2022-09-01 Rebuttal Argument in SupportCITYRECEIVED
CLERK'SOFFICE ARGUMENTS
PALM DESERT. CA Cftl
?@?z SEP -I P�Q AUTHORS OF ARGUMENTS ? OF STATEMENT TO BE T.4`t 6 axL
l
All arguments concerning measures filed pursuant to Division 9, Chapter 3
(beginning with § 9200) of the Elections Code shall be accompanied by
the following form statement to be signed by each proponent, and by11
each author, if different, of the argument: =argumen,(
The undersigned propone,t(s) or authors) of the ( butfavor oagainst) ballot proposition (15 at the General Munici alElec iom to
be held on TueNovember 8, 2022, hereby state that the argument is true and correct to the
best of (his/her heir) nowledge and belief.
Print Name: / 4!` L ll O) u f IVT4W11LA
Title: W � �Clt NjEM2
Signature:
Date: "YD
(If applicable): Submitted on behalf of:
name of organization)
Print Name:
Title:
Signature:
Date:
(If applicable): Submitted on behalf of:
name of
organization)
Print Name:
Title:
Signature:
Date:
(If applicable): Submitted on behalf of:
name of organization)
Print Name:
Title:
Signature:
Date:
(If applicable): Submitted on behalf of:
name of
organization)
ARGUMENTS RECEIVED
AUTHORIZATION FOR ANOTHER PERSON TO SIGN RE60ft"WIWf
The following majority of authors of the Argument 2012 SEP -I PM 4: 53
In Favor of
Measure authorizes the following person(s) to prepare, submit or sign the Rebuttal to the
Argument
- In Favor of -Against
Measure -,5- for the City of Palm Desert Election to be held on November B. 2022.
Signatures of a majority of the authors of the Argument
In Favor o - Against Mess are required:
; X —
KAdZ l NA W (NrA 11("k of as
Name (Print) Signature Date
Name (Print) Signature Date
Name (Print)
Signature Date
Name (Print) Signature
Date
The foll are authrepare, submit or sign {qe Rebuttal to the Argument
I f Against Measure
Print Name: �� -! H�IT/E
Signature:
A��..�
Title: FVVROIAr OWA it.
Date:
iq -Z - L%Z=—
Print Name: IAA y�p��yL
Signature:
Title: A&rwy nt✓
Date:
$�31�Z02
Print Name: Oayy� O ybto
Signature:
Title:�4tv1C5s p Ary Gr Q 12496idli f
Date:
� 31- 2 0 Z61
Print Name: i(/Y &rc; 4
Signature:
"- -'
Title: S ���'' n6.r/
Date:
v
, 7/' 2G 207
PrintName:StQhIrfa A- -g
Signatur
`e::
I 'ev 0t{�' �� t I� rt-N
/
7 _3
Title: •
Date:
Attach this form to the Form of Statement of Authors Form submitted with the Rebuttal Argument
- In Favor of -Against Measure
RECEIVED
CITY Cl OFFICE
PALM DESERT. CA
Councilmembers directly impact quality of life througft?N alplepM 4: 53
neighborhoods, community events, and public health for those who live.
work. study and play in Palm Desert. We experience our city in different
ways. Impacts of sand storms and health issues have been repeatedly
ignored.
Why? Most Councilmembers have lived in one neighborhood in South
Palm Desert. While at -large elections do not solve these problems,
they do help some officials stay in office.
Districts support opportunity, embracing neighbors, families, visitors,
and workers. Districts make us all stronger, not just those who can attend
meetings during work hours. This inclusion produces robust. well rounded
solutions that do not overlook obvious issues. Measure B elevates the
community's values. We need the voices of our businesses and
employees of all types.
DRIVING PAST A NEIGHBORHOOD IS NOT THE SAME AS LIVING OR
WORKING THERE. Working families, people on limited incomes, without
investment portfolios suffered most
YES on Measure B for stronger leaders. One official's 3rd place victory
came by only 45 votes in a city of 50,000, a mere 15.8% of votes. At the
first opportunity, voters in our new Civic Center district gave a new
candidate 61 % of votes. Voters decided Palm Desert deserves better than
the at -large system which sabotaged public health experts.This cost lives
and damaged our economy. You deserve leaders who truly care.
YES on Measure B brings City Hall to M.