HomeMy WebLinkAboutPrelim - RDA 01/13/2011DRAFT
PRELIMINARY MINUTES 'A
REGULAR PALM DESERT REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY MEETING
THURSDAY, JANUARY 13, 2011
CIVIC CENTER COUNCIL CHAMBER
73510 FRED WARING DRIVE, PALM DESERT, CA 92260
I. CALL TO ORDER - 3:00 P.M.
Chairman Benson convened the meeting at 3:00 p.m.
II. ROLL CALL
Present:
Member Cindy Finerty
Member Jan C. Harnik
Member William R. Kroonen
Vice Chairman Robert A. Spiegel
Chairman Jean M. Benson
Also Present:
John M. Wohlmuth, City Manager/RDA Executive Director
David J. Erwin, City Attorney
Justin McCarthy, ACM for Redevelopment
Stephen Y. Aryan, Assistant to the City Manager
Rachelle D. Klassen, City Clerk
Bo Chen, City Engineer
Russell Grance, Director of Building & Safety
Lauri Aylaian, Director of Community Development
Paul S. Gibson, Director of Finance/City Treasurer
Janet M. Moore, Director of Housing
Mark Greenwood, Director of Public Works
Frankie Riddle, Director of Special Programs
Bill Hunley, Battalion Chief, Palm Desert Fire/Riverside Co. Fire Dept./Cal Fire
Andrew Shouse, Asst. Chief, Palm Desert Police/Riverside Co. Sheriff's Dept.
Grace L. Mendoza, Deputy City Clerk
III. ADJOURN TO CLOSED SESSION
Reauest for Closed Session:
PRELIMINARY MINUTES DRAFT
PALM DESERT REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY MEETING JANUARY 13, 2011
Conference with Real Property Negotiator pursuant to Government Code
Section 54956.8:
1) Property: Northwest Corner of Highway 111 and Monterey Avenue
(APN 640-140-019)
Negotiating Parties:
Agency: John M. Wohlmuth/Justin McCarthy/City of Palm Desert/
Palm Desert Redevelopment Agency
Property Owner: City of Palm Desert/
Palm Desert Redevelopment Agency
Under Negotiation: x Price x Terms of Payment
Mr. Erwin requested that the Agency Board consider adding an item to the Closed
Session agenda having to do with existing litigation pursuant to Government Code
Section 54956.9(a)
a) Edith Slater v. City of Palm Desert, Palm Desert Redevelopment Agency,
and Palm Desert Housing Authority, Riverside County Superior Court Case
No. INC 10004792
Upon a motion by Spiegel, second by Kroonen, and 5-0 vote of the Agency Board,
the aforementioned item of existing litigation was added to the agenda for Closed Session
consideration.
With Agency Board concurrence, Mayor Benson adjourned the meeting to Closed
Session at 3:02 p.m. She reconvened the meeting at 4:01 p.m.
IV. RECONVENE REGULAR MEETING - 4:00 P.M.
A. REPORT ON ACTION FROM CLOSED SESSION.
None
V. AWARDS, PRESENTATIONS, AND APPOINTMENTS
None
V1. CONSENT CALENDAR
A. MINUTES of the Regular Redevelopment Agency Meetings of December 9
and December 23, 2010.
Rec: Approve as presented.
K
PRELIMINARY MINUTES DRAFT
PALM DESERT REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY MEETING JANUARY 13, 2011
B. CLAIMS AND DEMANDS AGAINST THE AGENCY TREASURY - Warrant
Nos. 127RDA, 129RDA, 132RDA, 137RDA, 142RDA, 147RDA,
127-Housing, 130-Housing,133-Housing, 138-Housing, 143-Housing,
148-Housing, 134HA, 139HA, and 144HA.
Rec: Approve as presented.
C. REQUEST FOR RATIFICATION of Amendment No. 2 to Contract
No. R27280C for Professional Engineering Services and Community
Outreach forthe Palm Desert Country Club (PDCC) Undergrounding Project.
Rec: By Minute Motion, ratify Amendment No. 2 in an amount to exceed
$6,400 to the subject contract with Willdan Financial Services,
Temecula, California, for Professional Engineering Services and
Community Outreach - funds are available in PDCC Undergrounding,
Account No. 854-4256-464-4001.
D. REQUEST FOR APPROVAL of Amendment No.1 to Contract No. R29450B
for Construction Management Services for the Desert Willow Lakeview
Terrace and Kitchen/Building Expansion Projects.
Rec: By Minute Motion: 1) Approve Amendment No. 1 in an amount not to
exceed $17,840 and an additional amount not to exceed $2,500 for
reimbursable expenses to the subject contract with Barnhart Balfour
Beatty, Palm Desert, California, for Construction Management
Services forthe Desert Willow Lakeview Terrace and Kitchen/Building
Expansion projects; 2) transfer $17,040 from the budgeted
contingency to contract base; 3) appropriate $3,300 from the
Unobligated Project Area No. 2 Fund to Redevelopment Agency
(RDA) Post Construction Costs, Account No. 851-4663-454-4001; 4)
authorize Executive Director to execute the contract amendment.
Upon a motion by Finerty, second by Spiegel, and 5-0 vote of the Agency Board,
the Consent Calendar was approved as presented.
VII. CONSENT ITEMS HELD OVER
None
VIII. RESOLUTIONS
None
3
PRELIMINARY MINUTES DRAFT
PALM DESERT REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY MEETING JANUARY 13, 2011
IX. NEW BUSINESS
A. REQUEST FORAWARD OF CONTRACT FOR PERIMETER LANDSCAPE
IMPROVEMENTS AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF LARKSPUR LANE
AND SHADOW MOUNTAIN DRIVE FOR PROJECT NO. P87110
(CONTRACT NO. R30380).
Project Administrator Bryce L. White noted the staff report and offered to
answer questions.
Member Finerty stated she would move to approve because funding was
coming out of Project Area #1 Funds.
Member Finerty moved to, by Minute Motion: 1) Award the subject contract in the
combined total price of $42,044 to Earth Sculptures, Inc., Indio, California, for Perimeter
Landscape Improvements at the Northeast Corner of Larkspur Lane and Shadow Mountain
Drive; 2) authorize the Director of Finance to set aside the amount of $4,204.40 as 10%
contingency (use of contingency requires additional action); 3) authorize the Chairman to
execute said Agreement for the subject contract; 4) appropriate the amount of $50,000
from Unobligated Project Area 1 funds to Account No. 850-4388-433-4001. Motion was
seconded by Spiegel and carried by a 5-0 vote.
X. CONTINUED BUSINESS
A. REQUEST FOR APPROVAL OF THE 2011 MASTER LIST OF QUALIFIED
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONSULTANTS FOR SERVICES VALUED
AT LESS THAN $25,000 PER PROJECT (JOINT CONSIDERATION WITH
THE PALM DESERT CITY COUNCIL AND THE PALM DESERT
HOUSING AUTHORITY) (Continued from the Meeting of December 9,
2010).
Redevelopment Accountant Veronica Tapia stated staff went through the list
that was provided in December and reorganized it. She pointed out that the
local vendors were prioritized to the front of the list, which represented 40%
of the vendors, and then by region and out-of-state.
Mayor Pro Tem/Vice Chairman Spiegel asked if any vendors were removed
that weren't local.
Ms. Tapia responded the list was just reorganized.
Mayor Pro Tem/Vice Chairman Spiegel stated the Chamber of Commerce
is having a program on Saturday, March 19, 2011, on encouraging people
to purchase locally, which he was in favor. He said hopefully the people that
CI
PRELIMINARY MINUTES DRAFT
PALM DESERT REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY MEETING JANUARY 13, 2011
will be making purchases will primarily search for local vendors and not go
outside the Valley.
Councilmember/Member Harnik stated the staff report indicated the
companies on the list were considered qualified for three years. She asked
if other people were eligible to be placed on the list or was the list comprised
every three years.
Ms. Tapia said the list was comprised every year, but once accepted, they
are allowed to remain on the list for three years.
Mayor Pro Tem/Vice Chairman Spiegel invited Barbara deBoom to comment
on the matter.
MS. BARBARA deBOOM, President/CEO of the Palm Desert Chamber of
Commerce, stated she liked the order in which the vendors were listed and
appreciated staff working with the Chamber.
Mayor/Chairman Benson noted the Housing Authority approved the list as
well
Mayor Pro Tem/Vice Chairman Spiegel moved to, by Minute Motion:1) Approve the
2011 Consultant Master List as outlined in the accompanying staff report; 2) authorize staff
to negotiate agreements and contract amendments with the Qualified Consultants for up
to $25,000 per project, and authorize the City Manager/Executive Director to execute
same; 3) approve the proceedings for selection and award of contracts as set forth in the
accompanying staff report and as authorized by Palm Desert Municipal Code Section
3.32.090. Motion was seconded by Kroonen and carried by a 5-0 vote.
XI. OLD BUSINESS
A. REQUEST FOR APPROVAL. OF CHANGE ORDER NO.2 TO CONTRACT
NO. R29450C (THE PENTA GROUP) FOR THE KITCHEN/BUILDING
EXPANSION PROJECT AT DESERT WILLOW GOLF RESORT.
Redevelopment Manager Martin Alvarez stated this item was a change order
to the Penta Group contract, the contractor for the Desert Willow Kitchen and
Building Expansion. He said in 2008 the Agency Board authorized a contract
in the amount of $2.8 million out of Redevelopment Funds and also set aside
a $288,000 contingency. He was proud to announce the kitchen expansion
was complete and invited the City Council to attend the grand opening
scheduled for the following day at 4:00 p.m. He said the change order was
in the amount of $195,984, which included some unforeseen site conditions
and electrical and structural upgrades that were not included in the scope of
work. To date this amount encompassed the 10% contingency and an
additional $55,000 increase or appropriation, which was a 12% overage to
5
PRELIMINARY MINUTES DRAFT
PALM DESERT REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY MEETING JANUARY 13, 2011
the contract. Responding to question, he said the money had not been
issued to the contractor, but the work was completed.
Member Spiegel moved to, by Minute Motion: 1) Approve Change Order 2 to the
subject contract in the cumulative amount of $195,984 for items not included in the original
contract with The Penta Building Group, Palm Desert, California, for the Kitchen Building
expansion at Desert Willow Golf Resort; 2) authorize the Chairman to execute said
documents; 3) authorize the Director of Finance to transfer $140,061.35 from contingency
to base for Change Order No. 2, Account No. 851-4663-454-4001; 4) appropriate
$55,922.65 from Account No. 851-4663-454-4001. Motion was seconded by Kroonen and
carried by a 5-0 vote.
XII. PUBLIC HEARINGS
A. REQUEST FOR APPROVAL OF FOURTH AMENDMENT TO DISPOSITION
AND DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT BETWEEN PALM DESERT
REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY AND WVC RANCHO MIRAGE, INC.
REGARDING MODIFICATION OF MINIMUM PROJECT AMENITY FEES
FOR THE WESTIN DESERT WILLOW VILLAS TIMESHARE PROJECT
(JOINT CONSIDERATION WITH THE PALM DESERT CITY COUNCIL).
Mr. McCarthy stated this item was a joint hearing with the Palm Desert
Redevelopment Agency and as members of the Agency Board it currently
had a Disposition and Development Agreement (DDA) which was amended
when Starwood took over a portion of the Intrawest property and therefore
inherited a schedule of project amenity fee payments that were subsequently
modified in the Third Amendment, but that schedule is predicated on an
assumed build -out that was determined in 2006. The market for timeshares
has suffered along with a lot of other activities with the current extraordinary
economic distress. He said there was great deal of distressed timeshare
products in different markets that are competing with the City's project.
Representatives of Starwood asked if the City was willing to consider a
permanent modification to the agreement with respect to the project amenity
fee payments. Staff responded suggesting a five-year moratorium whereby
Starwood would just pay on timeshares that were actually built. They will
continue to pay on the ones that have been built with the schedule intact and
reassert it after the end of the five-year period. Staff believes it is in the
City's best interest to be accommodative with the developer as they are
building a fine product. He said Starwood expressed their concern in that if
they were forced to make payments well in advance on the construction of
the timeshare units, they would be at a disadvantage in terms of competing
for internal capital necessary to actually build these projects, because they
have to present the project to their parent company and compete internally
in terms of returns and things of this nature. He said their rationale seemed
to make sense and the recommendation was a collective recommendation
N
PRELIMINARY MINUTES DRAFT
PALM DESERT REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY MEETING JANUARY 13, 2011
from the management team. He said a representative from Starwood was
present to speak on the matter if Council had any questions.
Mayor Pro Tem/Vice Chairman Spiegel stated it meant the City would lose
$2.5 million to the General Fund.
Mr. McCarthy responded these funds actually went into the 241 Capital
Reserve Fund for Desert Willow and not typically operating General Funds;
however, the 241 Fund was accessible to the General Fund should it be
needed. He agreed there would be a reduction in revenue of about
$2.7 million over the five-year period.
Mayor Pro Tem/Vice Chairman Spiegel asked if the City's relationship with
anyone else be affected if this request was approved.
Mr. McCarthy answered no, stating the City had a similar agreement with the
existing Intrawest, but they have not been building and have been operating
under this agreement for sometime. He said this particular agreement with
the Amendment was still favorable to the City relative to other types out
there. He said other agreements are tied to "as built," as opposed to a
pre-existing schedule like with the Marriott on Monterey.
Councilman/Member Kroonen questioned what would be the scenario if this
wasn't approved.
Mr. McCarthy stated he didn't wish to speculate, because he never felt it was
appropriate to put a business in distress and it's never in the City's interest.
He said this has been a very good project for the City and it seems there is
a fair argument to be made that if the actual build -out has changed, it may
be appropriate to conform to the actual build -out as opposed to everybody's
best intentions four years ago.
Mayor/Chairman Benson asked if the City would return to the same
agreement at the end of this period.
Mr. McCarthy answered yes.
Mayor Pro Tem/Vice Chairman Spiegel asked if Starwood was continuing to
build on their last pad.
Mr. McCarthy stated it was his understanding they were, but deferred to the
representative of Starwood to speak to the issue of absorption and build -out.
Mayor/Chairman Benson declared the public hearing open and invited public
testimony FAVORING or OPPOSING this matter.
7
PRELIMINARY MINUTES DRAFT
PALM DESERT REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY MEETING JANUARY 13, 2011
MS. EMILY HEMPHILL stated she was Counsel and Local Representative
for Starwood. She said Starwood had 74 units that were already built and
entitled for 280 in total. She said 74 units started selling in 2007, and with
74 units you get about 3,700 timeshare units. In 2007 and 2008 Starwood
was selling at a rate of almost 2,000 timeshare units per year. In 2009 that
number dropped to less than half, but the numbers are starting to crawl up
again. Starwood's projections are that with the units already constructed, if
they don't begin building again, they will run out of inventory at this particular
location; they have run out of inventory in Rancho Mirage. She said
Starwood had a real investment in the sales machine here in the Desert, so
they would like to avoid dismantling the machine and keep it fed with
inventory as they go. Although the depressed economy hit tourism and
timeshare sales hard, they are starting to see it climb back up, so they went
ahead and purchased a building permit for Building 4, which has 22
additional units. They plan to meet with their Board of Directors on February
23 to ask for permission to begin construction on that building. However,
because it's a public company, until they act, she couldn't tell for sure what
will happen, but this request is an important piece. She said Starwood was
asking to not pay the project amenity fee for units that didn't exist for a period
of five years, but will continue to pay on the ones that did exist whether they
are sold or not. Further responding, she said if the additional 22 units are
approved for construction, Starwood will pay the fee on those as well. The
estimate provided to Council by staff, in terms of reduction, was a worse
case scenario. She said they were hopeful the market will continue to pick
up, and as they build the deficit number will be smaller. She thanked the
Council for its consideration.
With no further testimony offered, Mayor/Chairman Benson declared the public
hearing closed.
Mayor Pro Tem/Vice Chairman Spiegel moved to, by Minute Motion: 1) Approve the
Fourth Amendment with WVC Rancho Mirage, Inc.; 2) authorize the Mayor/Executive
Director to execute the Fourth Amendment. Motion was seconded by Harnik and carried
by a 5-0 vote.
XIII. REPORTS, REMARKS, AND AGENCY BOARD ITEMS REQUIRING ACTION
A. EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR
None
0
PRELIMINARY MINUTES
PALM DESERT REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY MEETING
B. AGENCY COUNSEL
None
C. CHAIRMAN AND MEMBERS OF THE AGENCY
None
XIV. ADJOURNMENT
DRAFT
JANUARY 13, 2011
Upon a motion by Finerty, second by Kroonen, and 5-0 vote of the Agency Board,
Chairman Benson adjourned the meeting at 5:25 p.m.
ATTEST:
JEAN M. BENSON, CHAIRMAN
RACHELLE D. KLASSEN, SECRETARY
PALM DESERT REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY
0