HomeMy WebLinkAboutResolution 2012-74 - Development Impact Fees - Government Code Section 66001CITY OF PALM DESERT
FINANCE DEPARTMENT
STAFF REPORT
Request: Adoption of Resolution No. 2012- 74 making certain findings pursuant to
Government Code Section 66001 relative to the Annual Report of Calculation of
Government Code Section 66006, Development Impact Fees for the City of Palm
Desert
Submitted by: Paul S. Gibson, Finance Director
Date: November 15, 2012
Contents: Resolution making certain findings pursuant to Government Code Section 66001
Annual Report of Calculation of Government Code Section 66006
Capital Improvement Program FY 2011-2012
Recommendation
By Minute Motion, that the City Council:
Receive public testimony on annual report and findings; and
2. Adopt Resolution No. 2012- 74 making certain findings pursuant to
California Government Code Section 66001 and 66006.
Background
Following the passage of Proposition 13 in 1978, many cities began charging fees on new
development to fund public improvements and services such as streets, traffic signals, parks,
drainage, housing and art in public places. These fees are commonly known as development
impact fees. In order to ensure that these fees were spent in a timely manner and on projects
for which they were being collected, the State Legislature passed a bill known as AB 1600
(Mitigation Fee Act). This bill applies to developer fees, increased or imposed on or after
January 1, 1989. AB 1600 enacts Government Code Sections 66000-66008 that generally
contain four requirements:
A local jurisdiction must follow the process set forth in the bill and make certain
determinations regarding the purpose and use of the fees, and establish a
"nexus" or connection between a development project or class of project and the
public improvement being financed with the fee.
2. The fee must be segregated from the general fund in order to avoid commingling
of public improvement fees and the general fund.
Staff Report
Adoption of Resolution relative to Government Code Section 66001 — Development Impact Fees
November 15, 2012
Page 2 of 4
3. If a local jurisdiction has had possession of a developer fee for five years or more
and has not committed that money to a project or actually spent that money, then
it must make findings describing the continuing need for that money. In addition,
an annual report must be made of fees collected, interest earned, projects on
which fees were expended, and any transfers or loans from the fee account.
This report is to be reviewed by the local agency assessing the fees.
4. If a local jurisdiction cannot make the findings required under paragraph 3, the
city must refund the fees collected.
The Transportation Uniform Mitigation Fee, Housing Mitigation, New Construction Tax,
Drainage Facility, Coachella Valley Multiple Species Habitat Conservation Plan Fee, Park &
Recreation Fee, Traffic Signalization Fee, Art in Public Places Fee, AIPP Maintenance, Child
Care Facility and Fire Facility Fund fees that the City collects, qualify as development impact
fees. Therefore, these fees must comply with the above -referenced Government Code
Sections. Government Code Section 66001 requires the City to make available to the public
certain information regarding development impact fees for each fund within 180 days after the
end of the each fiscal year. Expenditures of the fees collected must occur within a five-year
period.
The annual report attached hereto reflects the required information to conform to Government
Code Sections 66001 and 66006. Originally when the fees were adopted the Ordinance/staff
reports contained the necessary Nexus findings to establish each of the fees. The fees are
used to assist the City in handling the increased population affecting Palm Desert on our
streets, traffic signals, parks, public facilities like City Hall, housing needs for low-income
housing, public art and mitigation fees to protect environmental plants and wildlife due the new
development. Each fee is held in a separate fund and the report shows the fees collected and
interest earned along with the expenditures paid. Lastly, the report shows the fees collected up
to the five year requirement and compares it to the fund balance to verify that the fees were
spent within those five years. The Building Industry Association (BIA) has been provided a copy
of this report.
The following are the fees that exceeded the five-year expenditures test: Drainage
Facility Fee, Park and Recreation Fee, Traffic Signalization Fee, Art in Public Places,
Child Care Facility and Fire Facility. All of these fees have current capital improvement
budgeted projects (copy of capital budgets attached) which would bring the fees under the five-
year test and will be spent within one to two years dependent on State, local and design issues.
Drainage Facility Fee:
The Drainage Facility Fee fund balance is $2,335,590 versus the five-year revenue collected of
$910,768, and exceeds the five-year test by $1,424,822. We currently have a drainage facility
master plan that indicates the various projects that the fee is being collected to build.
Unfortunately, the cost of installation of these projects requires a large fund balance to be
accumulated prior to implementing the capital budget and must also be timed with other
improvements occurring around these capital projects. The future projects scheduled to draw
down these funds below the five-year test are the extension of Portola Drainage, Country Club
Drive, Fred Waring Drainage and Highway 111 for $2,341,241.
Staff Report
Adoption of Resolution relative to Government Code Section 66001 — Development Impact Fees
November 15, 2012
Page 3 of 4
Park and Recreation Fee:
The Park and Recreation Fee fund balance is $1,314,005 versus the five-year revenue collected
of $564,621, and exceeds the five-year test by $749,384. We currently have a Committee that
recommends the improvements needed for the various parks that the fee is being collected to
build. The future projects scheduled to draw down these funds below the five-year test are the
Civic Center park improvements, hiking trails modifications, all playground equipment upgrades
to comply with new ADA standards, Mid -Valley parkway bike path and the Aquatic Center
equipment. The total budgeted for the various projects is $1,204,001 which exceeds the excess
five-year fund balance.
Traffic Sianalization Fee:
The Traffic Signalization fee fund balance is $575,262 versus the five-year revenue collected of
$425,452, and exceeds the five-year test by $149,810. The future projects scheduled to draw
down these funds below the five-year test are the Fred Waring and San Pasqual modification,
Signal coordination, and vehicle speed feedback signs for at total of 956,306.
Art in Public Places:
The Art in Public Places fund balance is $1,508,341 versus the five-year revenue collected of
$1,118,022, and exceeds the five-year test by $390,319. The future projects scheduled to draw
down these funds, below the five-year test are the artwork on El Paseo, art purchases,
maintenance of art pieces, and administrative costs to oversee projects, for a total of $500,000.
Child Care Facility:
The Child Care Facility fund balance is $1,510,641 versus the five-year revenue collected of
$647,309, and exceeds the five-year test by $863,332. The future projects scheduled to draw
down these funds below the five-year test are the purchase of land and creation of a new center
for a total of $1,339,650.
Fire Facility Fund:
The Fire Facility fund balance is $738,963 versus the five-year revenue collected of $372,989,
and exceeds the five-year test by $365,974. The future project scheduled to draw down these
funds below the five-year test is the construction of a new fire station for which the land has
been dedicated next to the UCR campus. The new station is estimated to cost approximately
$6,000,000 with roughly 50% of the funds coming from this fee. Staff expects the fee to reach
approximately $3,000,000 in 3 to 5 years, depending on development. The remaining balance
of the station cost was originally budgeted from redevelopment funding prior to elimination of
redevelopment agencies by the State. This elimination coupled with the housing construction
slowdown has forced the City to wait for housing to be built in the north sphere prior to bidding
the project.
Staff recommends that City Council adopt a resolution finding that the City has complied with
the five-year test under Government Code Section 66006. The attached resolution outlines the
findings and should be utilized in conjunction with the Annual Report and the Capital
Improvement Budget for FY 2011-2012.
Staff Report
Adoption of Resolution relative to Government Code Section 66001 — Development Impact Fees
November 15, 2012
Page 4 of 4
Fiscal Analysis:
Since these findings have been made and the City is in compliance with the Code, no refunds
are required. There is no fiscal impact associated with the action.
Submitted By:
Paul S. Gibson
Director of Finance/City Treasurer
Approval:
hlmuth, City Manager
Dave Erwin, City Attorney
CTTYCOUNCILA�TION
APPROVED ' DENM
L--'
RECEIVED OTHER
AYES: ' iril C4
NOES: AkIV
ABSENT:
ABSTAIN:
VERIFIED BY: '
Original on File with City
office
RESOLUTION NO. 2012- 74
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PALM
DESERT, CALIFORNIA, TO MAKE CERTAIN FINDINGS PURSUANT
TO CALIFORNIA GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 66001
WHEREAS, the City of Palm Desert is required to make certain findings every
five years with respect to the unexpended fund balance of certain development fee
funds pursuant to California Government Code Section 66001; and
WHEREAS, the information to make the required findings can be found in the
Annual Report Calculation, in the 2011-2012 Capital Improvement Program, the original
ordinance adopting the fees file with the City Clerk; and
WHEREAS, the City Council has approved a master drainage plan, a general
plan for parks and approved a regional traffic signal plan that demonstrates the purpose
of the fee being charged, and
WHEREAS, these findings need to be made in conjunction with the. public
information required in Code Section 66006.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Palm
Desert, California, as follows:
1. That the above recitations are true and correct.
2. That the following findings are made as required under the Government Code
Section 66006:
a. That the purpose to which the developer fee is to be put has been
identified.
b. That a reasonable relationship has been demonstrated between the
fee and the purpose for which it is charged.
c. That all sources and amounts of funding anticipated to complete
financing on incomplete improvements have been identified.
d. That the approximate dates on which the funding referred to above is
expected to be deposited into the appropriate fund have been
designated.
3. That these findings are based on information provided in the City of Palm
Desert Annual Development Impact Report, Operating Budget and Capital
Improvement Program 2012-2013 and master plans for improvements, which
is incorporated herein by reference.
RESOLUTION NO. 201274
-
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED at the regular meeting of the Palm
Desert City Council held on this 15th day of November, 2012, by the following vote, to
wit:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ABSTAIN:
ATTEST:
RACHELLE D. KLASSEN, CITY CLERK
CITY OF PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA
ROBERT A. SPIEGEL, MAYOR
2 of 2
Annual Report
of Calculation of Government Code 66006
Development Impact Fees for the City of Palm Desert
For Fiscal Year Ending June 30, 2012
Government Code Section 66006 requires local agencies to submit annual and five-year
compliance reports detailing the status of development impact fees. The annual report must be
made available to the public and presented to the public agency (City Council) at least fifteen days
after it is made available to the public.
This report summarizes the following information for each of the development fee programs:
1. A brief description of the fee program.
2. Schedule of fees.
3. Beginning and ending balances of the fee program.
4. Amount of fees collected and the interest earned.
5. Disbursement information and percentage funded by fees, including operating transfers.
6. Five year compliance testing of unexpended fees and future capital project commitments to
expend the funds.
The fee programs included in this report are the following:
Section A — Transportation Uniform Mitigation Fee
Section B — Housing Mitigation Fee
Section C — New Construction Tax Fee
Section D — Drainage Facility Fee
Section E — Fringe Toed Lizard Fee/ MSHCP
Section F — Park & Recreation Fee
Section G — Traffic Signalization Fee
Section H —Art In Public Places Fee
Section I—A.I.P.P. Maintenance Fund
Section J — Child Care Facility Fund
Section K — Fire Facility Fund
Page 1
Section A — Transportation Uniform Mitigation Fee (T.U.M.F.)
The TUMF program is collected by the City and administer by the Coachella Valley Association of
Government (CVAG). The City of Palm Desert collects the fee based on a Ordinance adopted by
City Council based on type of building usage and vehicles generated by the residential or
commercial activity on City streets. The City monthly remits the fee to C.V.A.G. to be disbursed
on a regional basis for street widening projects determine yearly by CVAG Capital Project
Program Budget. Fee for residential is $1837.44 and all commercial buildings are based on
attached formula and data sheet schedule which varies from project to project (per ordinance)
Part 1 — Fund Balance, Revenue, Interest, Expenditures, Ending Balance Fund 610-Trust
Beginning
Fiscal Year
Ending
Account Description
Fund Balance
2011-12
Fund Balance
Revenues & Other Sources:
Developer Fee
171,564
Interest Income
Contributions
Transfers In
Total Sources
171,564
Expenditures & Other Uses:
Capital Projects (Paid to CVAG)
171,564
Transfers Out
Total Uses
171,564
Total Available
- 0 -
- 0 -
- 0 -
Part II — Compliance with expending funds within 5 Years
Five Year Revenue Test
Using First In First Out Method
Unspent Funds Represents Ending Fund Balance
June 30, 2012
Revenues Collected From FY 2011-2012
171,564
Total Ending Fund Balance
- 0 -
Result: Five year spent test met in accordance
With Government Code 66001
Capital Improvement
Projects
FY2011-2012
% Complete
% Funded with Fee
CVAG Payments
171,564
100%
100%
Page 2
Section B— Housing Mitigation Fee (Fund 214)
The Housing Mitigation Fee is used to mitigate the low-income housing impacts caused by
commercial and industrial development. Used to help construct or provide low-income housing
assistance with the City of Palm Desert residence. A yearly and five year Low Income Housing
Needs Report/Plan is compile to access the needs within the City. Fee is based on $1/sq. ft. —
Commercial; $0.33/sq. ,ft. — Industrial; $0.40/sq. ft. — Professional; $1,000/room — Resort Hotel;
$620/Room Non Resort.
Part 1 — Fund Balance, Revenue, Interest, Expenditures, Ending Balance
Beginning
Fiscal Year
Ending
Account Description
Fund Balance
2011-12
Fund Balance
Revenues & Other Sources:
Developer Fee
12,476
Interest Income
21,576
Contributions (State Grant) Neighbor
120,000
Stabilization Program
Transfers In Note Rec.
Total Sources
154,052
Expenditures & Other Uses:
Capital Projects
24,538
Transfers Out to Low -Income Housing
Total Uses
24,538
Total Available
2,410,710
129,514
2,540,224
Part II — Compliance with expending funds within 5 Years
Five Year Revenue Test
Using First In First Out Method
Unspent Funds Represents Ending Fund Balance
June 30, 2012
Revenues Collected From FY 2007-2008
1,214,744
Revenues Collected From FY 2008-2009
2,309,418
Revenues Collected From FY 2009-2010
175,553
Revenues Collected From FY 2010-2011
583,696
Revenues Collected From FY 2011-2012
154,052
Total Ending Fund Balance
2,540,224
Result: Five year spent test met in accordance
With Government Code 66001 (2 Year Balance)
Capital Improvement
FY2011-2012
Five Year
% Funded with Fee
Projects
Future Commitments
Low Income Housing
24,538
Working on Design &
100%
Project (Falcon/ La
Land purchase
Rocca Apartments)
500,000
Page 3
Section C — New Construction Tax Fee (Fund 231)
The New Construction Tax Fee is used for acquisition and development of public facilities like
playgrounds, public structures, and street improvements. Yearly the City Council approves a five
year Capital Improvement Budget that reflects current projects along with future committed
projects utilizing these fees. The fee for Industrial Buildings is $0.05/sq. ft.; Residential units
$0.40/sq. ft.; all other development $0.40/sq. ft.
Part 1 — Fund Balance, Revenue, Interest, Expenditures, Ending Balance
Beginning
Fiscal Year
Ending
Account Description
Fund Balance
2011-12
Fund Balance
Revenues & Other Sources:
Developer Fee
117,063
Interest Income
2,321
Prior Yr Adjustment
Transfers In from General Fund -LOAN
Total Sources
119,384
Expenditures & Other Uses:
Capital Projects
51,105
Transfers Out
Total Uses
51,105
Total Available
1,124,033
68,279
1,192,312
Part II — Compliance with expending funds within 5 Years
Five Year Revenue Test
Using First In First Out Method
Unspent Funds Represents Ending Fund Balance
June 30, 2012
Revenues Collected From FY 2007-2008
344,582
Revenues Collected From FY 2008-2009
398,829
Revenues Collected From FY 2009-2010
112,873
Revenues Collected From FY 2010-2011
148,811
Revenues Collected From FY 2011-2012
119,384
Total Ending Fund Balance
1,192,312*
Result: Five year spent test met in accordance
With Government Code 66001. (5 Year Balance
includes General Fund loan
Capital Improvement
FY2011-2012
Five Year
% Funded with Fee
Projects
Future Commitments
ADA Retrofit
10,850
100%
Parking Lot
40,255
100%
*Repayment of General
433,650
100%
Fund
350,000
100%
Sheriff Substation
70,000
100%
PS Art Museum
100,000
20%
ADA Curb
Page 4
Section D — Drainage Facility Fee (Fund 232)
The Drainage Facility Fee is used for planned local drainage created by the development and
adjoining streets to the project. The City has adopted a master drainage plan which gets modify
as new development occurs. In addition, the five-year City Capital Improvement Budget includes
both current and future projects planned for use of the fees connected to the various development
projects. Fees are based on which drainage map zone they reside within: Zone 1 fee is $4,000;
Zone 2 is $1,000; Zone 3 is $1,000; Zone 4 is $1,000. The map is available with the public works
department upon request.
Part 1 — Fund Balance, Revenue, Interest, Expenditures, Ending Balance
Account Description
Beginning
Fund Balance
Fiscal Year
2011-12
Ending
Fund Balance
Revenues & Other Sources:
Developer Fee
Interest Income
Contributions fm CVAG
2,200
12,336
25,175
Total Sources
39,711
Expenditures & Other Uses:
Capital Projects
1,717,183
Total Uses
1,717,183
Total Available
4,013,062
1,677,472
2,335,590
Part II — Compliance with expending funds within 5 Years
Five Year Revenue Test
Using First In First Out Method
Unspent Funds Represents Ending Fund Balance
June 30, 2012
Revenues Collected From FY 2007-2008
310,925
Revenues Collected From FY 2008-2009
168,043
Revenues Collected From FY 2009-2010
141,697
Revenues Collected From FY 2010-2011
250,392
Revenues Collected From FY 2011-2012
39,711 Total=$910,768
Total Ending Fund Balance
2,335,590-910,768=1,424,822
Result: Five year spent test over the limit by
$1,424,822 however, City has Budgeted capital
projects ($2,341,241) well above the excess that
will be completed within 24 months from 6/30/12
which will comply with Government Code 66001.
Capital Improvement
FY2011-2012
Five Year
% Funded with Fee
Projects
Future Commitments
Fred WaringDrainage
385,084 Bid
100%
North Sphere -
Drainage (ADA)
360,000 -Design
100%
Country Club Drive
50,350
1,496,157 -Const.
100%
Frank Sinatra/Portola
1,666,833
100%
Hwy 111 Non -State
100,000
-Design
100%
Total=2,341,241
Page 5
Section E — Fringe Toed Lizard Fee / Wildlife Mitigation (MSHCP)
This fee is collected in connection with environmental endanger plants & wildlife agreements with
State and Federal environmental agencies. The fee is collected and placed into trust and remitted
monthly to Center for Natural Lands Management to be used to acquire open space land to
preserve for various plants and wildlife preserves. The new fee is $1284 per acre.
Part 1 — Fund Balance, Revenue, Interest, Expenditures, Ending Balance
Beginning
Fiscal Year
Ending
Account Description
Fund Balance
2011-12
Fund Balance
Revenues & Other Sources:
Developer Fee
65,017
Interest Income
Contributions
Transfers In
Total Sources
65,017
Expenditures & Other Uses:
Capital Projects
65,017
(paid to CV Conservation)
Transfers In
Total Uses
65,017
Total Available
- 0 -
- 0 -
- 0 -
Part II — Compliance with expending funds within 5 Years
Five Year Revenue Test
Using First In First Out Method
Unspent Funds Represents Ending Fund Balance
June 30, 2012
Revenues Collected From FY 2007-2008
- 0—
Revenues Collected From FY 2008-2009
- 0 —
Revenues Collected From FY 2009-2010
- 0—
Revenues Collected From FY 2010-2011
- 0 -
Revenues Collected From FY 2011-2012
- 0 -
Total Ending Fund Balance
- 0 -
Result: Five year spent test met in accordance
With Government Code 66001
Capital Improvement
FY2011-2012
Five Year
% Funded with Fee
Projects
Future Commitments
Payment to C. V.
65,017
-0-
100%
Conservation Comm.
Page 6
Section F — Park & Recreation Fee (Fund 233)
The fee is used to acquire land, construct parks and recreational areas, open space, and other
public facilities for the city residents. Yearly the City Council adopts a five year Capital
Improvement Plan detailing the current and future projects necessary for use of the fee. The fee
is only charged to residential properties based on the following formula: Number of units x 2.292
(people per household) x 5 acres divided by 1000 population x land market value per acre.
Part 1 — Fund Balance, Revenue, Interest, Expenditures, Ending Balance
Beginning
Fiscal Year
Ending
Account Description
Fund Balance
2011-12
Fund Balance
Revenues & Other Sources:
Developer Fee
Interest Income
6,167
Contributions (Insurance Settlement)
Transfers In
Total Sources
6,167
Expenditures & Other Uses:
Capital Projects
87,355
Transfers In
Total Uses
87,355
Total Available
1,395,193
(81,188)
1,314,005,
Part II — Compliance with expending funds within 5 Years
Five Year Revenue Test
Using First In First Out Method
Unspent Funds Represents Ending Fund Balance
June 30, 2012
Revenues Collected From FY 2007-2008
210,664
Revenues Collected From FY 2008-2009
226,960
Revenues Collected From FY 2009-2010
42.757
Revenues Collected From FY 2010-2011
78,073
Revenues Collected From FY 2011-2012
6,167 Total = 564,621
Total Ending Fund Balance
1,314,005-564,621=$749,384
Result: Five year spent test over the limit by
$749,384 however, City has Budgeted capital
projects ($1,204,001) well above the excess that
will be completed within 24 months from 6/30/12
which will comply with Government Code 66001
Capital Improvement Projects
FY2011-2012
Five Year
% Funded
(Completed in FY or Future Projects)
Future
with Fee
Commitments
*Civic Center Amphitheater & Park Improvements
11,518
283,123 -Const
50%
New Community Center Design
50%
Hiking Trail
Park Improvements (Various Parks)
100%
All Playground Upgrade to meet new ADA
6,474
920,878 Bids
25%
Mid Valley Parkway Bike path
50%
Aquatic Center
69,252
78,977 Encumb
100%
Page 7
Section G — Traffic Signalization Fee (Fund 234)
The fee is used for acquisition and development of the regional traffic signals within the City
created by increase traffic load added by the development. Yearly the City Council adopts a five
year Capital Improvement Plan detailing the current and future projects necessary for use of the
fee. The fee is charged based on the type of building constructed, which is: Residential $ 50 per
unit; Commercial $500 per 1,000 sq. ft.; Industrial $500 per acre.
Part 1 — Fund Balance, Revenue, Interest, Expenditures, E ding Balance
Beginning
Fiscal Year
Ending
Account Description
Fund Balance
2011-12
Fund Balance
Revenues & Other Sources:
Developer Fee
7,738
Interest Income
2,297
Contributions -State Grant
38,248
Reimbursement fm Other Govt
15,299
Total Sources
63,584
Expenditures & Other Uses:
Capital Projects
25,605
Transfers Out (Traffic Signal payout of
Measure A Fund — Reimb for Traf Sig.
Total Uses
25,605
Total Available
537,283
37,979
575,262
Part II — Compliance with expending funds within 5 Years
Five Year Revenue Test
Using First In First Out Method
Unspent Funds Represents Ending Fund Balance
June 30, 2012
Revenues Collected From FY 2007-2008
137,663
Revenues Collected From FY 2008-2009
70,972
Revenues Collected From FY 2009-2010
38,342
Revenues Collected From FY 2010-2011
140,496
Revenues Collected From FY 2011-2012
37,979 Total = 425,452 5 Yr Rev.
Total Ending Fund Balance
Result: Five year spent test over the limit by
575,262 — 425,452=$149,810
$149,810 however, City has Budgeted capital
projects ($956,306) well above the excess that
will be completed within 24 months from 6/30/12
which will comply with Government Code 66001
Capital Improvement
FY2011-2012
Five Year
% Funded with Fee
Projects
Future Commitments
Frank Sinatra & GF
1,937
100%
Portola & Frank
400
100%
Fred Waring Mod
7,118
276,306
100%
Signal Coordination
16,150
240,000
100%
Accessible Ped.
300,000
100%
Vehicle Speed Feedb
140,000
100%
Page 8
Section H — Art In Public Places Fee (Fund 436)
The fee is used to acquire, develop, install and maintain artwork to be displayed in the city (City
owned land), the administration of the program and community public art education programs.
The City has an Art in Public Places committee that meets monthly to decide both location and
type of art that will be placed throughout the City. Developers may choose to place and develop
art within their project site without paying a fee to the City. Yearly the City Council adopts a five-
year Capital Improvement Plan and administration plan detailing the current and future projects
necessary for use of the fee.
Part 1 — Fund Balance, Revenue, Interest, Expenditures, Ending Balance
Beginning
Fiscal Year
Ending
Account Description
Fund Balance
2011-12
Fund Balance
Revenues & Other Sources:
Developer Fee
144,110
Interest Income
6,842
Contributions
216
Total Sources
151,168
Expenditures & Other Uses:
Capital Projects/Administration of Project
356,481
Transfers Out — AIPP Maint Fund per Ord
-0-
Total Uses
356,481
Total Available
1,713,654
205,313
1,508,341
Part II — Compliance with expending funds within 5 Years
Five Year Revenue Test
Using First In First Out Method
Unspent Funds Represents Ending Fund Balance
June 30, 2012
Revenues Collected From FY 2007-2008
412,842
Revenues Collected From FY 2008-2009
378,299
Revenues Collected From FY 2009-2010
122,440
Revenues Collected From FY 2010-2011
53,273
Revenues Collected From FY 2011-2012
161,168 Total = 1,118,022
Total Ending Fund Balance
1,508,341-1,118,022 = $390,319
Result: Five year spent test over the limit by
$390,319 however, City has Budgeted capital
projects ($500,000) well above the excess that
will be completed within 24 months from 6/30/12
which will comply with Government Code 66001
Capital Improvement
FY2011-2012
Future Commitments
% Funded with Fee
Administration
283,716
300,000
60%
Prof. Arch itectu re/Eng
4,795
100%
Art Work —El Paseo
50,000
100%
Art
16,845
100,000
100%
/Placement/Purchase
51,123
50,000
100%
AIPP Maint of ART
Page 9
Section I — A.I.P.P. Maintenance Fund (Fund 240)
A portion of the Art in Public Places fee is used to cover the yearly maintenance of all the art
placed within the City on public places. The City of Palm Desert placed General Fund cash within
the fund of a sum of $300,000 to be used as a loan to have sufficient funds to adequately maintain
the Artwork until sufficient funds are collected to cover the yearly costs.
Part 1 — Fund Balance, Revenue, Interest, Expenditures, Ending Balance
Beginning
Fiscal Year
Ending
Account Description
Fund Balance
2011-12
Fund Balance
Revenues & Other Sources:
Developer Fee
Interest Income
Contributions (Damage Restitution)
Transfers In
-0-
Total Sources
-0-
Expenditures & Other Uses:
Maintenance of Art Work
-0-
Transfers Out
Total Uses
-0-
Total Available
-0-
-0-
-0-
Part II — Compliance with expending funds within 5 Years
Five Year Revenue Test
Using First In First Out Method
Unspent Funds Represents Ending Fund Balance
June 30, 2012
Loan From General Fund — Transfer In
Revenues Collected From FY 2011-2012
Total Ending Fund Balance
-0-
Result: Five year spent test met in accordance
With Government Code 66001
Capital Improvement
Projects
FY2011-2012
Five Year
Future Commitments
% Funded with Fee
Maintenance of Art
-0-
100%
Page 10
Section J — Child Care Facility Fund 228
The City of Palm Desert is interested in providing funding, through impact fees for new child care
homes and centers, in order to meet some of the child care demand generated by employees and
commercial uses in the City. A Nexus Study was prepared and approved by City Council in
August 2005. Yearly, the City will adopt a budget to use these funds to create new facilities and
equipment.
Part 1 — Fund Balance, Revenue, Interest, Expenditures, Ending Balance
Beginning
Fiscal Year
Ending
Account Description
Fund Balance
2011-12
Fund Balance
Revenues & Other Sources:
Developer Fee
20,557
Interest Income
6,297
Contributions
Transfers In
Total Sources
26,854
Expenditures & Other Uses:
Design, Construction & Equip
5,920
(Wallaroo)
Transfers Out
Total Uses
5,920
Total Available
1,489,707
20,934
1,510,641
Part II — Compliance with expending funds within 5 Years
Five Year Revenue Test
Using First In First Out Method
Unspent Funds Represents Ending Fund Balance
June 30, 2012
Loan From General Fund — Transfer In
Revenues Collected From FY 2007-2008
257,680
Revenues Collected From FY 2008-2009
212,717
Revenues Collected From FY 2009-2010
120,213
Revenues Collected From FY 2010-2011
29,845
Revenues Collected From FY 2011-2012
26,854 Total = $647,309
Total Ending Fund Balance
1,510,641-647,309= $863,332
Result: Five year spent test over the limit by
$863,332 however, City has Budgeted capital
projects ($1,339,650) well above the excess that
will be completed within 24 months from 6/30/12
which will comply with Government Code 66001
Capital Improvement
FY2011-2012
Five Year
% Funded with Fee
Projects
Future Commitments
Land
1,339,650 (Land & Design
100%
Purchase(Spanish)
5,920
of New Facility)
Bermuda
Dunes Portola
Attempting to locate land and facility to acquire.
Page 11
Section K — Fire Facility Fund (235)
The City of Palm Desert is interested in providing funding, through impact fees for new Fire
Station and equipment, in order to meet some of the new commercial and residential development
in the northern half of the City. A Nexus Study was prepared and approved by City Council in
June 2006. Commercial development rate is $0.22 per square foot, industrial/office rate is $0.20
per square foot, and residential development would be based on a $2,262 per acre depending on
density of units built. Yearly, the City will adopt a budget to use these funds to create new
facilities and equipment.
Part 1 — Fund Balance, Revenue, Interest, Expenditures, Ending Balance
Beginning
Fiscal Year
Ending
Account Description
Fund Balance
2011-12
Fund Balance
Revenues & Other Sources:
Developer Fee
38,447
Interest Income
3,031
Contributions
Transfers In
Total Sources
41,478
Expenditures & Other Uses:
Design, Construction & Equipment
-0-
Total Uses
-
Total Available
697,485
41,478
738,963
Part II — Com liance with expendinq funds within 5 Years
Five Year Revenue Test
Using First In First Out Method
Unspent Funds Represents Ending Fund Balance
June 30, 2012
Loan From General Fund —Transfer In
Revenues Collected From FY 2007-2008
118,306
Revenues Collected From FY 2008-2009
130,326
Revenues Collected From FY 2009-2010
29,954
Revenues Collected From FY 2010-2011
52,925
Revenues Collected From FY 2011-2012
41,478 Total = 372,989
Total Ending Fund Balance
738,963 — 372,989 = 365,974
Result: Five year spent test over the limit by
$365,974 however, City has Budgeted capital
projects ($6,000,000) well above the excess that
will be completed within 24 months from 6/30/12
which will comply with Government Code 66001
Capital Improvement
FY2011-2012
Five Year
% Funded with Fee
Projects
Future Commitments
New Fire Station
- 0 -
6,000,000 Upon
50%
Housing built in North
Sphere
Land acquired, preliminary design complete, awaiting development prior to building
facility. City budget could not support new facility.
Page 12