HomeMy WebLinkAboutSR - FY 08-09 Cal COPS Grant Award ���- ,���
�� ��� CITY OF PALM DESERT
������
� �/
--_ Community Services Division
. .
Staff Report
REQUEST: REQUEST FOR ACCEPTANCE OF 2008/09 CAL COPS
(SUPPLEMENTAL LAW ENFORCEMENT SERVICES
FUNDING/SLESF) GRANT AWARD IN THE AMOUNT OF
APPROXIMATELY $100,000
SUBMITTED BY: Sheila R. Gilligan, ACM/Community Services
DATE: November 20, 2008
RECOMMENDATION:
By Minute Motion, accept the Cal COPS (Supplemental Law Enforcement Services
Funding/SLESF) Grant Award of approximately$100,000 to be used to cover the cost for
the 2008 Holiday Theft Suppression Program and the acquisition of necessary equipment
to support front line law enforcement services.
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:
The City of Palm Desert is eligible to receive approximately $100,000 in Cal COPS
(Supplemental Law Enforcement Services Fund/SLESF) Grant funding for Fiscal Year
2008/09. Approval of this request will allow staff to move forward in securing these funds.
As required by law, a public hearing was scheduled for consideration of this item(Notice of
Public Hearing and copy of Government Code Section 30061 are attached).
BACKGROUND:
Because of the loss of time in approving the State Budget, the City has just received
unofficial notification that its Cal COPS funding has been approved in the amount of
approximately$100,000. The Palm Desert Police Department would like to implement the
CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT NOVEMBER 20, 2008
RE: REQUEST FOR ACCEPTANCE OF 2008/09 CAL COPS(SUPPLEMENTAL U4W
ENFORCEMENT SERVICES FUNDING/SLESF) GRANT AWARD IN THE
AMOUNT OF APPROXIMATELY $100,000
Holiday Theft Suppression Program during the 2008 holiday season starting on Friday,
November 28, 2008, and concluding on Friday, January 2, 2009. The purpose ofi this
program will be to conduct high visibility patrol in retail and commercial areas of the City,
including the Highway 111 business corridor, EI Paseo business district, WestField
Shoppingtown Palm Desert, and any other appropriate business complexes. This program
will include high visibility patrol in adjoining residential areas of the locations listed above,
proactive citizen contacts, and the issuance of moving and parking citations as well as
verbal warnings. Deputies assigned to the program will handle radio calls for routine
reports and arrests, particularly calls involving theft and other business related crimes in
the focus areas, and will enforce on-site violations of any nature. The program will also
include one patrol vehicle to provide extra patrol in the Costco and WalMart complexes. It
is expected that this program will cost approximately$30,000 for approximately 600 hours
of extra patrol services, which would be totally funded by the requested grant monies.
Since the City of Palm Desert is eligible for approximately $100,000 in grant funding, the
remaining $70,000 would be dedicated to necessary equipment purchases to assist the
Police Department in its efforts to prevent and combat crime (i.e., computers, technology,
and support equipment for patrol, traffic, and special teams'staff as approved by the City).
At its meeting of November 12, 2008, the Palm Desert Public Safety Commission voted
unanimously to recommend that the City Council accept the Cal COPS Grant award in the
amount of approximately$100,000 to be used to cover the cost for the 2008 Holiday Theft
Suppression Program and the acquisition of necessary equipment to support front line law
enforcement services.
2
CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT NOVEMBER 20, 2008
RE: REQUEST FOR ACCEPTANCE OF 2008/09 CAL COPS(SUPPLEMENTAL LAW
ENFORCEMENT SERVICES FUNDING/SLESF) GRANT AWARD IN THE
AMOUNT OF APPROXIMATELY $100,000
The Holiday Theft Suppression Program has proved most beneficial to residents, visitors,
and businesses in the City of Palm Desert in past years. Therefore,staff recommends that
the City Council approve the recommendation of the Palm Desert Public Safety
Commission and accept the Cal COPS Grant award of approximately $100,000. The
official notification of the grant approval is expected to be received the first part of
December, 2008. If for any reason the City were not to receive the grant, funding for the
2008 Holiday Theft Suppression Program would come from the Palm Desert Police budget.
� , r
�
SHEILA R. GILLIGAN PAUL S. GIBSON
ACM/COMMUNITY SERVICES FINANCE DIR./CITY TREASURER
CARLOS L. TEGA
CITY MANA ER
SRG:mpg
..�Y C;v�iVC:IL ACTIOIv:
.:aPPROVED ✓ DENIED
'�,ECEIVED OTHER
l`�'(w�,�TZNG I5A'�'E —
, :�>�::��.�_Iri�� t11��
����:,t: � ���r --
�; ., r.
�:t���siti'�'d..�.r
"�1>S�'A�N' �Cl�
`J��IFIEl� BX: �l�i
:��z a.�:�nal c�n Fi1.e with ity C],erk°s Office
3
CITY OF PALM DESERT
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING
REGARDING CAL COPS
(SUPPLEMENTAL LAW ENFORCEMENT SERVICES FUND - SLESF)
GRANT AWARD
Notice is hereby given by the CITY OF PALM DESERT that a PUBLIC HEARING will be
held before the PALM DESERT CITY COUNCIL at 4:00 p.m. on Thursday, November 20,
2008, at the Palm Desert Civic Center Council Chamber, located at 73-510 Fred Waring
Drive, Palm Desert, California, to consider the following item:
SUBJECT:A Public Hearing to consider acceptance of the Cal COPS (Supplemental Law
Enforcement Services Funding - SLESF) Grant Award of approximately $100,000 to be
used to cover the cost for the 2008 Holiday Theft Suppression Program and the acquisition
of necessary equipment to support front line law enforcement services .
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION:Any interested person may be present and comment at the
public meeting or may submit written comments concerning this matter. Any comments or
inquiries should be directed to the attention of Rachelle Klassen, City Clerk, City of Palm
Desert, 73-510 Fred Waring Drive, Palm Desert, CA 92260-2578; (760)346-0611. Written
comments must be submitted no later than November 20. 2008, at 4:00 p.m.
. RACHELLE D. KLASSEN, CITY CLERK
CITY OF PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA
Publish: Desert Sun 11/08/08
CA Codes (gov:30061-30065) Page 1 of 7
GOVERNMENT CODE
SECTION 30061-30065
30061. (a) There shall be established in each county treasury a
Supplemental Law Enforcement Services Fund (SLESF) , to receive all
amounts allocated to a county for purposes of implementing this
chapter.
(b) In any fiscal year for which a county receives moneys to be
expended for the implementation of this chapter, the county auditor
shall allocate the moneys in the county's SLESF, including any
interest or other return earned on trie investment of those moneys,
within 30 days of the deposit of those moneys into the fund, and
shall allocate those moneys in accordance with the requirements set
forth in this subdivision. However, the auditor shall not transfer
those moneys to a recipient agency until the Supplemental Law
Enforcement Oversight Committee certifies receipt of an approved
expenditure plan from the governing board of that agency. The moneys
shall be allocated as follows:
(1) Five and fifteen-hundredths percent to the county sheriff for
county jail construction and operation. In the case of Madera, Napa,
and Santa Clara Counties, this allocation shall be made to the county
director or chief of corrections.
(2) Five and fifteen-hundredths percent to the district attorney
for criminal prosecution.
(3) Thirty-nine and seven-tenths percent to the county and the
cities within the county, and, in the case of San Mateo, Kern,
Siskiyou, and Contra Costa Counties, also to the Broadmoor Police
Protection District, the Bear Valley Community Services District, the
Stallion Springs Community Services District, the Lake Shastina
Community Services District, and the Kensington Police Protection and
Community Services District, in accordance with the relative
population of the cities within the county and the unincorporated
area of the county, and the Broadmoor Police Protection District in
the County of San Mateo, the Bear Valley Community Services District
and the Stallion Springs Community Services District in Kern County,
the Lake Shastina Community Services District in Siskiyou County, and
the Kensington Police Protection and Community Services District in
Contra Costa County, as specified in the most recent January estimate
by the population research unit of the Department of Finance, and as
adjusted to provide a grant of at least one hundred thousand dollars
($100, 000) to each law enforcement jurisdiction. For a newly
incorporated city whose population estimate is not published by the
Department of Finance, but that was incorporated prior to July 1 of
the fiscal year in which an allocation from the SLESF is to be made,
the city manager, or an appointee of the legislative body, if a city
manager is not available, and the county administrative or executive
officer shall prepare a joint notification to the Department of
Finance and the county auditor with a population estimate reduction
of the unincorporated area of the county equal to the population of
the newly incorporated city by July 15, or within 15 days after the
Budget Act is enacted, of the fiscal year in which an allocation from
the SLESF is to be made. No person residing within the Broadmoor
Police Protection District, the Bear Valley Community Services
District, the Stallion Springs Community Services District, the Lake
Shastina Community Services District, or the Kensington Police
Protection and Community Services District shall also be counted as
http://www.leginfo.ca.gov/cgi-bin/displaycode?section=gov&group=30001-31000&file=3... 11/5/2008
CA Codes (gov:30061-30065) Page 2 of 7
residing within the unincorporated area of the County of San Mateo,
Kern, Siskiyou, or Contra Costa, or within any city located within
those counties. The county auditor shall allocate a grant of at least
one hundred thousand dollars ($100, 000) to each law enforcement
jurisdiction. Moneys allocated to the county pursuant to this
subdivision shall be retained in the county SLESF, and moneys
allocated to a city pursuant to this subdivision shall be deposited
in an SLESF established in the city treasury.
(4) Fifty percent to the county or city and county to implement a
comprehensive multiagency juvenile justice plan as provided in this
paragraph and to the Board of Corrections for administrative
purposes. Funding for the Board of Corrections, as determined by the
Department of Finance, shall not exceed two hundred seventy-five
thousand dollars ($275, 000) . For the 2003-04 fiscal year, of the two
hundred seventy-five thousand dollars ($275, 000) , up to one hundred
seventy-six thousand dollars ($176, 000) may be used for juvenile
facility inspections. The juvenile justice plan shall be developed
by the local juvenile justice coordinating council in each county and
city and county with the membership described in Section 749.22 of
the Welfare and Institutions Code. If a plan has been previously
approved by the Board of Corrections, the plan shall be reviewed and
modified annually by the council. The plan or modified plan shall be
approved by the county board of supervisors, and in the case of a
city and county, the plan shall also be approved by the mayor. The
plan or modified plan shall be submitted to the Board of Corrections
by May 1, 2002, and annually thereafter.
(A) Juvenile justice plans shall include, but not be limited to,
all of the following components:
(i) An assessment of existing law enforcement, probation,
education, mental health, health, social services, drug and alcohol,
and youth services resources that specifically target at-risk
juveniles, juvenile offenders, and their families.
(ii) An identification and prioritization of the neighborhoods,
schools, and other areas in the community that face a significant
public safety risk from juvenile crime, such as gang activity,
daylight burglary, late-night robbery, vandalism, truancy, controlled
substances sales, firearm-related violence, and juvenile substance
abuse and alcohol use.
(iii) A local juvenile justice action strategy that provides for a
continuum of responses to juvenile crime and delinquency and
demonstrates a collaborative and integrated approach for implementing
a system of swift, certain, and graduated responses for at-risk
youth and juvenile offenders.
(iv) Programs identified in clause (iii) that are proposed to be
funded pursuant to this subparagraph, including the projected amount
of funding for each program.
(B) Programs proposed to be funded shall satisfy all of the
following requirements:
(i) Be based on programs and approaches that have been
demonstrated to be effective in reducing delinquency and addressing
juvenile crime for any elements of response to juvenile crime and
delinquency, including prevention, intervention, suppression, and
incapacitation.
(ii) Collaborate and integrate services of all the resources set
forth in clause (i) of subparagraph (A) , to the extent appropriate.
(iii) Employ information sharing systems to ensure that county
actions are fully coordinated, and designed to provide data for
measurinq the success of juvenile justice programs and strategies.
(iv) Adopt goals related to the outcome measures that shall be
used to determine the effectiveness of the local juvenile justice
http://www.leginfo.ca.gov/cgi-bin/displaycode?section=gov&group=30001-31000&file=3... 11/5/2008
CA Codes (gov:30061-30065) Page 3 of 7
action strategy.
(C) The plan shall also identify the specific objectives of the
programs proposed for funding and specified outcome measures to
determine the effectiveness of the programs and contain an accounting
for all program participants, including those who do not complete
the programs. Outcome measures of the programs proposed to be funded
shall include, but not be limited to, all of the following:
(i) The rate of juvenile arrests per 100, 000 population.
(ii) The rate of successful completion of probation.
(iii) The rate of successful completion of restitution and
court-ordered community service responsibilities.
(iv) Arrest, incarceration, and probation violation rates of
program participants.
(v) Quantification of the annual per capita costs of the program.
(D) The Board of Corrections shall review plans or modified plans
submitted pursuant to this paragraph within 30 days upon receipt of
submitted or resubmitted plans or modified plans. The board shall
approve only those plans or modified plans that fulfill the
requirements of this paragraph, and shall advise a submitting county
or city and county immediately upon the approval of its plan or
modified plan. The board shall offer, and provide, if requested,
technical assistance to any county or city and county that submits a
plan or modified plan not in compliance with the requirements of this
paragraph. The SLESF shall only allocate funding pursuant to this
paragraph upon notification from the board that a plan or modified
plan has been approved.
(E) To assess the effectiveness of programs funded pursuant to
this paragraph using the program outcome criteria specified in
subparagraph (C) , the following periodic reports shall be submitted:
(i) Each county or city and county shall report, beginning October
15, 2002, and annually each October 15 thereafter, to the county
board of supervisors and the Board of Corrections, in a format
specified by the Board of Corrections, on the programs funded
pursuant to this chapter and program outcomes as specified in
subparagraph (C) .
(ii) The Board of Corrections shall compile the local reports and,
by March 15, 2003, and annually thereafter, make a report to the
Governor and the Legislature on program expenditures within each
county and city and county from the appropriation for the purposes of
this paragraph, on the outcomes as specified in subparagraph (C) of
the programs funded pursuant to this paragraph and the statewide
effectiveness of the comprehensive multiagency juvenile justice
plans.
(c) Subject to subdivision (d) , for each fiscal year in which the
county, each city, the Broadmoor Police Protection District, the Bear
Valley Community Services District, the Stallion Springs Community
Services District, the Lake Shastina Community Services District, and
the Kensington Police Protection and Community Services District
receive moneys pursuant to paragraph (3) of subdivision (b) , the
county, each city, and each district specified in this subdivision
shall appropriate those moneys in accordance with the following
procedures:
(1) In the case of the county, the county board of supervisors
shall appropriate existing and anticipated moneys exclusively to
provide frontline law enforcement services, other than those services
specified in paragraphs (1) and (2} of subdivision (b) , in the
unincorporated areas of the county, in response to written requests
submitted to the board by the county sheriff and the district
http://www.leginfo.ca.gov/cgi-bin/displaycode?section=gov&group=30001-31000&file=3... 11/5/2008
CA Codes(gov:30061-30065) Page 4 of 7
attorney. Any request submitted pursuant to this paragraph shall
specify the frontline law enforcement needs of the requesting entity,
and those personnel, equipment, and programs that are necessary to
meet those needs. The board shall, at a public hearing held at a time
determined by the board in each year that the Legislature
appropriates funds for purposes of this chapter, or within 30 days
after a request by a recipient agency for a hearing if the funds have
been received by the county from the state prior to that request,
consider and determine each submitted request within 60 days of
receipt, pursuant to the decision of a majority of a quorum present.
The board shall consider these written requests separate and apart
from the process applicable to proposed allocations of the county
qeneral fund.
(2) In the case of a city, the city council shall appropriate
existing and anticipated moneys exclusively to fund frontline
municipal police services, in accordance with written requests
submitted by the chief of police of that city or the chief
administrator of the law enforcement agency that provides police
services for that city. These written requests shall be acted upon by
the city council in the same manner as specified in paragraph (1)
for county appropriations.
(3) In the case of the Broadmoor Police Protection District within
the County of San Mateo, the Bear Valley Community Services District
or the Stallion Springs Community Services District within Kern
County, the Lake Shastina Community Services District within Siskiyou
County, or the Kensington Police Protection and Community Services
District within Contra Costa County, the leqislative body of that
special district shall appropriate existing and anticipated moneys
exclusively to fund frontline municipal police services, in
accordance with written requests submitted by the chief administrator
of the law enforcement agency that provides police services for that
special district. These written requests shall be acted upon by the
legislative body in the same manner specified in paragraph (1) for
county appropriations.
(d) For each fiscal year in which the county, a city, or the
Broadmoor Police Protection District within the County of San Mateo,
the Bear Valley Community Services District or the Stallion Springs
Community Services District within Kern County, the Lake Shastina
Community Services District within Siskiyou County, or the Kensington
Police Protection and Community Services District within Contra
Costa County receives any moneys pursuant to this chapter, in no
event shall the governing body of any of those recipient agencies
subsequently alter any previous, valid appropriation by that body,
for that same fiscal year, of moneys allocated to the county or city
pursuant to paraqraph (3) of subdivision (b) .
(e) The Controller shall allocate funds, upon their appropriation
by the Legislature in the annual Budget Act, to local jurisdictions
for public safety in accordance with this section as calculated by
the Director of Finance. The Controller shall allocate these funds in
four equal installments, to be paid in September, December, March,
and June of each fiscal year.
(f) Funds received pursuant to subdivision (b) shall be expended
or encumbered in accordance with this chapter no later than June 30
of the following fiscal year. A local agency that has not met this
requirement shall remit unspent SLESF moneys to the Controller for
deposit into the General Fund.
(g) If a county, a city, a city and county, or a qualifying
special district does not comply with the requirements of this
chapter to receive an SLESF allocation, the Controller shall revert
those funds to the General Fund.
http://www.leginfo.ca.gov/cgi-bin/displaycode?section=gov&group=30001-31000&file=3... 11/5/2008
CA Codes (gov:30061-30065) Page 5 of 7
30062. (a) Except as required by paragraphs (1) , (2) , and (4) of
subdivision (b) of Section 30061, moneys allocated from a
Supplemental Law Enforcement Services Fund (SLESF) to a recipient
entity shall be expended exclusively to provide front line law
enforcement services. These moneys shall supplement existing
services, and shall not be used to supplant any existing funding for
law enforcement services provided by that entity. Moneys allocated
pursuant to paragraph (4) of subdivision (b) of Section 30061 shall
be used to supplement and not supplant funding by local agencies for
existing services.
(b) In the Counties of Los Angeles, Orange, and San Diego only,
the district attorney may, in consultation with city attorneys in the
county, determine a prorated share of the moneys received by the
district attorney pursuant to this section to be allocated to city
attorneys in the county in each fiscal year to fund the prosecution
by those city attorneys of misdemeanor violations of state law.
(c) In no event shall any moneys allocated from the county's SLESF
be expended by a recipient agency to fund any of the following:
(1) Administrative overhead costs in excess of 0.5 percent of a
recipient entity's SLESF allocation for that year.
(2) The costs of any capital project or construction project
funded from moneys allocated pursuant to paragraph (3) of subdivision
(b) of Section 30061 that does not directly support front line law
enforcement services.
(3) The costs of any capital project or construction project
funded from moneys allocated pursuant to paragraph (4) of subdivision
(b) of Section 30061.
(d) For purposes of subdivision (c) , both of the following shall
apply:
(1) A "recipient agency" or "recipient entity" is that entity that
actually incurs the expenditures of SLESF funds allocated pursuant
to paragraph (1) , (2) , (3) , or (4) of subdivision (b) of Section
30061.
(2) Administrative overhead costs shall only be charged by the
recipient entity, as defined in paragraph (1) , up to 0.5 percent of
its SLESF allocation.
(e) For purposes of this chapter, "front line law enforcement
services" and "front line municipal police services" each include
antigang, community crime prevention, and juvenile justice programs.
30063. (a) The Supplemental Law Enforcement Services Fund (SLESF)
in each county or city is to be expended exclusively as required by
this chapter. Moneys in that fund shall not be transferred to, or
intermingled with, the moneys in any other fund in the county or city
treasury, except that moneys may be transferred from the SLESF to
the county's or city's general fund to the extent necessary to
facilitate the appropriation and expenditure of those transferred
moneys in the manner required by this chapter.
(b) Moneys in an SLESF inay only be invested in safe and
conservative investments in accordance with those standards of
prudent investment applicable to the investment of trust moneys. The
treasurer of the county and each city shall provide a monthly SLESF
investment report to either the police chief or the county sheriff
and district attorney, as applicable.
(c) Each year, at least 30 days prior to the date of the duly
http://www.leginfo.ca.gov/cgi-bin/displaycode?section=gov&group=30001-31000&file=3... 11/5/2008
CA Codes (gov:30061-30065) Page 6 of 7
noticed public hearing required pursuant to paragraph (1) of
subdivision (c) of Section 30061, the county auditor and city
treasurer shall detail and summarize allocations from the county's or
city's SLESF, as applicable, in a written, public report filed with
the Supplemental Law Enforcement Oversight Committee (SLEOC) , the
county board of supervisors, or the city council, as applicable, for
the entirety of the immediately preceding fiscal year, and the county
sheriff or police chief, as applicable.
(d) A summary of the annual reports required in subdivision (c)
shall be submitted in a standardized format to be developed by the
Controller, in conjunction with the California District Attorney's
Association, California Police Chief's Association, California State
Sheriff's Association, California Peace Officer's Association,
California County Auditor's Association, and California Municipal
Treasurer's Association, by each SLEOC to the Controller on or before
October 15, 2001, and each year thereafter. The Controller shall
make a copy of the summarized reports available to the Governor, the
Legislature, and the Legislative Analyst's Office.
(e) A county, a city, or a city and county that fails to submit
the data required pursuant to subdivision (d) of this section or to
report as required pursuant to clause (i) of subparagraph (E) of
paragraph (4) of subdivision (b) of Section 30061 shall not continue
to expend funds allocated pursuant to subdivision (b) of Section
30061 or interest earned pursuant to subdivision (b) of this section
until that data and that report are submitted as required by this
chapter.
(f) Notwithstanding subdivision (e) , if the SLEOC fails to
transmit the data to the Controller required pursuant to subdivision
(d) , the local law enforcement agency may submit its expenditure data
directly to the Controller no later than 15 days after the date
specified in subdivision (d) . If the local law enforcement agency has
complied with other requirements in this chapter, it may continue to
expend funds allocated and interest earned pursuant to this chapter.
30064 . (a) There is in each county a Supplemental Law Enforcement
Oversight Committee (SLEOC) , consisting of five members as follows:
(1) One municipal police chief.
(2) The county sheriff.
(3) The district attorney.
(4) The county's executive officer.
(5) One city manager.
(b) (1) The cities in each county shall organize as a city
selection committee for the purposes of appointing a city manager and
a municipal police chief to the SLEOC. Each appointment shall be
made by not less than a majority of all the cities in the county
having not less than a majority of the population of all the cities
in the county. For purposes of this paragraph, population figures
shall be determined on the basis of the most recent census data
developed by the Department of Finance.
(2) The SLEOC shall determine whether recipient entities have
expended moneys received from the Supplemental Law Enforcement
Services Fund (SLESF) in compliance with this chapter. For this
purpose, the SLEOC shall at least annually review the expenditure of
SLESF funds by city police departments, the county sheriff, and the
district attorney, and shall make its annual review report available
to the public.
http://www.leginfo.ca.gov/cgi-bin/displaycode?section=gov&group=30001-31000&file=3... 11/5/2008
CA Codes (gov:30061-30065) Page 7 of 7
30065. In no event shall this chapter be construed to affect in any
manner the public safety service allocations required by Chapter 6.5
(commencing with Section 30051) .
t,,+�•ii.,,..,.,,�o,.;,,� ,.., ,.,..,i,.,,; �.;,,ia;�,.i,,.,,.,,ao��o,.+;,,,,—,�,,.,�e,,.,.,,,,�—znnn� ��nnn�e,�;io—� > > i�i�nn4
Martinez, Gloria
From: Moeller, Charlene [CMOELLER@palmspri.gannett.comJ
Sent: Wednesday, November 05, 2008 5:32 PM
To: Martinez, Gloria
Subject: RE: Legal Notice- PH 11/20/08 - Cal COPS Grant Award
Ad received and will publish on date(s) requested.
Charlene Mneller
Pub�ie Notice Custamer Service Rep.
The Desert Sun Newspaper
750 N. Gene Autrq Trail, Palm Springs, CA 92262
(760) 778-4578, Fax(760) 778-4731
Desert Sun legals(c�thedesertsun.com
&Desert Post Weekly�wleqals@thedesertsun.com �
The Coachella Valley's#1 Saurce in News &Adver#ising!
Visit us at mydesert.com
.. _.,.,.. . _ __
From: gmartinez@ci.palm-desert.ca.us [mailto:gmartinez@ci.palm-desert.ca.us]
Sent: Wednesday, November 05, 2008 5:05 PM
To: tds-legals
Cc: mgates@ci.palm-desert.ca.us; ashouse@riversidesherifF.org
Subject: Legal Notice - PH 11/20/08 - Cal COPS Grant Award
PLEASE PUBLISH THE FOLLOWING:
PUBLIC HEARING
Notice of Public Hearing Regarding Cal COPS(Supplemental Law Enforcement Services Fund—SLESF)Grant Award
ONE TIME IN THE DESERT SUN
Saturday, November 8,2008
Thank you, Charlene!
�- ��
•�>�. ����-�<:��, �'���a�'"��,�;�
��ee�3f•�?�;"I'e-ci���icsx�a�
C`itc �st I'<�I��7 1:3t•�t>rt
';;>-:;it}I'�-etl.�,�'a�~:��ti I)��itie
I'<�Izr21?es��-C,(�;alifix•ttSa Sfv,°�E�{�
�Fit);:','��t:i-C)f;1 I �'.a t. °3::;-1.
�martinez(a�ci.��alrn-desert ca.us
1
CITY OF PALM DESERT
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING
REGARDING CAL COPS
(SUPPLEMENTAL LAW ENFORCEMENT SERVICES FUND - SLESF)
GRANT AWARD
Notice is hereby given by the CITY OF PALM DESERT that a PUBLIC HEARING will be
held before the PALM DESERT CITY COUNCIL at 4:00 p.m. on Thursday, November 20,
2008, at the Palm Desert Civic Center Council Chamber, located at 73-510 Fred Waring
Drive, Palm Desert, California, to consider the following item:
SUBJECT:A Public Hearing to consider acceptance of the Cal COPS (Supplemental Law
Enforcement Services Funding - SLESF) Grant Award of approxir�iately $100,000 to be
used to cover the cost for the 2008 Holiday Theft Suppression Program and the acquisition
of necessary equipment to support front line law enforcement services .
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION: Any interested person may be present and comment at the
public meeting or may submit written comments concerning this matter. Any comments or
inquiries should be directed to the attention of Rachelle Klassen, City Clerk, City of Palm
Desert, 73-510 Fred Waring Drive, Palm Desert, CA 92260-2578; (760)346-0611. Written
comments must be submitted no later than November 20 2008 at 4•00 p m
CHELLE D. KLASS N, CITY CL K
CITY OF PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA
Publish: Desert Sun 11/08/08