HomeMy WebLinkAboutRprt - Measure A Trnsprtatn Fund FYE 06-30-2012 X -�.,.
CITY OF PALM DESERT
FINANCE DEPARTMENT
STAFF REPORT
REQUEST: RECEIVE AND FILE THE INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS' REPORT
ON AGREED-UPON PROCEDURES PERFORMED ON THE MEASURE
A TRANSPORTATION FUND FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDED JUNE 30,
2012
DATE: April 25, 2013
SUBMITTED BY: Paul S. Gibson, Finance Director
CONTENTS: Independent Accountants' Report on Agreed-Upon Procedures
Recommendation
By Minute Motion, that the City Council receive and file the Independent
Accountants' Report on Agreed-Upon Procedures Performed on the Measure A
Transportation Fund for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2012.
Committee Recommendation
The Audit, Investment and Finance Committee received the Independent Accountants' Report at
their April 23, 2013 meeting, and it was recommended that the report for the fiscal year ended
June 30, 2012 be received and filed by the City Council.
Backqround
The Measure A Fund is a special revenue fund that was created to keep track of funds received
by the Riverside County Transportation Commission. In 1988, Riverside County voters approved
a half cent sales tax, known as Measure A, to fund a variety of highway improvements, local
streets and roads maintenance, commuter assistance and specialized transit projects.
Macia, Gini & O'Connell, LLP, performed the procedures which were agreed to by the Riverside
County Transportation Commission, Riverside, California (RCTC) solely to assist RCTC with
respect to an evaluation of the City of Palm Desert's Measure A Transportation Fund and degree
of the City's compliance with RCTC requirements for the year ended June 30, 2012.
Staff requests that the Council receive and file the Independent Accountants' Report on
Agreed-Upon Procedures Performed on the Measure A Transportation Fund for the fiscal year
ended June 30, 2012.
G:\Finance\Niamh Ortega\Staff ReportsWudit staff reportsWudit Staff Reports 2012\SR-Council audit 2012 Measure A.docx
Staff Report
Approval of Report on Procedures for Measure A Fund for Fiscal Year ended June 30, 2012
April 25, 2013
Page 2 of 2
Fiscal lmpact
There is no fiscal impact associated with this action.
Submitted by: Approval:
aul S. Gibson ohn M. Wohlmuth
Finance Director/City Treasurer City Manager
C1TY COUNCIL ACTION
APPROVED _._Di;NIF.D
RECEIVED 9`'�OTHCR
MF,ETING DATE - �- a �
AYES: ° `f � /�K
NOES: N�'nP _
AT3SF.NT: .No�P __�
ABSTAIN: ���1 e . _.
VE[21FIF.D I3Y: �� -
Original on File with Citg� Cfea•�:'s Of'ticc
G:\Finance\Niamh Ortega\Staff ReportsWudit staff reports�Audit Staff Reports 2012\SR-Council audit 2012 Measure A.docx
Newport Beach
4675 MacArth;..r Court,Suita 600
�ic:wpnrt 3•,a,.'r:,CA 92660
Certi�ied Public Accountants. �a9 22, �0�5
Sacramento
Walnut Creek
The Board of Commissioners Oakland
Riverside County Transportation Commission
Riverside,California LA/Century City
San Diego
Independent Accountant's Report
On Applying Agreed-Upon Procedures Seattle
We have performed the procedures enumerated below, which were agreed to by the Riverside County
Transportation Commission (RCTC), solely to assist RCTC in determining whether the City of Palm
Desert, California(City), was in compliance with the Measure A Local Streets and Roads Program grant
terms and conditions for the year ended June 30, 2012. The City's management is responsible for the
accounting records. This agreed-upon procedures engagement was conducted in accordance with
attestation standards established by the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants. The
' sufficiency of these procedures is solely the responsibility of those parties specified in the report.
Consequently, we make no representation regarding the sufficiency of the procedures described below,
either for the purpose for which this report has been requested, or for any other purpose.
Our procedures and findings are as follows:
]. Obtain the 2009 Measure A (Ordinance 02-001) compliance requirements. Western County
jurisdictions are required to participate in the Transportation Uniform Mitigation Fee (TUMF)
program and in the Multi-Species Habitat Conservation Plan (MSHCP), which are administered by
the Western Riverside Council of Governments (WRCOG) and the Western Riverside County
Regional Conservation Authority (RCA), respectively. Coachella Valley jurisdictions are required to
participate in the TUMF program administered by the Coachella Valley Association of Governments
(CVAG).
Finding: No exceptions were noted as a result of applying this procedure. The City participates in the
TUMF program administered by CVAG.
2. Obtain the City's approved Five-Year Capital Improvement Plan(CIP) from RCTC for the fiscal year
ended June 30, 2012.
Finding: No exceptions were noted as a result of applying this procedure.
3. Obtain a detailed general ledger and balance sheet from the City for the fiscal year ended
June 30,2012.
a. Identify the amount of Measure A cash and investments recorded at June 30, 2012.
Finding: Measure A cash and investments were$20,972,547 at June 30, 2012.
b. ldentify amounts due from other funds.
Finding: There were no amounts due from other funds as of June 30, 2012.
www.mgo�pacom
�
c. Identify any levels of constraint of ending fund balance for Measure A activity.
Finding: Ending fund balance for Measure A activity was restricted for street related purposes in
the amount of$21,425,164 at June 30, 2012.
d. Identify the existence of any restatement of Measure A fund balance and inquire of management
as to the reason for any restatement.
Finding: We noted no restatement of Measure A fund balance at June 30, 2011.
4. Obtain an operating statement for Measure A activity for the fiscal year ended June 30,2012 (see
Exhibit A), including budget amounts.
a. Review the revenues in the operating statement.
i. Inquire of management as to what fund was used to record Measure A revenues received
from RCTC and document total revenues for the fiscal year ended June 30,2012.
Finding: The City accounts for Measure A revenues in its Measure A Fund (Fund #213).
The City recorded total revenues in the amount of$3,146,265 for the fiscal year ended June
30,2012,which includes reimbursement from other agencies of$760,244 and interest income
of$87,034.
ii. Obtain a listing of Measure A payments made from RCTC to the City. Compare the Measure
A revenues recorded by the City to the listing of payments made by RCTC.
Finding: We identified a variance of$63,332 between the Measure A revenues recorded by
the City and the RCTC Measure A payment schedule. The difference is due to a fiscal year
2011 adjustment from RCTC, in the amount of$63,332, recorded by the City in fiscal year
2012. The following schedule summarizes these differences.
City of
� RCTC Palm Desert
Measure A revenue recorded $ 2,235,655 $ 2,298,987
2011 clean-up payment - (63,332)
Measure A revenue reconciled $ 2,235,655 $ 2,235,655
iii. Determine the amount of interest allocated to Measure A activity for the fiscal year ended
June 30, 2012.
Finding: The City allocated interest in the amount of$87,034 to Measure A activity for the
fiscal year ended June 30, 2012.
b. Review the expenditures in the operating statement.
i. Inquire of management as to what fund is used to record Measure A expenditures and
document total expenditures for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2012.
�
Finding: The City accounts for Measure A expenditures in its Measure A Fund(Fund#213).
The City recorded total Measure A expenditures in the amount of$2,082,693 for the fiscal
year ended June 30, 2012.
ii. Select expenditures for testing that comprise at least 20%of total Measure A expenditures.
Finding: The City recorded Measure A expenditures in the amount of $2,082,693. We
selected$1,l 16,095, or 53.6%, for testing.
1. For the expenditures selected for testing, compare the dollar amount recorded in the
general ledger to the supporting documentation.
Finding: No exceptions were noted as a result of applying this procedure.
2. For the expenditures selected for testing, review the Five-Year CIP and note whether the
projects claimed were included in the Five-Year CIP and whether they constitute
allowable costs.
Finding: The expenditures selected for testing were included in the Five-Year CIP and
were allowable costs. No exceptions were noted as a result of applying this procedure.
iii. Inquire of management as to the nature of any transfers recorded in the Measure A Fund.
Finding: We noted no transfers in the Measure A Fund for the fiscal year ended June 30,
2012.
iv. Inquire of management as to the amount of indirect costs, if any, included in expenditures.
Finding: Per discussion with City management, no indirect costs were allocated to the
Measure A Fund for the fiscal year ended June 30,2012.
5. Compare budgeted expenditures to actual amounts and inquire of management as to the nature of
significant variances.
Finding: The following schedule compares budgeted expenditures to actual amounts.
Budget Actual Variance
Construction and Maintenance $ 21,987,754 $ 2,082,693 $ 19,905,061
Per discussion with City management, the variance in construction and maintenance was due to
projects that were not started or were in the beginning stages of construction at year end June 30,
2012.
6. Obtain from RCTC a listing of jurisdictions that participate in the Western County or Coachella
Valley TUMF programs.
a. If the jurisdiction is a participant in the TUMF program, select at least one disbursement for
validation as to the amount remitted to WRCOG or CVAG, as applicable.
3
Finding: We selected one disbursement in the amount of $67,298. The payment selected for
testing indicated that TUMF is collected and remitted to CVAG, as required.
b. Indicate the total amount of TUMF fees collected and remitted during the fiscal year ended June
30, 2012.
Finding: The total amount of TUMF fees collected and remitted during the fiscal year ended
June 30,2012, was$171,564.
7. Obtain from RCTC a listing of jurisdictions that participate in the Western County MSHCP program.
a. [f the jurisdiction is a participant in the Western County MSHCP program, select at least one
disbursement for validation as to the amount remitted to RCA.
Finding: The City is not a participant in the Western County MSHCP program.
b. Inquire of management as to the existence of fees collected in prior years that were not remitted
to RCA by the end of this fiscal year.
Finding: The City is not a participant in the Western County MSHCP program.
c. Indicate the total amount of Western County MSHCP fees collected and remitted during the fiscal
year.
Finding: The City is not a participant in the Western County MSHCP program.
8. Obtain from RCTC the Maintenance of Effort(MOE) base year requirement, including its supporting
detail calculations for the City,and the carryover amount allowed as of July 1,2011.
a. Obtain from the City a calculation of its current year MOE amount in a format similar to its base
year calculation. See Exhibit B.
Finding: No exceptions were noted as a result of applying this procedure.
b. Compare the amount of current year MOE expenditures to the MOE base requirement.
Finding: We noted that current year MOE expenditures were greater than the MOE base
requirement.
c. If the amount of discretionary funds spent is less than the MOE base requirement (MOE
deficiency), determine the amount of any prior year MOE carryover using the information
obtained from RCTC, and reduce the MOE deficiency by any available MOE carryover to
determine an adjusted current year expenditure amount.
Finding: No exceptions were noted as a result of applying this procedure. The City's
discretionary funds spent in the fiscal year ended June 30, 2012, exceed the MOE base year
requirement. The City's MOE carryover at June 30,2012, is calculated as follows:
4
MOE excess at July l,2011 $ 4,796,292
Current year MOE expenditures 2,428,610
Less:MOE base year requirement (2,398,146)
Excess MOE for fiscal year ended June 30,2012 30,464
MOE excess at June 30,2012 $ 4,826,756
We were not engaged to, and did not, conduct an audit, the objective of which would be the expression of
an opinion on the accounting records. Accordingly, we do not express such an opinion. Had we
performed additional procedures, other matters might have come to our attention that would have been
reported to you.
This report is intended solely for the information and use of the Board of Commissioners of RCTC and
the City of Palm Desert and is not intended to be, and should not be, used by anyone other than these
specified parties.
I c/.`:,•�•t, ( D ' LL�
Newport Beach, California
April 1 l,2013
5
Exhibit A
CITY OF PALM DESERT
Measure A Operating Statements
For the Fiscal Year Ended June 30,2012
(Unaudited)
Revenues: Budget Actual Variance
Measure A $ 1,913,000 $ 2,298,987 $ 385,987
ReQnbursements from other agencies 12,170,500 760,244 (11,410,256)
Interest income 200,000 87,034 (112,966)
Total revenues 14,283,500 3,146,265 (11,137,235)
Expenditures:
Construction and maintenance 21,987,754 2,082,693 19,905,061
Excess (deficiency)of revenues
over(under)expenditures $ (7,704,254) $ 1,063,572 $ 8,767,826
6
m
�
r
N
Lii
O
�
0
J�
�
U
�
�
m
�
L
�
�y
C
W
pe�
6
r
3
0
� �
�
d
N �
O �
N
C O
F .L "�
a
� � '
� y y�
� U q y � O � M t�+t P N K N N o0 � ? r � d � t��l t�; 0�0 � r � V n V � ^ �O
� � p O P P T h t'i �D � O O 1� �O -� O 1� 1� O V -+ N o0 N N o0 N �O a
�.7 fcl 9 9 �: 1 N �� �n vi ' 1�— � t� � O o0 0o C ae � o oG oy 0o aG O
� � �' � w N M� r � � N � N � O � � � b O �O O M M
� Y � ? a �l� a � O h� N N
0 V
}i 7 u C O
u � r � v"
� w w vi n sv b,
�
fa 9 a
0 9 0
� � u � u
o � � • o
• 9 � '�
� � � y �
o °° �� M '3 ��
� r � 0� 41 Q' i�
Q � r y �:
��" [L O �
6 � � � � b � �
H eo � q � � � o a
�
V � � M � N � Q � �
A � Q
C o �y =' Q N � � a 2 � 2
N r N � p
.9 C� o N � � C] �•, � o �
a C � u' t� Q � 7 r1 4' � � . i C V
v ' �' `'�' "� C] �n n p � m V' o � � '�
� � � a N p � � 9 � �
� � 9 Q � > � �` v0 0 � � Q � h 'n E � +�� �? Q .� B �
a ° � `�' y `r � °' v �.�, �° b �1 .o o a°i n' � o 5,�,�, '3 � d .9 � S � .w. a..�
� Q � M y � E u ^ � � '� o. ,� r € � 3 V m W .� .� � � .� � '� � o
� E N a u c v °' $ $
o � 9 O o0 g oy � inC� v�iZo oY � b e � � ? .o � v�'i d yE e p � � � n
U c � � u. a y � E ^. � � � W$ 0 E [a °� v � � � e .5 : A � T �^ N d Q � a a,~ �
e w t� o E x c� b `v 3S � � �'n o �v" � 3 v � `u C7 � b a� 'm 3 v •v e � .� � C K $ � a � a
v o � �C �. a °V' -�
o '� � a � = a° 3 `n �, m A `� 3 n � > � y °Joe ,� � w :� y �' �5 .. � ' 'a .c S � � C7 � m a e, 9
ry �j . C �p ,Y V1 O {t�i.,� C O y n `L N N `� N .G ••� 7 L 7 L 1 k7 fal C
Q V � � T � ` � O � � u W ttl N � O � � L 'L � L u a1 � L tp " L � '� � p O O O V
rri °:, a � a° ..`CSk- i,.. U � V a° u. �,. 1= � Q � � m � vbiUavivbiV vbiZcn � W C .5 v � W F E � � �