The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutC31510 JW Marriott Desert Springs - Assistance for a Water Park ProjectCITY OF PALM DESERT OFFICE OF THE CITY MANAGER STAFF REPORT REQUEST: Consideration of Request by JW Marriott Desert Springs Palm Desert for City Assistance to Construct a Water Park Project at Desert Springs Marriott SUBMITTED BY: John M. Wohlmuth, City Manager DATE: January 26, 2012 CONTENTS: (1) December 12, 2011 letter from Ken Schwartz, General Manager, JW Marriott Desert Springs Resort & Spa (2) Transient Occupancy Tax Comparison between 9% TOT and 11 % TOT (3) Resolution 2011-45 Recommendation By Minute Motion, direct staff to prepare an agreement to assist the JW Marriott Desert Springs Water Park Project utilizing one of the following financial options discussed in this staff report. (contract No. C31510) Options 1. TOT Rebate Option The City contribute the generated incremental increase in TOT after the water park project opens. The City would provide the difference between the new higher TOT collection from the immediate past quarter and the same quarter in the previous year. To achieve a $1,000,000 contribution, it is likely that the incremental difference in TOT collection would require contributions back to the Marriott Desert Springs from multiple quarters. 2. Increase TOT Option The City place a TOT increase on the June or November 2013 ballot to raise the Transient Occupancy Tax from the current 9% to 11 %. A 2% TOT increase would Staff Report Consideration of Request by JW Marriott Desert Springs Palm Desert for City Assistance to Construct a Water Park Project at Desert Springs Marriott January 26, 2012 Page 2 result in an approximate $1.6 million increase with our current hotel rooms, average daily room rate, and occupancy rate. All of these factors are expected to change; however, it is safe to assume the $1 million loan would be paid back well within the first year of a new higher TOT rate for Palm Desert. A TOT increase would require a voter approval ballot measure at an established election date (March, June, or November 2013) at a cost to the City of approximately $60,000. The advantage of the TOT 2% increase is the City would receive greater TOT and a loan to Marriott Desert Springs would be made from the new funds. The advantage of a loan from an incremental increase of the existing TOT shows a direct relationship between the improvement (water park) and the increased TOT. 3. A Direct Contribution of $1 Million from General Fund Reserves The City of Palm Desert established a Reserve Policy through Resolution 2011-45 approved on June 9, 2011. This Resolution does set a $500,000 Community Contingency Reserve that can go to meet half of the loan/grant with Council concurrence. Any contribution would not be made until the completion of the water park. Background The JW Marriott Desert Springs Palm Desert is requesting a City loan or grant in the amount of $1 million for a water park at Desert Springs. Desert Springs believes the development of a water park is vital to becoming a more prominent player in the leisure market. The addition of a water park will be useful in attracting more families, especially during the slower summer months. The cost of the water park is estimated to be $9 million. If the City contributes $1 million, Marriott Desert Springs management believes the grant/loan would be a strong selling point to the owners/investors and parent organization Host Hotels. With a commitment from the City, Marriott management believes a financial contribution from the owners and Host Hotels is more likely. Staff Report Consideration of Request by JW Marriott Desert Springs Palm Desert for City Assistance to Construct a Water Park Project at Desert Springs Marriott January 26, 2012 Page 3 The JW Marriott Desert Springs Palm Desert has renovated the rooms, hallways, and spa already. In the near future, Marriott will renovate the Lakeview restaurant. To my knowledge, the City of Palm Desert has not granted or loaned the JW Marriott Desert Springs Palm Desert any funds, while the Marriott Desert Springs is the largest General Fund revenue producer. CITY COUNCIL}ACTION APPROVED ✓✓ DENTED Submitted By: RECEIVED OTHER MEETING DA'E AYES: IL -el r �4 Zo zct,�� NOES-.AaLl ABSENT: n M. Wohlmuth, City Manager ABSTAIN: VERIFIED BY: Original on File with City dok's Office * Approved the recommendation, utilizing the accompanying staff report's Option No. 1 - T.O.T. Rebate. 3-2 (Benson, Finerty NO) JW MARRIOTT. DESERT SPRINGS PALM DESERT Jr December 12, 2011 Mr. John M. Wohlmuth City Manager City of Palm Desert 73-510 Fred Waring Drive Palm Desert, CA 92260-2578 Dear John: Thank you for taking the time to have lunch last week and allow me the opportunity to review the proposed Water Park Project at Desert Springs. As discussed, the scope and proforma for the proposed Water Park is estimated at a $9M investment. The Owners of the Resort, Host Hotels, are continuing to work on the project details as we expect the project to be presented to their Investment Committee for review and approval within the next 45 days. We believe this project is vital to the future success of Desert Springs as it will allows us to become the predominant player in the leisure market. Marriott International has already endorsed this project and believes that it will be beneficial to the Resort. Desert Springs is requesting that the City also consider helping with the financial impact of this project. The financial help with this project would be a significant commitment that would help the approval process with the Investment Committee. Our suggestion would be to provide relief by reimbursing the property -for incremental transient occupancy tax over the first five year of the Project's operation. The attached financial report shows the proforma work for the proposed Water Park. In summary, the proforma estimates that incremental room revenue in Years 1 thru 5 is $11.6M. This would mean incremental TOT at 9% would equal $1.04M. The incremental TOT reimbursement would be capped at $11VI even. A monthly year over year calculation could be calculated to determine the monthly impact once the project is open. Thank you for your time and interest in the future success of Desert Springs. We are very excited about this additional partnership opportunity that will drive additional business and success for the Resort and the City of Palm Desert. Sincerely, Ken Schwartz � General Manager JW Marriott Desert Springs ort & Spa desertspringsresort.com 74855 Country Club Drive, Palm Desert, CA 92260 USA Tel 760.341.2211 Fax 760.341.1830 JW MARRIOTT DESERT SPRINGS - PROPOSED WATER PARK INCREMENTAL NHP SUMMARY BASE CASE 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Occupied Room Nights 191,983 206,502 212,956 212,956 212,956 212,956 Occupancy 59.5% 64.0% 66.0% 66.0% 66.0% 66.0% ADR $172.61 $182.11 $192.67 $197.68 $203.02 $208.90 Room Revenue (000's) $33,139 $37,606 $41,030 $42,097 $43,234 $44,487 Total Revenue $87,709 $100,064 $108,799 $111,436 $114,251 $117,369 Dept Profit $36,677 $42,466 $47,054 $48,508 $49,788 $51,315 HP $16,133 $20,788 $24,209 $25,053 $25,906 $26,950 NHP (000's) $4,074 $7,968 $10,841 $11,566 $12,172 $12,881 WATER PARK CASE 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Occupied Room Nights 191,983 212,956 222,635 222,635 222,635 222,635 Occupancy 59.5% 66.0% 69.0% 69.0% 69.0% 69.0% ADR $172.61 $184.34 $195.03 $200.10 $205.50 $211.46 Room Revenue (000's) $33,139 $39,256 $43,421 $44,550 $45,752 $47,079 Total Revenue $87,709 $105,874 $116,252 $119,049 $122,036 $125,345 Dept Profit $36,677 $44,819 $50,361 $51,717 $53,078 $54,700 HP $15,981 $22,523 $26,834 $27,558 $28,478 $29,600 NHP (000's) $3,923 $9,177 $12,754 $13,236 $13,829 $14,597 DIFFERENCE 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Occupied Room Nights - 6,453 9,680 9,680 9,680 9,680 Occupancy 0.0% 2.0% 3.0% 3.0% 3.0% 3.0% ADR 0.00 2.23 2.36 2.42 2.48 2.56 Room Revenue (000's) $0 $1,650 $2,390 $2,452 $2,519 $2,592 Total Revenue $0 $5,810 $7,453 $7,613 $7,785 $7,976 Dept Profit $0 $2,363 $3,307 $3,209 $3,290 $3,385 HP -$152 $1,734 $2,624 $2,505 $2,571 $2,650 NHP (000's) -$152 $1,210 $1,913 $1,670 $1,657 $1,716 A U7 N 0 A Ln O W W N 01 In N A A V In lD O A V In r am to o w O 00 A V 0o A w N F-� W O 00 A c W � dl cu 0 O 7 0) � V-+ F+ 00 V O) A m W Pb lD 00 A O W A V Ln i N N N M O CO 01 (n N F+ (D F� W V I w o v � a 01 F, < �. N F+ FJ to 0) O N O 00 lD N A 00 O l!7 W V A A LO r1i N N lD V 01 In 00 Vl In 01 F+ m V 00 0 ry C C N N O (J O F-� I� W A W l0 V A V V 00 01 N A l0 W W F+ 00 W V In 01 A F� W 00 W In F+ 01 00 � v Z O 0)c' F+ N O ~O O to to w W W N 00 A V 0) V V 0) LO O A A A ,I Ln to In LO 0) 00 D! �O V n 0) O W W 0J W t00 A M+ S 00 00 Ln N V 0) N :Pb V F �. In O (n A Ul A V lD CITY OF PALM DESERT Redevelopment Agency TANNUOUTTAUNU To: John Wohlmuth, City Manager CC: Justin McCarthy, ACM for Redevelopment From: Ruth Ann Moore, Economic Development Manager Date: December 20, 2011 Subject: Transient Occupancy Tax Comparison Per your request, I contacted the Palm Springs Desert Resort Communities Convention and Visitors Authority (CVA) in order to compare the City of Palm Desert's transient occupancy tax (TOT) with other cities in both the Coachella Valley and competitive locations outside of the trade area. Palm Desert's TOT currently is 9% with the Coachella Valley cities listed below: Cathedral City 12 % Desert Hot Springs 12% Indian Wells 9.25% increasing t 11.25D/ in 2012 Indio 10% La Quinta 11 % for hotels with 50+ rooms, 10% for all other hotels Palm Springs 13.5% for hotels with 50+ rooms, 11.5% for all other hotels Rancho Mirage 10% A review of the 2010/2011 fiscal budget for the City of Coachella indicates that there is no TOT collected. These totals do not include the Business Improvement District (BID) funding for the CVA that adds an additional 2% tax onto each hotel room. G:IRDAIRUTH ANN MOOREIWORD DATAIJOHN WOHLMUTHITOT COMPARISON.DOC The CVA considers the following California communities as completion for the Coachella Valley: Dana Point 10% Laguna Beach 10% Long Beach/Torrance 12% / 11 % Los Angeles 12% Monterey/Salinas MSA 10% Newport Beach 10% Orange County Beach Cities 10% San Die o/Lo Jolla 10.5% Santa Barbara/Santa Maria 12% Other direct competition for tourism and conventions outside the state include the following locations: Las Vegas, NV 12% Phoenix, AZ 13.27% Scottsdale, AZ 14.92% Tucson, AZ 15.05% It should be noted that Arizona and its counties also collect sales tax that is included in the totals above for cities in Arizona. The state's share is 6.5% and Maricopa County is 1.77% G:IRDAIRUTH ANN MOORMWORD DATAWOHN WOHLMUTHITOT COMPARISON.DOC CITY OF PALM DESERT FINANCE DEPARTMENT STAFF REPORT Request: Approve Resolution No. 2011- 45 authorizing the Fiscal Year 2010-2011 Budget Amendment to provide transfer, appropriation and estimated revenues from the Unobligated General Fund Reserves to Fleet / Equipment Replacement, Retiree Health, Building Maintenance / Capital Replacement, Golf Course Capital Improvements, Parks & Aquatic Center Capital Improvements, Community Contingency Reserve (Within General Fund), and Land Acquisition Funds Date: June 9, 2010 Contents: Resolution No. 2011- 45 Recommendation By Minute Motion, that the City Council approve Resolution No. 2011-45 amending the 2010-11 budget to provide transfer, appropriation and estimated revenues of unobligated funds from the Unobligated General Fund Reserves to Fleet / Equipment Replacement, Retiree Health, Building Maintenance / Capital Replacement, Golf Course Capital Improvements, Parks & Aquatic Center Capital Improvements, Community Contingency Reserve (Within General Fund), and Land Acquisition Funds. Background In response to a request at the budget study sessions of April 7, 2011 and April 29, 2011, the following is a recommendation for the allocation of approximately $6 million currently available in excess of the reserve requirement. It is intended that these individual reserve accounts will initially be deposited; however, future deposits are unlikely unless revenues significantly outpace expenditures. Therefore, these are likely to be one-time deposits that may not be replenished and should last for several or more years. General Fund Unobligated Reserve As of June 30, 2010 Fleet / Equipment replacement Retiree Health Building Maintenance / Capital replacement Desert Willow capital improvements Parks & Aquatic Center (capital improvements) Community Contingency Reserve Land Acquisitions Future General Fund Unobligated Reserve Required General Fund Unobligated Reserve pursuant to policy (including Fire) Difference $ 63,847,586 1,000,000 500,000 1,000,000 1,000,000 1,000,000 500,000 1,000,000 $ 57, 847, 586 56, 588,653 Staff Report Approve Resolution Authorizing FY 2010-2011 General Fund Appropriations June 9, 2011 Page 2 of 3 FleettEauiament replacement This reserve is held in a separate fund to replace the current city vehicles and city equipment. Staff typically transfers funds annually to this reserve to ensure sufficient funds to maintain the fleet/equipment. Since the downturn to the economy, however, staff has not transferred any funds. It is recommended that $1,000,000 be transferred to this fund to cover the three years of capital. Retiree Health Yearly, the Finance department remits funds to the State retiree benefit trust based on our actuarial requirement. However, over the last two years no funds have been transferred from the General Fund to the separate fund to cover this liability. Staff's recommendation is to transfer $500,000 to maintain the necessary funds to cover the retiree health payments. Building Maintenance In the current year, staff has exhausted the majority of the reserves established for repair and maintenance of the Civic Center roof. The fund is responsible for covering all city building maintenance including City Hall, three Fire stations, Portola Community Center, the old sheriff station, Henderson and Chamber buildings, etc. Staff recommends reestablishing a reserve of $1,000,000 for this purpose. As additional funds become available staff would recommend we increase this reserve to over $5,000,000 due to the age of a number of the buildings. Desert Willow capital improvements Fund 241 was originally established to collect the revenue from Intrawest and Starwood and cover expenditures for any necessary minor improvements to the complex. Since the downturn in the economy, staff has instead been transferring the revenue to the General Fund to lessen the impact of lower revenues in the General Fund. However, the proposed legislation to eliminate Redevelopment or curtail its use of funds toward golf courses will require the General Fund contribution for all major capital improvements. This would include future renovations to Firecliff and Mountain View courses along with replacing well pumps, plant material, etc. The next two years' forecast for capital improvements is well over $2,000,000, therefore requiring the additional $1,000,000 transfer from the General Fund. Parks & Aquatic Center Over the years, our parks have grown tremendously and so has the need to replace park equipment, replace plant materials, and repair restrooms and lighting destroyed by vandalism. The addition of the swimming pool has created a further burden to the parks requirements. Over the next ten years, major equipment such as pool pumps will require replacement. Therefore, staff is recommending that a reserve be established for future needs for both the parks and the aquatic center in the amount of $1,000,000. GAFINANCEWIAMH ORTEGAISTAFF REPORTSISR-APPROP FROM GEN FUND 10-11.DOCX Staff Report Approve Resolution Authorizing FY 2010-2011 General Fund Appropriations June 9, 2011 Page 3 of 3 Community Contingency Reserve City Council has requested that a Community contingency reserve be established to provide for unforeseen operating or capital needs of non-profit agencies and residents in an amount of $500,000. As individual City Council members determine appropriate needs during the year, this reserve should be used to address these issues. Staff recommends that each City Council member have the ability to use up to $25,000 per year for their individual unforeseen items contingent upon City Council approval at the next available meeting. Remember, a Council member can request a community appropriation, but a majority of the Council must ultimately approve. Land City Council has requested that reserves be set aside for the purpose of acquiring additional land within the City limits. Staff recommends that $1,000,000 be allocated for this purpose. Staff recommends transfer of reserves as outlined. Fiscal Impact Approval of this recommendation will result in the transfer of unobligated general fund reserves to various accounts. Submitted By: aul S. Gibson Director of Finance/City Treasurer Approval: CITY COUNTCTL A�,T1<ON APPROVED DF,NMI) RECEIVED OTHER �. Na,1.5 MEETING DATE AYES: KrWn MSP�et�-� NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: None VERIFIED BY: rn Original on File with City Cler s Office * Including an appropriation of $535,000 for property acquisition. G:IFINANCEWIAMH ORTEGAZTAFF REPORTSISR-APPROP FROM G£N FUND 10-11.DOCX RESOLUTION NO. 2011- 45 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA AMENDING THE FISCAL YEAR 2010-11 BUDGET TO PROVIDE TRANSFER, APPROPRIATION AND ESTIMATED REVENUES OF UNOBLIGATED FUNDS FROM THE UNOBLIGATED GENERAL FUND RESERVES TO FLEET / EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT, RETIREE HEALTH, BUILDING MAINTENANCE / CAPITAL REPLACEMENT, GOLF COURSE CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS, PARKS & AQUATIC CENTER CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS, COMMUNITY CONTINGENCY RESERVE (WITHIN GENERAL FUND), AND LAND ACQUISITION FUNDS WHEREAS, it is desirable to appropriate said revenues from the Unobligated General Fund Reserves to Fleet / Equipment Replacement, Retiree Health, Building Maintenance / Capital Replacement, Golf Course Capital Improvements, Parks & Aquatic Center Capital Improvements, Community Contingency Reserve (Within General Fund), and Land Acquisition funds. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Palm Desert, California, that the 2010-11 Budget is hereby amended by appropriating from the Unobligated General Fund Balance to the identified funds as follows, Transfer Out Account Amount Transfer In Account Description Fleet I Equipment 110-4199-499-5010 1,000,000 530-0000-391-0000 Transfer out from General Fund Replacement to Fleet / Equipment Replacement Fund for vehicle and equipment replacement Retiree Health Building Maintenance / Capital Replacement Golf Course Capital Improvements 110-4199-499-5010 500,000 576-0000-391-0000 Transfer out from General Fund to Retiree Health Fund for actuarial requirement 110-4199-499-5010 1,000,000 450-0000-391-0000 110-4199-499-5010 1,000,000 441-0000-391-0000 Transfer out from General Fund to Building Maintenance / Capital Replacement Fund for City buildings maintenance Transfer out from General Fund to Golf Course Capital Improvement Fund for Desert Willow golf course improvements Parks & Aquatic 110-4199-499-5010 1,000,000 242-0000-391-0000 Transfer out from General Fund Center Capital to Parks & Aquatic Center Improvements Capital Improvement Fund for equipment replacement Community 110-0000-253-1000 500,000 110-0000-243-0900 Reserve within the General Fund Contingency for Community Contingency for use at Council's discretion Land Acquisitions 110-4199-499-5010 1,000,000 400-0000-391-0000 Transfer out from General Fund to Land Acquisition Fund for additional land acquisitions Resolution No. 2011- 45 June 9, 2011 Page 2 of 2 PASSED, APPROVED and ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Palm Desert, California, at its regular meeting held on the a of June, 2011 by the following vote, to wit: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: JEAN M. BENSON, MAYOR ATTEST: RACHELLE D. KLASSEN, CITY CLERK CITY OF PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA G:Tinanceftamh OrtegalResolutions\RES-approp from gen fund 10-11.docx Klassen, Rachelle From: Hermann, David Sent: Wednesday, January 25, 2012 5:33 PM To: Klassen, Rachelle Subject: FW: - Contact Us Submission Hi Rachelle, We received the message below today addressed to the City Council concerning the JW Marriott Desert Springs water park proposal on tomorrow's agenda. Please let me know if there is anyone else on staff to whom I should forward it. Thanks, as alwaysM David David Hermann Public Information Officer City of Palm Desert 760-776-6380 -----Original Message ----- From: info(aci.palm-desert.ca.us Lmailto:info(aci.palm-desert.ca.usl Sent: Wednesday, January 25, 2012 10:16 AM To: InformationMail Subject: [SPAM] - Contact Us Submission Submission information ----------------------------------------- Submitter DB ID : 1763 Submitter's language : Default language IP address : 71.102.65.125 Time to take the survey 7 min. , 10 sec. Submission recorded on : 1/25/2012 10:15:32 AM Survey answers Your Contact Information First name: * Charlotte Last name: * Rios E-mail Address: * dvscrios(averizon.net Address line 1 40476 Eastwood Lane Address line 2 Not answered City Palm Desert State CA Zip code: * 92211 Phone number 7603455268 I Am a: Palm Desert Business Owner [] Palm Desert Resident [x] N c_ (V (TJ -Z) v 7� — a m --C _ �Of7' CO •• n N > n m Comments: City Council: Tomorrow you will be discussing giving 7W Marriott a gift, grant, or increase TOT rate, so the corporation can build a water park. Please, consider what you are doing. This kind of spending is completely inappropriate in this time of economic difficulty. You will not get the sympathy of residents, when things go badly, if you give money to Marriott. The money Marriott has brought into the community is their free enterprise business; they would not pay one cent more in taxes than is legally required of them. They make money; lots of money, being here. It is not up to the taxpayer, in any shape of form, to give them this break. Consider all aspects of such an action. Councilwoman Cindy Finerty sounds like she is giving this much more discriminating thought than the three councilmembers who initially are in favor. Thank you for considering my and many others' opinion. Charlotte Rios z Prusinowski, Karen From: Sent: To: Cc: Subject: Good morning Karen, Hermann, David Thursday, January 26, 2012 10:35 AM Prusinowski, Karen Wohlmuth, John FW: Contact Us Submission We received the message below today addressed to the City Manager regarding the JW Marriott Desert Springs' proposed water park. Thanks very much for sharing this with John! David David Hermann Public Information Officer City of Palm Desert 760-776-6380 -----Original Message ----- From: infooci.palm-desert.ca.us fmailto:info(@ci.palm-desert.ca.usl Sent: Thursday, January 26, 2012 9:36 AM To: InformationMail Subject: Contact Us Submission Submission information ----------------------------------------- Submitter DB ID : 1764 Submitter's language : Default language IP address : 76.89.123.38 Time to take the survey 6 min. , 38 sec. Submission recorded on 1/26/2012 9:35:49 AM Survey answers ------------------------ Your Contact Information First name: * Jane Last name: * Udall E-mail Address: * iudall(@dc.rr.com Address line 1 9 White Sun Way Address line 2 Not answered City Rancho Mirage State CA Zip code: * 92270 Phone number 340-3539 I Am a: Palm Desert Business Owner [] Palm Desert Resident [] 1 Comments: Hello, John. I'm not a PD resident, so delete if you wish. I'm writing in regard to the Marriott request. If I lived in PD, I would be a vocal critic of the proposed transaction as yet another example of a corporation sucking at the taxpayer tit. That being said, the Council will undoubtedly do it, so my hope is that there is at least some quid pro quo applied as to conservation. The new water park is going to be an energy hog. Their property is over - watered and inappropriately landscaped. Renovations are supposed to trigger the "new" landscaping ordinance. Don't let them off too easily, John. They want something big, a cool million (in this economy!), get something big in return. Jane z Klassen, Rachelle From: Hermann, David Sent: Thursday, January 26, 2012 10:47 AM To: Klassen, Rachelle Subject: FW: comment on Marriott proposal Hi Rachelle, Here is another comment we received today regarding the JW Marriott's proposed water park. Please let me know if there is anyone else to whom I should send this. Thanks! David David Hermann Public Information Officer City of Palm Desert 760-776-6380 -----Original Message ----- From: Joan Beasley fmailto:joan beasley(@yahoo.coml Sent: Thursday, January 26, 2012 9:37 AM To: InformationMail Subject: comment on Marriott proposal City Council Members: I am against giving dollars to the huge Marriott Corporation. Why would we spend money to undercut our new Aquatic Center? Why would we use reserve monies when the budget constraints are projected to continue? Why not make a PR partnership plan to appeal to families by advertising a package of discount or free tickets to the Palm Desert Aquatic Center/Living Desert/PS Art Museum site for family groups using the Marriott? That increases bed tax revenue, increases hotel usage by the mentioned demographic, increases gate count at local sites, and eliminates the need for hotel construction. Since other hotels bring in tax funds there should be equal treatment. Joan Beasley 0 J —i fN 0 CYN M m _ MUrn -+oo o �T n� ce m Michelson, Wilma From: Sherry Schroeder [s4schroeder@gmail.com] Sent: Thursday, January 26, 2012 9:42 AM To: CityhallMail Subject: Attn: City Council Members re Marriott's Water Park Request To: Palm Desert City Council Members Re: The Desert Springs Marriott's Proposed Water Park I am writing this to voice my opposition to the proposed water park at the Desert Springs Marriott. I not only oppose the use of public funds for such a project, but I also oppose it on the grounds that not enough information has been given to the public regarding the exact location of said water park. As a resident of a residential community adjacent to the Marriott, I already have to deal with the noise from various outdoor parties held at the Marriott. The noise from a water park (i.e. people screeching accompanied by, undoubtedly, loud background music) would be a daily disturbance. Please do not approve the Marriott's request. Thank you, A Silver Sands Racquet Club Resident & Taxpayer