HomeMy WebLinkAbout05E C27540A - Special Audit - White Nelson Diehl Evans CITY OF PALM DESERT
FINANCE DEPARTMENT
STAFF REPORT
REQUEST: APPROVE CONTRACT NO. C27540 WITH WHITE NELSON DIEHL
EVANS LLP TO PERFORM A SPECIAL AUDIT FOR PALM DESERT
REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY AND PALM DESERT HOUSING
AUTHORITY FOR THE PERIOD ENDED JANUARY 31, 2012
Submitted by: Paul S. Gibson, Finance Director
Date: March 22, 2012
Contents: Engagement Letter
Recommendation
By Minute Motion, that the City Council approve the contract with White
Nelson Diehl Evans LLP to perform a special audit for the Palm Desert
Redevelopment Agency and Palm Desert Housing Authority for the period
ended January 31, 2012.
Background
On March 27, 2008, the City Council approved the selection of White Nelson Diehl
Evans LLP as independent auditors for the fiscal years ended June 30, 2008 through
June 30, 2014. This is the fifth year of the existing seven-year contract. Their services
include auditing the City, Successor Agency to the Palm Desert Redevelopment
Agency, the Housing Authority's Apartment Complexes, Desert Willow and the City's
Office Complex. In addition, they perform reviews on Waste Management, Time Warner
Cable, and various hotels on behalf of the City. Staff finds that White Nelson Diehl
Evans LLP has a professional staff that is knowledgeable in the accounting arena and
feels comfortable in calling them when an accounting question arises.
Due to the dissolution of redevelopment agencies on January 31, 3012, the State of
California and the County of Riverside have imposed a requirement that audit work for
the period of July 1, 2011 through January 31, 2012 be completed by July 1, 2012. This
is considered a special audit in addition to the typical audit functions conducted on an
annual basis. Staff requests that the City Council approve the contract with White
Nelson Diehl Evans LLP to perform auditing services for the Palm Desert
Redevelopment Agency and Housing Authority for the period ended January 31, 2012.
Staff Report
Approval of Contract No. C27540 —White Nelson Diehl Evans LLP
March 22, 2012
Page 2 of 2
Fiscal Impact
Auditing services are contracted at a maximum of $16,300 for the Palm Desert
Redevelopment Agency and $3,300 for the Palm Desert Housing Authority for a total of
$19.600. Staff requests that the Successor Agency be responsible for payment of this
audit.
Submitted By: Approved by:
Paul S. ibson, Director of Finance n M. Wohlmuth, City Manager
r y&AC c'nc jt
appcdBY HOUSG AUTH RDA
ON
Old__
Ongi a;
Original on iiie ::i:ft 4.:',i'v• f?r; s Office.
Approved* BY OVERSIGHT BOARD (Reyes ABSENT)
ON 04-09-2012
VERIFIED BY RDK
Original on file with City Clerk's Office
*Subject to discussion with legal counsel
and bond trustees about necessity therefor.
G-IFinanceNhamn OnegalStai Repo ns.AudnorsWudhng services 031312 docx
WHITE NELSON DIEHL EVANS LLP
crnti,,l I'ulli� r�cr��untan�s �� (',ui�ulr;un;
March 13, 2012
Mr. Paul Gibson
Director of Finance
Palm Desert Redevelopment Agency
73-510 Fred Warning Drive
Palm Desert, CA 92260
Dear Mr. Gibson:
We are pleased to confirm our understanding of the services we are to provide the Palm Desert
Redevelopment Agency (the Agency) for the period from July 1, 2011 to January 31, 2012. We will
audit the financial statements of the governmental activities, each major fund, and the aggregate
remaining fund information, which collectively comprise the basic financial statements, of the Agency
as of and for the period ended January 31, 2012. Accounting standards generally accepted in the
United States of America provide for certain required supplementary information (RSI), such as
management's discussion and analysis (MD&A), to supplement the Agency's basic financial
statements. Such information, although not a part of the basic financial statements, is required by the
Governmental Accounting Standards Board who considers it to be an essential part of financial
reporting for placing the basic financial statements in an appropriate operational, economic or
historical context. As part of our engagement, we will apply certain limited procedures to the
Agency's RSI in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the United States of
America. These limited procedures will consist of inquiries of management regarding the methods of
preparing the information and comparing the information for consistency with management's
responses to our inquiries, the basic financial statements, and other knowledge we obtained during our
audit of the basic financial statements. We will not express an opinion or provide any assurance on the
information because the limited procedures do not provide us with sufficient evidence to express an
opinion or provide any assurance. The following RSI is required by generally accepted accounting
principles and will be subjected to certain limited procedures,but will not be audited:
1) Management's Discussion and Analysis
2) Budgetary Comparison Schedules - Major Special Revenue Funds
1
2875 Michelle Drive,Suite 300,Irvine,CA 92606 • Tel:714.978.1300 • Fax: 714.978.7893
Offices located in Orange and San Diego Counties
Mr. Paul Gibson
Director of Finance
Palm Desert Redevelopment Agency
March 13,2012
Page 2
We have also been engaged to report on supplementary information other than RSI that accompanies
the Agency's financial statements. We will subject the following supplementary information to the
auditing procedures applied in our audit of the financial statements and certain additional procedures,
including comparing and reconciling such information directly to the underlying accounting and other
records used to prepare the financial statements or to the financial statements themselves, and other
additional procedures in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the United States of
America and will provide an opinion on it in relation to the financial statements as a whole:
1) Combining and individual other governmental fund financial statements.
Audit Objectives:
The objective of our audit is the expression of opinions as to whether your basic financial statements
are fairly presented, in all material respects, in conformity with accounting principles generally
accepted in the United States of America and to report on the fairness of the supplementary
information referred to in the second paragraph when considered in relation to the financial statements
taken as a whole. Our audit will be conducted in accordance with auditing standards generally
accepted in the United States of America and the standards for financial audits contained in
Government Auditing Standards, issued by the Comptroller General of the United States, and will
include tests of the accounting records of the Agency and other procedures we consider necessary to
enable us to express such opinions. If our opinions on the financial statements are other than
unqualified, we will discuss the reasons with you in advance. If, for any reason, we are unable to
complete the audit or are unable to form or have not formed opinions, we may decline to express
opinions or to issue a report as a result of this engagement.
We will also provide a report (that does not include an opinion) on internal control related to the
financial statements and compliance with laws, regulations, and the provisions of contracts or grant
agreements, noncompliance with which could have a material effect on the financial statements as
required by Government Auditing Standards. The report on internal control and compliance will
include a statement that the report is intended solely for the information and use of management, the
body of individual charged with governance, others within the Agency, and specific legislative or
regulatory bodies and is not intended to be and should not be used by anyone other than these specified
parties. If during our audit we become aware that the Agency is subject to an audit requirement that is
not encompassed in the terms of this engagement, we will communicate to management and those
charged with governance that an audit in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the
United States of America and the standards for financial audits contained in Government Auditing
Standards may not satisfy the relevant legal, regulatory, or contractual requirements.
•
Mr. Paul Gibson
Director of Finance
Palm Desert Redevelopment Agency
March 13,2012
Page 3
Management Responsibilities:
Management is responsible for the basic financial statements and all accompanying information as
well as all representations contained therein. As part of the audit, we will assist with preparation of
your financial statements and related notes. You are responsible for making all management decisions
and performing all management functions relating to the financial statements and related notes and for
accepting full responsibility for such decisions. You will be required to acknowledge in the
management representation letter our assistance with preparation of the financial statements and that
you have reviewed and approved the financial statements and related notes prior to their issuance and
have accepted responsibility for them. Further, you are required to designate an individual with
suitable skill, knowledge, or experience to oversee any nonaudit services we provide and for evaluating
the adequacy and results of those services and accepting responsibility for them.
Management is responsible for establishing and maintaining effective internal controls, including
evaluating and monitoring ongoing activities, to help ensure that appropriate goals and objectives are
met, for the selection and application of accounting principles, and for the fair presentation in the
financial statements of the respective financial position of the governmental activities, each major
fund, and the aggregate remaining fund information of the Agency and the respective changes in
financial position and, where applicable, cash flows in conformity with accounting principles generally
accepted in the United States of America.
Management is also responsible for making all financial records and related information available to us
and for ensuring that management and financial information is reliable and properly recorded. Your
responsibilities include adjusting the financial statements to correct material misstatements and for
confirming to us in the representation letter that the effects of any uncorrected misstatements
aggregated by us during the current engagement and pertaining to the latest period presented are
immaterial,both individually and in the aggregate, to the financial statements taken as a whole.
You are responsible for the design and implementation of programs and controls to prevent and detect
fraud, and for informing us about all known or suspected fraud affecting the government involving
(1)management, (2) employees who have significant roles in internal control, and (3)others where the
fraud or illegal acts could have a material effect on the financial statements. Your responsibilities
include informing us of your knowledge of any allegations of fraud or suspected fraud affecting the
government received in communications from employees, former employees, grantors, regulators, or
others. In addition, you are responsible for identifying and ensuring that the Agency complies with
applicable laws, regulations, contracts, agreements, and grants for taking timely and appropriate steps
to remedy any fraud, illegal acts, violations of contracts or grant agreements, or abuse that we may
report. You are responsible for the preparation of the supplementary information in conformity with
accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. You agree to include our
report on the supplementary information in any document that contains and indicates that we have
reported on the supplementary information.
•
Mr. Paul Gibson
Director of Finance
Palm Desert Redevelopment Agency
March 13,2012
Page 4
Management Responsibilities (Continued):
Management is responsible for establishing and maintaining a process for tracking the status of audit
findings and recommendations. Management is also responsible for identifying for us previous
financial audits, attestation engagements, performance audits, or other studies related to the objectives
discussed in the Audit Objectives section of this letter. This responsibility includes relaying to us
corrective actions taken to address significant findings and recommendations resulting from those
audits, attestation engagements, performance audits, or studies. You are also responsible for providing
management's views on our current findings, conclusions, and recommendations, as well as your
planned corrective actions, for the report, and for the timing and format for providing that information.
Audit Procedures - General:
An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the
financial statements; therefore, our audit will involve judgment about the number of transactions to be
examined and the areas to be tested. We will plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable rather
than absolute assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement,
whether from (1) errors, (2) fraudulent financial reporting, (3) misappropriation of assets, or
(4) violations of laws or governmental regulations that are attributable to the Agency or to acts by
management or employees acting on behalf of the Agency. Because the determination of abuse is
subjective, Government Auditing Standards do not expect auditors to provide reasonable assurance of
detecting abuse.
Because an audit is designed to provide reasonable, but not absolute assurance and because we will not
perform a detailed examination of all transactions,there is a risk that material misstatements may exist
and not be detected by us. In addition, an audit is not designed to detect immaterial misstatements or
violations of laws or governmental regulations that do not have a direct and material effect on the
financial statements. However, we will inform you of any material errors and any fraudulent financial
reporting or misappropriation of assets that come to our attention. We will also inform you of any
violations of laws or governmental regulations that come to our attention, unless clearly
inconsequential. Our responsibility as auditors is limited to the period covered by our audit and does
not extend to any later periods for which we are not engaged as auditors.
Our procedures will include tests of documentary evidence supporting the transactions recorded in the
accounts, and may include tests of the physical existence of inventories, and direct confirmation of
receivables and certain other assets and liabilities by correspondence with selected individuals, funding
sources, creditors, and financial institutions. We will request written representations from your
attorneys as part of the engagement, and they may bill you for responding to this inquiry. At the
conclusion of our audit, we will require certain written representations from you about the financial
statements and related matters.
Mr. Paul Gibson
Director of Finance
Palm Desert Redevelopment Agency
March 13,2012
Page 5
Audit Procedures-Internal Controls:
Our audit will include obtaining an understanding of the Agency and its environment, including
internal control, sufficient to assess the risks of material misstatement of the financial statements and to
design the nature, timing, and extent of further audit procedures. Tests of controls may be performed
to test the effectiveness of certain controls that we consider relevant to preventing and detecting errors
and fraud that are material to the financial statements and to preventing and detecting misstatements
resulting from illegal acts and other noncompliance matters that have a direct and material effect on the
financial statements. Our tests, if performed, will be less in scope than would be necessary to render an
opinion on internal control and, accordingly, no opinion will be expressed in our report on internal
control issued pursuant to Government Auditing Standards.
An audit is not designed to provide assurance on internal control or to identify significant deficiencies.
However, during the audit, we will communicate to management and those charged with governance
internal control related matters that are required to be communicated under AICPA professional
standards and Government Auditing Standards.
Audit Procedures- Compliance:
As part of obtaining reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material
misstatement, we will perform tests of the Agency's compliance with the provisions of applicable
laws,regulations, contracts, agreements, and grants. However, the objective of our audit will not be to
provide an opinion on overall compliance and we will not express such an opinion in our report on
compliance issued pursuant to Government Auditing Standards.
Audit Administration,Fees and Other:
Noted below is a listing of work required by Agency staff to assist in the audit.
1. Technical assistance in familiarizing our staff with:
• The flow of information through the various departments and accounting systems.
• Reports generated by your accounting system.
• The system of internal controls.
• Controls established to monitor compliance with federal grants.
2. Preparation of trial balances for all funds, after posting of all year end journal entries.
3. Preparation of schedules supporting all major balance sheet accounts, and selected revenue and
expenditure accounts.
4. Typing of all confirmation requests.
Mr. Paul Gibson
Director of Finance
Palm Desert Redevelopment Agency
March 13, 2012
Page 6
Audit Administration, Fees and Other(Continued):
Work Required by Agency Staff(Continued):
5. Pulling and refiling of all supporting documents required for audit verification.
6. Preparation of the basic financial statements and notes.
7. Preparation of the management's discussion and analysis.
Our maximum annual fee for the audit of the Agency's financial statements for the period ended
January 31, 2012 will be $19,000.
The maximum annual fee stipulated herein contemplates that conditions satisfactory to the normal
progress and completion of the examination will be encountered and the Agency accounting personnel
will furnish the agreed upon assistance in connection with the audit. However, if unusual
circumstances are encountered which make it necessary for us to do additional work; we shall report
such conditions to the responsible Agency officials and provide the Agency with an estimate of the
additional accounting fees involved. You may terminate our services or we may withdraw from this
engagement at any time. Any disputes arising under this agreement shall be mediated under the rules
of the American Arbitration Association.
The workpapers for this engagement are the property of White Nelson Diehl Evans LLP and constitute
confidential information. However, we may be requested to make certain workpapers available to
grantor agencies pursuant to authority given to it by law or regulation. If requested, access to such
workpapers will be provided under the supervision of our personnel. Furthermore, upon request, we
may provide photocopies of selected workpapers to the grantor agencies. The grantor agencies may
intend, or decide, to distribute the photocopies or information contained therein to others, including
other governmental agencies.
In accordance with our firm's current record retention policy, all of your original records will be
returned to you at the conclusion of this engagement. Our accounting workpaper files will be kept for
a period of seven years after the issuance of the audit report. All other files will be kept for as long as
you retain us as your accountants. However, upon termination of our service, all records will be
destroyed after a period of seven years. Physical deterioration or catastrophic events may further
shorten the life of these records. The working papers and files of our firm are not a substitute for your
original records.
Government Auditing Standards require that we provide you with a copy of our most recent external
peer review report and any letter of comment, and any subsequent peer review reports and letters of
comment received during the period of the contract. Our 2009 peer reviews accompany this letter.
•
Mr. Paul Gibson
Director of Finance
Palm Desert Redevelopment Agency
March 13, 2012
Page 7
We appreciate the opportunity to be of service to the Palm Desert Redevelopment Agency and believe
this letter accurately summarizes the significant terms of our engagement. If you have any questions,
please let us know. If you agree with the terms of our engagement as described in this letter, please
sign the enclosed copy and return it to us.
Very truly yours,
WHITE NELSON DIEHL EVANS LLP
By: • e
Nitin P. Patel, CPA
Engagement Partner
RESPONSE:
This letter correctly sets forth the understanding
of the Palm Desert Redevelopment Agency
By
Title
Date
HEIDENREICH $ HEIDENREICH, CPAs, PLLC
10201 S.51"Street #170
Phoenix,AZ 85044
(480)704-6301 fax 785-4619
System Review Report
January 28,2009
To the Owners of
Diehl, Evans&Company, LLP
and the Peer Review Committee of the CA Society of CPAs
We have reviewed the system of quality control for the accounting and auditing practice of Diehl,
Evans&Company, LLP(the firm)in effect for the year ended September 30,2008. Our peer
review was conducted in accordance with the Standards for Performing and Reporting on Peer
Reviews established by the Peer Review Board of the American Institute of Certified Public
Accountants.The firm is responsible for designing a system of quality control and complying with
it to provide the firm with reasonable assurance of performing and reporting in conformity with
applicable professional standards in all material respects. Our responsibility is to express an
opinion on the design of the system of quality control and the firm's compliance therewith based
on our review.The nature,objectives, scope, limitations of, and the procedures performed in a
System Review are described in the standards at www.aicpa.org/prsummary.
As required by the standards, engagements selected for review included engagements performed
under the Government Auditing Standards and audits of employee benefit plans.
In our opinion, the system of quality control for the accounting and auditing practice of Diehl,
Evans&Company, LLP in effect for the year ended September 30,2008, has been suitably
designed and complied with to provide the firm.with reasonable assurance of performing and
reporting in conformity with applicable professional standards in all material respects. Firms can
receive a rating of pass,pass with deficiency(ies)or fail. Diehl, Evans&Company, LLP has
received a peer review rating of pass.
Ni idetweic k & 5C¢ae414eic1,
Heidenreich& Heidenreich, CPAs, PLLC
aC nod� G'YSOIl LLP
Certified Public Accountants&Consultants
System Review Report
To the Partners
White Nelson&Co., LLP
and the Peer Review Committee of the California Society of Certified Public Accountants
We have reviewed the system of quality control for the accounting and auditing practice of
White Nelson & Co., LLP (the firm) in effect for the year ended March 31, 2009. Our peer review
was conducted in accordance with the Standards for Performing and Reporting on Peer
Reviews established by the Peer Review Board of the American Institute of Certified Public
Accountants. The firm is responsible for designing a system of quality control and complying
with it to provide the firm with reasonable assurance of performing and reporting in conformity
with applicable professional standards in all material respects. Our responsibility is to express
an opinion on the design of the system of quality control and the firm's compliance therewith
based on our review. The nature, objectives, scope, limitations of, and the procedures
performed in a System Review are described in the standards at www.aicpa.org/prsummarv.
As required by the standards, engagement selected for review included engagements
performed under the Government Auditing Standards and audits of employee benefit plans.
In our opinion, the system of quality control for the accounting and auditing practice of White
Nelson & Co., LLP in effect for the year ended March 31, 2009, has been suitably designed and
complied with to provide the firm with reasonable assurance of performing and reporting in
conformity with applicable professional standards in all material respects. Firms can receive a
rating of pass, pass with deficiency(ies) or fail. White Nelson & Co., LLP has received a peer
review rating of pass.
Phoenix,Arizona
September 30, 2009
Offices in 17 statcs and Washington,DC HLB Gnantatona!
Palm Desert RDA Prepared By: Nitin Patel
Budget for 1/31/2012 Audit Date: 3/11/12
Description Hours
Audit planning/general audit programs 16
Compliance audit 12
Internal controls 12
Cash and Investments 12
Receivables 8
Payables 8
longterm debt 12
Revenues 6
Expenditures 12
Supervision and Review(Partner) 16
Subtotal 114
Travel 10
Total Estimated Hours without Housing Authority 124
Fee Determination
RDA Audit without Housing Authority Hourly Total
Hours Rate Cost
Staff 54 $ 96 $ 5,184
Senior 54 113 6,102
Partner 16 197 3,152
124 14,438
Out-of pocket
Lodging (140 *8) 1,120
Meals(40*8) 320
Mileage 422
Total out-of-pocket 1,862
Total for Audit without Housing Authority $ 16,300
Hourly
Housing Authority(lodi) Hours Rate
Staff accountant(travel) 8 $ 96 $ 768
Staff accountant(fieldwork) 16 96 1,536
Supervision 2 197 394
Subtotal 2,698
Airfare 300
Hotel(2 nights) 250
Meals S2
Total for Housing Authority $ 3,300
Totals for 1/31/2012 audit $ 19,600