HomeMy WebLinkAboutHousing Cmsn - 11/10/09PALM DESERT REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY
INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM
TO: RACHELLE KLASSEN, CITY CLERK
FROM: PATTY LEON, RECORDING SECRETAR
DATE: December 10, 2009
SUBJECT: HOUSING COMMISSION MINUTES
Attached is the following Housing Commission Meeting Minutes approved at the Housing
Commission meeting held December 9, 2009:
➢ November 10, 2009
Please submit to the Housing Authority Board.
Thank you.
cc: John M. Wohlmuth, Executive Director
L'on i�, £ ri Ie.. BY HOUSG AUTH ( - 0)
ON 1--1y-a_Lln
VERIFIED BY: RhK
Original on file with City Clerk's Office
CITY OF PALM DESERT
ADJOURNED REGULAR
HOUSING COMMISSION MEETING
MINUTES
NOVEMBER 10, 2009
I. CALL TO ORDER
Verna Smith, Housing Commission Chair, convened the meeting at 3:30 p.m.
II. ROLL CALL
Present:
Donna Lewis
Natalie Russo
Verna Smith
Jane Turner
Wade Tucker
Also Present:
Richard S. Kelly, Councilmember Liaison
Janet Moore, Director of Housing
Jessica Gonzales, Management Analyst
Patty Leon, Recording Secretary
Guest(s):
Members Absent:
Teresa Vakili, RPM Company
Cathy Walker, Senior Management Analyst
Veronica Tapia, Redevelopment Accountant II
III. ORAL COMMUNICATIONS
Verna Smith thanked Natalie Russo for directing October's Housing
Commission meeting during her absence.
IV. CONSENT CALENDAR
A. MINUTES of the Regular Housing Commission meeting of October 7, 2009.
1
Housing Commission
Minutes NOVEMBER 10, 2009
With a Motion made by Commissioner Tucker and seconded by
Commissioner Lewis the minutes of October 7, 2009 were unanimously
approved.
A revised copy of the first page of the minutes was distributed to the
Commission that highlighted an administrative change to the header to read
"Adjourned Regular Housing Commission Meeting".
A grammatical correction was made to page 3; perceptive was changed to
perspective.
V. REPORTS AND REMARKS
A. COMMISSION REPORTS
Janet Moore updated the Commission on Carlos Ortega Villas, stating that staff
is in the process of selecting an architect for the actual design drawing.
Interviews will be conducted shortly after the selection is narrowed down. This
process will take a few months before a contract is awarded.
Verna Smith asked when the ADHOC Subcommittee would be having another
meeting.
Mrs. Moore anticipates meeting with the ADHOC Subcommittee after the
architect is selected. The conceptual design, approved by the subcommittee,
will be provided to the architect once selected, and therefore there are no
further discussions at this time.
B. SUMMARY OF CITY COUNCIL, REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY, AND
HOUSING AUTHORITY AGENDA ITEMS AND ACTIONS
The summary was reviewed by the Commission.
The Commission was also provided with a copy of the Appendix I Affordable
Housing Compliance Plan Update; Veronica Tapia and Cathy Walker were
present to answer any questions from the Commission.
Janet Moore summarized the Compliance Plan. She stated that the
Redevelopment Agency is tasked with spending 20% of the monies received
from property tax increment for the purpose of providing affordable housing.
Every five years both the Redevelopment Agency and Housing Division are
required to prepare an Implementation Plan. That Plan outlines all of the goals
and projects as well as identifies proposed projects that may be included during
that five year period. As part of that Plan the Housing Division is tasked with
2
Housing Commission
Minutes NOVEMBER 10, 2009
almost the same responsibility only in much more detail to include housing that
was built, housing that will be built, replacement of any units, and how Housing
anticipates expending fund dollars over the next five years. In the event the
Agency or the Housing Division did not identify a certain project that they might
anticipate doing in either plan then that project cannot be done.
Mrs. Moore stated that the Compliance Plan was provided to the Commission
as informational only, stating that this plan is a component of the
Implementation Plan. She noted that staff spent a considerable amount of time
in the preparation of the Plan. The Redevelopment Implementation Plan,
consisting of four project areas, is approximately 50 to 52 pages and the
Housing Compliance Plan is 46; both Plans were quite detailed.
Jane Turner inquired if this Plan had anything to do with the stipulation.
Mrs. Moore replied that the Plan identified that the stipulation was met and
taken into consideration.
Donna Lewis asked what the Commission Members' responsibility with the
Plan was.
Mrs. Moore replied that the Plan was simply provided to the Commissioners to
show what the Housing Plan is projected to be for the next five years. There are
certain projects that the Commission will be advisory to such as Carlos Ortega
Villas which will be constructed by the Agency as part of the Housing Plan but
then will be transferred to the Housing Authority for the operation. Carlos
Ortega Villas will be a senior complex with approximately 72 units.
Mr. Richard Kelly, Councilmember Liaison, added that Carlos Ortega Villas will
be constructed with all the advanced, modern, technical, and experimental
equipment/upgrades; noting there are lots of reasons to brag about.
Wade Tucker asked on the number of units Country Village had.
Mrs. Moore stated that Country Village had 66 units and the Agency already
identified units to replace those units that were demolished. The rebuilt units on
that site will not be considered "replacement units". Replacement units cannot
be counted both as production units and replacement units so the Agency
considers all units available and identifies which units will give us the 'most
bang for our buck'. Since units outside the project areas only count as 1/2 for
production, the Agency identified many units outside project areas as
"replacement" because those units are counted one for one as long as they are
within the jurisdiction's boundaries.
3
Housing Commission
Minutes NOVEMBER 10, 2009
Upon question, Mrs. Moore stated that the affordable housing income eligibility
limits change on a yearly basis.
C. MONTHLY OCCUPANCY STATUS REPORT
RPM WEEKLY ACTIVITY STATISTICS
The Commission reviewed the Monthly Occupancy Status Report and Weekly
Activity Statistics for September.
Donna Lewis referenced all the reports provided by RPM Company. She
stated that having taken a statistics class in college she was looking for a report
with the most information she can get and the easiest way to help her
understand where we are with each property. She noted that the report that
works best for her is the Monthly Occupancy Status Report where it shows the
comparisons from this year to last year. She stated that the Weekly Activity
Statistics report is somewhat helpful because it gives you the total units at the
beginning of the period as well as the end of the period for that particular
month. Regarding Report 1 and 2, she commented that those two reports were
not as helpful. She addressed Teresa Vakili and asked if the Commission had
to choose two pieces of paper that would provide the most helpful information
that they need so that they could do their jobs, which ones would they be.
Teresa Vakili stated that it depends on what the Commission would like to see.
She stated that she tries to give the Commission all the information possible
with regard to occupancy, recertification, and leases as well as monthly
average activities on where the properties are according to stipulation.
Natalie Russo stated that because of her background she actually preferred
Reports 1 and 2 since it shows how much rent the properties are getting per
unit and what the expenses are line by line. She further noted that Report 2
was informational and helpful and appreciated the information provided
referencing the advertising line that denotes the dollar amount spent for the
month and how that was important to know.
Mrs. Lewis asked what the Commission's role was and if they were an over
sight Commission. She expressed that she did not think the Commission was
really worried about expenses such as paperclips. Ms. Lewis commented that
maybe she was missing something.
Janet Moore stated that these reports are created monthly for the benefit of
staff as well as the Commission to show where the properties are on a monthly
basis. The reports are informational and available for review in case the
Commission wants to see a specific line item. With regard to the Commission's
role, Mrs. Moore stated that their role is to review the financial aspect and
approve the budget every year per property. The Housing Commission is an
4
Housing Commission
Minutes NOVEMBER 10, 2009
advisory board to the Housing Authority Board which oversees the actual
expenditures by month that are expended from the City's bank account. The
Housing Authority has their own bank account with respect to the operations
and expenditures of the properties and it is reflected monthly in these reports.
RPM has an obligation to create the reports provided to the Commission. In
addition, RPM also provides a trial balance on a monthly basis that shows
everything they spend which is used to post the books.
Mrs. Moore asked if the Commission preferred to review a report that only
shows revenue, expenses, and income as opposed to Report 1 and 2 which
are more detailed, or maybe add a line to the Monthly Occupancy Status report
that just shows overall occupancy by property by month to include overall
average rent. The existing reports were originally created to show how much
per month is spent on a particular line item and provided to the Commission as
informational only with no action required.
Jane Turner asked if RPM provided these reports to staff every month and if it
was helpful.
Mrs. Moore stated that as part of RPM's contract they are required to provide
this information that is necessary and useful to the operations of the properties.
In addition, RPM is required to maintain occupancy at the income levels
identified by the Housing Department. She provided an example that if a
property is required to have 32 units at the 35% Area Median Income (AMI),
RPM is required to stay within those guidelines. In most cases, that particular
property is under the 35% level which means they were not able to find anyone
at the 35% level which is acceptable as long as it's lower and not higher. Mrs.
Moore stated that she looks at these reports to ensure RPM is complying with
the requirement.
Ms. Turner stated that these reports are valuable to the Housing Division and
felt that the Commission is an advisory board only and have no obligation to
scrutinize RPM and point out any problems.
Verna Smith suggested that Janet and Teresa further review the reports, given
the Commissions comments and concerns. She asked the Commission if they
should continue reviewing the reports as they are or would they like to see
something different.
Mrs. Russo commented that if there was an easier way to provide everything in
one report would be fine with her. She referenced Report 2 and reiterated how
she felt it was very informational, noting that 85% of these units are very low
and how that statistic alone is phenomenal. She expressed that it would be a
shame not to have that information.
5
Housing Commission
Minutes NOVEMBER 10, 2009
Mrs. Moore stated that she and Teresa can further review these reports as
suggested by the Chair. A suggestion was also made to provide box reports
that come from the financial system and see if it would be more helpful. She
asked the Commission if it was informational to know how many units we have,
the type of bedrooms, and what the average rents are for that property.
Wade Tucker replied yes and stated that this information is important to know
since he lives at one of the properties.
D. REPORT #1 - MONTHLY OCCUPANCY AND AVERAGE RENT STATEMENT
The Commission reviewed the Monthly Occupancy and Average Rent
Statement for September.
E. REPORT #2 — MONTHLY NET OPERATING INCOME STATEMENTS
The Commission reviewed the Monthly Net Operating Income Statements for
September.
F. HOUSING AUTHORITY PROPERTIES UPDATE
The update on the Housing Authority properties was reviewed by the
Commission.
Janet Moore summarized the update, referencing the new item added on the
Agenda for discussion under Informational Items. She mentioned that James
Conway will update the Commission on the Taos Palms renovation project to
include pictures of the construction in process.
RPM staff was asked to include all routine and continuous work on the update
so that the Commission would have an idea of the daily maintenance at the
properties, with the exception of Mr. Wade Tucker who is a resident at one of
the properties. Property Managers are tasked to walk the properties at least
once a week from one end of the property to the other.
Natalie Russo inquired on the $3,000 savings off original low bidders' proposal
listed under One Quail Place.
Mrs. Moore stated that some of the work done in the sauna rooms was
completed by the maintenance staff in house rather than paying a contractor to
do the work.
Wade Tucker asked about the landscape situation.
6
Housing Commission
Minutes NOVEMBER 10, 2009
Mrs. Moore stated that it has been 60 days since the new landscape company
has been at the properties. RPM has been doing a great job documenting any
concerns that are not up to standard. Staff met with Sierra Landscape again
and provided them with a binder outlining the maintenance they are required to
do on a continuous basis. In the event another meeting is called to order,
Spencer Knight will be invited to explain how the contract should be managed.
Staff has been considerate with the fact that they were brought in during
scalping and reseeding. However, James Conway brought up a good point with
regard to the upkeep of the properties such as debris piling up on the sidewalks
for days which is unacceptable and considered a routine maintenance that has
nothing to do with learning the properties. There are specific methods by which
a landscape company should already know when trimming trees and keeping
the properties clean.
Mr. Tucker commented that the landscape company is doing a lot better.
Teresa Vakili stated that Sierra Landscape is responding to the meeting and
how the binder really helped, commenting they have seen an improvement.
Mr. Tucker mentioned that he has seen more landscape maintenance workers
and felt Sierra Landscape probably underbid the job.
Mrs. Moore stated that Sierra Landscape has a few more months to get the
properties in shape before the Housing tour takes place, noting this will be their
time to shine.
Mr. Tucker asked if Sierra Landscape had previous experience with apartment
complexes.
Janet Moore stated that she was not sure if Sierra Landscape had previous
experience. However, she explained how multi -family residential have specific
requirements to consider such as the walkways have to be clear, properties are
occupied, as well as ingress and egress all day. She noted that Spencer Knight
was involved in the bid process and there was nothing to preclude Sierra from
doing this job.
Mr. Tucker commented that the first time Sierra Landscape started work at Las
Serenas they used a huge tracker mower to cut the grass which left high grass
in some areas besides having no place to park the tracker.
Ms. Vakili mentioned that Spencer Knight had addressed this issue.
7
Housing Commission
Minutes NOVEMBER 10, 2009
Mrs. Moore provided a brief update on Taos Palms stating that Phase I is
underway and have addressed a significant portion of the structural issues.
Several units have already been drywalled.
Ms. Vakili commented that the contractor is doing a great job by keeping it
clean and orderly.
Mr. Tucker asked if there was a problem with Commissioners visiting projects
during construction to make sure the job is getting done.
Mrs. Moore stated that in most cases these projects are hard hat construction
zone areas and may not be safe for visitors. Staff would prefer that if a
Commissioner is interested in visiting a project site that they be accompanied
by either a City or RPM staff member. She stated that it was staff's
responsibility to ensure contractors are complying with their contract. This
project was added to the Agenda so that staff can provide updates and pictures
during the meetings so that the Commission can be informed on the status
routinely.
Verna Smith suggested that maybe sometime during the period of improving
Taos Palms a tour can be made.
Mrs. Moore stated that this property will be toured during the annual Housing
Tour.
VI. NEW BUSINESS
VII. CONTINUED BUSINESS
VIII. INFORMATIONAL ITEMS
A. AGENCY HOME IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM UPDATE
An update on the Home Improvement Program (HIP) was provided to the
Commission for review.
Janet Moore stated that the program is very active. She mentioned how most
homeowners are not transiently moving around to new houses but rather fixing
up their current homes. The program has had the same amount of applications
from July to this date than the entire year last year. There were changes made
to the program making it friendlier to the residents in Palm Desert that included
manufactured homes as well.
8
Housing Commission
Minutes
B. TAOS PALMS RENOVATION UPDATE
Janet Moore stated that pictures will be available at the next meeting.
IX. NEXT MEETING DATE — December 9, 2009
ADJOURNMENT
NOVEMBER 10, 2009
Verna Smith, Housing Commission Chair, adjourned the Housing
Commission meeting at 4:10 p.m. to December 9, 2009.
Patty Leon, Recording Secretary
9