777 Contact: TOM MC KIMMEY Telephone: 760340t312 FacilityAdd2: Notreported Mailing Name: Not reported Mailing Address: 41725 COOK ST Mailing City,St,Zip: PALM DESERT,CA 922600000 Gen County: Riverside TSD EPA ID: CAT000613927 TSD Couniy: Riverside Waste Category: Aqueous soWtion with less than 10°/a total organic residues Disposal Method: Transfer Station Tons: 0.36 Facility County: Riverside LUST: Region: RIVERSIDE Site Closed: Yes Employee ID: 13 Facility ID: 93102 Case Type: Undefined Status: 9 CA FID UST: Facility ID: 33000182 TC01805628.1 r Page 9 of 24 .��..MAP FINDINGS Map ID Direction EDR ID Num6er Distance Distance(ft.)Site Database(s) EPA ID Number PALMER CABLE VISION (Continued) S'101589822 Regulated By: UTNKA Regulated Ip: Not reported Cortese Code: Not reported SIC Code: Not reported Facility Phone: 6193401312 . Mail To: Not reported Mailing Address: 41725 COOK ST Mailing Address 2: Not reported Mailing City,St,Zip: PALM DESERT 92260 Contact Not reported Contact Phone: Not reported DUNs Number: Not reported NPOES Number: Not reported EPA ID: Not reported Commenls: Not reported Status: 'Active - SWEEPS UST: Status: A Comp Number: 60 Number: 1 . Board Of Equalization: 44-017829 Ref Date: 11-17-92 Act Date: 11-17-92 Crealed Date: 11-21-88 Tank Status: A Owner Tank Id: 000333 . Swrcb Tank Id: 33-000-000060-000001 AcN Date: 11-17-92 Capacity: 5000 Tank Use: M.V.FUEL Sig: P Content REG UNLEA�ED � Number Of Tanks: 2 Status: A Comp Number: 60 Number: 1 Board Of Equalization: 44-017829 Ref Date: 11-17-92 Act Date: 11-17-92 Created Date: 11-2'I-88 Tank Status: A Owner Tank Id: 000333 Swrcb Tank Id: 33-000-000060-000002 AcN Date: 11-17-92 Capacity: 550 Tank Use: M.V.FUEL Stg: P Content: DIESEL Number Of Tanks: Not reported TC01805628.1r Page 10 of 24 �;MAP FINDWGS Map ID Direction EDR ID Number Distance � Distance(R.)Site Database(s) EPA ID Num6er 3 COLONY CABLE VISION LUST S103820933 41725 COOK STREET Cortese N/A PALM DESERT,CA 92260 LUST: Region: STATE Case Type: Soil only Cross Street: Not reported Enf Type: None Taken Funding: Not reported How Discovered: OM How Stopped: Not reported Leak Cause: UNK LeakSource: UNK Globalld: T0606501002 Stop Date: � 1993-01-05 00:00:00 Confrm Leak: 1993-02-09 00:00:00 Workplan: 1994-03-22 00:00:00 - Prelim Assess: Not reported Pollution Char: Not reported Remed Plan: Not reported Remed Action: Not reported Monitoring: Not reported Close Date: 1994-OB-02 00:00:00 Discover Date: 1993-01-27 00:00:00 Enforcement Dt: 1965-01-Ot OO:OO:OD Release Date: 1993-02-09 00:00:00 Review Date: 1994-09-20 00:00:00 Enter Date: 1994-04-25 00:00:00 MTBE Date: Not repoded GWQualifier: Notreported Soil Qualifier: Not reported Max MTBE GW ppb: Not reported � Max MTBE Soil ppb: Not reported County: 33 Org Name: Not reported Reg Board: Colorado River Basin Region Status: Case Closed Chemical: Gasoline Contact Person: Not reported Responsible Party: COLONY CABLE VISION � RP Address: 41725 COOK STREET,PALM DESERT,CA 92260 � Interim: Not reported Oversight Prgm: LUST MTBE Class: ' MTBE Conc: 0 MTBE Fuel: 1 MTBE Tested: Site NOT Tested for MTBE.Includes Unknown and Not Analyzed. Staff: RFL Slaff Inilials: Not reported Lead Agency: LocalAgency Local Agency: 33000L Hydr Basin#: COACHELLA VALLEY(7- Benefcial: Notreported Priority: Noi reported Cleanup Fund Id: Not repoded Work Suspended: Not reported Local Case#: 93-102 � Case Number: 7T2260013 TC01805628.tr Page 11 of 24 ::MAP FINDINGS Map ID Direction EDR ID Number Distance Distance(H.)Site Dalabase(s) EPA ID Num6er COLONY CABLE VISION (Continued) 5103820933 Qty Leaked: Not reported Abate Method: Excavate and Dispose-remove contaminated soil and dispose in approved sile Operator. TONY I.ICARDO Water System Name:Noi reported Well Name: Not reported Distance To Lust: 0 Waste Discharge Global ID: Not reported Waste Disch Assigned Name: Not reported Summary: Not reported LUST: Region: 7 Lead Agency: Local Agency . Siatus: 9-Case Closed Case Num: 7T2260013 ID: 667 GloballD: � T0606501002 Case Worker. KO Substance: Gasoline-Automotive Cortese: . Region: CORTESE Facility Add2: 4�725 COOK STREET 4 JT MAINTANCE HAZNET 5105722256 74991 VELIE WAY#3 NIA PALM DESERT,CA 92260 HAZNET: Gepaid: CA1000006402 Contact DEACT PER VQ96 Telephone: -- Facility Add2: Not reported Mailing Name: Not reported Mailing Address: 74991 VELIE WAY#3 Mailing City,St,Zip: PALM DESERT,CA 922600000 Gen County: Riverside TSD EPA ID: Not reported TSD County: Los Angeles � Waste Category: Unspecifed oil-containing waste Disposal Method: Not reported Tons: 0.45 Facility County: Noi reported 4 VALLEY WIDE TOOL REPAIR � HAZNET 5107149115 42005 COOK ST#108 NIA PALM DESERT,CA 92211 HAZNET: Gepaid: CAL000271561 Contacl: 6EORGE RAMIREZ/OWNER Telephone: 7606749222 � Faciliry Addr2: Not reported Mailing Name: Not reported Mailing Address: 42005 COOK ST#108 TC01805628.tr Paget2of24 �'MAP FINDINGS Map ID Direction � � EDR ID Number Disiance Distance(ft.�Site Database(s) EPA ID Number VALLEYWIDETOOLREPAIR (Continued) 5107149N5 Mailing City,St,Zip: PALM DESERT,CA 92211 Gen County: Riverside TSD EPA ID: CAT000613927 TSD Couniy: Riverside Waste Category: Aqueous solution with less than 10%total organic residues Disposal Method: Transfer Station Tons: 0.08 Faciliry County: Riverside 5 JOHN'S FURNISHINGS,JOHN ORTEG EMI 5106833566 74-872 VELIE WAY#5 N/A PALM DESERT,CA 922fi0 � EMI: Yeac 1990 Carbo�Monoxide Emissions Tons/Yr: 33 Air Basin: SS Facility ID: 71916 Air District Name: SC SIC Code: 2426 Air District Name: SOUTH COAST AQMD Community Health Air Pollution Info System: Noi reported Consolidated Emission Reporiing Rule: Not repoKed � Total Organic Hydmcarbon Gases Tons/Yr: 1 Reactive Organic Gases TonslYr: 'I Carbon Monoxide Emissions Tons/Yr: 0 NOX-Oxides of Nitrogen Tons/Yr: 0 SOX-Oxides of Sulphur Tons/Yr: 0 Particulate Malier Tons/Yr: 0 Part.Matter 10 Micrometers&Smllr Tons/Yr: 0 5 EXCLUSIVEAUTOBODY RCRA-SQG 1000293095 74872 VELIE WAY#7 FINDS CAD982520769 PALM DESERT,CA 92260 HAZNET RCRAInfo: Owner: STEVE HASTOR (415)555-1212 EPA ID: CAD982520769 � Contack ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGER (6'19)340-4855 Classification: Small Quantity Generetor TSDF Activities: Nol reported Violation Siatus:No violations found FINDS: Other Pertinent E�vironmental Activity Identified at Site RCRAInfo is a national information system that supports the Resource Conservation and Recovery Acl(RCR4)program lhrough the tracking of events and activities relaled to facilities that generate,transport,and treat,store,or dispose of hazardous waste.RCRAInfo allows RCRA program staff to track the notification,permit,compliance,and correciive action activities required under RCR4. � TCO'I805626.7 r Page 13 of 24 '��.MAP FINDINGS Map ID Direction EDR ID Number Distance Distance(ft.)Site Database(s) EPA ID Number EXCLUSIVE AUTO BODY (Continued) 1000293095 HAZNET: Gepaid: CAL000041330 Contact: HASTOR STEVE � Telephone: 0000000000 Facility Addr2: Not reported MailingName: Notreported Mailing Address: 74872 VELIE WAY Mailing City,St,Zip: PALM DESERT,CA 922600000 Gen County: Riverside TSD EPA ID: CAD008252405 TSD County: Los Angeles Waste Category: Unspecified solveni mixture Waste Disposal Melhod: Recycler Tons: .2293 Facility County: .Riverside 5 DESERT MAGIC,JOHN ISRAEL E1T EMI S106829972 74•872 VELIE WY#5 N/A PALM DESERT,CA 92260 EMI: Year: 19,87 Car6on Monoxide Emissions Tons/Yr: 33 Air Basin: � SS Facility ID: 47188 Air District Name: SC SIC Code: 2511 Air District Name: SOUTH COAST AQMD Communily Health Air Pollution Info System: Not reported Consolidated Emission Reporting Rule: Not repoAed Total Organic Hydrocarbon Gases To�slYr: .1 Reaclive Organic Gases Tons/Yr: 1 Carbon Monoxide Emissions Tons/Yr: 0 NOX-Oxides of Nitrogen Tons/Yr: 0 � SOX-Oxides of Sulphur Tons/Yr: 0 Particulate Matter Tons/Yr. 0 Part.Matter 10 Micrometers&Smllr Tons/Yr: 0 5 PALM DESERT BODY 8.PAINT,INC RCRA-SQG 1000294113 74867 VELIE WY PINDS CA0981376809 PALM DESERT,CA 92260 RCRAInfo: Owner: NOT REQUIRED (415)555-1212 EPA ID: CAD981376809 Contact Not reported Classification: Small Quantity Generator TSDF Activities: Not reported TC01605628.1 r Page 14 of 24 .�'.��MAP FINDINGS Map ID Direction EDR ID Number Distance �istance(fl.)Site Database(s) EPA ID Number PALM DESERT BODY&PAINT,INC (Continued) 1000294113 Violation Status:No violations found FINDS: ' Other PeAinent Environmental Activity Ideniifed at Site RCRAInfo is a national information system that supports the Resource Conservation a�d Recovery Act(RCR4)program through ihe tracking of events and activities related to facilities lhat ge�erate,transpod,and treat,store,or dispose of hazardous waste.RCRAInfo allows RCR4 program staff to track ihe notification,permit,compliance,and corrective action activities required under RCRA. 5 JULES AUTO SERVICE RCRA-SQG 1000819952 74841 AVE 42 FINDS CAU983659715 PALM DESERT,CA 92260 RCR41nfo: Owner: JULIUS KNOBLAUCH (619)346-0463 EPA ID: CAD983659715 Contact JULIUS KNOBLAUCH (619)346-0463 Classification: Small Quantity Generator TSDF Activities: Not reported Violation Status:No violations found FINDS: Other Pertinent Environmental Activily Identified at Site . RCRAInfo is a national informalion system that supports the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act(RCRA)program through the tracking of events and activities related to facilities that generate,transport,and treat,store,or dispose of hazardous waste.RCRAInfo allows RCR4 program staff to track the notification,permit,compliance,and corrective action activities required under RCRA. 6 VALLEYWIDETOOLREPAIR RCRA•SQG 1001967529 74 991 JONI DR UNIT 6 FINDS CAR000070185 PALM DESERT,CA 92260 TC01805628.1 r Page 15 of 24 r�.MAP FINDINGS Map ID Direciion EDR I�Number Distance Distance(ft.�Site Database(s) EPA ID Number VALLEYWIDETOOLREPAIR (Continued) 7007967529 RCRAInfo: Owner: GEORGE RAMIREZ (760)346-9452 EPA ID: CAR000070185 ContacC GEORGE RAMIREZ (760)674-0669 Classification: Small Quantity Generator TSDF Activities: Not reported Violation Status:No violations found FINDS: Other Pedinent Environmental Activity Identified at Site Califomia-Hazardous Waste Tracking System-Datamart RCRAInfo is a national information system that supports the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act(RCRA)program through the trecki�g of events and activities related to facilities that generate,transport,and treat,store,or dispose of hazardous waste.RCRAInfo allows RCR4 program staff to treck the notiBcation,permit,compliance,and corrective action aciivities required under RCR4. 7 CVWD-PALM DESERT LUST S103820850 43000 COOK Cortese NIA PALM DESERT,CA 92260 LUST: Region: RIVERSIDE Site Closed: Yes Employee ID: 7 Facility ID: 91162 Case Type: Soil only Status: 9 Cortese: Region: CORTESE Facility Addr2: Not reported 7 CVWD PALM DESERT LUST U002167902 43000 COOK STREET N/A PALM DESERT,CA LUST: Region: STATE CaseType: Undefined Cross Slreet: Not reported Enf Type: None Taken ' Funding: Notreported How Discovered: OM How Stopped: Not reported TC0�805628.1r Page�6of24 �'��. MAP FINDINGS Map ID �irection EDR ID Number Distance Distance(ft.�Site Database(s) EPA ID Number CVWD PALM DESERT (Continued) U002167902 LeakCause: UNK LeakSource: UNK Global id: T0606500999 Stop Date: 1990-11-15 00:00:00 Confirm Leak: Not reported Workplan: Not reported Prelim Assess: Not reported Pollution Char: Not reported Remed Plan: Not reported Remed Action: Not reported Moniloring: Not reported Close Date: 1992-07-'10 00:00:00 Discover Date: 1990-11-15 00:00:00 EnforcementDi: �965-Ot-0100:00:00 Release Date: 1991-03-04 00:00:00 Review Date: 1992-07-10 00:00:00 - Enter Date: 1994-06-06 00:00:00 MTBE Date: Not reported GW Qualifier: Not reported . Soil Qualifier: Not reported Max MTBE GW ppb: Noi reported Max MTBE Soil ppb: Noi reported Caunty: 33 Org Name: Not reported Reg Board: Colorado River Basin Region Status: Case Closed Chemical: Diesel Contact Person: Not repoded Responsible Party: COACHELLA VALLEY WATER DIST RP Address: 85820 COACHELLA NEIGHTS,COACHELLA,CA 92236 Interim: Not reported Oversight Prgm: lUST MTBE Class: ' MTBE Conc: 0 MTBE Fuel: 0 � MTBE Tested: Not Required lo be Tested. Staff: RFL Staff Initials: Not reported Lead Agency: LocalAgency LocalAgency: 33000L Hydr Basin#: COACHELLA VALLEY(7- Beneficial: Not reported Priority: Not reported Cleanup Fund Id: Not reported Work Suspended: Not reported Local Case#: 91162 Case Number: 7T2260010 Qty Leaked: Not reported Abate Method: Not reported Operator: ERV RISLEY Water System Name:Not reported Well Name: Not reported DistanceToWst 0 Waste Discharge Global ID: Not repoAed Waste Disch Assigned Name: Not reported Summary: Notreported � TC01805628.1 r Page 17 of 24 r:MAP FINDINGS Map ID Direction EDR ID Number Distance Distance(ftJSite � Database(s) EPA ID Number CVWD PALM DESERT (Continued) U002167902 LUST: Region: 7 Lead Agency: Local Agency � Siatus: 9-Case Closed Case Num: 7T22600'10 ID: 686 GloballD: T0606500999 Case Worker: KO Substance: Diesel fuel oil and additives 7 CVWD UST U003713197 43000 COOK ST NIA PALM DESERT,CA 92211 UST: Region: STATE LocalAgency: 33000 Facility ID: 130 7 CHMIRS 5105883315 43-000 COOK ST. NIA PALM DESERT,CA 92236 CHMIRS: OES Incident Number: 02-1030 OES notification: 2/22/200202:14:43 PM OES Date: Not reported OES Time: Not reported . Incident Date: Not reported Date Completed: Not reported � Property Use: Not reported Agency Id Number: Not reported Agency Incident Number: Not reported Time Notified: Not reported Time Completed: Not reported Surrounding Area: Not reported EstimatedTempereture: Notreported Property Managemenl: Not reported Special Studies 1: Not reported Special Sludies 2: Not reported Special Studies 3: Not reported Special Studies 4: Not reported Special Studies 5: Not repor[ed Special Studies 6: Not reported More Than Two Substances Involved?: Noi reported Resp Agncy Personel#Of Decontaminated:Not reported Responding Agency Personel#Of Injuries: Not reported Responding Agency Personel#Of Fatalities:Not reported Others Number Of Decontaminated: Not reported Others Number Of Injuries: Not reported Olhers Number Of Fatalilies: Not reported Vehicle Make/year. Not reported Vehicle License Numbec Not reported Vehicle Staie: Not reported Vehicle Id Number: Not reported CA/DOT/PUC/ICC Number. Not reported TC01805628.1 r Page 18 of 24 �".MAP FINDINGS MapID Direciion EDR ID Number Distance Distance(ft.)Site �atabase(s) EPA ID Num6er (Continued) 5105883375 Company Name: Not reported Repoding Officer Name/ID: Not reported Report Date: Not reported Comments: Not reported Facilily Telephone: Not reported Waterway Involved: No Waterway: Not reported Spill Site: Not reported Cleanup By: Reporting Party Containment Not reported What Happened: Not reported Type: Notreported Measure: Not reported Othec Notreported Date/Time: Not reported Year. 2002 " Agency: Chowchilla Valley Water Dist. Incident Dale: 2/22/200212:00:00 AM Admin Agency: Riverside County Environmental Health � Amount: Notreported � Contained: Yes Sile Type: TreatmenUSewage Facility E Date: Not reported Substance: Sewage Quaniity Released: Not reported BBLS: 0 Cups: 0 CUFT: 0 Gallons: 2637 Grams: 0 Pounds: 0 Liters 0 Ounces: 0 Pinls: 0 Quarts: 0 Sheen: 0 Tons: 0 Unknown: 0 Description: An overFlow at the head works at Water Reclamation Plant#10 Evacuaiions: 0 Number of Injuries: 0 Number of Fatalities: 0 7 PALM DESERT WRP#10 00•008 CA WDS 5102005547 � 43000 COOK ST N/A PAI.M DESERT,CA 92260 CA WDS: Facility ID: West Colorado River 330105012 Faciliry Type: Municipal/Domestic-Facility that treats sewage or a mixture of predominantly sewage and other waste from districts,municipalities,communities,hospitals, schools,and publicly or privately ow�ed systems(excluding individual subsurface leaching systems disposing of less than 1,000 gallons per day). Facility Status: Active-Any facility with a continuous or seasonal discharge that is under Waste Discharge Requirements. NPDES Num6er: Not reported Subregion: 7 Facility Telephone: 7603982661 TC01805628.1 r Page 19 of 24 4 MAP FINDINGS Map ID Direction EDR ID Number Distance Distance(ft.)Site Database(s) EPA ID Number PALM DESERT WRP#10 00-008 (Continued) 5102005547 Facility Contact: STEVE BIGLEY Agency Name: COACHELLA VALLEY WATER DIST Agency Address: PO BOX 1058 Agency City,St,Zip: COACHELLA 92236 Agency Contact: AIAN HARRELL Agency Telephone: 7603982651 Agency Type: Special District Qncludes districts established wder general acts,sanitary disiricts,water districts irrigaGon disUicts,etc.) SIC Code: 4952 SIC Code 2: Not repoded Primary Waste: Domestic Sewage Primary Waste Type: �esignated/InFluent or Solid Wastes that pose a significant threat to water quality because of their high concenlrations(E.G.,BOD,Hardness,TRF, Chloride).'Manageable'hazardous wastes(E.G.,inorganic salts and heavy metals)are included in this category. SecondaryWaste: ' Notreported - Secondary Waste Type:Not reported Design Flow: 18 Baseline Flow: 17 Redamatio�: Producer-User:Reclamation requirements that have been issued to a producer of reclaimed water who also uses the prod�ct. POTW: The POTW Does not have an approved pretreaiment program.Some POTWs may have local pretreatmeni programs that have not been approved by the regional board and/or EPA. Treat To Watec Major Threal to Water Quality.A violation could render unusable a ground water or surtace water resource used as a significant drink water supply,require closure of an area used for contact recreation,result in long-term deleterious effects on shell fish spawning or growth areas of aquatic resources,or directly expose the public lo toxic substances. Complexity: Category A-Any major NPDES facility,any non-NP�ES facility(particularly those with toxic wastes)that would be a major if discharge was made to surface or ground waters,or any Class I disposal site.I�cludes any small-volume complex facility(particularly those with toxicwastes)with numerous discharge points,leak detection systems or ground water monitoring wells. 7 COACHELLA VALLEY WATER DIST FINDS 1006837140 43-000 COOK ST 110013980344 PALM DESERT,CA 92260 FINDS: Other Pertinent Environmental Activity Identifed at Site The NEI(National Emissions Inventory)database contains information on stalionary and mobile sources that emit criteria air pollulants and their precursors,as well as hazardous air pollutants(HAPs). TC01805628.1 r Page 20 of 24 :��MAP FINDWGS � Map ID Direction � EDR ID Number Distance Distance(ft.)Site Database(s) EPA ID Number 7 COACHELLA VALLEY WATER DIST CA FID UST 5701590190 43000 COOK ST SWEEPS UST NIA PALM DESERT,CA 92260 CA FID UST: Facility ID: 33006665 Regulated By: UTNKA Regulated ID: Not reported Codese Code: Not reported SIC Code: Not reported Facility Phone: 6193982651 Mail To: Not reported Mailing Address: P O BOX 1058 Mailing Address 2: Not reported Mailing City,St,Zip: PALM DESERT 92260 Contact: Not reported Contact Phone: Not reported DUNs Number. Not reported - NPDES Number: Not reported EPA ID: Not reported , Commenis: Not reported Status: Active SWEEPS UST: Status: A CompNumber: 68589 Number: 4 Board Of Equalization: Not reported Ref Date: 10-28-92 Act Date: 10-28-92 Created Date: 12-27-90 Tank Status: A Owner Tank Id: Not reported Swrcb Tank Id: 33-000-068589-000001 Actv Date: 10-28-92 Capacity: 280 Tank Use: M.V.FUEL Stg: P Conteni: DIESEL Number Of Tanks: 1 8 HAZNET S'105886878 75-000 GERALD FORD DR. CHMIRS N/A PALM DESERT,CA 92211 HAZNET: Gepaid: CAC002561008 Contact: JOHN HOOVER Telephone: 3039868011 Facility Add2: Not reported Mailing Name: Not reported Mailing Address: 75-000 GERALD FORD OR Mailing City,St,Zip; INDIO,CA 92211 Gen County: Riverside TSD EPAID: CAD028409019 TSD County: Riverside Waste Category: Aqueous solution with less than 10%total organic residues Disposal Method: Treatment,Tank Tons: 1.6 TC01805628.tr Page21 of24 ::MAP FINDINGS Map ID Direction EDR ID Number Distance Distance(8.)Site Database(s) EPA ID Number (Continued) 5105886876 Facility County: Riverside CHMIRS: OES Incident Number: 02-6419 OES notification: 11/22/200207:34:57 PM OES Date: Not reported OES Time: Not reported Incident Date: Not reported Date Completed: Not reported Property Use: Notreported Agency Id Num6er: Not reported Agency Incide�t Number: Not reported Time Notified: Not reported Time Completed: Not reported Surrounding Area: . Not reported Estimated TemperaWre: Not reported � Property Management: Not reported Special Studies 1: Not reported Special Sludies 2: Not reported Special Studies 3: Not reported Special Studies 4: Not reported Special Studies 5: Not reported Special SWdies 6: Not reported More Than Two Substances Involved?: Not reported Resp Agncy Personel#Of Deconiaminated:Not reported Responding Agency Personel#Of Injuries: Not reported Responding Agency Personel#Of Fatalities:Not reported Others Number Of Decontaminated: Not reported Others Number Of Injuries: Not reported Others Number Of Fatalities: Not reported Vehicle Make/year: Not reported Vehicle license Number: Not reported Vehicle State: Not reported Vehicle Id Number: Not repoAed CA/DOT/PUGICC Number. Not reported Company Name: Not reported Reporting Officer Name/ID: Not repoded Report�ate: Not reported Comments: Not reported Facility Telephone: Not reported Waterway Involved: No Waterway: Not reported Spill Site: Not reported Cleanup By: Responsible Party Containment: Not reported What Happened: Not reported Type: Notreported Measure: Notreported Other. Not reported Dateffime: Not reported Year: 2002 Agency: Veeder Root Incident Date: 11/22/200212:00:00 AM Admin Agency: Riverside County Environmental Health Amount: Not reported Contained: Yes Site Type: Service Siation TC01805628.1r Page 22 of 24 i MAP FINDINGS Map ID Direciion EDR ID Number Dislance Distance(fl.)Sile Database(s) EPA ID Number (Continued) 5105866878 E Date: Not reported Substance: Gasoline Quantity Released: Not reported BBLS: 0 Cups: 0 CUFT: 0 Gallons: 0 Grams: 0 Pounds: 0 Liters: 0 Ounces: 24 Pints: 0 Quarts: 0 Sheen: 0 To�s: 0 Unknown: - 0 - Description: Customer overtilled tank. Evacuations: 0 Number of Injuries: 0 Number of Fatalities: 0 OES Incident Number: 03-3210 OES notification: 6/24/200305:32:37 PM OES Date: Not repoded OES Time: Not reported � Incident Date: Not reported Date Compieted: Not reported Propedy Use: Not reported Agency Id Number: Not reported Agency Incident N�mber: Not reported Time Nolified: Not reporied Time Completed: Not reported Surrounding Area: Not reported Estimated Temperature: Not reported PropeM1y Management Not reported Special Studies 1: Not reported Special Studies 2: Not reportetl Special Studies 3: Not reported Special Studies 4: Not reported Special Studies 5: Not reported Special Studies 6: Not reported More Than Two Substances Involved?: Not reported Resp Agncy Personel#Of Decontaminated:Not reported � Responding Agency Personel#Of Injuries: Not reported Responding Agency Personel#Of Fatalities:Not reportetl Others Number Of Decontaminated: Not reported Olhers Number Of Injuries: Not reported Others Numher Of Fatalities: Not reported Vehicle Make/year: Not reported Vehicle License Number: Not reported Vehicle State: Not reported Vehicle Id Number: Not reported CA/DOT/PUC/ICC Num6ec Not reported CompanyName: Notreported Reporting Offcer Name/ID: Not reported Report Date: Not reported Comments: Not reported TC01805628.tr Page 23 of 24 '�.MAP FINDINGS Map ID Direction EDR ID Number Distance �istance(ft.)Site Database(s) EPA ID Number (Continued) S105886878 Facility Telephone: Not reported Watervvay Involved: No � Watervvay: Not repoded Spill Site: Not reported Cleanup By: ConUactor Containmeni; Not repoded What Happened: Not reported Type: Not reported Measure: Not reported Other: Not reported Date/Time: Not reported Year: 2003 Agency: VeederRoot Incident Date: 6/24/200312:00:00 AM � Admin Agency: Riverside County Environmental Health Amount: ' Not reported - Contained: Yes Site Type: Service Station E Date: Not reported Substance: Gasoline Quantity Released: Not reported BBLS: 0 Cups: 0 CUFT: 0 Gallons: .75 Grams: 0 Pounds: 0 Liters: 0 Ounces: 0 Pints: 0 Quarts: 0 Sheen: 0 Tons: 0 Unknown: � 0 Description: Substance was released due to auto shut-off failing on dispensers 1 &13. Evacuations: 0 Number of Injuries: 0 Number of Fatalities: 0 TC01605628.1 r Page 24 of 24 � w � � � W W W N < a �J U � W m �... 2 � vmi w vdi � F" aJ U U U U �' W W W F' ' W y I- `F (j N m W W Z Z Z W Z � W W W � zN q� � � � � � zN � � � a � a zI� a r F zN Nz F w N Q U � > > > > Q j � � � � � Q f E E � N N N N N j � t~/1 E E E � Q Q J E E 3 O S � J J J J J = J J J U U U S W W W U � � � J � J 2 � W W W W S S J W W fn � O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O � O � � � � � � � e- O O f0 N t0 �O tO [O N t0 �O �O tO t0 �O 0 (O t0 t0 (O [O �O �O �O �O �O � (O �O d N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N 0 O� O� O� O� O� OI O� m T O� O� m m m m m m m OI m m m m m m m m O) m m m rn O� m O� O N m N a � N N � O W m � W F N � K a � p N F w m w F � n U F � F m F Q 6 W � FW- � _ � O F Q � N i- 1- fn 4J f� f� f0 Q � W W � � ln f/1 1=- Y Y Y Y �.O � � � � > Y Y > Y > } N N u Y I Z O Q Q 6 Q } � S a "' � � Q Q Q Q � � Q Q Q � � � ^ � " " Q � � •- •- •- LL LL � � 0 O O � U Z 3 � Q � 3 � 3 3 � � 3 3 3 � � �r r� � � � � � �} �y �r r� o o � ¢ ¢ ¢ Z z a w w 3 a 2 � x S 2 S � 2 x 2 S S S S S � � � i � S S S S ¢ ¢ ¢ m m m m � p a > > � Q o � oo m m o .- �n in � � y o m o �oo 0 0 � � o � opp � � m V O N O T N m O N N N � N f0 O � �p 1� O N m fp N N N p� � m m Q W n N N O f0 Sl N CJ O Yf Ct O O N tO 10 eJ W Q O� p � r � 0] A i W a1 t7 N t7 (7 l7 f7 (�l [7 (7 t7 {7 V N N l7 N N f�J V N l7 l7 f7 1� 1� I� �- f� ID t0 Q p (n fD 1� 1` I� 1� I� 1� h 1� 1� 1� I� h I� 1� I� (` 1� h 1� 1� 1� I� 1� 1� I� I� V V Q V 1� I� I� 1� � o Q U � � (7 W F y N � Q ~ W � < Q � O � � W � � w � W a Q Q a ti � U' w � w 0 � NQ � K Q N mtn ui p O � ¢ Z � Q Fm W a ¢ a � w a � � � � rtu� �- z wa Zz w m � p � O ?i � N 2 Q O W Z N Z ZWQ Z W J � Z Z J J LL K W m J K O it N J O D U # N U U � � Z .W.1 J J � O � LL O W u' Q J } Z Q � F- E N tq Z Z U !n h' � F w O m K F � Z � � Z O W � W W Z W U a F t J 2 2 ¢] t� Z J W Z �U Q 4' U' amuwc� FdwUaQ � c� '= '= 5 � c� oN � cai ° � ca.iz �noz � v� wo ? E � � ow � � � w � � v�i3 = 33w 3Z �' Oo � zc� c� Y � c� wow > c� a m U Z � � W N N 0 W (q � � 6 � O y F, � O 2 2 W J W N � U Y N S y z r o > E y o � � y � � w w 3 3 Z � 3 � � > � o N x �o x x 3 G u � '� g � � �( W J F U J J F J W �. N � O � 1 O Q O W W U Q.' N m � N � J � J y W U � � v W X S Q K K Q Q K Q S 7 p Z Z Q Z R K W a t� ¢ Q Q Q = X Q 6 f� m W U d Q Q d 0. Q d N N N tp � E fq (q f/J U N Q > ?i m ?i = � N � rtl � I- W E d � � Vp Qp p VR f�0 N N f�0 m O tm0 ^ � n � 0 m m f�0 O�I N � N N n ry M n O�] N V � � In N N m N N N N � Ir N N N N N N m Q N Ol [O r' t7 C�J W N O P N N m O�] N �A Cm'1 N p 1� O Q � 1� N N N N V) I� N N b P C V W f7 e] c] tA V t7 N t7 1� W t7 (7 M t7 1� CJ O e� ct Ol � O O O O 1n O N N N Cl N O� W (O N 1� I� m m O N Ol m (O ] T O fp P W t0 OI a. l7 CO N N I(1 N iA (O fD (O (O f0 t0 f0 (O (O (O (O (O (7 M Cf CJ I� Cl (O t0 (O {7 C (O N (O � O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O W N � f� N N N (9 f� N lq N U! N N 4l N h N N � J J � � N � � N lq l� h ln N y Vl N l� � � i- F- i- r i- �- F- i- �- rr F FFrr �- �- � F Fr � rri- rr rrr rri- i- �' J � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W � N Ul N Ul N t� t/1 N 41 N Gl N N (n l9 lq f� rn fq N N 4l 41 N t7 fq N f/1 N t7 l/1 N l9 f/1 f� K � w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w a w o 0 0 0 0 0 0 o a o 0 0 o a o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o a o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o rn x E E � � � � E � E � E � f E � E E � E � E E g E E � E g f E E E E E E � � F �I J �l J J ..l J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J �l J Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q U U a 6 a a a a a a �. d a a a a a a 6 �. a a d d a a a a a a a a a a a a a a ti ii� ��� C.: t�i �. ., [E .. ! ! .. 4':. . � � � _ . .. � ����V����...I'� �������.�� �.,�� i ���L�i�. 1.��..Ji ���r.Jl�..�. C V'�.+�� ��.L V�.r�� ��,��i A l LV� ��� INT�RSE�T�O�N �h�PR��E�h.E�TS �'1����CT Prepared for City of Palm Deserf 73-510 Fred Wc�ring Driv� Palr� �es�rt,Cali#ornia 922�0 Prep�red by BonT�rra Consul$inc� 151 Kalmus D�€v�,5�ite E-20i� Costa Mesa, Califarnia 92b26 �: [714) 4�449199 F: (71�4) 444-9�99 �v+nr�r.Ban��rraConsulting.carn �1ay 24D8 Cook Street Drainage and Intersection Improvemen(s Project COOK STREET DRAINAGE AND INTERSECTION IMPROVEMENTS PROJECT MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM Date: May 21, 2008 CEQA Action: Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration Project Applicant: City of Palm Desert Lead Agency: City of Palm Desert Project Location and Description: The project site consists of the intersections of Cook Street at Country Ciub Drive and Cook Street at Hovley Lane in the City of Palm Desert, Riverside County. The Cook Street Drainage and Intersection Improvements Project (hereafter referred to as the _ "ProjecY') allows for the construction of drainage improvements; reconfiguration of vehicle travel and turn lanes, raised medians, and sidewalks at the intersection of Cook Street at Country Club Drive and the intersection of Cook Street at Hovley Lane; and installation of signal interconnect(in-road sig nal traffic sensors) between 42nd Avenue and Frank Sinatra Drive. The drainage improvements at the Country Club Drive intersection include instailation of an 18-inch storm drain pipe, a catch basin on the northwestern corner, and two catch basins on the northeastern corner. The storm drain pipe would drain from these catch basins to a proposed catch basin and existing 18-inch storm drain pipe at Desert Willow Drive approximately 1,200 feet to the west. Installation of storm drains would eliminate cross gutters (dips) at the intersection. At the Cook Street and Country Club Drive intersection, Cook Street would be widened by approximately 12 feet at its widest point primarily on the southwestern and northwestern segments. Cook Street would be widened from approximately 460 feet north of the intersection to 900 feet south of the intersection. The raised median would be reconfigured for two 10-foot- wide dedicated left-turn Ianes onto Country Club Drive in both directions of travel. A 13-foot- wide dedicated right-turn lane on the northwestern segment of the intersection would be provided. The sidewalk on the western side of Cook Street would be widened from 10 to 12 feet from the intersection with Country Club Drive to approximately 840 feet to the south. T he Project requires the acquisition of property on the northern and southern sides of the intersection of Cook Street at Country Club Drive. A list of parcels that would be impacted and the approximate square footage of the acquisit ion on each parcel is identified on Table 1. The drainage improvements at the Hovley Lane intersection include installation of 18-inch storm drain pipes, a catch basin on the northwestern corner, and two catch 6asins on the northeastern corner. The storm drain pipes would drain from these catch basins to a proposed to a proposed 36-inch storm drain pipe that would be installed in the center of Cook Street from the northern side of the intersection to approximately 280 feet south where it would connect with an existing storm drain pipe. Installation of storm drains would eliminate cross gutters (dips) at the intersection. Cook Street would be widened by approximately 12 feet at its widest point on the northwestern and southeastern segm ents of the Hovley Lane intersection extending approxim ately 335 feet to the north and 230 feet to the south. The southeastern segment of the intersection would be widened for a 14-foot-wide right-turn lane, and a 4-foot-high retaining wall would be constructed R:\PmjeclsU-lams\J0041MMRP�052108.doc 1 Mitigation Moniforing and Reporting Program Cook Street Orainage and Infersection Improvemenfs Project at this corner. The intersection's existing raised median would be reconfigured for two 10-foot- wide dedicated left-turn lanes in both directions of travel, and a 13-foot-wide dedicated right-turn lane on the northwestern corner of the intersection. The sidewalk on the western side of Cook Street would be widened from 10• to 12 feet. The project would require the acquisition of property on the northwestern and southwestern sides of the intersection of Cook Street at Hovley Lane (Table 1). TABLE 1 RIGHT-OF-WAY ACQUISITION ON PRIVATELY OWNED PARCELS . . � � . � � � . � � Parcel' � . Approximate Area of Location���� � � � � �� � � � � � � � Number(s)� � � Acquisition(s�� Northwest corner of Cook Sireet and Country Club Drive 620370-011 590 620-370-012 3,430 Southwest corner of Cook Street and Country Club 624310-003 6,990 Drive Northwest corner of Cook Street and Hovley Lane 624-040-034 3,495 South side of Hovley Lane west of Cook Street 624-290-001 495 _ Southeast corner of Cook Street and Hovley Lane 632-060-033 1,930 North of Hovley Lane, east side of Cook Street 632-410-035 146 Total 17,076 Source:Harris&Associates,2008. On Hovley Lane, improvements include the widening of the southern side of the roadway by approximately 6 feet and widening of the northern side by approximately 6 feet from the intersection to approximately 500 feet to the west, and reconfiguration of the raised median from the intersection to approximately 450 feet west and 300 feet east of the intersection for two 11-foot-wide left-turn lanes in both directions of travel. To prevent traffic delays during project construction, improvements at Country Club Drive would be completed in five stages and improvements at Hovley Lane would be completed in six stages. Mitiaation Monitorinq and Reportinq Proqram The California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) requires that all public agencies establish monitoring and/or reporting procedures for mitigation measures (MMs) adopted as conditions of approval in order to mitigate or avoid significant project impacts. Specifically, §21081.6(a)(1) states: The public agency shall adopt a reporting or monitoring program for the changes made to the project or conditions of project approval, adopted in order to mitigate or avoid significant effects on the environment. The reporting or monitoring program shall be designed to ensure compliance during project im plementation. CEQA Guidelines §15097 provides clarification of mitigation monitoring and reporting requirements and guidance to local lead agencies on implementing strategies. The reporting or monitoring program must be designed to ensure compliance during project implementation. The City of Palm Desert (City) is the lead agency for the Project and is therefore respo�sible for implementing the Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program (MMRP). The MMRP contains the mitigation program that has been incorporated through preparation of the Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration. Mitigation measures have been drafted to meet RiProlecls\Hams\J004UAMRP-052108.tloc 2 Mitigafion Monitoring and Reporting Program Cook Street Drainage and Intersection Improvements Projecl the requirements of Public Resources Code §21081.6 as fully enforceable monitoring programs. The MMRP defines the following for each m itigation measure: 1. Timeframe. In each case, a time for performance of the mitigation measure, or review of evidence that mitigation has taken place, is provided. The performance points selected are designed to ensure that impact-related components of project implementation do not proceed without establishing that the mitigation is implemented or assured. 2. Responsible Party. In each case, unless where otherwise indicated, the City, as both lead agency and applicant, is the Responsible Party for implementing the mitigation. The City will also monitor the performance and implementation of the mitigation measures. To guarantee that the mitigation measure will not be inadvertently overlooked, the supervising public official is the official who grants the permit or authorization called for in the performance. 3. Definifion of Mitigation. In each case (except where a mitigation measure, such as a geotechnical report, is a well-known procedure or term of art), the mitigation _ measure contains the criteria for mitigation, either in the form of adherence to certain adopted regulations or identification of the steps to be taken in m itigation. The numbering system corresponds with the numbering system used in the Initial Study/Mitigated Declaration. The last column of the MMRP table will be used by the Compliance Monitor to document when implementation of the measure has been completed. The ongoing documentation and monitoring of mitigation compliance will be completed by the City. The completed MMRP and supplemental documents will be kept on file at the City of Palm Desert Planning Department. R:\Projeds\HarnsW004\MMRP-052108.doc 3 Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program u E m m a N o y N d c w a d � '= c � o 0 i '+.+ a o N � � a a E � � U y c «, c h R � � � o � � Dc o m - °' o, a . . _ � � m a�i g � � � � °� c r r m Cc s O n� a� z � O = � c � c o Ui p, O �"m . m"m (j � d � �c W �� W Q�' Q�' m,..�`. m w 4 aU aU � — � wm �o'� ino � � '�n� °' in ^� E `otl1 �'3 � owwaid a� Z o " > > m .C � m .�.. � � ❑ � � c� _wco� .NT� 3a � nn :N � � � � � nNo �;. o �'oaind� m�yaa��ia-16oa �aaciQ °v' '�= Y � O - a�i `om=U� wa� „N $ Uc°�i �' amict '� rnm3 °� m E � wrn3 a a � `o �om >>�.nyU 3�?c�a � « c� o ��� nn'a � 16 � �,a�i o W Q mc � �� � 3?��« a� � cwo� u�'i c °� c °� � a'� m;> a- � " tUU = tm� �r EinZa� ao � 'wmr�noo ,t�, o a� � R � a� .G �° y � a 2 N O ~ U L 'C ~ "' N N � N U � .'C.. I- �L.. N Ul N rt+ r�+ > � L -O @ J� C m L � N Q O N U (p�O O d �I � m � Ul —C N .-:� � �� � N pl O N � y� � �� � L...�-, � " c> �n. cU � wma�o � 3E� � U!n �" "' m �� m = � °�' > N �om y om ? C iC d� � N U N O t0 L N Ol�� @ �!L � 3 �'N O U a N �C .J N � W O 'O'� QQ O a� vvYa�`�� a� �c a`�i c� >�ar � `mmE�o ;� uCi d vi?c� `o a`�i > > � y � y10 -�� m.�'cwa�Qa�i � ���°' om � Sm ��r �cuvi ''-- �o�.- c�i�3a �ny� � � o - m w o 3 a m c t m c E >.v ti �r-o�c= °�r 'v y m N—v r m cYi L o 2 � « U �_ om> a m "�,-- �wa�o $ >, oi.mrn o O R m N O N y U O 3 N O U � d � C M"�-C i0 0 p.v- C= V 0.— t-O 41 _ O_ � N i+ O N � � @ � �V U �n O O V� � C «V y d N� '.0 N'O� O � N N +�0 Z LL � d C Q�9 � 3 p� � � Y � C � N G m U � N E N a 0- N y l0 y'O d N N (0 Q C f0 � O �' QO�' O WLN_ � 0 � ,.. NdNC_ > > .t.. � in � �oEm°� � � ° ma°'i Uin�� a�i� ma�i > >'Nc v3i � � � ��� c�ir �jU�� ¢ ❑ `_=oui �'n�Ea � o� c1Oi r � d� oao'iEa�i � � a�0i � f� F-U mn�._ � mf. Em • • . . • I� u g � �� �- N �' M M n' � � � � � � 0 0 U U � � iq N Cl o O 4 C U U � �C � Ol g � C G � � � � / 9 � � ?.�` U U E G C N N N 3 d � � o = o O d Q U U � N � C � N � N O , m - a o �, o, Q = � c E O — o o N � � Q � � � a ` c d O t0 _ U y c' w a � o � p 'c � � �0 c c o O p� . Ui . N � L � C m✓1 C m C S� v O v O'� � O N (n �` LA Eo0 E � E �n o a 'yC'. m 16 � m m m o L C L U Q � c �Q m �Q Oa] � C, o m�n, . m� �'a�i - 0 N � c:c o �"_ �''"-- � �, c m� c m � m a y aC7 m a�.U=' aC7 � U rn m v � — U a— >. c m a� N v m m c �.N N c c �n ^--o w" a) c � w ol 2 ` 'O ` NOIUVp =� �'TC O« NGY '- � « � O N ��w '..C-.�C N �(OC � � y � `m `.crnm— ... � mo U � .Z` — m m � �o NOa� � Adm � > r� �._ Qot � c�Ra— a.,s.. � ..� c Zc � m � aai � caawi o �ym O o �o!gmmc vcdm� v� c ; °3 � .� ,Ja'€ 'n 9 � ;= Q a '� a � o a � o �� � � ° � a� � �� � 9 ='' � � � � � N � '° �oY yLL �� W .�. E � o-mu `oo° ui a w. 3EEcv wcm�� mcrn.. � 'O a � E�an �,LLom� ymocmE rna� ot � YYo �ymc .` Q N p ti � '- C y N a 3 c � a> m c o w U m v c c n'" o Y� c E �n � 3�m `n � y oct > � :c inr=oQ. � wov �vw�m � -= m o— �a 3 -- 00 2 C G (/1 N Ul«9 OX ���.�N (`m C.O U.G �r E O 0 L.O V W O� C� Q Y O 01 � v G T Ul ;� d� O N OI O U.� j N G OI N N -O E y O. N N R O-0 v[p 2Vat�n o- t6omm� mmcEmU aaEiE.' �m €~ 3m = � osaw � w „s�„� `�m � a�°i a"i3 � a� � mma��i � � 3 a � � d � � E . �a� .Jm � my 6N4= 0 v V cG s � 4j � � O " a a v N .0 C O �C 9 (0 �L C V T� � > ... � C D � C � F_ w O '-' �°n� `" m _ my �,�0 3EU 'o � c « �.�c0 m� ya�'ia3co oa'� 6 Z L . d•u.0 N� �9 O r � � �N ry J O y w T . � G Y � -� O_ N_ J l0 O a3+ 16 C U— D ..�. >`_ U O O � C 9 N .� .- N� � C C O �C � 3 � T �— �p C— U > C � O a � O l0 Cl= � d N .O Zli � m 'o�c�`� EEa�rn�-o:°� m9� U� �Q � � `� a�io ` T« �� y �'�'-� � o �� � � mooc" a`�iyoa`�ia`�im3 ovm,... � mvmca N � o._ w � m o� >,c � •v�i � mLmo� � 'C' m5 � = o �'°�'�w �rmEc � mt o2 aoo � c mf.-'iE a� t �— � o:°.coo— m m� � r� .- > mc�i'`my " �w000nw '° � cv °3 �` � � `ma16io $ '.N-c � mQ � � nci6i �r�oaKs�Zv�aQ �3 `—tin3m@vo wc�ima I� u — — g d � � 'o � � a` � � � � � N w C C p � C O O O R [0 � 2 � U > > > @ (0 O y'y � X X y O_p C C o C UI � � ` N U � � ¢ C N 'O -O TV- m � p � C C � l0 O C pp � F � N m O 'O « :`. C � O m m � � � @ ? o y � > � �' 'D �v, � m m � N � E m E rn rn c> c u� -0 3 ✓i N � �> �> � °' E> �C� - o Z E� 0 6 a U Om � m [0 (� c�im � � � � � � � E N o "> m a e :� � E c � C o — o c ++ 4 o G� � � � @ w O � � U � c y,� G D � O m � O m g c o O p, :' � m a�i � u' y c r r o a ` a� n� �c O � � U � p C � c � c U' °' 0 �'c c'�' - O y � cw cw � R m� `m� y aU aU � O y'O T tl) T(0 N N y 0 C N O � O T � C N N 0 'C T T L Z o � c c m c d'-r � o E [h a o m N« w N a) m:�' � � in � m m Q m= -� c �'�:- iri �� T � T�Y� 3s O N 0 O '�' U � O � O �p N N O C � .... � N N O .�. Ena`�iw o�� �.L « a� N� � a�. c �� m � m � �-�oc m c� N T o �— Y c 5� � � � m > c�U m W ^ 2 E-omo;=�� omn .c � o Qa ¢o tA E�� :n « m�.c � R' Q � ca� � � °� o-o�o'g — � o � o 'n c of0 � a�icm�" � W p E �-� c �0 �o a�3 y 3 Q� � � r:io ° ° � c'a� E A � n'0 w �c p 3 0 �- �, ¢s a o�- n-C a a� c Z3 �n c0c�i ro�= � om � nai = E � E� .� m � SA .«: cd;oo Q,^ Y OiLT10 � UlQO �D � � 10 �0 � OM � OO� � OOfQN � U � OL v � �O (A 3 N rT+ � C @� =� w C J� U @�Q (0 pj N � N C � 19 N O Q d � V Oa�°i wo'f�-.� rn9a� � � R zOv '� omoE � i. Y '° ��._ nOT; o ,C � V l6 Y L C Q L N E LL w J LL O OJ C � �g� O �LL O O� Ul C O V � N'� m . v.- m a�— � os.= -- � 3 _ ww oa>!� o I� f/1 C C �9 C O C O!/1 N Ol TY OIN N N p ND qL9 "':_ O � O m� �o K 'E� o m� '�Z a o 9 N ` �(� c� o �p ��� v � � a�+ l0 N v f0 C � d ...y 9� � R .L.- �� .'_-� j Ol� N �-�p �t� C U'O m rn �_ � � N �c � U E� m v �-o Cc ai ;7 �-o c�� Yn a v v-0 16 0 � y w m i�a m'° ° ' � � R � N� �y d O c � .� R m m c y�� �� � �p �+ � c � c�� c � y 3 a �-°�o� a c � ti � y�;oa''io �CocEon a�i �> in �a�ga � Uo� - o � � d-`�oaEaxi ¢ � " �.cZa.�c � o � o� �muo o„-'= o.>_ '° � �s (� � �.°2axiu�it0oa�i `moo.o a�- m � • • . zoUU�vJEh « � V Sc O N i a � � � � 0 � o � 2 3 T:= c a 16 u U y� � OI - N 0 � � C N N 'O p �� m �i� N E F = � O C m � � U � C 7 U . d t � � E � O x � � U � � - U d Q.- •- N � p v 'o o� � op v g` Z U N a Z o-o rc � E m m � N o > m . a o _ p� E � � � O - a o N � " °. a y � G d Q � � U � c' Y O � O � O � � N C G � � p� m ` �' g O `" d c a' o � '� o S� p `o U � p c a�i � O O a�ig ms � � �`o a o� Z L'�soaovm �� v N R � C � � � NF-3 O N ��Q� O uico � 'OE O � E �oc� c �� m �a-°�oE � a a `m :o � m � c � l'n N c�i n- �._ d a. ,D � Q � n.-o m�� o-o � m y.. C 'p._ U C N 0 3 � � N � (0 � N C N � �C r Z � G N U Yn N C N v� m� E m Q i.:r � ` @ � � N — � N (� p '=' � � E '�C'A c mv `o �' .o i. Z :p y � m J N v U-p c � m V CR Nom� m�`- � � � '�o Q V � O �O L p 1]'O � O U ~ d 0 N G r�j Ol N p G N� UI C @ C � U 0 V 14 l0 U � v� � q O V a � � �C d .°_, _ � �wo �n oa, > N O t0 U � C N O � N u- N'-- O! �� C U d y N U.p E p p�g � =oyo!° 2a�� c�i:� a�i r y Y L U S 9 U E � Q N C O O L U1 iU 0 y V ry � Ve p aUU3� Eomm .- � a� � U � O � d U � T N p� 9 N 9 �� N C � > Ol O O �O p� r d m U o C C C a � 'a A rc 'E y � � � � F- ` `mm"- E � � r �� � � V R E C U O O I N � V O- � VI O O� � A ,`o_ EaE Q i- a-�o m o. �