Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutUrgent Ordinance 1232 - Extension of Existing 45-Day Moratorium - Roof DecksCITY OF PALM DESERT DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT STAFF REPORT REQUEST: RECOMMENDATION FOR APPROVAL OF: • A 10-1/2 MONTH EXTENSION OF THE EXISTING 45-DAY MORATORIUM ON ISSUANCE OF BUILDING PERMITS, CONDITIONAL USE PERMITS, AND RELATED ENTITLEMENTS FOR CONSTRUCTION OF ROOF DECKS WITHIN THE CITY WHILE OPTIONS FOR LONG-TERM REGULATORY STRATEGY ARE STUDIED; AND • AN EXCEPTION FOR A BUILDING PERMIT THAT WAS SUBMITTED BEFORE THE 45-DAY INTERM MORITORIUM TO ALLOW A VIEWING ROOF DECK LOCATED ON A PROPOSED CASITA ADDITION AT A RESIDENCE IN SOUTH PALM DESERT LOCATED AT 73-271 BUCKBOARD TRAIL, SUBJECT TO THE DIRECTOR OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL: 1. THE PROPERTY OWNER MUST RECORD ALL CONDITIONS AGAINST THE PROPERTY; 2. APPLICANT MUST ADD LANDSCAPE MATERIAL IN THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF THE PROPERTY TO THE SATISFACTION OF THE DIRECTOR; 3. THE LANDSCAPING AROUND THE EAST, WEST, AND SOUTH PROPERTY LINES MUST BE MAINTAINED AT A HEIGHT OF 15 FEET; 4. IF THE PROPERTY IS SOLD, THE NEW OWNER MUST MAINTAIN THE LANDSCAPING AROUND THE EAST, WEST, AND SOUTH PROPERTY LINES. SUBMITTED BY: Kevin Swartz, Assistant Planner DATE: February 9, 2012 CONTENTS: Ordinance No. 1232 Legal Notice Silver Spur Ranch Association letter dated November 18, 2011 3D image of the casita showing the viewing roof deck Photos Recommendation: 1. That the City Council, by four -fifths vote, waive further reading and adopt Ordinance No. 1232 approving an extension for an additional 10-1/2 months to the existing 45-day interim moratorium on issuance of building permits, Conditional Use Permits, and other entitlements for construction of roof decks; and Roof Deck Moratorium February 9, 2012 Page 2 of 3 2. By minute motion, that the City Council approve an exception to allow a viewing roof deck located on a proposed casita addition at 73-271 Buckboard Trail, subject to conditions. Executive Summary: On January 12, 2012 the City Council approved an Urgency Ordinance for a 45-day interim moratorium on issuance of building permits, Conditional Use Permits, and other entitlements for construction of roof decks. Approval of the extension for an additional 10- 1/2 months would eliminate the possibility of construction of any roof decks, which can undermine the goals and policies of the City of Palm Desert General Plan, while the issue is studied further. Long term regulatory control of roof decks can then be included as part of the Zoning Ordinance update process that is currently underway and expected to be completed later in 2012. On January 11, 2012 Mr. Jeffords submitted building plans to the Department of Building and Safety for a 974 square -foot casita, which includes a viewing roof deck. In the past, staff has not allowed viewing roof decks, because of potential privacy concerns from adjacent neighbors. The Zoning Ordinance does not prohibit viewing roof decks in the single-family zone. Staff believes that at this location a viewing roof deck would not be detrimental to the existing neighbors because of location and existing landscaping. Staff is recommending that the City Council grant an exception to allow the viewing roof deck, since the building plans were submitted before the 45-day interim moratorium was imposed. Discussion: In December 2011, Mr. Jeffords submitted preliminary plans for a casita addition at his residence in south Palm Desert, located on the northwest corner of Buckboard Trail and Arrow Trail, within Silver Spur Ranch. Staff informed the homeowner that roof decks are not allowed in single-family zones because of potential privacy concerns from adjacent neighbors. The homeowner challenged staff's position, and requested a copy of the ordinance prohibiting the roof deck in single-family zones. In reviewing the Zoning Ordinance, staff determined that there is no specific prohibition against roof decks in single-family zones, and the City Attorney confirmed staff's conclusion. Staff informed the homeowner that the City Council requested a 45-day interim moratorium on all roof decks within the City, and the item would be on the January 12, 2012 City Council meeting. On January 11, 2012 the homeowner submitted building plans to the Department of Building and Safety, for a 974 square foot casita, with a viewing roof deck. The proposed casita is at 14'4" in total height. The viewing deck elevation is at 10 feet above grade with a 4'4" parapet wall built around the roof deck. Except for a small section, the homeowner has 15' of existing landscaping around the east, west, and south property lines, which block all neighboring views. Staff visited the site and stood on an eight -foot latter looking in all Roof Deck Moratorium February 9, 2012 Page 3 of 3 directions, and took photos which are attached to the staff report. With the exception of a short portion of wall in the southeast corner of the property, staff did not see any concerns with potential privacy concerns. The homeowner has voluntarily agreed to add landscaping in the area described, and to maintain the landscaping and record the conditions of approval to his property. Also, Silver Spur Ranch Homeowner's Association has approved the construction, but had concerns of the use of the deck, which was addressed in their letter dated November 18, 2011, attached to the staff report. On January 12, 2012 the City Council imposed a 45-day interim moratorium on issuance of building permits, Conditional Use Permits, and related entitlements for construction of roof decks. So far, during the 45-day period, staff has been reviewing the possible impacts and studying the issue farther. Staff will need to verify the intent of the City's policy makers and analyze conditions, if any, under which such decks may not pose a threat to the privacy of neighboring residents. The findings of this analysis will be used to shape development standards in the update of the Zoning Ordinance that is currently underway. Staff is still in the process of researching this information and is requesting additional time extending the moratorium for an additional 10-1/2 months. Submitted by: Kevin Swartz Assistant Planner Jof�n M. Wohlmuth City Manager Department Head: Lauri Aylaian Director, Community Development CITY COUNCI�CTION APPROVED DFNWID 4CEIVED OTHER MEETING DATE ' 1- .:1�� AYESs�1 L alJO& r(1 /�'Z el),. NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: ? ` VERIFIED BY: IULIML Original on File with City Clerk's Office Two Actions Here. FINAL ACTION: By Minute Motion, requested reconsideration and continuance of this public hearing to the meeting of March 8, 2012. 3-2 (Benson, Finerty NO) ORDINANCE NO. 1232 AN URGENCY ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA, MAKING FINDINGS AND IMPOSING AN EXTENSION TO THE 45- DAY MORATORIUM FOR UP TO 10-1/2 MONTHS ON ISSUANCE OF BUILDING PERMITS, CONDITIONAL USE PERMITS, AND RELATED ENTITLEMENTS FOR CONSTRUCTION OF ROOF DECKS WITHIN THE CITY WHILE OPTIONS FOR LONG-TERM REGULATORY STRATEGY ARE STUDIED. WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Palm Desert, California, did on the 91h day of February 2012, hold a duly noticed public hearing to consider extending for up to 10-1/2 months the 45-day interim moratorium on the issuance of building permits, Conditional Use Permits, and related entitlements for construction of roof deck; and WHEREAS, on January 12, 2012, the City Council approved a 45-day interim moratorium on issuance of building permits, Conditional Use Permits, and other entitlements for construction of roof decks within the City while options for long-term regulatory strategy are studied; and WHEREAS, to enhance the community's appearance and to protect the public health, safety, and welfare, the City Council desires to adopt an ordinance to impose an extension of the 45-day interim moratorium for up to another 10-1/2 months on the issuance of roof decks within the City; and WHEREAS, based on the foregoing, the City Council finds that issuing building permits, Conditional Use Permits, and related entitlements for construction of roof decks prior to consideration and adoption of an alternative ordinance would pose a current and immediate threat to the public health, safety, and welfare, and that a temporary moratorium on the issuance of such permits is thus necessary. NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Palm Desert, California does hereby ordain as follows: SECTION 1. IMPOSITION OF THE MORATORIUM A. In accordance with the authority granted to the City of Palm Desert under Government Code Section 65858, the City Council does adopt a temporary moratorium on issuance of building permits, Conditional Use Permits, and other entitlements for construction of roof desks. B. This ordinance is adopted pursuant to Government Code Section 65858, and immediate preservation of the public health, safety, and welfare. The facts necessitating this moratorium are: 1. the City has recently received an application for a roof deck and the City Council directed staff to prepare a 45-day moratorium; and 1(A). except for roof decks for which an application for building permit was submitted prior to January 12, 2012, which shall not be subject to this moratorium; and ORDINANCE NO. 1232 2. the City staff wants to study the matter to ensure that roof decks do not create public safety hazards or diminish property values; and 3. the City staff is requesting the extension for an additional 10-1/2 months to study the issues identified with land use, enforcement, and community compatibility. C. The City Council finds that the adoption of an ordinance extending the moratorium on of the issuance of building permits, Conditional Use Permits, and related entitlements for construction of roof decks within the City. D. Notwithstanding any provision of the Municipal Code to the contrary, no issuance of permit of any nature shall be approved for any request for roof decks within the 10-1/2 months of this ordinance while options for long-term regulatory strategy are studied. SECTION 2. SEVERABILITY If any section, subsection, clause or phrase of this Ordinance or any part thereof is for any reason held to be invalid, unconstitutional, or unenforceable by the decision of any court of competent jurisdiction, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portion of the Ordinance. The City Council declares that it would have passed each section, subsection, paragraph, sentence clause or phrase thereof, irrespective of the fact that any one or more section, subsection, sentence, clause or phrase would be declared invalid, unconstitutional or unenforceable. SECTION 3. COMPLIANCE WITH THE CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT The City Council finds that this moratorium complies with the "City of Palm Desert Procedure for Implementation of California Environmental Quality Act, Resolution No. 2011- 84, in that the Director Community Development has determined, pursuant to Section 3.07, that the moratorium is exempt because there is no possibility that the adoption of the moratorium will have significant effect on the environment. SECTION 4. EFFECTIVE DATE This Ordinance shall become effective immediately upon adoption if adopted by at least four -fifths (4/5) vote of the City Council and shall be in effect for ten and one half (10- 1/2) months from the date of adoption unless extended by the City Council as provided for in the Government Code. SECTION 5. PUBLICATION The City Clerk of the City of Palm Desert, California, is hereby directed to publish this ordinance in the Desert Sun, a newspaper of general circulation, published and circulated in the City of Palm Desert, California. ORDINANCE NO. 1232 PASSED, APPROVED and ADOPTED this day of , 2012, by the City Council of the City of Palm Desert, California by the following vote, to wit: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: ROBERT A. SPIEGEL, Mayor City of Palm Desert, California ATTEST: RACHELLE D. KLASSEN, City Clerk City of Palm Desert, California APPROVED AS TO FORM: DAVID J. ERWIN, City Attorney y 0 73-510 Plum WAITING DRIVV PALL Desuri, CAI II ORNIA 9226o-2578 TEL: 760 346—o61 i I, rAx: 760 341-7098 infoC palm-de>en.org CITY OF PALM DESERT LEGAL NOTICE CONSIDERATION BY THE CITY COUNCIL EXTENDING THE 45- DAY MORATORIUM FOR AN ADDITIONAL 10-1/2 MONTHS ON ISSUANCE OF BUILDING PERMITS, CONDITIONAL USE PERMITS, AND RELATED ENTITLEMENTS FOR CONSTRUCTION OF ROOF DECKS WITHIN THE CITY WHILE OPTIONS FOR LONG- TERM REGULATORY STRATEGY ARE STUDIED. PROJECT LOCATION FOR THE MORATORIUM: City wide, City of Palm Desert PUBLIC HEARING: SAID public hearing will be held on Thursday, February 9, 2012 at 4:00 p.m. in the Council Chamber at the Palm Desert Civic Center, 73-510 Fred Waring Drive, Palm Desert, California, at which time and place all interested persons are invited to attend and be heard. Written comments concerning all items covered by this public hearing notice shall be accepted up to the date of the hearing. Information concerning the proposed moratorium is available for review in the Department of Community Development at the above address between the hours of 8:00 a.m. and 5:00 p.m. Monday through Friday. If you challenge the proposed actions in court, you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing described in this notice, or in written correspondence delivered to the City Council at, or prior to, the public hearing. PUBLISH: Desert Sun Rachelle Klassen, City Clerk January 28, 2012 City of Palm Desert, California Silver Spur Ranchers Association P. a Box 680 Palm Desert, CA 92261 November 18, 2011 Mr. James Jeffords 73-271 Buckboard Trail Palm Desert, CA Dear Mr. Jeffords: Pursuant to my meeting with you along with Carol Tostenson on Monday November 14, we wish to confirm our mutual understanding of your proposed expanded casita on your property located at the above address. You presented an artist rendering with two views and a floor plan. Your plans reflect the construction of a two room casita. One room is considered the living area and the other being an adjacent bedroom. Your plan indicates the structure will be at a maximum height of 15 feet on the exterior, with the inside areas having 10 foot ceilings. You also propose to install a circular staircase in the living area near the entrance of the casita. This staircase will lead to the roof deck you are planning. As such, the external walls of the casita above living area will only be approximately 3.5 to 4.0 feet in height. Finally, the roof deck will not be used for a daily living area. Our concern is with the roof deck being a venue that would encroach upon the privacy of your neighbors in the area. Article III Sec 2 of the CC&Rs in part, specifically states, "....nor shall anything be done thereon which may be, or may become, an annoyance or nuisance to the neighborhood, or which shall in any way interfere with the quiet enjoyment of each of the owners.....". I supplied you with a full set of the CC&Rs when we first spoke in late October. Based on your current plans, the Association does not have any objections to the construction. However, should your plans be altered in any fashion, we require you to present these changes before actual construction begins. Our concern still remains regarding the use of the deck. Page 2 As you know, you are obligated to submit your final plans to the City for approval and abide by the planning, construction and permit regulations that govern the City of Palm Desert's building codes. Furthermore, the Association's approval of the construction does not supersede any building codes or approvals required by the City. If you agree with the details of paragraph two of this letter, please acknowledge this by signing below and returning the original signature in the enclosed envelope. Sincerely,. Joe Dikdan Acting President Silver Spur Ranchers Association cc: P. Dillon, C. Tostenson - Architectural Committee Tony Bagato - City of Palm Desert I, , hereby acknowledge and agree with the contents of paragraph two above. 4• � & � w v \ cn �\M> |§ # in ~_ — 5 /\ / \ �| § ! m �` ry4 n7 .y;:: '"✓x ,,,fit[. "' it - Looking ` southeost v r.. . .f yy J r 4 iSP 4J�"�'� � r 7r �R3 �♦�, I .� x krng,Squth' f � �♦ .%fit � M ��•, .1 ,y ��. v • oar � 3� •� - � _ � `�•...�". 4 * 4e 4 Wl. -Looking south Ili .y Looking west 14 r, Jew kr j x Looking East ;i .1 r ; ; , 001. i 24ht• #K iv looking north, at H660,home ,f towards street. :a Silver Spur Ranchers Association, Inc. P. O. Box 680 Palm Desert, CA 92261-0680 760.774.9289 February 6, 2012 Dear Mayor and City Council, Due to my wife's surgery Thursday, I will be unable to attend the public hearing regarding the moratorium on roof decks. Could it be possible to have my comments read in the public forum in my absences? Attached are my prepared comments. Respectfully, J-0e Dikdanxj- '= Acting President N ;7. vey Silver Spur Ranchers Association' m Thank you Mayor and Council members for this opportunity to speak. I am Joe Dikdan representing Silver Spur Ranchers Association. As stated in our letter of January 23 to the Mayor and Council Members, roof decks in the City of Palm Desert could cause a deterioration of the quality, peacefulness and safety of the residents adjacent to a home with a roof deck. Our Association supports the current moratorium and the proposed extension to restrict the construction of roof decks. Further, we solicit the City's Planning, Safety and Development Departments as well as final approval by the City Council, to permanently restrict the construction of roof decks in any fashion. A roof deck could affect up to 5 neighbors. A roof deck most of all, would cause neighbor's privacy to be violated. Think of sitting in your back yard and having a neighbor peer over while you swim or read the paper. It may be difficult to sell your home with a neighbor having a roof deck. There could potentially be outdoor stair cases, which are unsightly. Additionally, a roof deck could be a venue for firepits and chimenias which could cause a safety hazard. (Unlike patio fixtures with water hoses available nearby). Silver Spur's CC&Rs as well as the City's ordinances are not clear or specific on roof decks. I trust the Council and city departments will act to permanently prohibit roof decks for the preservation of all resident's peace and tranquility. Thank you. Klassen, Rachelle From: Swartz, Kevin Sent: Tuesday, February 07, 2012 3:58 PM To: Klassen, Rachelle Subject: FW: Roof Decks Please include this as public record. From: Joedikdan(&aol.com Lmailto:Joedikdan@aol.coml Sent: Tuesday, February 07, 2012 3:40 PM To: Swartz, Kevin Subject: Roof Decks Kevin, following up on my voice mail back to you, Tony Bagato suggested I send something in writing. We do support an extension of the roof deck moratorium. Secondly, we would like to see a permanent ban on the construction of roof decks in Palm Desert as outlined in my communications to the city. Regarding Silver Spurs "approval" of Mr Jeffords casita and roof deck, we "approved" the plan due to the fact our CC & Rs, do not specifically prohibit such a structure, although the by-laws state, ..... No building shall be erected other than a single story, single family residence together with a garage and/or guest house". We also supplied Mr. Jeffords a letter regarding our concerns and asked him to sign our mutual understanding of his plans as presented. We did not receive any signature back.. As I understand, from the info sent to me by the city, "....there is no specific prohibition against roof decks....". Roof decks, if permitted, will jeopardize the privacy and tranquility of neighbors living in the adjacent homes. They could also cause noise pollution, fire hazards and unsightly "roof art" or umbrellas. Think about sitting in your back yard reading the morning paper and having someone looking down on you or swimming in your pool with others watching. As I mentioned in my voice mail, based on my wife's surgery, I may not be able to get to the public hearing section, but will do my best to attend in order to voice my concerns and those of friends and neighbors in all of Palm Desert. Respectfully, Joe Dikdan Joe Dikdan 760-774-9289 c 760-346-2720 h